器官投射与技术想象:作为生成媒介的眼镜与助听器

章戈浩

国际新闻界 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8) : 59-73.

PDF(1521 KB)
PDF(1521 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8) : 59-73.
研究论文

器官投射与技术想象:作为生成媒介的眼镜与助听器

作者信息 +

Organ Projection and Technical Imagination: Glasses and Hearing Aid as Becoming Media

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

近年来,随着感官研究、多感官传播研究的兴起,感官与媒介间关系的讨论颇为热络。眼镜与助听器是弥补人类感官的最主要媒介,然而在传播与媒介研究中鲜有详细的考察。本文试图关联起一系列来自德国媒介理论传统的概念如卡普的器官投射、沃格的生成媒介与弗卢瑟的技术图像,探讨媒介与多重感官的关系。

Abstract

To date, as the emergence of sensory studies and multisensory communication studies, the debates on the relation between senses and media becomes heated. Glasses and hearing aid are main media to repair human’s senses, anyhow they were seldom discussed in communication and media studies. In this article, a series of theoretical conceptions from German media theory tradition as organ projection, becoming media and technical image will be articulated to re-exam the interaction between senses and media.

关键词

器官投射 / 生成媒介 / 技术想象

Key words

organ projection / becoming media / technical imagination

引用本文

导出引用
章戈浩. 器官投射与技术想象:作为生成媒介的眼镜与助听器[J]. 国际新闻界. 2023, 45(8): 59-73
ZHANG Gehao. Organ Projection and Technical Imagination: Glasses and Hearing Aid as Becoming Media[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2023, 45(8): 59-73

