表达的具象度与距离感:危机传播模式中两个关键性变量的效应评测

付佳, 喻国明

国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12) : 84-108.

PDF(1591 KB)
PDF(1591 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12) : 84-108.
研究论文

表达的具象度与距离感:危机传播模式中两个关键性变量的效应评测

作者信息 +

The concreteness of expression and the distance perception: Effect evaluation of two key variables in the crisis communication model

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

危机回应是一种有说服力的沟通方式,是组织为了避免或减少舆论危机对其声誉产生不良影响的常用方法之一。然而,危机回应时组织应该“如何说”在很大程度上被研究者所忽视。本研究利用双重编码理论和解释水平理论构建有调节的中介模型,检验传播表达模式的具象度对组织声誉的影响。研究结果发现,在危机情境中组织采用高具象度的传播表达模式会给组织声誉带来积极影响,该影响是通过受众对回应信息的可理解性起作用的,但这一过程会受到距离感的调节。高具象度的危机回应将为被受众感知距离接近的组织带来更高的组织声誉;相反,低具象度的危机回应将为被受众感知距离遥远的组织带来更高的组织声誉。

Abstract

Crisis response is a persuasive form of communication, one of the common method to avoid or reduce the damage to organizational reputation when faced with a crisis in public opinion. However, the “how to say” in organizational crisis response has been largely ignored by researchers. This study uses dual coding theory and construal level theory to construct a moderated mediation model to test the effect of concreteness of communication expression style on organizational reputation. The results of the study showed that, in a crisis situation, the communication expression style of high concreteness adopted by an organization will have a positive impact on the organization’s reputation, the effect is mediated by the audience’s comprehensibility of the response message, but this process is moderated by the distance perception. High concreteness crisis response will bring higher organizational reputation for organizations perceived to be close to the audience. On the contrary, low concreteness crisis response will bring higher organizational reputation to organizations perceived as distant by the audience.

关键词

危机回应 / 传播表达模式 / 双重编码理论 / 解释水平理论

Key words

crisis response / communication expression style / dual coding theory / construal level theory

引用本文

导出引用
付佳, 喻国明. 表达的具象度与距离感:危机传播模式中两个关键性变量的效应评测[J]. 国际新闻界. 2022, 44(12): 84-108
FU Jia, YU Guoming. The concreteness of expression and the distance perception: Effect evaluation of two key variables in the crisis communication model[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2022, 44(12): 84-108

