PDF(1603 KB)
PDF(1603 KB)
PDF(1603 KB)
中国记者的非正式社会化——基于“记者的家”BBS的互联网历史研究
The Informal Socialization of Chinese Journalists: A Web History Case Study of “Journalists' Home” BBS
已经消逝的网站是互联网历史研究的重要对象。本文通过开展深度访谈和搜集整理互联网档案的方法，重访已经关停的西祠胡同分版“记者的家”，旨在为中文互联网历史研究提供一个关于新闻业的具体个案。该论坛在发展鼎盛期吸引了规模可观的新闻从业者在日常工作中使用，参与进了新闻产制的多个环节和职业社群的维系，成为中国市场化媒体记者在正式工作场所之外进行社会化的重要中介。研究认为，“记者的家”是互联网历史发展和中国新闻业改革发展交汇的产物，体现了新闻业在社交网络等非正式场合的职业社会化形态。这一非正式的社会化从工作实践和集体阐释上均对社群维系产生了积极效应。
Websites that have disappeared are crucial objects of study in web history. This article examines the life span of an online BBS (Bulletin Board System) called “Journalists' Home” and explores its interactions with Chinese journalism. At its peak, the website attracted a large number of journalists who integrated it into their daily work, engaging in various stages of news production and fostering a professional community. It served as a key intermediary for journalists in China's commercial media, facilitating informal socialization beyond the formal workplace. This study finds that “Journalists' Home” emerged at the intersection of web history and China's journalism reform. It illustrates how professional socialization in journalism occurs within informal settings, such as online social networks. Informal socialization contributed positively to community cohesion by shaping work practices and fostering collective interpretation.
记者的家 / 西祠胡同 / 职业社会化 / 非正式职业空间 / 互联网历史
Journalists' Home / Xici Hutong / professional socialization / informal professional space / web history
| [1] |
白红义(2012). 奋不顾身的“哀愁”——当代中国调查记者的职业生涯研究. 《新闻记者》,(12),18-25.
|
| [2] |
陈楚洁, 张雨龙(2024). 西祠网事:BBS怀旧的地方性与媒介世代的记忆流转. 《新闻记者》,(9),3-20.
|
| [3] |
陈峰(2005). 一切发生在意料之外——孙志刚事件采访记. 《今传媒》,(3),28-29.
|
| [4] |
冯济海(2022). 重返“黄金时代”:媒介产品衰落与用户记忆复兴——基于一个博客平台“前用户”群体的考察. 《新闻界》,(2),57-71.
|
| [5] |
盖伊·塔克曼(1978/2022). 《做新闻: 现实的社会建构》(李红涛译). 中国人民大学出版社.
|
| [6] |
赫伯特·甘斯(2004/2009) 《什么在决定新闻: 对CBS晚间新闻、 NBC夜间新闻、〈新闻周刊〉及〈时代〉周刊的研究》(石琳,李红涛译). 北京大学出版社.
|
| [7] |
鞠靖(2012). 深度报道生产方式的新变化——深度报道记者QQ群初探. 《新闻记者》,(1),68-73.
|
| [8] |
李红涛(2016). “点燃理想的日子”——新闻界怀旧中的“黄金时代”神话. 《国际新闻界》,(5),6-30.
|
| [9] |
潘忠党(1997). 新闻改革与新闻体制的改造——我国新闻改革实践的传播社会学之探讨. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),62-80.
|
| [10] |
彭华新(2017). 社交媒体中的自发式“记者联盟”:身份、环境、伦理. 《国际新闻界》,(7),149-168.
|
| [11] |
施好音, 白红义(2024). 新闻业怀旧中的“话语制度”——基于电影《不止不休》的案例研究. 《新闻记者》,(4),46-63.
|
| [12] |
王芳, 史海燕(2013). 国外Web Archive研究与实践进展. 《中国图书馆学报》,(2),36-45.
|
| [13] |
王海燕(2015). 记者的另类诠释社群:对一个组织外新闻空间的民族志研究. 《传播、文化与政治》,(2),1-26.
|
| [14] |
王敏(2022). “空荡荡的编辑室”: 互联网时代新闻民族志的重思与改造——基于对一家省级党报的田野研究. 《新闻记者》,(6),30-40.
|
| [15] |
吴世文(2022). 《网事绵延: 社会记忆视角下的中国互联网历史》. 中国社会科学出版社.
|
| [16] |
吴世文, 王嘉乐(2025). 网络论坛记忆的激活与书写: 基于天涯社区记忆的分析.《新闻界》,(1),74-86.
