消费主义逆行:基于豆瓣反消费主义小组的网络民族志观察

董天策, 何璇

国际新闻界 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 75-95.

PDF(1564 KB)
PDF(1564 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 75-95.
研究论文

消费主义逆行:基于豆瓣反消费主义小组的网络民族志观察

作者信息 +

Consumerism Retrograde: An Online Ethnography Based on the Douban Anti-Consumerism Group

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文以豆瓣小组“不要买|消费主义逆行者”为研究对象,通过网络民族志观察与深度访谈,从文化研究的视角分析反消费主义网络社区的文化现象与传播景观,认为反消费主义文化体现出部分青年群体的反身性、主体性觉醒等现实境况。“抵抗”不是基于拒绝,而是寻求平衡和免遭异化,选择并重构那些服务于现代社会的审美感受、意识形态和逻辑元素。通过网络社区将分散的个体相互联系起来,开辟了技术支持下的意义与反抗空间,为文化批判场域的形成提供了新的可能。

Abstract

This article uses the Douban group “Don’t Buy” as the research object. Based on online ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews, this paper analyzes the cultural phenomenon and communication landscape of anti-consumerism online community from the perspective of culture studies, arguing that anti-consumerism culture reflects the realities of some youth groups’ reflexivity and the awakening of female consciousness. The “resistance” is not based on rejection, but on seeking balance and protection from alienation, selecting and reconstructing those aesthetic feelings, ideologies and logical elements that serve modern society. The interconnection of scattered individuals through online communities opens up a space of meaning and resistance under technological support, offering new possibilities for the formation of a cultural critical field.

关键词

反消费主义 / 网络社区 / 媒介文化 / 青年亚文化 / 网络民族志

Key words

anti-consumerism / online communities / media culture / youth subcultures / cyber-ethnography

引用本文

导出引用
董天策, 何璇. 消费主义逆行:基于豆瓣反消费主义小组的网络民族志观察[J]. 国际新闻界. 2023, 45(5): 75-95
DONG Tiance, HE Xuan. Consumerism Retrograde: An Online Ethnography Based on the Douban Anti-Consumerism Group[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2023, 45(5): 75-95