参考文献

[1]
北京日报(2021). 有温度的回应!北京市政府就“误伤”市民致歉获一片好评. 检索于: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1715374200245223157&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[2]
卞世博, 贾德奎, 阎志鹏(2020). 招股说明书负面语调与IPO表现. 《系统管理学报》,(29),1025-1033.
[3]
陈经超, 吴倩(2017). 社交媒体“类危机”沟通策略效果研究. 《新闻与传播研究》,(24),62-78.
[4]
冯丙奇, 朱广慧(2007). 跨国品牌危机回应策略分析——形象修护的视角. 《国际新闻界》,(04),59-62.
[5]
宫贺, 黄苗红, 柯颖妮(2020). 幽默的“两面性”:社交媒介危机回应的效果与影响因素. 《新闻与传播研究》,(27),58-76.
[6]
赖胜强(2014). 在线点评信息抽象性的说服效果研究. 《情报资料工作》,(4),45-49.
[7]
李思贤, 宋艾珈, 段锦云(2022). 言语具体程度对建议采纳的影响: 性别的作用. 《心理研究》,(15),230-235.
[8]
人民日报(2014). “模式回应”影响公信“自说自话”回避问题、“光说不练”搪塞群众:政府回应, 有姿态还要有干货(深阅读). 检索于http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2014/0912/c1001-25645697.html.
[9]
孙斐(2022). 政府形式回应是无奈之举还是必要手段:一个整合性归因模型. 《上海行政学院学报》,(1),28-41.
[10]
谢德仁, 林乐(2015). 管理层语调能预示公司未来业绩吗?——基于我国上市公司年度业绩说明会的文本分析. 《会计研究》,(2),20-27.
[11]
张继勋, 张广冬, 杨小娟(2021). 社交媒体建议理由具体性、发帖人经验与投资者判断— —一项实验研究. 《南开管理评论》,(24),131-135.
[12]
证券时报(2021). 硬刚!贝壳强力回击浑水做空:数据严重失实!中信证券力挺贝壳:廊坊数据不能代表全国. 检索于https://www.stcn.com/xw/sd/202112/t20211218_3985014.html.
[13]
钟新, 陈婷(2022). 公共卫生危机语境下的国家在场与乡村动员:湖南省双溪村新冠疫情防控传播体系调查. 《国际新闻界》,(4),6-29.
[14]
Aerts G., Smits T., & Verlegh P. W. (2017). How online consumer reviews are influenced by the language and valence of prior reviews: A construal level perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 75(October), 855-864.
[15]
Aljarah A., Dalal B., Ibrahim B., & Lahuerta-Otero E. (2022). The attribution effects of CSR motivations on brand advocacy: psychological distance matters. The Service Industries Journal, 42(7-8), 583-605.
[16]
Appel M., & Richter T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13(2), 101-135.
[17]
Atav G., Chatterjee S., & Roy R. (2021). To forgive or retaliate? How regulatory fit affects emotional reactions and repurchase decisions following product failures. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(4), 397-409.
When a product fails out of negligence on the seller’s part, consumers can either retaliate against the seller, more so if a third party encourages them to do so, or forgive the seller should the seller express remorse. This paper aims to examine how the fit between the consumer’s promotion/prevention regulatory orientation and the promotion/prevention frame of a message of contrition (retaliation), such as an apology from a chief executive officer (CEO) (a class action suit threat by a lawyer), affects such forgiveness (retaliation) intentions in the form of product repurchase decisions.
[18]
Barefoot S. M., Bochner J. H., Johnson B. A., & Eigen, B. A. V.(1993). Rating deaf speakers’ comprehensibility: An exploratory investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2(3), 31-35.
[19]
Benoit W. L., & Drew S. (1997). Appropriateness and effectiveness of image repair strategies. Communication reports, 10(2), 153-163.
[20]
Bonfanti A., Vigolo V., & Negri F. (2016). Hotel responses to guests’ online reviews:An exploratory study on communication styles. In Inversini, A., & ScheggR.(Eds.). Information and communication technologies in tourism 2016 (pp. 397-409). Switzerland,Cham: Springer-Verlag.
[21]
Cengiz E. (2019). Highlighting the concrete language in IFRS based footnote. Would that really help to increase willingness to invest?. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 20(1), 127-140.
[22]
Chung S., & Park J. (2017). Exploring consumer evaluations in social media: The role of psychological distance between company and consumer. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 312-320.
[23]
Claeys A. S., Cauberghe V., & Vyncke P. (2010). Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control. Public Relations Review, 36(3), 256-262.
[24]
Clementson D. E. (2020). Narrative persuasion, identification, attitudes, and trustworthiness in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101889.
[25]
Cohen M., Jaffray J. Y., & Said T. (1987). Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 1-22.
[26]
Connors S., Khamitov M., Thomson M., & Perkins A. (2021). They’re just not that into you: How to leverage existing consumer-brand relationships through social psychological distance. Journal of Marketing, 85(5), 92-108.
[27]
Coombs W. T. (2004). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 41(3), 265-289.
[28]
Coombs W. T. (2013). Situational theory of crisis:Situational crisis communication theory and corporate reputation. In Carroll, C. E. (Eds.). The handbook of communication and corporate reputation (pp.262-278). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[29]
Coombs W. T. (2018). Rhetoric as the Progenitor:The Creation and Expansion of Crisis. In Ihlen, Y., & HeathR. L. (Eds.). The Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication (pp.429-437). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[30]
Coombs W. T., & Holladay S. J. (2005). An exploratory study of stakeholder emotions:Affect and crises. In Ashkanasy, N. M., ZerbeW. J. & Härtel,C. E. J. (Eds.). The effect of affect in organizational settings (pp.263-280). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[31]
