电竞爱国主义:国家权力、行业资本和个人梦想的三重接合

林仲轩

国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1) : 122-144.

PDF(1619 KB)
PDF(1619 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1) : 122-144.
研究论文

电竞爱国主义:国家权力、行业资本和个人梦想的三重接合

作者信息 +

eSports Patriotism: Triple Articulation of State Power, Industry Capital and Individual Dream

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

中国电竞场域近几年涌现出了“电竞爱国主义”的话语组合。在中国特定情境下,国家、行业、个人等不同行动者,通过特定的“三重接合”形式和实践过程,相互博弈、相互连接、相互转译,争夺性地接合形成一个复杂的、动态的、甚至临时的“电竞爱国主义”认同。第一重接合是在国家权力层面话语的接合、解接合和再接合,第二重接合是在行业资本层面数字话语和利益联盟的合法性接合,第三重接合是在个人梦想层面“冠军梦”和“中国梦”的双向接合。

Abstract

In recent years, the Chinese eSports field has emerged with a discourse assemblage of “eSports patriotism”. Situated in China’s specific context, different actors such as countries, industries, and individuals, through the specific form and practice of “triple articulation”, compete with each other, connect with each other, and translate each other, to form a complex, dynamic and even temporary consensus on eSports patriotism. The first articulation is on the level of state power, with the articulation, disarticulation and rearticulation of discourse; the second articulation is on the level of industry capital, with the number discourse and the alliance of interests; and the third articulation is on the level of individual dream, with the two-way articulation of the “championship dream” and the “Chinese dream”.

关键词

电竞 / 爱国主义 / 国家权力 / 行业资本 / 个人梦想

Key words

eSports / Patriotism / State Power / Industry Capital / Individual Dream

引用本文

导出引用
林仲轩. 电竞爱国主义:国家权力、行业资本和个人梦想的三重接合[J]. 国际新闻界. 2024, 46(1): 122-144
LIN Zhongxuan. eSports Patriotism: Triple Articulation of State Power, Industry Capital and Individual Dream[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(1): 122-144

