幻象消费:“蹲直播”购物者的欲望制造

林仲轩, 夏昕

国际新闻界 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10) : 66-89.

PDF(1846 KB)
PDF(1846 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10) : 66-89.
研究论文

幻象消费:“蹲直播”购物者的欲望制造

作者信息 +

Phantom Consumption: The Production of Desire in Live-Stream Deals

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

电商直播间是数字消费时代欲望实践的重要场所。本文以“幻象消费”作为分析框架,从模仿、竞争与循环三个维度考察直播间购物者的欲望制造:欲望由模仿生成,消费者在主播演绎、社群互动与算法推荐等多重嵌套下将他者欲望转化为自我意志;欲望在竞争中运作,精算式折扣与炫耀性节俭构建了数字消费的新型优胜逻辑;最终,欲望往复为无始无终的消费,成为日常惯习与自我确认的持续依赖。这揭示了数字消费欲望的“空转”幻象,消费者身处欲望迷惘与逃逸困顿的循环悖论之中。

Abstract

Livestream e-commerce has become a key site for the performance and fabrication of consumer desire in the digital era. This article conceptualizes “phantom consumption” as an analytical framework to investigate how desire is produced among livestream shoppers through imitation, competition, and repetition. Desire is generated through imitation, as consumers, embedded within multiple layers of streamer performances, community interactions, and algorithmic recommendations, translate others’ desires into their own will. Desire operates through competition, where strategic discounts and conspicuous thrift create a new logic of distinction in digital consumption. Ultimately, desire is sustained through repetition—rendering consumption an endless routine and embedded in daily habits and reaffirmations of self-identity. This cycle reveals a phantom-like perpetual motion of digital consumer desire—trapping individuals within a paradoxical cycle of confusion and escapism.

关键词

电商直播 / 幻象消费 / 模仿欲望 / 竞争机制 / 消费循环

Key words

Livestream e-commerce / phantom consumption / mimetic desire / competitive mechanisms / consumption cycles

引用本文

导出引用
林仲轩, 夏昕. 幻象消费:“蹲直播”购物者的欲望制造[J]. 国际新闻界. 2025, 47(10): 66-89
LIN Zhongxuan, XIA Xin. Phantom Consumption: The Production of Desire in Live-Stream Deals[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2025, 47(10): 66-89