参考文献

[1]
陈永国(2009). 《视觉文化研究读本》. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[2]
罗岗, 顾铮(主编)(2003). 《视觉文化读本》. 广西: 广西师范大学出版社.
[3]
孙机(2016). 《从历史中醒来:孙机谈中国古文物》. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[4]
孙机, 杨泓(1991). 《文物丛谈》. 北京: 北京文物出版社.
[5]
王婧(2017). 《声音与感受力:中国声音实践的人类学研究》. 浙江: 浙江大学出版社.
[6]
章戈浩(2018). 数字功夫:格斗游戏的姿态现象学. 《国际新闻界》,(5),27-39.
[7]
章戈浩(主编)(2008). 《可见的思想》. 山东: 山东文艺出版社.
[8]
赵孟江(2004). 《中国眼镜历史与收藏》. 四川: 四川美术出版社.
[9]
Artal P., & Tabernero J. (2010). Optics of human eye: 400 years of exploration from Galileo’s time. Applied Optics, 49(16), D123-D130.
[10]
Classen C. (1993). Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London, UK: Routledge.
[11]
Eckstein E., Firkins J., & Firkins P. (1994). Gentlemen’s Dress Accessories. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
[12]
Flusser V. (2006). Towards a Philosophy of Photography. London, UK: Reaktion Books.
[13]
Flusser V. (2011). Into the Universe of Technical Images (Vol. 32). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
[14]
Flusser V. (2015). Into Immaterial Culture:São Paulo, BRA: Metaflux Publishing.
[15]
Goh A. (2016). The Dimension of Sound in Flusser: Implications for a Sonic Media Archaeology. MAP-Media| Archive| Performance Research on Media, Art and Performance, 7.
[16]
Horn E. (2007). Editor’s Introduction: “There Are No Media”. Grey Room, (29), 6-13.
[17]
Howes D. (2003). Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory:Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
[18]
Howes D.(Ed.). (2004). Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. London, UK: Routledge.
[19]
Howses. D., & Classen. C.(Ed.).(2013). Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. London, UK: Routledge.
[20]
Jewitt C., Price S., Leder Mackley K., Yiannoutsou N., & Atkinson D. (2020). Interdisciplinary lnsights for Digital Touch Communication. London, UK: Springer Nature.
[21]
Jones C. (2010). Senses. In Mitchell, W. J. T., & Hansen, M. B. (Eds.). Critical Terms for Media Studies (pp. 88-101). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[22]
Laplantine F. (2015). The Life of the Senses: Introduction to a Modal Anthropology. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
[23]
Machin D.(Ed.).(2014). Visual Communication (Vol.4). Berlin, DE/Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
[24]
Mills M. (2011). Hearing aids and the history of electronics miniaturization. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 33(2), 24-45.
[25]
Mills M. (2012). Do Signals Have Politics? Inscribing Abilities in Cochlear Implants. In Pinch, T., & Bijsterveld, K. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies (pp. 320-346). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
[26]
Mirzoeff N. (1999). An Introduction to Visual Culture. London, UK: Routledge.
[27]
Mirzoeff N.(Ed.).(2002). The Visual Culture Reader. London, UK: Routledge.
[28]
Montaña R. C., & Vagt C. (2018). Constructing the invisible-Computer graphics and the end of Optical Media. communication+1, 7(1), 2.
[29]
Mulder A. (2016). Meaning and Agency in the Universe of Technical Images. Flusser Studies, 22(1).
[30]
Kane B. (2015). Sound studies without auditory culture: A critique of the ontological turn. Sound Studies, 1(1), 2-21.
[31]
Kapp E. (2018a). Selections from Elements of a Philosophy of Technology. Grey Room, (72), 16-35.
[32]
Kapp E. (2018b). Elements of a Philosophy of Technology: On the Evolutionary History of Culture。 Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
[33]
Kenney K. (2016). Philosophy for Multisensory Communication and Media. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
[34]
Kirkwood J. W., & Weatherby L. (2018). Operations of culture: Ernst Kapp’s philosophy of technology. Grey Room, (72), 6-15.
[35]
Kriss T. C., & Kriss V. M. (1998). History of the operating microscope: From magnifying glass to microneurosurgery. Neurosurgery, 42(4), 899-907.
The advent of the microscope in the operating room revolutionized neurosurgery. We traced the origin and evolution of this important invention from the first magnifying lens to its practical application in neurosurgery. The concept of magnification evolved from unexplained observations in ancient times to the invention of the microscope by the late 16th century. In the subsequent 3 centuries, scientists made technical advances that greatly improved the power and utility of the microscope. By the early 20th century, otolaryngologists became the first surgeons to use the microscope in clinical surgery. After World War II, ophthalmologists and vascular and plastic surgeons began using the microscope in the operating room, making further technical improvements. It was a relatively small group of pioneering neurosurgeons in the late 1950s and 1960s who transformed microneurosurgery from a revolutionary and unorthodox "experiment" into the standard of care in much of modern neurosurgery.
[36]
Pinch T., & Bijsterveld K. (Eds.).(2012). The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
[37]
Poltronieri F. A. (2014). Communicology, Apparatus, and Post-history:Vilém Flusser’s Concepts Applied to Video games and Gamification. In Fuchs, M., Fizek, S., Ruffino, P., & Schrape, N. (Eds.). Rethinking Gamification(pp. 165-186). Luneburg, DE: Meson Press.
[38]
Pullin G. (2009). Design Meets Disability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[39]
Rosenthal J. W. (1996). Spectacles and Other Vision Aids: A History and Guide to Collecting. San Francisco, CA: Norman Publishing.
[40]
Smith K., Moriarty S., Barbatsis G.(Eds.).(2004). Handbook of Visual Communication Theory, Methods, and Media. London, UK: Routledge.
[41]
Smith M. (2008). Visual culture studies: Interviews with key thinkers. Visual Culture Studies, 1-264.
[42]
Sterne J.(Ed.).(2012). The Sound Studies Reader. London, UK: Routledge.
[43]
Vogl J. (2007). Becoming-media: Galileo's telescope. Grey Room, (29), 14-25.

注释 [Notes]

1. 引自弗卢瑟未发表文献《助听器》(Hearing Aids,德语Hörapparate)。

2. 同上。

3. 同上。

基金

澳门科技大学研究基金资助项目“后人类媒介:一个后质性探究”成果,项目编号FRG-22-031-FA。

PDF(1521 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/