Dean D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 41(2), 192-211.
[32]
Doney P. M., & Cannon J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
[33]
Dutta S., & Pullig C. (2011). Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1281-1287.
[34]
Elliott W. B., Rennekamp K. M., & White B. J. (2015). Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest?. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(2), 839-865.
[35]
Fediuk T. A., Coombs W. T., & Botero I. C. (2010). Exploring crisis from a receiver perspective:Understanding stakeholder reactions during crisis events. In Coombs, W.& Holladay, S. J. (Eds.). The handbook of crisis communication (pp.635-656.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[36]
Fediuk T. A., Pace K. M., & Botero I. C. (2010). Crisis response effectiveness:Methodological considerations for advancement in empirical investigation into response impact. In Coombs, W.& Holladay, S.J. (Eds.). The handbook of crisis communication (pp.221-242.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
[37]
Fombrun C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. M.(2004). Fame and Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Prentice Hall.
[38]
Fombrun C. J., Gardberg N. A., & Sever J. M. (2000). The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241-255.
[39]
Fujita K., Henderson M. D., Eng J., Trope Y., & Liberman N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278-282.
[40]
Guerber A. J., Anand V., Ellstrand A. E., Waller M. A., & Reychav I. (2020). Extending the situational crisis communication theory: the impact of linguistic style and culture. Corporate Reputation Review, 23(2), 106-127.
[41]
Hall S. (1973). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Birmingham.
[42]
Hansen J., & Wänke M. (2010). Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1576-1588.
In four experiments, the impact of concreteness of language on judgments of truth was examined. In Experiments 1 and 2, it was found that statements of the very same content were judged as more probably true when they were written in concrete language than when they were written in abstract language. Findings of Experiment 2 also showed that this linguistic concreteness effect on judgments of truth could most likely be attributed to greater perceived vividness of concrete compared to abstract statements. Two further experiments demonstrated an additional fit effect: The truth advantage of concrete statements occurred especially when participants were primed with a concrete (vs. abstract) mind-set (Experiment 3) or when the statements were presented in a spatially proximal (vs. distant) location (Experiment 4). Implications for communication strategies are discussed.
[43]
Hartley N., & Green T. (2017). Consumer construal of separation in virtual services. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(2),358-383
Service encounters are becoming increasingly virtual through the infusion of computer-mediated technologies. Virtual services separate consumers and service providers both spatially and temporally. With the advent of virtual services is the need to theoretically explain how service separability is psychologically perceived by consumers across the spectrum of computer-mediated technologies. Drawing on construal-level theory, the purpose of this paper is to conceptualize a theoretical framework depicting consumer’s construal of spatial and temporal separation across a continuum of technology-mediated service virtuality.
[44]
Hastie R., & Dawes R. M. (2009). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. London, UK: Sage Publications.
[45]
Hayes A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis:A Regression-based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford publications.
[46]
Hong S., & Kim B. (2019). Exploring social media use in university crisis communication: An experiment to measure impact on perceived crisis severity and attitudes of key publics. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 27(1), 61-71.
[47]
Jin Y. (2010). Making sense sensibly in crisis communication: How publics’ crisis appraisals influence their negative emotions, coping strategy preferences, and crisis response acceptance. Communication Research, 37(4), 522-552.
Despite the importance of affect in persuasion and strategic communication decision making, there is a lack of a systematic and integrated approach to understanding how discrete emotions publics experience in crises and their behavioral tendencies are associated with their cognitive appraisals. A 2 (predictability: high and low) × 2 (controllability: high and low) between-subjects experiment using a random general public sample was designed to examine the variance in publics’ affective responses, their strategies of coping with crises, and their acceptance of different organizational crisis responses, as a function of publics’ appraisal of crisis predictability and controllability. Differential influences of the cognitive appraisals were found on publics’ negative emotional responses (i.e., anger, sadness, and fright) as well as their coping strategy and organizational crisis response preferences.