参考文献

[1]
陈淼, 荣浩浩(2024). 从数字依赖到数字简化:青年群体“数字极简行动”的主体性实践. 《新闻与传播研究》,(10),71-89+127-128.
[2]
陈曦, 贺子阳(2025). 数字化亲密感的征兆性解读:电商主播情感劳动的数字民族志研究. 《国际新闻界》,(2),94-113.
[3]
董天策, 何璇(2023). 消费主义逆行:基于豆瓣反消费主义小组的网络民族志观察. 《国际新闻界》,(5),75-95.
[4]
刘京(2023). 媒介社会下“流量”实在论:基于“数据—权利”之视角批判. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(7),161-168.
[5]
彭兰(2022). 媒介化、群体化、审美化:生活分享类社交媒体改写的“消费”. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(9),129-137.
[6]
潘文年, 李祎雯(2023). 新媒体情境下电商直播对个体消费行为的影响研究——基于淘宝直播的SOR模型分析. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(10),132-143.
[7]
漆亚林, 杨婧童(2024). S-O-R理论视域下情绪、感知对电商直播用户购买行为的中介效应研究. 《新闻界》,(8),55-65.
[8]
孙旭(2023). “复数个人”的“共在”狂欢:社交媒介中的共情及其暴力. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(9),46-54.
[9]
王喆(2023). 生成性的技术装置:网吧平台“顺网”的技术化封装与物质性变迁. 《国际新闻界》,(8),90-108.
[10]
新华网数智新消费工作组(2024年10月18日). 超级发布—《2024中国数智社媒电商市场洞察报告》. http://www.news.cn/info/20241018/054852fcb7854fc0961f85dca7d8883b/c.html
[11]
徐增展, 陆晓明(2022). 拼多多网络直播效果实证研究. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(10),162-168.
[12]
燕道成, 李菲(2020). 场景·符号·权力:电商直播的视觉景观与价值反思. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(6),124-129.
[13]
晏青(2024). 视觉传播中的欲望化表征:惯习与规制. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(8),104-113.
[14]
亿邦智库(2024年12月4日). 亿邦智库《2024双十一暨未来零售发展研究报告》重磅发布. https://www.ebrun.com/20241204/567248.shtml?eb=search_chan_pcol_content
[15]
Adam, M., Reinelt, A., & Roethke, K. (2023). Gamified monetary reward designs: Offering certain versus chance-based rewards. Information Systems Journal, 33(6), 1426-1454.
[16]
Arora, S. D. (2023). Contemporary challenges of consumption: A Kafkaesque and critical marketing perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 59(4), 58-73.
Markets are sites of collaboration as well as contestation between their various actors, including firms and consumers. In this respect, a narrative that consumers are more empowered than ever has been in vogue. Drawing from Kafka’s literature and philosophy and the paradigm of critical marketing, this paper argues for a broadened perspective.
[17]
Baudrillard, J. (1981/1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
[18]
Baudrillard, J. (1970/1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[19]
Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326-351.
[20]
Boréus, K., Bradley, K., & Tornhill, S. (2024). Breaking through banal consumerism? Representations of postconsumerist perspectives in mainstream press media. Journal of Consumer Culture, 24(1), 155-174.
Current calls for deep societal transformation stress the need to go beyond green consumption and aim for the reduction of material consumption. Such a shift is enacted by grassroots initiatives around reuse, repair and sharing. However, the possibility of postconsumerist perspectives and practices to reach a broader audience is affected by discursive opportunity structures (DOS) formed in public debate. To understand the DOS it is relevant to pay attention both to the continuous normalisation of consumption and to the ways in which alternatives are represented. To develop new analytical tools for examining what postconsumerist initiatives are up against, we introduce the concept of banal consumerism: mundane, habitual expressions that reproduce consumer culture. Through an empirical study of Swedish daily newspapers, we construct the basis for a typology of different expressions of banal consumerism. We find several expressions, of which the massive advertising of consumer goods is the most common but editorial material also plays an important role. This largely disabling DOS is then put in relation to the potentially enabling opportunities entailed in the existing media coverage of postconsumerist initiatives, practices and perspectives. The results show that postconsumerist initiatives and practices are newsworthy and presented as commendable. The fact that high levels of material consumption negatively impact the environment and life on the planet is widely accepted. To argue for degrowth or criticise consumerism is, however, controversial. Thus, support for postconsumerist practices coexist with massive expressions of banal consumerism, creating a complex set of DOS for the postconsumerist initiatives to navigate.
[21]
Burns, D. J. (2010). Mimeticism and the basis of value: Toward a theory of fashion marketing. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 1(1), 40-50.
[22]
Campbell, C. (2018). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism (2nd ed.). Basil Blackwell.
[23]
Castigliano, F. (2023). Flaneuring the buyosphere: A comparative historical analysis of shopping environments and phantasmagorias. Journal of Consumer Culture, 23(2), 465-481.
