网络亲社会参与:概念、维度与测量——基于突发公共事件中社交媒体用户数据的实证研究

黄丽娜

国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 49-69.

PDF(1653 KB)
PDF(1653 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 49-69.
研究论文

网络亲社会参与:概念、维度与测量——基于突发公共事件中社交媒体用户数据的实证研究

作者信息 +

Online Prosocoal Participation: Concept, Dimension and Measurement: An Empirical Study Based on Social Media Users Data in the Public Emergencie

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

网络亲社会参与极具社会意义,但相较于对突发公共事件网络风险行为的研究热情,学术界对其还未有足够重视。要研究这一领域,首先应当明确如何从概念上去认识、理解,以及测度它。为此,本文设计了一个二阶段研究方案。首先通过网络文本采集与内容分析法,从行为表现视角来分析网络亲社会参与类别,从而解析用户参与内容,初步形成概念维度;其次引入量表开发的一般路径,进一步通过实证研究探索、验证概念维度,并在此基础上发展出有效的测量工具。研究发现,网络亲社会参与是社交媒体用户在线参与的重要内容,作为一个多维概念,它具有三个核心维度,包括“情感支持”“网络贡献”“爱心行动”,可以通过16个题项来实现有效测量。

Abstract

Online prosocial participation itself has great social significance, but compared with the research enthusiasm of network risk behavior in public emergencies, the academic community has not paid enough attention to it. To study this field, we should first clarify how to recognize, understand and measure it conceptually. Therefore, this paper designs a two-stage research scheme. Firstly, through the method of network text collection and content analysis, this paper analyzes the behavior categories of prosocial participation from the perspective of behavior performance, so as to analyze the specific behavior performance and initially form the conceptual dimension; Secondly, the general path of scale development is introduced to further explore and verify the conceptual dimension through empirical research, so as to develop effective measurement tools on this basis. It is found that network prosocial participation is an important content of users’ online participation; Online prosocial participation is a concept with three core dimensions, including “emotional support”, “Online contribution” and “charitable action”, which can be effectively measured through 16 items.

关键词

网络参与 / 亲社会行为 / 社交媒体 / 内容分析 / 因子分析

Key words

online prosocial participation / prosocial behavior / social media / content analysis / factor analysis

引用本文

导出引用
黄丽娜. 网络亲社会参与:概念、维度与测量——基于突发公共事件中社交媒体用户数据的实证研究[J]. 国际新闻界. 2022, 44(8): 49-69
HUANG Lina. Online Prosocoal Participation: Concept, Dimension and Measurement: An Empirical Study Based on Social Media Users Data in the Public Emergencie[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2022, 44(8): 49-69

参考文献

[1]
寇彧, 张庆鹏 (2006). 青少年亲社会行为的概念表征研究. 《社会学研究》,(5),169-187,245.
[2]
吴明隆(2013). 《结构方程模型:AMOS实务进阶》. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
[3]
杨成虎(2010). 公众网络参与若干问题探析. 《云南社会科学》,(3),24-27.
[4]
余来辉(2019).互联网群体传播中用户突发公共卫生事件参与行为研究.上海交通大学媒体与传播学院博士论文.上海.
[5]
曾润喜, 魏冯(2016). 政媒共治:灾难事件中网络造谣与辟谣的信息行为研究——基于“8·12天津爆炸事故”谣言的内容分析. 《电子政务》,(5),25-34.
[6]
张庆鹏, 寇彧(2011). 青少年亲社会行为测评维度的建立与验证. 《社会学研究》,(4),105-121,244.
[7]
宗乾进, 杨淑芳, 谌莹, 沈洪洲(2017). 突发性灾难中受灾地区社交媒体用户行为研究——基于对“天津8·12爆炸”相关微博日志的内容分析和纵向分析. 《信息资源管理学报》,(1)13-19,105.
[8]
朱智贤(1989). 《心理学大辞典》. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[9]
中国互联网络信息中心(2020). 第45次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告.检索于http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202004/P020210205505603631479.pdf.
[10]
Aronson E, Wilson T. D., & Akert R. M.(2004). Social Psychology. USR,NJ,US: Pearson prentice hall.
[11]
Barrett D. E., & Yarrow M. R. (1977). Prosocial behavior, social inferential ability, and assertiveness in children. Child Development, 48(2), 475-481.
[12]
Churchill G.A., & Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
A critical element in the evolution of a fundamental body of knowledge in marketing, as well as for improved marketing practice, is the development of better measures of the variables with which marketers work. In this article an approach is outlined by which this goal can be achieved and portions of the approach are illustrated in terms of a job satisfaction measure.
[13]
Didegah F., & Thelwall M. (2018). Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(8), 959-973.
[14]
Eisenberg N., Fabes R. A., & Spinrad T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:Social, emotional, and personality development, (pp. 646-718). NYC, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[15]
Khan M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on youtube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247.
[16]
Piliavin J. A., Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L., & Clark R. D., III. (1981). Emergency intervention. NYC, US : Academic.
[17]
Sarason I. G., Levine H. M., Basham R. B., & Sarason B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 127-139.
[18]
Warren A. M., Sulaiman A., & Jaafar N. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291-301.
[19]
Weber R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. London, UK: Sage Publications.
[20]
Wispe L.G. (1972), Positive forms of social behavior: An overview. Journal of social issues, 28(3), 1-19.
[21]
Yew J. C. (2011). Social Performances: A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding Online Prosocial Behavior. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, State of Michigan.
[22]
Yarrow B. (1977). Prosocial behavior, social inferential ability, and assertiveness in children. Child Development, 48(2), 475-481.

基金

教育部人文社会科学一般项目研究成果(19YJC860015)

PDF(1653 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/