[48]
Kapuściński G., Zhang N., Zeng L., & Cao A. (2021). Effects of crisis response tone and spokesperson's gender on employer attractiveness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102884.
[49]
Kelleher T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172-188.
[50]
Kent M. L. (2015). The power of storytelling in public relations: Introducing the 20 master plots. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 480-489.
[51]
Kim H., Rao A. R., & Lee A. Y. (2009). It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 877-889.
[52]
Kim S., Jin Y., & Reber B. H. (2020). Assessing an organizational crisis at the construal level: how psychological distance impacts publics’ crisis responses. Journal of Communication Management, 24(4),319-337
The purpose of this study is to elaborate on the notion of crisis distance and to investigate its influence on publics' crisis responses (i.e. crisis severity, crisis emotions, organizational reputation and supportive behavioral intentions). In addition, this study aims to unearth the underlying mechanisms behind the effects of crisis distance.
[53]
Kim S., Zhang X. A., & Zhang B. W. (2016). Self-mocking crisis strategy on social media: Focusing on Alibaba chairman Jack Ma in China. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 903-912.
[54]
Labrecque L. I., Swani K., & Stephen A. T. (2020). The impact of pronoun choices on consumer engagement actions: exploring top global brands' social media communications. Psychology & Marketing, 37(6), 796-814.
[55]
Laufer D., & Coombs W. T. (2006). How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues. Business Horizons, 49(5), 379-385.
[56]
Lee H., & Jahng M. R. (2020). The role of storytelling in crisis communication: a test of crisis severity, crisis responsibility, and organizational trust. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 981-1002.
[57]
Lee S. Y., Sung Y. H., Choi D., & Kim D. H. (2021). Surviving a crisis: how crisis type and psychological distance can inform corporate crisis responses. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 795-811.
[58]
Li J., Zou S., & Yang H. (2019). How does “storytelling” influence consumer trust in we media advertorials? An investigation in China. Journal of Global Marketing, 32(5), 319-334.
[59]
Lii Y. S., Wu K. W., & Ding M. C. (2013). Doing good does good? Sustainable marketing of CSR and consumer evaluations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 15-28.
[60]
Lippmann M., Schwartz N. H., Jacobson N. G., & Narciss S. (2019). The concreteness of titles affects metacognition and study motivation. Instructional Science, 47(3), 257-277.
[61]
Liu B. F., Austin L., Lee Y. I., Jin Y., & Kim S. (2020). Telling the tale: The role of narratives in helping people respond to crises. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(3), 328-349.
[62]
Ludwig S., De Ruyter K., Friedman M., Brüggen E. C., Wetzels M., & Pfann G. (2013). More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 87-103.
Customers increasingly rely on other consumers' reviews to make purchase decisions online. New insights into the customer review phenomenon can be derived from studying the semantic content and style properties of verbatim customer reviews to examine their influence on online retail sites' conversion rates. The authors employ text mining to extract changes in affective content and linguistic style properties of customer book reviews on Amazon.com. A dynamic panel data model reveals that the influence of positive affective content on conversion rates is asymmetrical, such that greater increases in positive affective content in customer reviews have a smaller effect on subsequent increases in conversion rate. No such tapering-off effect occurs for changes in negative affective content in reviews. Furthermore, positive changes in affective cues and increasing congruence with the product interest group's typical linguistic style directly and conjointly increase conversion rates. These findings suggest that managers should identify and promote the most influential reviews in a given product category, provide instructions to stimulate reviewers to write powerful reviews, and adapt the style of their own editorial reviews to the relevant product category.
[63]
Maiorescu R. D. (2016). Crisis management at General Motors and Toyota: An analysis of gender-specific communication and media coverage. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 556-563.
[64]
Millar D. P., & Heath R. L. (2003). A rhetorical approach to crisis communication:Management, communication processes, and strategic responses. In Millar, D. P., & HeathR. L. (Eds.). Responding to crisis (pp.9-26). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
