信息穷人还是信息富人:可行能力视角下农村居民信息分化及政府支持的效应研究

陶建杰, 林晶珂, 尹子伊

国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 78-97.

PDF(1563 KB)
PDF(1563 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2) : 78-97.
传播学研究

信息穷人还是信息富人:可行能力视角下农村居民信息分化及政府支持的效应研究

作者信息 +

Info-poor or info-rich: The effects of government support on the information divide among rural residents from the perspective of capability approach

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文以可行能力为理论视角分析农村信息分化状况,根据信息能力和信息意识将农村居民分为四种类型:作为信息穷人的“滞后者”、作为信息富人的“领先者”、处于中层的“觉醒者”和“蛮干者”,并重点探讨政府支持的影响效应。研究发现,农村居民内部信息分化严重,“哑铃状”结构明显。中西部农村居民互联网相关能力差,信息获取经济意志低,要持续供给公益性信息服务,增加“数字软实力”。同时,“一对一”帮扶可有效改善信息贫困,信息服务有助于跨越式发展,“政策熟悉度”带来显著的持续性影响。人员、机构与政策支持嵌入农民的“信息小世界”时,可有效改善信息贫困。“可行信息能力”是“信息脱贫”内生动力的直接体现,需重视多维信息困境,加强政府柔性支持。

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to shed light on the information divide between residents in rural China under the perspective of information capabilities. According to information ability and information consciousness, rural residents are divided into four types: the “lag” as the information- poor, the “leader” as the information-rich, the “awakened” and the “unconscious” at the middle level. And the article focuses on the effects of the government support. The study found that with regards to the information divide among rural residents, these four types are distributed in a dumbbell shape, which means that the information-poor and the information-rich are further differentiated. And Internet-related capabilities are the weakest of rural residents’ information capabilities. In terms of willingness to obtain information, rural residents have high psychological will, but low economic will. Therefore, it is necessary to provide public information services to increase “digital soft power”. Through multiple logistic regression, “one-to-one” personnel assistance can effectively alleviate information poverty. In addition, information services can help leapfrog development from the information-poor to the information-rich, while “policy familiarity” has a significant lasting impact. That means information poverty can be effectively improved while personnel support, institutional support and policy support are embedded in rural residents’ “small worlds”. Altogether, information capabilities directly reflect the endogenous motivation of “information poverty alleviation”. It is necessary to pay attention to the multi-dimensional information dilemma and strengthen soft government support.

关键词

可行信息能力 / 信息分化 / 政府支持 / 信息贫困

Key words

information capabilities / Information divide / government support / Information poverty

引用本文

导出引用
陶建杰, 林晶珂, 尹子伊. 信息穷人还是信息富人:可行能力视角下农村居民信息分化及政府支持的效应研究[J]. 国际新闻界. 2022, 44(2): 78-97
TAO Jianjie, LIN Jingke, YIN Ziyi. Info-poor or info-rich: The effects of government support on the information divide among rural residents from the perspective of capability approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2022, 44(2): 78-97

