保护还是束缚?限制型媒介干预对青少年抑郁的双刃剑影响效应研究

任围, 黄蓉

国际新闻界 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 145-165.

PDF(1809 KB)
PDF(1809 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 145-165.
研究论文

保护还是束缚?限制型媒介干预对青少年抑郁的双刃剑影响效应研究

作者信息 +

Protection or Constraint? A Study on the Double-Edged Effects of Restrictive Mediation on Adolescents’ Depression

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在“媒介风险论”的公共语境下,限制型干预已成为家长普遍采用的育儿策略。本文探讨了限制型干预是通过减少娱乐导向的网络活动来保护青少年心理健康,还是因触发青少年对家长权威的抵抗而加剧抑郁。基于对7,965名初高中学生的问卷数据分析,研究发现,频繁限制有助于减少网络娱乐,进而降低青少年抑郁水平。然而,这种限制同时会激发青少年的权威抵抗,不仅直接损害其心理健康,还导致他们的网络娱乐活动更频繁,从而削弱限制型干预的预期效果。不过,在亲子沟通较好的家庭中,限制型干预能在不触发权威抵抗的情况下显著提升青少年心理健康水平,其保护性作用得以充分发挥。研究揭示了限制型干预效应的双重性与情境依赖性,为优化家庭数字育儿实践提供重要参考。

Abstract

In the public discourse shaped by the “media risk” narrative, restrictive mediation has become a widely adopted parenting strategy among Chinese families. This study investigates whether restrictive mediation safeguards adolescents’ mental health by curbing entertainment-oriented Internet use or, conversely, exacerbates depression by triggering reactance towards parental authority. Based on survey data from 7,965 adolescents, the results show that frequent restrictions indeed reduce entertainment-oriented Internet use, thereby lowering adolescents’ depression. However, these restrictions also provoke reactance towards parental authority, which not only directly harms mental health but also increases engagement in entertainment-oriented Internet use, undermining the intended protective effects. Notably, in families with better parent-child communication, restrictive mediation can significantly enhance adolescents’ mental health without triggering reactance, allowing its protective effects to prevail. This study highlights the complexity and context-dependency of restrictive mediation effects, offering valuable insights for optimizing digital parenting practices.

关键词

限制型干预 / 青少年抑郁 / 网络娱乐 / 家长权威抵抗 / 亲子沟通

Key words

Restrictive mediation / adolescent depression / entertaining-oriented Internet use / reactance toward parental authority / parent-child communication

引用本文

导出引用
任围, 黄蓉. 保护还是束缚?限制型媒介干预对青少年抑郁的双刃剑影响效应研究[J]. 国际新闻界. 2026, 48(1): 145-165
REN Wei, HUANG Rong. Protection or Constraint? A Study on the Double-Edged Effects of Restrictive Mediation on Adolescents’ Depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2026, 48(1): 145-165