[65]
Miller C. H., Lane L. T., Deatrick L. M., Young A. M., & Potts K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219-240.
[66]
Norton R. W. (1978). Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 99-112.
[67]
Packard G., & Berger J. (2021). How concrete language shapes customer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 787-806.
Consumers are often frustrated by customer service. But could a simple shift in language help improve customer satisfaction? We suggest that linguistic concreteness—the tangibility, specificity, or imaginability of words employees use when speaking to customers—can shape consumer attitudes and behaviors. Five studies, including text analysis of over 1,000 real consumer–employee interactions in two different field contexts, demonstrate that customers are more satisfied, willing to purchase, and purchase more when employees speak to them concretely. This occurs because customers infer that employees who use more concrete language are listening (i.e., attending to and understanding their needs). These findings deepen understanding of how language shapes consumer behavior, reveal a psychological mechanism by which concreteness impacts person perception, and provide a straightforward way that managers could help enhance customer satisfaction.
[68]
Paivio A. (2013). Imagery and Verbal Processes. Brighton, UK: Psychology Press.
[69]
Pan L., McNamara G., Lee J. J., Haleblian J., & Devers C. E. (2018). Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2204-2225.
[70]
Park H., & Cameron G. T. (2014). Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 487-507.
[71]
Proost K., Germeys F., & Schreurs B. (2012). When does self-promotion work? The influence of temporal distance on interviewer evaluations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3),109-117
Based on temporal construal theory, this study examined how temporal distance (i.e., hiring someone for the near vs. distant future) influences the effectiveness of different types of self-promotion, applied by a fictive applicant in a personnel selection interview. Findings of two experiments were in line with our predictions that promoting oneself in a direct way (i.e., referring to one’s own achievements) or in concrete terms (i.e., focusing on situation-specific behaviors) is more successful when applying for immediate entry whereas promoting oneself in an indirect way (i.e., emphasizing connections with others) or in abstract terms (i.e., focusing on traits) is more successful when applying for a vacancy to be filled in the distant future.
[72]
Rachfał E. (2016). Towards a linguistic model of crisis response (CRModel): A study of crisis communication in the phone hacking scandal. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(2), 215-236.
[73]
Ran Y., Wei H., & Li Q. (2016). Forgiveness from emotion fit: emotional frame, consumer emotion, and feeling-right in consumer decision to forgive. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1775.
Three studies examine an emotion fit effect in the crisis communication, namely, the interaction between emotional frames of guilt and shame and consumer emotions of anger and fear on consumer forgiveness. Guilt-framing communication results in higher forgiveness than shame-framing for angry consumers, whereas shame-framing communication results in higher forgiveness than guilt-framing for fearful consumers. These effects are driven by consumers' accessible regulatory foci associated with anger/fear and guilt/shame. Specifically, feelings of anger activate a promotion focus that is represented by guilt frames, while feelings of fear activate a prevention focus that is enacted by shame frames. Compared with emotion non-fit (i.e., anger to shame and fear to guilt), emotion fit (i.e., anger to guilt and fear to shame) facilitates greater feeling-right and consumer forgiveness. The findings offer novel insights for extant literature on emotion, crisis communication, and regulatory focus theory, as well as practical suggestions regarding the emotional frames.
[74]
Reber R., Schwarz N., & Winkielman P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
We propose that aesthetic pleasure is a function of the perceiver's processing dynamics: The more fluently perceivers can process an object, the more positive their aesthetic response. We review variables known to influence aesthetic judgments, such as figural goodness, figure-ground contrast, stimulus repetition, symmetry, and prototypicality, and trace their effects to changes in processing fluency. Other variables that influence processing fluency, like visual or semantic priming, similarly increase judgments of aesthetic pleasure. Our proposal provides an integrative framework for the study of aesthetic pleasure and sheds light on the interplay between early preferences versus cultural influences on taste, preferences for both prototypical and abstracted forms, and the relation between beauty and truth. In contrast to theories that trace aesthetic pleasure to objective stimulus features per se, we propose that beauty is grounded in the processing experiences of the perceiver, which are in part a function of stimulus properties.