参考文献

[1]
戴焱淼(2019). 《电竞简史:从游戏到体育》. 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[2]
何威, 曹书乐(2018). 从“电子海洛因”到“中国创造”:《人民日报》游戏报道(1981-2017)的话语变迁. 《国际新闻界》,(5),57-81.
[3]
洪建平(2018). 娱乐·教育·产业:电子竞技的主流媒介镜像——以《人民日报》(1978-2018)为中心. 《成都体育学院学报》,(4),9-15,23.
[4]
景怀斌, 张善若(2021). 作为文本分析方法论的“文史哲”:意图与框架. 《中国社会科学评价》,(1),111-121+159-160.
[5]
刘海龙(2017). 像爱护爱豆一样爱国:新媒体与“粉丝民族主义”的诞生. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(4),27-36.
[6]
陆新蕾, 琚慧琴(2021). 从跨国追剧到饭圈“骂战”:粉丝民族主义的日常操演. 《国际新闻界》,(10),29-49.
[7]
饶一晨(2015). 网瘾少年与中国社会控制模式的变革. 《文化纵横》,(5),64-71.
[8]
施畅(2018). 恐慌的消逝:从“电子海洛因”到电子竞技. 《文化研究》,(1),145-165.
[9]
陶东风(2007). 西方文本研究的新近发展. 《当代文坛》,(1),7-12.
[10]
王洪喆, 李思闽, 吴靖(2016). 从“迷妹”到“小粉红”:新媒介商业文化环境下的国族身份生产和动员机制研究. 《国际新闻界》,(11),33-53.
[11]
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. London, UK: Verso.
[12]
Bairner, A. (2001). Sport, nationalism, and globalization. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[13]
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London, UK: Sage.
[14]
Brown, K. A., Billings, A. C., Murphy, B. & Puesan, L. (2017). Intersections of fandom in the age of interactive media. Communication & Sport, 6(4), 418-435.
[15]
Brownell, S. (2009). Beijing’s Olympic education programme: Re-thinking Suzhi education, re-imagining an international China. The China Quarterly, 1(197), 44-63.
[16]
Callahan, W. A. (2017). Dreaming as a critical discourse of national belonging: China Dream, American Dream and world dream. Nations & Nationalism, 23(2), 248-270.
[17]
Chen, X., Kaye, C. B. V. & Zeng, J. (2021). #PositiveEnergy Douyin: Constructing “playful patriotism” in a Chinese short-video application. Chinese Journal of Communication, 14(1), 97-117.
[18]
Cheung, K. C. K. (2012). Away from socialism, towards Chinese characteristics: Confucianism and the futures of Chinese nationalism. China Information, 26(2), 205-218.
Following the success of China’s economic reform in the past few decades, Chinese nationalism has entered a new stage. The sentiment born of ‘the century of national humiliation’ is insufficient to explain the phenomenon of Chinese new nationalism. In this new era, China no longer regards the West as the benchmark against which it defines its success, but is becoming more assertive about its own values and perspectives. This emphasis on a Chinese perspective is related to the cultural shift in China’s post-socialist transition, where the source of legitimacy in China’s development has moved from an ideological dimension of socialism to a cultural dimension of ‘Chinese characteristics’. Following this transition, growing importance is being placed on an indigenous voice in many aspects of China’s development, including the recent efforts to reinvent traditional Chinese culture as a source of China’s soft power. In particular, with strong state sponsorship, Confucianism is being revived as a new nationalist discourse, which not only provides new discursive resources for continuing authoritarianism in mainland China, but also redefines governance and nation-building with respect to Hong Kong and Taiwan.
[19]
Clarke, J. (2015). Stuart Hall and the theory and practice of articulation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(2), 275-286.
[20]
Clift, B. & Woll, C. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 307-323.
[21]
DeLuca, K. (1999). Articulation theory: A discursive grounding for rhetorical practice. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 32(4), 334-348.
[22]
Gao, Z. (2015). When nationalism goes to the market. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(4), 1-16.
[23]
Gries, P. H. (2004). China’s new nationalism:Pride, politics, and diplomacy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[24]
Grossberg, L. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 45-60.
[25]
Grossberg, L. (1992). We gotta get out of this place:Popular conservatism and postmodernism culture. New York, NY; London, UK: Routledge.
[26]
Grossberg, L. (1993). Cultural studies and / in the new worlds. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(1), 1-22.
[27]
Guan, T. & Hu, T. (2020). The conformation and negotiation of nationalism in China’s political animations - a case study of Year Hare Affair. Continuum, 34(3), 417-430.
[28]
Guo, X. & Yang, S. (2016). The memetic communication and consensus mobilization in the cyber nationalist movement. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 38(11), 54-74.
[29]
Hall, S. (1980). Cultural studies: Two paradigms. Media Culture & Society, 2(1), 57-72.
[30]
Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2(2), 91-114.
[31]
Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.). Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). London, UK: Sage.
[32]
Hallmann, K. & Giel, T. (2018). eSports: Competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Management Review, 21(1), 14-20.
[33]
Hamari, J. & Sjöblom, M. (2017). What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet Research, 27(2), 211-232.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate why do people spectate eSports on the internet. The authors define eSports (electronic sports) as “a form of sports where the primary aspects of the sport are facilitated by electronic systems; the input of players and teams as well as the output of the eSports system are mediated by human-computer interfaces.” In more practical terms, eSports refer to competitive video gaming (broadcasted on the internet).
[34]
Harris, P. (1997). Chinese nationalism: The state of the nation. The China Journal, 38(7), 121-137.
[35]
Heath, S. (1981). Questions of cinema. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
[36]
Hemphill, D. (2005). Cybersport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32(2), 195-207.
[37]
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London, UK: SAGE.
[38]
Hizi, G. (2018). Speaking the China dream: Self-Realization and nationalism in China’s public-speaking shows. Continuum, 33(6), 37-51.
[39]
Hoffman, L. (2006). Autonomous choices and patriotic professionalism: On governmentality in late-socialist China. Economy and Society, 35(4), 550-570.