This paper proposes a comparative historical analysis of shopping environments, focusing on the aesthetic experience they offer to the consumer and underscoring their nature as phantasmagorias. At a time when digital disruption, exacerbated by the recent pandemic, has dramatically changed social habits and the cityscape, this research aims to investigate the impact of technological and social transformations on the buyosphere and the practice of shopping. The approach's original perspective looks at the close correlation between the flâneur and the consumer, examining how retail spaces in the modern metropolis have developed. The shopping experience is shown as a social ritual with complex facets, where the urban walker and the cityscape have gradually transformed, giving symbolic meaning to architectural forms and human identities. The findings of this study call for considering the opportunities and threats of the present scenario. The shift to the virtual realm has created new forms of phantasmagoria, such as the immersive experience in the brand's universe combined with omnichannel strategies. At the same time, the “retail apocalypse” and the reduction of spaces for wandering may risk limiting social encounters, the freedom of movement, and the individual's ability to interpret urban reality, elements that once defined the practice of flânerie.
[24]
Chen, H., Chen, H., & Tian, X. (2022). The dual-process model of product information and habit in influencing consumers’ purchase intention: The role of live streaming features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 53, 101150.
[25]
Chen, X., Li, Y., Davison, R. M., & Liu, Y. (2021). The impact of imitation on Chinese social commerce buyers’ purchase behavior: The moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102262.
[26]
Dasgupta, P., Southerton, D., Ulph, A., & Ulph, D. (2016). Consumer behaviour with environmental and social externalities: Implications for analysis and policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65, 191-226.
[27]
Denegri-Knott, J. & Molesworth, M. (2013). Redistributed consumer desire in digital virtual worlds of consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13-14), 1561-1579.
[28]
Dholakia, U. M. (2015). Three senses of desire in consumer research. In W. Hofmann & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 407-431). Guilford Publications.
[29]
Dinh, T. C. T. & Lee, Y. (2022). “I want to be as trendy as influencers” - How “fear of missing out” leads to buying intention for products endorsed by social media influencers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 346-364.
As social media use rises, the impact of social media influencers on customer buying decisions increases, due to customers viewing influencers as ideal role models who they try to imitate. Nevertheless, this phenomenon is still under-researched. This study examined the impact of the imitation of influencers on customer buying intention toward endorsed products, which is mediated by social comparison, materialism and the fear of missing out (FOMO).
[30]
Flisfeder, M. (2014). Enjoying social media. In M. Flisfeder & L. Willis (Eds.), Žižek and media studies: A reader (pp. 229-240). Palgrave Macmillan US.
[31]
Franken, R., Brown D. (1995). Why do people like competition? Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 175-184.
[32]
Gabriel, Y. (2015). Identity, choice and consumer freedom-the new opiates? A psychoanalytic interrogation. Marketing Theory, 15(1), 25-30.
Psychoanalysis opens a variety of windows into understanding contemporary consumption and consumerism. The psychoanalytic theory of defence and the unconscious enables us to understand why commodities, from fast cars to luxury chocolate, so readily stand in to offer substitute gratification for deeper repressed desires and why the meaning of such commodities is liable to become mobile and unstable (Baudrillard, 1988 [1970]). The psychoanalytic concepts of narcissism (Freud, 1914) and the mirror stage (Lacan, 2006) provide powerful entry points into understanding our culture’s obsession with image (Cluley and Dunne, 2012), whilst the theory of neurosis offers significant insights into the addictive and deeply irrational qualities of contemporary consumption (Lasch, 1980). Object relations theory (Winnicott, 1964) enables us to understand how material objects, from early childhood attachments to teddy bears, act as bridges between our sense of self and what we come to view as an external world deeply indifferent to our desires. Several other psychoanalytic concepts and ideas have proven particularly helpful in contemporary discourses on consumption. This essay draws its inspiration from Freud’s theory of religion (Freud,1927, 1930) to test the view that the consumer’s freedom to choose and construct an identity is an illusion in the technical sense – a fantasy that discloses deeper desires and offers substitute gratifications for the discontents inflicted on us by contemporary consumer culture. Like earlier illusions, the illusion of freedom and the derivative illusions of choice and identity may provide some consolation, but, arguably, then deepen the discontents for which they purport to offer comfort.
[33]