[75]
Reynolds B., & Quinn S. C. (2008). Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4_suppl), 13S-17S.
[76]
Riley T. J., Semin G. R., & Yen A. C. (2014). Patterns of language use in accounting narratives and their impact on investment-related judgments and decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(1), 59-84.
Recent research has examined the role of accounting narratives on investors' judgments and decisions. This study extends this line of inquiry by examining the effects of language categories on investors' judgments and decisions—the notion that narratives written with different predicates (verbs versus adjectives/nouns) will have a differential effect on investors. We use a language classification system, the Linguistic Category Model (LCM), to identify linguistic categories that vary on the dimension of abstractness/concreteness. First, the validity of the LCM in an accounting context is tested by analyzing quarterly earnings press releases. Results show that the language in press releases is more concrete (abstract) when the associated financial information is positive (negative). Second, an experiment to examine the effect of language categories on investors' judgments and decisions is conducted. The findings indicate that investors are least (most) likely to invest when a negatively (positively) valenced narrative is written concretely.
[77]
Swani K., & Milne G. R. (2017). Evaluating facebook brand content popularity for service versus goods offerings. Journal of Business Research, 79(10), 123-133.
[78]
Sadoski, M., & Paivio A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. Theoretical models and processes of reading. In Alvermann, D. E., UnrauN. J., RuddellR. B. (Eds.). Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th ed.) (pp. 1329-1362). International Reading Association.
[79]
Sadoski M., & Paivio A. (2013). Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. Oxfordshire UK: Routledge.
[80]
Sadoski M., Goetz E. T., & Rodriguez M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 85.
[81]
Schindler R. M., & Bickart B. (2012). Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(3), 234-243.
[82]
Schwarz N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. In Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski, E Tory Higgins, Handbook of theories of social psychology, (pp.289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[83]
Smith A. K., Bolton R. N., & Wagner J. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of marketing research, 36(3), 356-372.
Customers often react strongly to service failures, so it is critical that an organization's recovery efforts be equally strong and effective. In this article, the authors develop a model of customer satisfaction with service failure/recovery encounters based on an exchange framework that integrates concepts from both the consumer satisfaction and social justice literature, using principles of resource exchange, mental accounting, and prospect theory. The research employs a mixed-design experiment, conducted using a survey method, in which customers evaluate various failure/recovery scenarios and complete a questionnaire with respect to an organization they recently had patronized. The authors execute the research in the context of two different service settings, restaurants and hotels. The results show that customers prefer to receive recovery resources that “match” the type of failure they experience in “amounts” that are commensurate with the magnitude of the failure that occurs. The findings contribute to the understanding of theoretical principles that explain customer evaluations of service failure/recovery encounters and provide managers with useful guidelines for establishing the proper “fit” between a service failure and the recovery effort.
[84]
Tausczik Y. R., & Pennebaker J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54.
We are in the midst of a technological revolution whereby, for the first time, researchers can link daily word use to a broad array of real-world behaviors. This article reviews several computerized text analysis methods and describes how Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) was created and validated. LIWC is a transparent text analysis program that counts words in psychologically meaningful categories. Empirical results using LIWC demonstrate its ability to detect meaning in a wide variety of experimental settings, including to show attentional focus, emotionality, social relationships, thinking styles, and individual differences.
[85]