[40]
Hutchins, B. (2008). Signs of meta-change in second modernity: The growth of e-sport and the world cyber games. New Media & Society, 10(6), 851-869.
Media, communication and information flows now define the logic and structure of social relations, a situation that affects almost every dimension of cultural life and activity. This article analyses the transformation of the relationship between computer gaming, media and sport in the global age of 'second modernity'. This analysis is undertaken through a critical case study of the World Cyber Games (WCG). This popular event and the 'cyber-athletes' that compete in it cannot be explained fully by reference to existing studies of computer and video gaming, media and sport, media events or organized sporting competition. It is not possible to think in terms of sport and the media when considering the WCG and organized competitive gaming. This is sport as media or e-sport, a term that signifies the seamless interpenetration of media content, sport and networked information and communications technologies.
[41]
Ismangil, M. (2018). (Re)creating the nation online: Nationalism in Chinese Dota 2 fandom. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(3), 198-224.
In August 2016, Wings Gaming won the sixth edition of the International, a tournament for the videogame Dota 2. Wings Gaming, a team consisting of five Chinese players, was praised for bringing honour to China. This article explores various ways in which this Chinese Dota 2 community frames its fandom using nationalistic rhetoric. Teams identified as Chinese represent the country, honouring or disappointing the nation when they square off in tournaments. This article focusses on the everyday experience in this online community, arguing that the way in which people cheer for their teams stems from a nationalistic filter that makes nationalism the normative discourse in the community. A further comparison is made to American social media to discuss the role that truth plays when nationalism is discussed in the daily experience. This study concludes that a combination of factors surrounding the Chinese community creates a form of banal (cold) nationalism, which normalizes and strengthens national truths and myths.
[42]
Jonasson, K. & Thiborg, J. (2010). Electronic sport and its impact on future sport. Sport in Society, 13(2), 287-299.
[43]
Karhulahti, V-M. (2017). Reconsidering esport: Economics and executive ownership. Physical Culture and Sport Studies and Research, 74(1), 43-53.
This article starts with a literary review of the conceptual frames through which esport has been labeled academically. It shows how the concept of “electronic” has been taken as the core term for labelingesport, often accompanied by a strong emphasis on “professionalism.” The literary review is followed by the submission of an alternative conceptual frame based on the economic notion of executive ownership, which provides a theoretical grounding for esport as a cultural phenomenon. In accordance with the above, the article concludes with a reframed look at the history of esport and suggests commercial analog gaming (especially Magic: The Gathering) as its point of origin.
[44]
Keane, M. & Yu, H. (2019). A digital empire in the making: China’s outbound digital platforms. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4624-4641.
[45]
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy:Towards a radical democratic politics. New York, NY: Verso.
[46]
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London, UK: Verso.
[47]
Lee, R. E. (2003). Life and times of cultural studies:The politics and transformation of the structures of knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[48]
Lin, Z. & Zhao, Y. (2020). Self-enterprising eSports: Meritocracy, precarity, and disposability of eSports players in China. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 582-599.
The emerging realm of eSports has become an inescapable part of overall sports and game culture. However, this study investigates eSports beyond sports and games, regarding it as a meta-change in the context of neoliberal Chinese society. In particular, this study focuses on the practices of Chinese eSports players to explore research questions of why and how eSports practitioners, especially professional players in China, have transformed themselves into new, self-enterprising subjects. Based on data collected from our fieldwork and interviews, this study demonstrates that Chinese eSports players pursue meritocracy, suffer from precarity, and face disposability in the future. The study finally proposes questions for sports ontologies and the challenges that eSports have created for the games empire.
[49]
Lin, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2021). (Dis) Assembling eSports: Material actors and relational networks in the Chinese eSports industry. Critical Arts, 35(5-6), 210-223.
[50]
Liu, C. & Ma, X. (2018). Popular threats and nationalistic propaganda: Political logic of China’s patriotic campaign. Security Studies, 27(4), 633-664.
[51]
Liu, F. (2012). Politically indifferent’ nationalists? Chinese youth negotiating political identity in the internet age. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 53-69.
This article explores why apparent political indifference coincides with nationalist passion in Chinese cyberspace. Drawing on interviews with university students and the notion of ‘new politics’, this article argues that online nationalism constitutes an important extension of the political being in the Chinese context, or a form of ‘new politics’ among contemporary youth in certain societies. The ‘dual’ political identity emerging from Chinese youth’s uses of the internet is reflective of, and reinforces, their offline self. Both their apparent lack of interest in engaging with the government and their strong nationalism are products of the same changing subjectivities in post-Mao China.
[52]
Liu, H. (2019). From cyber-nationalism to fandom nationalism. London, UK: Routledge.
[53]
Lu, Z. (2016). From e-heroin to e-sports: The development of competitive gaming in China. International Journal of the History of Sport, 33(18), 2186-2206.