Girard, R. (1961/1965). Deceit, desire, and the novel: Self and other in literary structure (Y. Freccero, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
[34]
Girard, R. (1987). Generative scapegoating. In R. G. Hammerton-Kelly (Ed.), Violent Origins (pp. 73-148). Stanford University Press.
[35]
Girard, R. (1972/2005). Violence and the sacred (P.Gregory, Trans.) (2nd ed.). Continuum.
[36]
Girard, R. (2008/2013). Anorexia and mimetic desire (M. R. Anspach, Trans.). Michigan State University Press. (Original work published 2008).
[37]
Gunderson, R. (2016). The will to consume: Schopenhauer and consumer society. Critical Horizons, 17(3-4), 376-389.
[38]
Hamilton, R., Thompson, D., Bone, S., Chaplin, L. N., Griskevicius, V., Goldsmith, K., Hill, R., John, D. R., Mittal, C., O’Guinn, T., Piff, P., Roux, C., Shah, A., & Zhu, M. (2019). The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(4), 532-550.
[39]
Higonnet, P., Higonnet, A., & Higonnet, M. (1984). Façades: Walter Benjamin’s Paris. Critical Inquiry, 10(3), 391-419.
[40]
Kanungo, R. P., Gupta, S., Patel, P., Prikshat, V., & Liu, R. (2022). Digital consumption and socio-normative vulnerability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121808.
[41]
Ko, H. C. (2018). Social desire or commercial desire? The factors driving social sharing and shopping intentions on social commerce platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 28, 1-15.
[42]
Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R. (2017). Networks of desire: How technology increases our passion to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 659-682.
How is consumer desire transformed by contemporary technology? Most extant theory holds that technology rationalizes and reduces passion. In our investigation of networks of desire—complex open systems of machines, consumers, energy, and objects—we find technology increasing the passion to consume. Effects depend upon participation in the network, which can be private, public, or professional. Private participation tends to discipline passion into interests reflecting established cultural categories. Public and professional participation build new connections between extant desires and a wider network, decentering ties and deterritorializing flows that limit hungers to emplaced bodies. Public and professional participation drive consumption passion to transgressive extremes. We use ethnography and netnography to study online food image sharing, a broad field that includes everything from friend networks to food bloggers. Using and extending Deleuze and Guattari’s desire theory, we conceptualize desire as energetic, connective, systemic, and innovative. Critically examining the role of technocapitalism in the realm of consumption passion, we question the emancipatory possibilities of unfettered desire. Networks of desire create a passionate new universe of technologically enhanced desire, one that challenges the way we think about consumer collectives, capitalism, emancipation, and posthuman consumption.
[43]
Lacan, J. (1998). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Book XI). Norton & Company.
[44]
Liao, T. H. & Keng, C. J.(2014). Online purchase delay: The roles of online consumer experiences. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 133.
[45]
Lim, S. H., & Kim, D. J. (2022). The effect of unmindfulness on impulse purchasing behaviours in the context of online shopping from a classical attitude theory perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(16), 3432-3449.
[46]
Livingston, P. (1994). What is mimetic desire? Philosophical Psychology, 7(3), 291-305.
[47]
Malhotra, D. (2010). The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 111(2), 139-146.
[48]
McDonald, T. & Dan, L. (2022). “Pulling the sheep’s wool”: The labours of online thrift in a Chinese factory. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(2), 398-416.
This paper draws on data collected during ethnographic fieldwork in a factory in south-east China to describe the significance of a group of activities colloquially known as “pulling the sheep’s wool” ( haoyangmao). This wide-ranging set of thrift-oriented practices involves gaining rewards and discounts by collecting various credits and points, most often through activities conducted on online shopping, news and payment platforms. Recent studies have sought to reposition thrift as a morally-infused consumptive practice for the creation of value, through which the concept of the house is enacted. However, this paper demonstrates how thrift is viewed by labourers as a kind of “work”. As such, it is able to act in a factory environment largely unmoored from notions of domesticity, instead delineating social boundaries between production line workers and managers, fostering communal behaviours amongst labourers and—through a process of earmarking—allowing for workers to direct a greater share of their wages toward household economies. We argue that this conception of thrift as labour actually reworks the way that consumption conjoins with production, challenging our received understandings of consumption, while also providing new possibilities for the creation of both value and personhood.