参考文献

[1]
白俊红, 江可申, 李婧(2009). 应用随机前沿模型评测中国区域研发创新效率. 《管理世界》,(10),51-61.
[2]
程盟超(2018年12月14日). 这块屏幕可能改变命运.检索于 http://news.cyol.com/node_65534.htm?para1=News&para2=201812&para3=12&urlId=162390.
[3]
陈建(2017). 超越结构性失灵:农村公共文化服务供给侧改革研究. 《图书馆建设》,(9),37-43.
[4]
陈婕(2021). 政府支持、企业R&D投入与技术创新绩效关系研究. 《预测》,(2),40-46.
[5]
樊振佳, 程乐天(2017). 可行信息能力:一个信息分化问题学术概念的构建与阐释. 《图书情报工作》,(13),19-30.
[6]
金明生, 金璐(2010). 非均衡性语境下城乡居民信息分化现状调查——以浙江省为个案. 《情报科学》,(1),13-17+34.
[7]
李磊(2018). 政府研发补贴对新能源汽车产业技术创新产出的影响研究. 《科技管理研究》,(17),160-166.
[8]
李曼, 陆迁, 乔丹(2017). 技术认知、政府支持与农户节水灌溉技术采用——基于张掖甘州区的调查研究. 《干旱区资源与环境》,(12),27-32.
[9]
李润泽(2018). 《阿马蒂亚•森的可行能力平等理论研究》. 武汉大学哲学学院博士论文,武汉.
[10]
刘和发, 王俊丽(2017). 农民个人信息世界的分化及其影响因素. 《图书馆论坛》,(10),54-63.
[11]
刘杰, 戴丹, 邹英(2020). 基于可行能力视角的产业扶贫增能. 《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(5),91-98+109.
[12]
刘丽(2012). 农民:信息素养研究领域被忽视的群体——对国内研究现状的思考. 《情报科学》,(10),1572-1578.
[13]
侣传振, 李华胤(2017). 家户联结:探索村民自治基本单元的社会因素. 《广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(6),69-75.
[14]
欧阳红(2011). 农村城镇化发展中公共图书馆的发展战略. 《图书情报工作》,(S2),1-6.
[15]
邱林川(2009). 新型网络社会的劳工问题. 《开放时代》,(12),128-139.
[16]
王子敏(2017). 互联网、技能偏向与农村流动人口就业. 《人口与经济》,(2),107-115.
[17]
韦路, 张明新(2006). 第三道数字鸿沟:互联网上的知识沟. 《新闻与传播研究》,(4),43-53.
[18]
吴春梅, 陈文科(2004). 农业技术推广领域中的政府支持与公共服务职能研究. 《中国科技论坛》,(2),127-131.
[19]
吴晓蓉, 田晓苗(2020). 后扶贫时代我国农村教育反贫困的价值理性回归——基于可行能力理论视角. 《国家教育行政学院学报》,(6),29-34+81.
[20]
徐秋艳, 西力艾里·要勒巴司, 谭斌, (2017). 边疆少数民族连片特困地区多维贫困测度及空间分异——以新疆和田地区为例. 《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(3),91-97.
[21]
闫慧, 孙立立(2012). 1989年以来国内外数字鸿沟研究回顾: 内涵、表现维度及影响因素综述. 《中国图书馆学报》,(5),82-94.
[22]
于莲(2018). 以可行能力视角看待障碍:对现有残障模式的反思与探索. 《社会》,(4),160-179.
[23]
于良芝(2013). “个人信息世界”——一个信息不平等概念的发现及阐释. 《中国图书馆学报》,(1),4-12.
[24]
于良芝, 周文杰(2015). 信息穷人与信息富人:个人层次的信息不平等测度述评. 《图书与情报》,(1),53-60+76.
[25]
苑春荟, 龚振炜, 陈文晶, 万岩(2014). 农民信息素质量表编制及其信效度检验. 《情报科学》,(2),26-30.
[26]
詹姆斯·斯科特(1976/2013). 《农民的道德经济学:东南亚的反叛与生存》(程立显,刘建等译). 南京: 译林出版社.
[27]
张立彬, 杨军花(2006). 信息分化问题的社会学思考. 《情报科学》,(11),1611-1614+1619.
[28]
赵玉林, 谷军健(2018). 政府补贴分配倾向与创新激励的结构性偏差——基于中国制造业上市公司匹配样本分析. 《财政研究》,(4),61-74.
[29]
郑素侠(2018). 反贫困语境下农村地区的信息贫困:致贫机理与信息援助对策. 《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(2),154-157.
[30]
周文杰, 闫慧, 韩圣龙(2015). 基于信息源视野理论的信息贫富分化研究. 《中国图书馆学报》,(1),50-61.
[31]
Alkire, B.S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford University Press.
[32]
American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
[33]
Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021-2044.
[34]
Chatman, E. A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 207-217.
[35]
Clark, A. (2002). Hip Hop Headz and Digital Equity: A Descriptive Study of Internet Usage by African American Male College Students. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
[36]
Czarnitzki, D., & Licht, G. (2006). Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of eastern Germany. Economics of Transition, 14(1), 101-131.
[37]
Dutta, R. (2009). Information needs and information-seeking behavior in developing countries: A review of the research. International Information & Library Review, 41(1): 44-51.
[38]
Dykstra, A. (2015). Adoption of no-till agriculture: The Role of Information,Technology Perception,and Farmer Characteristics in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Master Paper, the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University.
[39]
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 301-317.
[40]
Gigler, B.S. (2011). Informational Capabilities - the missing link for the impact of ICT on development. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/19011.
[41]
Hawkins, E.T., & Hawkins, K.A. (2003). Bridging Latin America’s digital divide: Government policies and internet access. Journalism &Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 646-665.
[42]
Leckie, G.J. (1996). Female farmers and the social construction of access to agricultural information. Library and Information Science Research, 18(4), 297-321.
[43]
Luckmann, B. (1970). The small life-worlds of modern man. Social Research, 37, 580-596.
[44]
Madon., S. (2004). Evaluating the developmental impact of e-governance initiatives: An exploratory framework. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(1), 1-13.
[45]
Magesa, M.M., Michael, K., & Jesuk, Ko. (2020). Access and use of agricultural market information by smallholder farmers: Measuring informational capabilities. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86(12), e12134.
[46]
Mittal, S., & Mehar, M. (2016). Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of modern information and communication technology by farmers in India: Analysis using multivariate probit model. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 22(2), 1-14.
[47]
Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide? Civic Engagement,Information Poverty & The Internet Worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[48]
Schiller, H. (1996). Information Inequality: The Deepening Social Crisis in American. New York, NY: Routledge.
[49]
Sen, A. (1984). Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[50]