[54]
Plantin, J. C., & de Seta, G. (2019). WeChat as infrastructure: The techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 257-273.
[55]
Rojek, C. (2003). Stuart Hall. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
[56]
Rosamond, B. (2012). Supranational governance as economic patriotism? The European Union, legitimacy and the reconstruction of state space. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 324-341.
[57]
Seo, Y. & Jung, S. U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635-655.
This article adopts the theory of social practices as a critical lens for understanding computer game consumption as multiple ‘nexuses of doings and sayings’, which represent the elements of and are situated within the broader context of consumer culture. Specifically, we explore an emerging phenomenon of an organised and competitive approach to computer gaming, referred to as ‘electronic sports’ or ‘eSports’, by offering a novel conceptualisation of eSports as an assemblage of consumption practices. In our endeavour, we illustrate that eSports practices are performed by consumers through multiple interconnected nexuses of unique understandings, tools, competencies and skills, whereby these nexuses transcend the elements of digital play to include the watching and governing of eSports. Accordingly, eSports consumers take on multiple roles beyond being considered merely as ‘players’, engaging with this phenomenon using different nexuses of practical activities. Our findings suggest that, in order to gain a more comprehensive perspective of what consumers actually do with computer games, we should explore gaming consumption in relation to different social practices that co-constitute multifaceted consumer engagement within this genre.
[58]
Seo, Y. (2013). Electronic sports: A new marketing landscape of the experience economy. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13-14), 1542-1560.
[59]
Seo, Y. (2016). Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 264-272.
[60]
Sinkkonen, E. (2013). Nationalism, patriotism and foreign policy attitudes among Chinese university students. The China Quarterly, (216), 1045-1063.
[61]
Skubida, D. (2016). Can some computer games be a sport? Issues with legitimization of eSport as a sporting activity. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 8(4), 38-52.
[62]
Slack, J. D. (1996). The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In Moley, D. & Chen, K-H (Eds.). Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. (pp. 124-140). London, UK: Routledge.
[63]
Smith, A. (2009). Ethno-symbolism and nationalism. A cultural approach. London, UK: Routledge.
[64]
Taylor, T. L. (2012). Raising the stakes:E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[65]
Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Vetter, E., & Wodak, R. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London, UK: Sage.
[66]
Trimbur, J. (1993). Articulation Theory and the problem of determination: A reading of “Lives on the Boundary”. Journal of Advanced Composition, 33-50.
[67]
van Hilvoorde, I. & Pot, N. (2016). Embodiment and fundamental motor skills in esports. Sport, Ethics & Philosophy, 10(1), 14-27.
[68]
Vida, I., & Reardon, J. (2008). Domestic consumption: Rational, affective or normative choice? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(1), 34-44.
This study focuses on consumer choice behavior in the context of a new European Union (EU) member state by examining cognitive, affective and normative mechanisms in consumer preference formation for domestic vs imported products.
[69]
Viki, G. T. & Calitri, R. (2008). Infrahuman outgroup or suprahuman ingroup: The role of nationalism and patriotism in the infrahumanization of outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 1054-1061.
[70]
Wagner, M. (2007). Competing in metagame gamespace:eSport as the first professionalized computer metagames. In von Borries., F. et al. (Eds.). Space time play, computer games, architecture and urbanism:The next level (pp.182-185). New York, NY: Springer.
[71]
Witkowski, E. (2012). On the digital playing field: How we ‘do sport’ with networked computer games. Games and Culture, 7(5), 349-374.
In the following article, the author explores the notion of playing computer games as sports by sketching out the labors and sensations of Counter-Strike teams playing at pro/am e-sports local area network (LAN) tournaments. How players are engaged physically in practice and play is described in this qualitative study through the core themes of movement, haptic engagement, and the balanced body. Furthermore, the research describes how technologies in play are laboring actors too; the players and technologies in this study are rendered as networked, extended, and acting in and on the same fields of play. In asking is there a “sport” in e-sports, this study questions the legitimacy of a traditional sports ontology and simultaneously tackles the notion of engagement with computer game play as a legitimate sporting endeavor.
[72]
Wu, X. (2007). Chinese cyber nationalism: Evolution, characteristics, and implications. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
[73]
Xu, G. (2008). Olympic dreams: China and sports, 1895-2008. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[74]
Yu, H. (2018). Game on: The rise of the esports middle Kingdom. Media Industries Journal, 5(1), 88-105.
[75]
Zeng, W. & Sparks, C. (2019). Popular nationalism: Global times and the US-China trade war. International Communication Gazette, 82(6), 26-41.
This article analyses the coverage of the current US–China trade war in the Global Times. Some scholars argue that official nationalism, which stress the unity of the Chinese people, is challenged by popular nationalism, which privileges the dominant Han ethnicity, and that official nationalism is forced to make concessions to popular nationalism. If this is true, then one would expect to find evidence in the coverage of international issues in a ‘popular’ official newspaper like Global Times. The newspaper’s coverage stresses negative features of the USA, but devotes considerable space to the damage that Trump's policies are doing to ordinary Americans. It does not present China as the unique victim of US economic aggression. The coverage stresses broad international agreement for free trade, leaving the USA isolated in adopting protectionist policies. At least in this instance, state-led nationalism remains central and no concessions are made to popular sentiments.