[49]
Miller, D. (1998). A theory of shopping. Polity Press.
[50]
Miranda, S., Borges-Tiago, M. T., Tiago, F., & Tu, X. (2024). To buy or not to buy? The impulse buying dilemma in livestream shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 41(5), 989-1005.
[51]
Orazi, D. C., Mah, K. Y., Derksen, T., & Murray, K. B. (2023). Consumer escapism: Scale development, validation, and physiological associations. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113805.
[52]
Preece, C., & Skandalis, A. (2024). Time to imagine an escape: Investigating the consumer timework at play in augmented reality. European Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 92-118.
While the spatial dimensions of augmented reality (AR) have received significant attention in the marketing literature, to date, there has been less consideration of its temporal dimensions. This paper aims to theorise digital timework through AR to understand a new form of consumption experience that offers short-lived, immersive forms of mundane, marketer-led escape from everyday life.
[53]
Rojek, C. (2004). The consumerist syndrome in contemporary society: An interview with Zygmunt Bauman. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 291-312.
This interview examines the relations between production and consumption and the significance of what Bauman calls ‘the consumerist syndrome’. The latter is defined by the desire for instant satisfaction. The article distinguishes the consumerist syndrome from Veblen’s concept of conspicuous consumption. It breaks with the 20th century practice of regarding consumer preoccupations and activities as derivative of needs and suggests that consumption is now driven by infinite desire. Bauman sets the consumer syndrome in relation to his concept of liquid modernity. The choices of the modern consumer are set against unfulfilled options. The notion of using consumption as a form of resistance is examined and criticized. The article concludes with some reflections on the condition of sociological activity today.
[54]
Song, M., Choi, S., & Moon, J. (2021). Limited time or limited quantity? The impact of other consumer existence and perceived competition on the scarcity messaging-purchase intention relation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 167-175.
[55]
Talaifar, S. & Lowery, B. S.(2023). Freedom and constraint in digital environments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(3), 544-575.
We evaluate how features of the digital environment free or constrain the self. Based on the current empirical literature, we argue that modern technological features, such as predictive algorithms and tracking tools, pose four potential obstacles to the freedom of the self: lack of privacy and anonymity, (dis)embodiment and entrenchment of social hierarchy, changes to memory and cognition, and behavioral reinforcement coupled with reduced randomness. Comparing these constraints on the self to the freedom promised by earlier digital environments suggests that digital reality can be designed in more freeing ways. We describe how people reassert personal agency in the face of the digital environment’s constraints and provide avenues for future research regarding technology’s influence on the self.
[56]
Vilone, D., Ramasco, J. J., Sánchez, A., & Miguel, M. S. (2012). Social and strategic imitation: The way to consensus. Scientific reports, 2(1), 686.
[57]
Wu, Y., Xin, L., Li, D., Yu, J., & Guo, J. (2021). How does scarcity promotion lead to impulse purchase in the online market? A field experiment. Information & Management, 58(1), 103283.
[58]
Yang, X., Hua, G., Cheng, T. C. E., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2022). Buy two and get X% off: Quantity discount under consumers’ anticipated regret. International Journal of Production Economics, 250, 108624.
[59]
Yates, J., & Hunter, J. D. (Eds.).(2011). Thrift and thriving in America: Capitalism and moral order from the Puritans to the present. OUP USA.
[60]
Zhang, T., Choi, T. M., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2024). Competitive pricing and product strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 312(2), 573-586.
[61]
Zhu, P., Liu, Z., Li, X., Jiang, X., & Zhu, M. X. (2023). The influences of livestreaming on online purchase intention: Examining platform characteristics and consumer psychology. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(3), 862-885.
[62]
Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. Verso.
[63]
Žižek, S. (2012). Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso.

基金

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“粤港澳大湾区国际传播话语体系建构研究”(23JZC036)

PDF(1846 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/