Sen, A. (1990). Justice: Means versus Freedoms. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19 (2), 111-21.
[51]
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York, NY: Knopf Press.
[52]
Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3),77—80.
[53]
Singh, M. K. (2013). Constraints in the utilization of information and communication technology by arable extension service in India. Environment & Ecology, 31(3A), 1414-1418.
[54]
Sweetland, J. H. (1993). Information poverty - let me count the ways. Database Magazine, 16(4), 8-10.
[55]
UNESCO. (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: Country Readiness and Competencies. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000224655?posInSet=1&queryId=f17162f6-5d8f-4683-bee1-63925b58dfed
[56]
Van, Dijk. Jan. (1997). Universal service from the perspective of consumers and citizens: Report to the information society forum. Paper presented at European Commission, Brussels.
[57]
Walsham, G. (2010). ICTs for the broad development of India: An analysis of the literature. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 41(4), 1-20.
[58]
Yeung, P., & Breheny, M. (2016). Using the capability approach to understand the determinants of subjective well-being among community-dwelling older people in New Zealand. Age and Ageing, 45, 292-298.
as the longevity of the population increases, attention has turned to quality of life of older people as a component of healthy ageing. The objective of this study was to use Welch Saleeby's model of the capability approach to explore the determinants of subjective well-being among older people.this analysis used data from a sample of older people, aged 50-87, from 2012 wave of the New Zealand Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NZLSA) (n = 2,793). Structural equation modelling was used to examine the relationships between the commodities (number of chronic conditions reported, physical and mental health), and personal and environmental factors (economic living standard and discrimination), on the capabilities of older people to achieve well-being.the findings supported Welch Saleeby's model. Capabilities mediated the relationship between commodities and well-being, indicating that increasing the range of real opportunities available to older people is a key step in increasing well-being. Age and gender were also found to be significant moderators of these relationships. The relationship between economic living standards and well-being was weakest for the oldest participants, but experiences of discrimination had a stronger effect on well-being in this age group.Welch Saleeby's model of the capability approach provides a useful framework for advancing the ethics of care as it highlights the multidimensional nature of well-being in later life. Focusing on expanding capabilities for older people enables policymakers and practitioners to understand the resources and supports required to enable well-being in the context of health challenges.© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
[59]
Yu, L. (2006). Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divide. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 38(4), 229-252.
This paper reviews related research since the early 1990s on the information and digital divides. It shows that, despite their shared concerns with illustrating social inequality through the lens of information resource distribution, the two areas in effect represent two overlapping research communities. The research focus and discourse of the former were primarily shaped by three different theoretical perspectives and were inspired by a fairly strong sense of ethical principles; those of the latter, on the other hand, were shaped primarily by four different political standpoints and were imbued with a fairly strong concern for political and economical interests. The co-existence of multifarious perspectives and standpoints has produced divergent, and sometimes contradictory, research findings and policy recommendations, which inevitably perplex researchers and policy makers. The paper concludes with some suggestions for future research and policy making.
[60]
Yu, L., Zhou, W., Yu, B., & Liu, H. (2016). Towards a comprehensive measurement of the information rich and poor: Based on the conceptualization of individuals as information agents. Journal of Documentation, 72(4), 614-635.
– Following the assumption that studies of information inequality need to be based on precise discrimination between society’s information rich and poor and against the context that a mechanism for such discrimination is still lacking, the purpose of this paper is to explore the possibility of establishing a holistic informational measurement.

注释 [Notes]

1. 国务院新闻办人类减贫的中国实践。检索于 http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/ndhf/44691/Document/1701664/1701664.htm

2. 中共中央国务院关于全面推进乡村振兴加快农业农村现代化的意见。检索于 http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/zwdt/202102/t20210221_6361863.htm

基金

2018年国家社科基金一般项目“信息扶贫精准传播机制与模式研究”(18BXW063)

PDF(1563 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/