[76]
Zhai, Y. (2018). The gap in viewing China’s rise between Chinese youth and their Asian counterparts. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(114), 848-866.
[77]
Zhao, S. (1998). A state-led nationalism: The patriotic education campaign in post-Tiananmen China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31(3), 287-302.
The decline of Communism after the end of the post-Cold War has seen the rise of nationalism in many parts of the former Communist world. In countries such as the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, nationalism was pursued largely from the bottom up as ethnic and separatist movements. Some observers also take this bottom-up approach to find the major cause of Chinese nationalism and believe that “the nationalist wave in China is a spontaneous public reaction to a series of international events, not a government propaganda.” (Zhang, M. (1997) The new thinking of Sino–US relations. Journal of Contemporary China, 6(14), 117–123). They see Chinese nationalism as “a belated response to the talk of containing China among journalists and politicians” in the United States and “a public protest against the mistreatment from the US in the last several years.” (Li, H. (1997) China talks back: anti-Americanism or nationalism? Journal of Contemporary China, 6(14), 153–160). This position concurs with the authors of nationalistic books in China, such as The China That Can Say No: Political and Sentimental Choice in the Post-Cold War Era (Song, Q., Zhang Z., Qiao B. (1996) Zhongguo Keyi Shuo Bu (The China That Can Say No). Zhonghua Gongshang Lianhe Chubanshe. Beijing), which called upon Chinese political elites to say no to the US, and argue that the rise of nationalism was not a result of the official propaganda but a reflection of the state of mind of a new generation of Chinese intelligentsia in response to the foreign pressures in the post-Cold War era. Indeed, Chinese nationalism was mainly reactive sentiments to foreign suppressions in modern history, and this new wave of nationalist sentiment also harbored a sense of wounded national pride and an anti-foreign (particularly the US and Japan) resentment. Many Chinese intellectuals gave voice to a rising nationalistic discourse in the 1990s (Zhao, S. (1997) Chinese intellectuals' quest for national greatness and nationalistic writing in the 1990s. The China Quarterly, 152, 725–745). However, Chinese nationalism in the 1990s was also constructed and enacted from the top by the Communist state. There were no major military threats to China's security after the end of the Cold War. Instead, the internal legitimacy crisis became a grave concern of the Chinese Communist regime because of the rapid decay of Communist ideology. In response, the Communist regime substituted performance legitimacy provided by surging economic development and nationalist legitimacy provided by invocation of the distinctive characteristics of Chinese culture in place of Marxist–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought. As one of the most important maneuvers to enact Chinese nationalism, the Communist government launched an extensive propaganda campaign of patriotic education after the Tiananmen Incident in 1989. The patriotic education campaign was well-engineered and appealed to nationalism in the name of patriotism to ensure loyalty in a population that was otherwise subject to many domestic discontents. The Communist regime, striving to maintain authoritarian control while Communist ideology was becoming obsolete in the post-Cold War era, warned of the existence of hostile international forces in the world perpetuating imperialist insult to Chinese pride. The patriotic education campaign was a state-led nationalist movement, which redefined the legitimacy of the post-Tiananmen leadership in a way that would permit the Communist Party's rule to continue on the basis of a non-Communist ideology. Patriotism was thus used to bolster CCP power in a country that was portrayed as besieged and embattled. The dependence on patriotism to build support for the government and the patriotic education campaign by the Communist propagandists were directly responsible for the nationalistic sentiment of the Chinese people in the mid-1990s. This paper focuses on the Communist state as the architect of nationalism in China and seeks to understand the rise of Chinese nationalism by examining the patriotic education campaign. It begins with an analysis of how nationalism took the place of the official ideology as the coalescing force in the post-Tiananmen years. It then goes on to examine the process, contents, methods and effectiveness of the patriotic education campaign. The conclusion offers a perspective on the instrumental aspect of state-led nationalism.
[78]
Zhao, S. (2000). Chinese nationalism and its international orientations. Political Science Quarterly, 115(1), 1-33.
[79]
Zhao, S. (2004). A nation-state by construction:Dynamics of modern Chinese nationalism. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
[80]
Zhao, S. (2015). Rethinking the Chinese world order: The imperial cycle and the rise of China. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(96), 961-982.
[81]
Zhao, S. (2018). A revisionist stakeholder: China and post-World War II world order. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 643-658.
[82]
Zhao, Y. & Lin, Z. (2021). Umbrella platform of Tencent eSports industry in China. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14(1), 9-25.
[83]
Zhao, Y. (2008). Communication in China: Political Economy, Power and Conflict. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