参考文献

[1]
冯强, 宋爽(2024). 网络游戏的“成长陷阱”:农村青少年网游活动、媒介干预与社会再生产. 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》,(4),148-156.
[2]
龚芳敏, 易培, 吴一波(2023). 媒介使用行为对青少年抑郁情绪的影响——家庭健康和自我效能的链式中介作用. 《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》,(6),124-136.
[3]
黄超(2018). 家长教养方式的阶层差异及其对子女非认知能力的影响. 《社会》,(6),216-240.
[4]
黄明明, 彭香萍, 陈亮华(2023). 父母低头行为与青少年问题行为:亲子沟通的中介与自我控制的调节. 《内江师范学院学报》,(8),19-24.
[5]
黄玉凤, 李府桂, 周明洁, 张建新(2019). 初中生亲子关系与逆反:孝道的中介作用. 《教育科学研究》,(7),66-70.
[6]
蒋晨, 曾秀芹, 战泓玮(2023). 青少年对父母游戏干预认知的影响力模型研究. 《新闻大学》,(3), 1-14+19.
[7]
赖泽栋(2018). 青少年微媒介叛逆与亲职督导. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(6),163-168.
[8]
李晓静, 覃智强, 潘颜(2021). 智能手机使用对学龄儿童健康的影响研究. 《新闻大学》,(12),77-91+123-124.
[9]
刘超(2023). 共谋与失序:青少年抑郁的“泛疾病化”. 《当代青年研究》,(2),74-84.
[10]
刘王平, 郑欣(2022). 手机争夺战:智能设备监管与农村留守家庭秩序研究. 《新闻记者》,(8),84-96.
[11]
刘朝霞, 李沐芸(2023). 赋权、减权与反向数字鸿沟——城乡比较视角下的未成年人互联网运用现状研究. 《青年探索》,(3), 92-102.
[12]
王孟成, 毕向阳(2018). 《潜变量建模与Mplus应用·进阶篇》. 重庆大学出版社.
[13]
吴旻, 刘争光, 梁丽婵(2016). 亲子关系对儿童青少年心理发展的影响. 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》,(5) 55-63.
[14]
谢欣, 李小芳(2024). 父母媒介干预研究:学术源流、迭代发展与未来走向. 《少年儿童研究》,(3), 112-118+127.
[15]
许琪, 陈默闻(2024). 父职实践与父职红利的阶层异质性——基于四期CFPS数据的实证分析. 《山东女子学院学报》,(6),108-122+2.
[16]
杨晓冬, 李怡静, 魏然(2022). 亲子间的手机博弈:家庭关系对青少年心理健康的影响研究. 《全球传媒学刊》,(3),35-57.
[17]
杨雪, 宋佳殷(2025). 家庭教养方式,亲子关系与青少年社会心理发展. 《人口学刊》,(1),78-93.
[18]
姚敏, 李凌鸥, 陈新力(2022). 观看短视频对青年人心理健康的影响——基于2020年中国家庭追踪调查数据的分析. 《当代青年研究》,(5),74-82+118.
[19]
姚倩, 陈祉妍, 蔡济民, 方圆(2023). 心理逆反与问题性手机使用的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和限制干预的调节作用. 《中国临床心理学杂志》,(5),1204-1208.
[20]
曾秀芹, 刘旭阳(2024). 自主支持抑或控制限制:数智时代青少年父母媒介干预策略及其高阶模型的验证. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(6),128-138.
[21]
曾秀芹, 柳莹, 邓雪梅(2020). 数字时代的父母媒介干预——研究综述与展望. 《新闻记者》,(5),60-73.
[22]
章平, 于佳鑫, 朱凯, 王俭勤(2023). 短视频使用、家长干预与儿童学业成绩之关系研究. 《新闻大学》,(5),80-93+121-122.
[23]
张晴(2023). 低龄儿童媒介使用、父母干预现状及对媒介沉迷的影响. 《新闻爱好者》,(4), 39-42.
[24]
张永欣, 张惠雯, 丁倩, 黄璐(2020). 心理阻抗、父母网络监管与初中生网络游戏成瘾的关系. 《中国临床心理学杂志》,(4),709-712.
[25]
张筝(2023). 数字时代城乡儿童父母的媒介干预比较研究——以鲁中地区J城和Q乡两地为例. 《少年儿童研究》,(3), 47-55.
[26]
郑春风(2022). 乡村家庭、儿童手机实践与父母媒介干预困境——基于GH乡的民族志考察. 《新闻记者》,(2),71-82.
[27]
郑磊, 祁翔, 朱志勇, 张鼎权(2021). 家庭互联网接入与城乡初中生的认知能力差距. 《教育发展研究》, (6)10-18.
[28]
中国互联网络信息中心(2023). 《第5次全国未成年人互联网使用情况调查报告》. https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2023/1225/c116-10908.html
[29]
周天然, 张海东(2024). 互联网使用对青少年社会交往的影响. 《社会发展研究》,(2),226-241+246.
[30]
Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child development, 56(2), 438-447.
[31]
Beyens, I., & Beullens, K. (2017). Parent-child conflict about children’s tablet use: The role of parental mediation. New media & society, 19(12), 2075-2093.
[32]
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
[33]
Byrne, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to Internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 90-113.
[34]
Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2019). Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173-193.
[35]
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323-343.
[36]
Collier, K. M., Coyne, S. M., Rasmussen, E. E., Hawkins, A. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Erickson, S. E., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 798-812.
[37]
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
[38]
Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). A matter of style? Exploring the effects of parental mediation styles on early adolescents' media violence exposure and aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 407-415.
[39]
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
[40]
Hampton, K. N., & Shin, I. (2023). Disconnection more problematic for adolescent self-Esteem than heavy social media use: Evidence from access inequalities and restrictive media parenting in rural America. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 626-647.
[41]
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediaton, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd edition). The Goilford Press.
[42]
Huang, C. (2022). A meta-analysis of the problematic social media use and mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 68(1), 12-33.
[43]
Huang, S., Lai, X., Li, Y., Cui, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Beyond screen time: The different longitudinal relations between adolescents’ smartphone use content and their mental health. Children, 10(5), 770.
[44]
Jiang, Q., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, C. (2023). Investigating links between Internet literacy, Internet use, and Internet addiction among Chinese youth and adolescents in the digital age. Frontiers in psychiatry, 14, 1233303.