参考文献

[1]
保罗·威利斯(1993/2013). 《学做工:工人阶级子弟为何继承父业》(秘舒,凌旻华译). 南京: 译林出版社.
[2]
陈昕(2003). 《救赎与消费:当代中国日常生活中的消费主义》. 南京: 江苏人民出版社.
[3]
达拉斯·斯迈思, 王洪喆(2014). 自行车之后是什么?——技术的政治与意识形态属性. 《开放时代》,(4),95-107+94.
[4]
德内拉·梅多斯, 乔根·兰德斯, 丹尼斯·梅多斯(1975/1984). 《增长的极限》(于树生译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[5]
迪克·赫伯迪格(1979/2009). 《亚文化:风格的意义》(陆道夫,胡疆锋译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[6]
董天策(2011). 《消费时代与中国传媒文化的嬗变》. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[7]
胡百精(2014). 《说服与认同》. 北京: 中国传媒大学出版社.
[8]
胡疆锋, 陆道夫(2006). 抵抗·风格·收编——英国伯明翰学派亚文化理论关键词解读. 《南京社会科学》,(4),87-92.
[9]
杰夫·刘易斯(2008/2013). 《文化研究基础理论》(郭镇之,任丛,秦洁,郑宇虹译)(第2版). 北京: 清华大学出版社.
[10]
莱斯利·斯克莱尔, 田禾, 黄平(1994). 全球化社会学的基础. 《社会学研究》,(2),5-17.
[11]
雷蒙德·威廉斯(1983/1991). 《文化与社会》(吴松江,张文定译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[12]
廖艳红(2020). 反消费景观:豆瓣“抠组”的亚文化抵抗与意义重构. 《新闻研究导刊》,(14),216-217.
[13]
罗伯特·V·库兹奈特(2010/2016). 《如何研究网络人群和社区:网络民族志方法实践指导》(叶韦明译). 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
[14]
马克斯·韦伯(1954/1998). 《论经济与社会中的法律》(张乃根译). 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社.
[15]
彭兰(2019). 网络的圈子化:关系,文化,技术维度下的类聚与群分. 《编辑之友》,(11),5-12.
[16]
让·波德里亚(1970/2000). 《消费社会》(刘成富,全志钢译). 南京: 南京大学出版社.
[17]
陶鹏辉(2020). 从反驯化到再驯化:青年亚文化视域下的网易严选反消费主义广告. 《新媒体研究》,(24),42-44+58.
[18]
吴翠丽, 周萍(2010). 主体性的消蚀——后现代视域下的女性消费. 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》,(4),43-46.
[19]
詹姆斯·凯瑞(2009/2019). 《作为文化的传播:“媒介与社会”论文集》(丁未译)(修订版). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[20]
张淑华, 李海莹, 刘芳(2012). 身份认同研究综述. 《心理研究》,(1),21-27.
[21]
Binkley, S. (2008). Liquid consumption: anti-consumerism and the fetishized de-fetishization of commodities. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 599-623.
[22]
Binkley, S., & Littler, J. (Eds.). (2014). Cultural Studies and Anti-consumerism. London, UK: Routledge.
[23]
Bosco, J. (2014). The problem of greed in economic anthropology: Sumptuary laws and new consumerism in China. Economic Anthropology, 1(1), 167-185.
[24]
Duesterhaus, M., Grauerholz, L., Weichsel, R., & Guittar, N. A. (2011). The cost of doing femininity: Gendered disparities in pricing of personal care products and services. Gender Issues, 28, 175-191.
[25]
Fuchs, C. (2011). Foundations of Critical Media and Information Studies. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
[26]
Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
[27]
Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
[28]
Ho, E. S. L. (1985). Values and Economic Development: Hong Kong and China (post-materialism). PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Michigan.
[29]
Holt, D. B. (2005). An interview with Juliet Schor. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 5-21.
[30]
Lash, S. (2002). Critique of Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[31]
Littler, J. (2005). Beyond the boycott: Anti-consumerism, cultural change and the limits of reflexivity. Cultural studies, 19(2), 227-252.
[32]
McNaughtan, H. (2012). Distinctive consumption and popular anti-consumerism: The case of Wall* E. Continuum, 26(5), 753-766.
[33]
Olaniran, B. (2008). Challenges to implementing e-learning in lesser developed countries. In Tomei, L. A. (Ed.). Online and Distance Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 3104-3118). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[34]
Portwood-Stacer, L. (2012). Anti-consumption as tactical resistance: Anarchists, subculture, and activist strategy. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 87-105.
[35]
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community, revised edition: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA:MIT press.
[36]
Shan, W. (2018). Post-materialism: what divides youth in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. East Asian Policy, 10(03), 87-98.
摘要
Post-materialism is a value orientation that gives priority to freedom of expression and participation in public affairs over fulfilment of material needs such as economic and physical security. Youth in Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China have significantly different levels of post-materialist values, with Hong Kongers scoring the highest and Mainlanders the lowest. These differences have led to their different political orientations.
[37]
Stevens, J. L., & Shanahan, K. J. (2017). Structured abstract:Anger, willingness, or clueless? Understanding why women pay a pink tax on the products they consume. In Stieler, M. (Ed.). Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future Marketing Trends: Proceedings of the 2016 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 571-575). Berlin, DE: Springer International Publishing.
[38]
Warwitz, S. (2005). Vom Sinn des Wagens. Warum Menschen sich gefährlichen Herausforderungen stellen. DAV, München-Innsbruck-Bozen. S. 96-111.
[39]
박지운, 최보길. (2015). 반소비주의 (Anti-Consumerism) 문화의 특징과 영향에 관한 연구: 캠페인 사례 분류를 중심으로. 디자인지식저널, 33, 285-293.

注释 [Notes]

1. 三坑是指Lolita服饰、汉服、JK服饰,由于这三种服饰很昂贵,同时喜欢这三种服饰的女生被称作“三坑少女”。

2. 种草,作为网络词汇,意思是分享推荐某一商品的优秀品质,以激发他人的购买欲望。

3. 抠抠子,网络上抠门青年群体的自称。

4. 拔草,原意是把草拔掉,作为网络词汇是指消除购买欲望。

基金

教育部重大课题攻关项目“大众传媒在文化建设中的功能和作用机制研究”(12JZD020)
重庆市高校协同创新研究团队“重庆大学新闻传播学”(Z20200504)

PDF(1564 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/