注释 [Notes]

1. 2002年6月16日凌晨,两个十三四岁的孩子因为被网管以未成年人不得入内的理由拒之门外,二人便买来汽油一把火烧了这家名为“蓝极速”的网吧,造成25人死亡,12人受伤。

2. Newzoo’s Global Esports & Live Streaming Market Report 2022。检索于 https://newzoo.com/resources/trend-reports/newzoo-global-esports-live-streaming-market-report-2022-free-version

3. 2020年中国游戏产业报告。检索于 http://new.cgigc.com.cn/details.html?id=08da81c4-fc35-4bd1-853d-9f66bba69125&tp=report

4. 2022年中国游戏产业报告。检索于 https://www.cgigc.com.cn/details.html?id=08db0f16-2eca-4e7e-849d-89087a240576&tp=report

5. 腾讯2022年游戏业务总营收2074亿,手游收入占比超过77%。检索于 https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1761061480290993250&wfr=spider&for=pc

6. 2021LPL春季赛微博观赛报告。检索于 https://www.vpgame.com/news/article/1063063

7. 2022电竞数据:《英雄联盟》收视率登顶,《无尽对决》占据多席。检索于 https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20221227A07V3100

8. 新职业——电子竞技员就业景气现状分析报告。检索于 https://www.sohu.com/a/323854248_100057771


PDF(1619 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/