[45]
Kirwil, L., Garmendia, M., Garitonandia, C., & Fernández, G. M. (2009). Parental mediation. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children (pp.199-216). The Policy Press.
[46]
Li, Q., Wei, S., & Liu, Z. (2024). How is parental psychological control associated with adolescent mental health in economically disadvantaged areas? The serial mediating role of psychological reactance and problematic smartphone use. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1458378.
[47]
Li, W., & Xie, Y. (2020). The influence of family background on educational expectations: A comparative study. Chinese Sociological Review, 52(3), 269-294.
[48]
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.
[49]
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of communication, 67(1), 82-105.
[50]
Lukavská K., Hrabec, O., Lukavský J., Demetrovics, Z., & Király, O. (2022). The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 135, 107423.
[51]
Lwin, M. O., Panchapakesan, C., Teresa, J., Cayabyab, Y. M., & Shin, W. (2021). Are parents doing it right? Parent and child perspectives on parental mediation in Singapore. Journal of family communication, 21(4), 306-321.
[52]
Ma, Y., & Gu, J. (2023). Internet and depression in adolescents: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1026920.
[53]
Matthes, J., Thomas, M. F., Stevic, A., & Schmuck, D. E. (2021). Fighting over smartphones parents' excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children' s use, and conflict. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106618.
[54]
Nakshine, V. S., Thute, P., Khatib, M. N., & Sarkar, B. (2022). Increased screen time as a cause of declining physical, psychological health, and sleep patterns: A Literary Review. Cureus, 14(10), 30051.
[55]
Nathanson, A. I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4(3), 207-230.
[56]
Nikken, P., & de Graaf, H. (2013). Reciprocal relationships between friends’ and parental mediation of adolescents’ media use and their sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(11), 1696-1707.
[57]
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401.
[58]
Ren, W., & Zhu, X. (2022). Parental mediation and adolescents’ Internet use: The moderating role of parenting style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(8), 1483-1496.
[59]
Ren, W., Zhu, X., & Yang, J. (2022). The SES-based difference of adolescents' digital skills and usages: An explanation from family cultural capital. Computers & Education, 177, 104382.
[60]
Santos, R. M. S., Mendes, C. G., Sen Bressani, G. Y., de Alcantara Ventura, S., de Almeida Nogueira, Y. J., de Miranda, D. M., & Romano-Silva, M. A. (2023). The associations between screen time and mental health in adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 1-21.
[61]
Steinfeld, N. (2021). Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1897-1920.
[62]
Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Walrave, M., & Van Ouytsel, J. (2020). Parent-child communication about Internet use and acceptance of parental authority. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic media, 64(1), 1-19.
[63]
Twenge, J. M. (2020). Increases in depression, self-Harm, and suicide among U.S. adolescents after 2012 and links to technology use: Possible mechanisms. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 2(1), 19-25.
[64]
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-17.
[65]
Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445-469.
[66]
Wang, M., Lwin, M. O., Cayabyab, Y. M. T. M., Hou, G., & You, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis of factors predicting parental mediation of children’s media use based on studies published between 1992-2019. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(5), 1249-1260.
[67]
White, S. R., Rasmussen, E. E., & King, A. J. (2015). Restrictive mediation and unintended effects: Serial multiple mediation analysis explaining the role of reactance in US adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 9(4), 510-527.
[68]
Zapf, H., Boettcher, J., Haukeland, Y., Orm, S., Coslar, S., Wiegand-Grefe, S., & Fjermestad, K. (2023). A systematic review of parent-child communication measures: Instruments and their psychometric properties. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 26(1), 121-142.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年项目“生态系统理论视角下青少年数字韧性研究:现状评估、影响机制与提升策略”(72404223)

PDF(1809 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/