|
| [17] |
杨国斌(2013). 《连线力: 中国网民在行动》(邓燕华译). 广西师范大学出版社.
|
| [18] |
余成普, 宗铮(2023). 过渡期的职业社会化:规培生职业互动中的边缘与冲突. 《社会学研究》,(3),45-57.
|
| [19] |
张志安, 沈菲(2011). 中国调查记者行业生态报告. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(10),51-55.
|
| [20] |
张志安(2019). 《编辑部场域中的新闻生产——基于〈南方都市报〉的研究》. 复旦大学出版社.
|
| [21] |
周睿鸣(2022). 《转型: 传播技术变革中的新闻创新——澎湃新闻案例研究》. 复旦大学出版社.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
This article puts on the agenda one of the fundamental theoretical questions within the emerging field of website history: how can the object of historical study — the website — be delimited? Its focus is on the 'website' artefact as a medium and a text. After elaborating a definition of the website, as well as discussing how the website is distinct from other possible analytical web objects (the web as a whole, web sphere, webpage and textual web element), the article addresses the challenges of delimiting the archived website. Finally, it outlines some of the key issues in a general discussion of website history.
|
| [27] |
Virtual newsrooms have enormous potential: enabling journalists around the world to pool their knowledge, skills and perspectives within joint projects, such as the Panama Papers. These virtual newsrooms are supported by Online Collaborative Software (OCS), the most popular of which is Slack. But although many of the world’s top news organisations now use Slack, there is no empirical research examining its impact on workplace processes or culture. This article presents the results of a year-long ethnographic study of a global digital news outlet, whose remote journalists collaborate, almost exclusively, via Slack. We found that the platform deepened relationships and enabled new creative practices across geographic regions. However, it also contributed to the erasure of the line between private and professional spheres for workers, and introduced new opportunities for management to shape newsroom culture. We argue that the concept of ‘space’ as developed by Harvey can helpfully frame the analysis of these new, important digital platforms.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
In light of changes in the structure of how journalism works due to technological, economic, cultural, and political shifts, we examine the theoretical framework of communities of practice and explore how it can productively be applied to the study of journalists. In evaluating the feasibility of applying communities of practice to journalism, we also consider other theoretical frameworks that have been used for examining journalistic groups, including interpretive communities, professions and organizations, and boundary work. The article provides examples to illustrate how different groups of journalists may constitute communities of practice. Whereas community is often attached to the idea of discourse communities or interpretive communities, we find that focusing on the collaborative learning aspect and development of shared practice through the lens of communities of practice enables us to more fully understand the nature of skill- and practice-building among specific subgroups of journalistic practitioners.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Although hostility toward journalists is a pressing issue, research on how instructors are preparing students for hostility is lacking. Interviews with 30 journalism instructors from across the U.S. help illuminate how hostility is perceived and if/how hostility is talked about in journalism courses. Through the lens of professional socialization, this manuscript argues the majority of instructors normalize hostility in problematic ways, identifying a gap in journalism curriculum that needs filled.
|
| [40] |
Despite attempts to reinvigorate studies of materiality in Journalism Studies, research has often failed to move beyond a narrow application of actor-network theory focused on the affordances of digital objects of journalism. As a result, journalism studies has missed a productive opportunity to consider the emotional, cultural and aesthetic potential of object-oriented study. This article makes the case for focusing on how objects of journalism are felt, experienced and are otherwise culturally situated. Drawing on cultural studies, we advocate for a rethinking of materialism to more expansively reckon with the affective and emotional dimensions of journalism. Further, we develop Schudson’s (2015) theory of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ objects to include a third category: ‘unexpected objects’ of journalism. These objects, such as art on newsroom walls, news media merchandise, and daily ephemera, often have little directly to do with newsmaking processes, yet play an important affective role in journalism.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
Studies about journalists’ professional identity have so far been scarce. However, understanding the constitution and formation processes of professional identity helps to explore journalists’ and journalism’s identity, performance, and adaption to challenges. The study enhances theories about journalistic roles, professional identity, and adaptation processes in journalism, based on a synthesis of literature from different fields as well as qualitative interviews with 20 journalists from print and online Swiss newspapers. This research proposes a model that explains: (a) the constitution of professional identity in journalism as an additive, relational, and hierarchical concept; and (b) the process of formation at three distinct level of analysis. The idea is that different theories address adaptation processes on distinctive analytical fields: discursive institutionalism captures the relationship between journalists’ and journalism’s identity (macro); socialization theory focuses on the adaption process into a social community (meso); and resilience theory explains individuals’ adaptation in face of challenges (micro).
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