Theodorakis I. G., & Painesis G. (2018). The impact of psychological distance and construal level on consumers' responses to taboos in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 161-181.
[86]
Toma C. L., & D’Angelo J. D. (2015). Tell-tale words: Linguistic cues used to infer the expertise of online medical advice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 25-45.
This article analyzes the linguistic cues used by naïve perceivers to assess the expertise of online medical advice. We develop a theoretical framework of linguistic correlates to perceived expertise and test it on a corpus of 120 online medical advice messages, written by either medical doctors or laypersons. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analyses show that messages were perceived as more expert if they contained more words (an indicator of uncertainty reduction), fewer I-pronouns and anxiety-related words (indicators of psychological distancing), and more long words and negations (indicators of cognitive complexity). These linguistic cues explained over a third of the variance in expertise ratings. Although unaware of the author of each message, perceivers were able to discern between messages written by doctors versus laypersons. However, only long words were helpful in making this distinction. Results advance the literature on linguistic correlates of psychological processes.
[87]
Torelli C. J., Monga A. B., & Kaikati A. M. (2012). Doing poorly by doing good: Corporate social responsibility and brand concepts. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 948-963.
[88]
Trope Y., & Liberman N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.
[89]
Trope Y., Liberman N., & Wakslak C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Construal level theory (CLT) is an account of how psychological distance influences individuals' thoughts and behavior. CLT assumes that people mentally construe objects that are psychologically near in terms of low-level, detailed, and contextualized features, whereas at a distance they construe the same objects or events in terms of high-level, abstract, and stable characteristics. Research has shown that different dimensions of psychological distance (time, space, social distance, and hypotheticality) affect mental construal and that these construals, in turn, guide prediction, evaluation, and behavior. The present paper reviews this research and its implications for consumer psychology.
[90]
Tsai W. H. S., & Men L. R. (2017). Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1848-1867.
As one of the first empirical analyses focusing on corporate executive officers’ (CEOs) communication style on social media and its impacts, the study aims to advance the theoretical understanding of CEO sociability and the mechanism underneath its effects on the broader public relations outcome of organization–public relationship and public advocacy. Through a quantitative survey with 332 social media users who have followed corporate CEOs on social media, this study illuminated how CEOs’ responsive and assertive communications induce the CEOs’ followers to perceive the corporate leaders as amicable role models and caring friends, which in turn improve their trust of, satisfaction with, and advocacy for the company. Hence, the findings highlight the pivotal role of CEOs as chief engagement officer in developing meaningful interpersonal interactions and relationships with today’s digital savvy publics.
[91]
Turk J. V., Jin Y., Stewart S., Kim J., & Hipple J. R. (2012). Examining the interplay of an organization's prior reputation, CEO's visibility, and immediate response to a crisis. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 574-583.
[92]
Usunier J. C., & Roulin N. (2010). The influence of high-and low-context communication styles on the design, content, and language of business-to-business web sites. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 47(2), 189-227.
[93]
Varonis E. M., & Gass S. (1982). The comprehensibility of non-native speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 114-136.
[94]
Walker S. M., Earnhardt M. P., Newcomer J. M., Marion Jr J. W., & Tomlinson J. C. (2016). Crisis leadership during the Great Recession of 2008. International Journal of Leadership and Change, 4(1), 9.
[95]
Wang B., Liu S. Q., Kandampully J., & Bujisic M. (2020). How color affects the effectiveness of taste-versus health-focused restaurant advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 49(5), 557-574.
[96]
Wang Q., Ngai C. S. B., & Singh R. G. (2021). A discursive analysis of crisis response strategies in CEO apologies—Drawing on linguistic insights from the appraisal framework. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(4), 602-622.
When corporations are confronted with a crisis, well-crafted CEO apologies can serve to repair, restore, and rebuild a damaged corporate image. In prior research, the use of linguistic resources exhibited in CEO corporate apology discourse for different crisis response strategies has not been sufficiently examined. Drawing on the appraisal framework and subsumed linguistic resources, this study analyzed the discursive construction of crisis response strategies in the corporate apology discourse of leading companies listed in the Fortune Global 2000. The findings revealed an integrated use of crisis response strategies in which attitude appraisal resources predominated, while different types of appraisal resources were deployed in various crisis response strategies to achieve rhetorical persuasion in corporate communication. The proposed framework integrating crisis response strategies in CEO apology discourse with appraisal resources could guide CEOs and crisis communicators to use the right words when composing corporate apologies.
[97]
Webster C., & Sundaram D. S. (2009). Effect of service provider's communication style on customer satisfaction in professional services setting: the moderating role of criticality and service nature. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(2),103-113
This study aims to examine the relationship between service providers' communication style and customer satisfaction and how service criticality and nature moderate this relationship.
[98]
Wu J., Chen J., Chen H., Dou W., & Shao D. (2019). What to say on social media and how: Effects of communication style and function on online customer engagement in China. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 29(5), 691-707
The purpose of this paper is to investigate how nonprofit service providers can better engage their customers through online communication. It identifies two communication styles and three communication functions, and examines their impact on customer commenting, customer liking and customer sharing.
[99]
Xu H., Lee E., & Rim H. (2022). Should businesses take a stand? Effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers’ expectation and evaluation of corporate social advocacy. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(8), 840-863
[100]
Yang S. U., Kang M., & Johnson P. (2010). Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication Research, 37(4), 473-497.
This study focused on individual interpretation of crisis communication messages and aimed to examine which forms of crisis narratives can enhance audience engagement in crisis communication such as reduction of negative emotions. An experimental study was conducted, simulating audience experience with blog posts written for crisis communication. Data suggest that the openness to dialogic communication is essential to creating and enhancing audience engagement in crisis communication, which, in turn, leads to positive postcrisis perceptions. Among several dimensions of audience engagement, reduction of negative emotions was a critical mediator that connected the impact of openness to dialogic communication with positive postcrisis perceptions.
[101]
Zhang X., Tao W., & Kim S. (2014). A comparative study on global brands’ micro blogs between China and USA: Focusing on communication styles and branding strategies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 8(4), 231-249.
[102]
Zhuo B., & Lovari A. (2021). Rethinking crisis dynamics from the perspective of online publics: A case study of Dolce & Gabbana’s China crisis. Public Relations Inquiry, 10(3), 311-331.
On November 18, 2018, the Italian fashion house Dolce & Gabbana (D&G) released a controversial video on all their social media channels. The video triggered an instant outcry from the general Chinese public, who called the video a racist caricature of Chinese culture. D&G responded to the crisis with several image repair strategies. This study examines D&G’s crisis communication efforts in the wake of this incident. Departing from corporate-oriented perspectives prevalent in the field of public relations, this study employs a dynamic, public-oriented view of crisis communication, which focuses on the dynamic, interactive process of crisis development from the standpoint of the publics. By analyzing communicative behavior on Twitter (an increasingly influential alternative public sphere in China) and in particular, comments and responses toward the crisis communication strategies employed by D&G, we have identified four prominent themes, or ways that publics framed their key messages against the corporation: “Apology not enough”; “Apology done badly”; “Call to unite against D&G”; and “Sarcasm, mockery, and abuse.” And they can be interpreted as a number of crisis communication strategies of the global, online publics. Based on our analysis of the D&G case, we discuss the theoretical implications of a dynamic, public-oriented perspective (DPOP) on crisis communication, highlighting its key areas of difference from the corporate-oriented perspective (COP).

致谢[Acknowledgement]

感谢华南理工大学新闻与传播学院硕士生许昕栩同学在数据采集中所做的工作。

基金

国家社科基金一般项目“松-紧文化理论视角下第三人效果的作用及机制研究”(20BXW104)

PDF(1591 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/