PDF(1551 KB)
PDF(1551 KB)
PDF(1551 KB)
“媒介化移动”：手机与地铁乘客的移动节奏
“Mediatized Mobilities”: A Rhythmanalysis on Metro Passengers’ Mobile Phone Use
手机等现代传播科技的普遍使用与移动性的塑造密不可分，尤其是在地铁这样一个双重封闭的空间中。数字网络中的“移动”事实上改变了乘客本身的物理移动体验，如何理解这种相互建构的“移动”就构成了本研究的主要问题。借助列斐伏尔的“节奏分析”，本研究发现，乘客的时-空体验关联于手机所带来的移动潜能，由此经验到三个维度的不同移动节奏，包括旨在定制化个人移动体验的“同步节奏”，主动暂停移动的“异步节奏”，以及物理移动与虚拟移动交互而形成的“等律节奏”。本研究以“媒介化移动”来指称这样一种复合移动形态，从而确立手机等信息传播技术之物质性维度在形塑移动生成中的基础性地位。最后，本研究还对节奏分析与移动性研究的未来方向提出展望。
Passengers’ mobile phone use in metro system contributes to the construction of various mobilities in which the virtual mobility can reshape passengers’ physical mobility and vice versa. Taking departure from Lefebvre’s rhythmanalysis, this paper argues there exist three different kinds of rhythms during passengers’ travelling times which are polyrhythmia, eurhythmia and isorhythmia based on the conceptualization of “mediatized mobilities”. This paper highlights the materiality of mobile phone as a crucial anchor in shaping and reshaping of passengers’ mobilities. In the concluding part, we propose a future orientation of research for the combination between mobilities studies and rhythmanalysis.
Mobility / physical mobility / virtual mobility / rhythmanalysis
| [1] |
卞冬磊(2019). 路上无风景:城市 “移动空间”中的交流. 《传播与社会学刊》(香港),(47),29-54.
|
| [2] |
戴宇辰(2018). 媒介化研究:一种新的传播研究范式. 《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(3),147-156.
|
| [3] |
戴宇辰(2019). “旧相识”和“新重逢”:行动者网络理论与媒介(化)研究的未来——一个理论史视角. 《国际新闻界》,(4),68-88.
|
| [4] |
戴宇辰(2020). “物”也是城市中的行动者吗?——理解城市传播分析的物质性维度. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),54-67.
|
| [5] |
韩炳哲(2013/2019). 《在群中:数字媒体时代的大众心理学》(程巍译). 北京: 中信出版集团.
|
| [6] |
吉见俊哉(2004/2009). 《媒介文化论——给媒介学习者的15讲》(苏硕斌译)(1版). 台北: 群学出版社.
|
| [7] |
凯瑟琳·海勒(1999/2017). 《我们何以成为后人类:文学、信息科学和控制论中的虚拟身体》(刘宇清译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
|
| [8] |
孔舒越(2020). 《坐地铁:城市移动实践中的地方感——以南京地铁为例》.南京大学新闻传播学院硕士论文.南京.
|
| [9] |
孙玮(2018a). 赛博人:后人类时代的媒介融合. 《新闻记者》,(6),4-11.
|
| [10] |
孙玮(2018b). 交流者的身体:传播与在场——意识主体、身体—主体、智能主体的演变. 《国际新闻界》,(12),83-103.
|
| [11] |
张磊(2020). 社会减速与媒介时间性. 《全球传媒学刊》,(2),4-20.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
In this article we argue that the mobilities turn and its studies of the performativity of everyday (im)mobilities enable new forms of sociological inquiry, explanation and engagement. New kinds of researchable entities arise, opening up a new or rediscovered realm of the empirical, and new avenues for critique. The mobilities paradigm not only remedies the academic neglect of various movements, of people, objects, information and ideas. It also gathers new empirical sensitivities, analytical orientations, methods and motivations to examine important social and material phenomena and fold social science insight into responses. After an outline of the mobilities paradigm, this article provides a wide-ranging review of emergent `mobile methods' of studying (im)mobilities. We discuss some of the new researchable entities they engender and explore important implications for the relationship between the empirical, theory, critique, and engagement.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
This article assesses some potential approaches to museums and cities propelled by a theoretical preoccupation with modernity as a condition of speed. Here, one can extrapolate two variants in the writings and interventions of Marinetti, Simmel, Virilio, and writers in the postmodern tradition: (a) the museum is slow, it is a brake on modernity, it is modernity’s sedentary other and (b) the museum is fast, it is as quick as the city, reflecting modernity’s impulse toward acceleration. To finesse these approaches, the article will move toward the method of rhythmanalysis and an emphasis on time—space considerations. It is Lefebvre’s teasing last snippets on the concept of rhythm, the article will argue, presaged by Benjamin’s approach to the variant tempos of modernity in The Arcades Project, that point to a fuller and more advanced approach to urban—museological relations and the multiple rhythms that feature in both.
|
| [49] |
This paper argues that rather than simply enabling studies of regulation and embodiment, rhythm can facilitate reintegration of the apparently separate dimensions of mobile experience enabling them, as Cresswell says, to ‘make sense together’. Taking a critical lead from Lefebvre's engagement with Lacan, it argues that in order for this to happen a more active and reflexive sense of listening to rhythm is needed than that provided by Lefebvre. Drawing on a conception of listening developed by Ihde, Nancy and LaBelle the paper concludes by exploring some ways in which the rhythms of the railway station produce experiences which are simultaneously affectively embodied and deeply socially and culturally meaningful.
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
It seems that a new paradigm is being formed within the social sciences, the ‘new mobilities’ paradigm. Some recent contributions to forming and stabilising this new paradigm include work from anthropology, cultural studies, geography, migration studies, science and technology studies, tourism and transport studies, and sociology. In this paper we draw out some characteristics, properties, and implications of this emergent paradigm, especially documenting some novel mobile theories and methods. We reflect on how far this paradigm has developed and thereby to extend and develop the ‘mobility turn’ within the social sciences.
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
This article explores aspects of travelling times. First, it is argued that there is something about contemporary times in which travelling assumes a greater significance within many people's lives, even at a time when more communication devices are readily ‘at-hand’. Also, it is shown that there are multiple kinds of time involved in the process of travel and not just the measured clock-time that people seek to minimize in getting from A to B. It is further shown that the problem for travellers and, indeed, for non travellers is coordinating multiple and inconsistent times through complex communications and scheduling tools. Thus travel time involves sets of activities that require examination since the time is not always wasted, dead or empty. These points are demonstrated with regard to walking, train travel and even car journeys.
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
1. 我们对于物质性这一概念的理解并不局限于手机的“技术特质”。在我们看来，“物质性”这一概念不等于“物质的特性”。物质性更多体现在具体社会建构活动过程中人类意图所遭遇的一种隶属于物本身的“固着性”（fixedness），它包含两个要点：（1）这种固着性并不能被还原为建构过程中的人类意图；（2）这种固着性可以超越（至少阶段性地超越）建构活动中的社会情境，从而对建构活动的结果产生影响。换言之，对于手机的物质性而言，我们想要说明的是手机的技术特征如何中介社会意图（而不是相反），地铁上使用者的社会意图是如何被手机物质性的在场所改变了。这也构成了本节讨论手机的物质性所形成的“等律节奏”以及之后讨论空间的社会—物质建构的一个理论基础。关于物质性与社会建构活动之关联更为详细的理论阐释参见戴宇辰（
2. “社会-物质建构”的空间不同于“社会建构”的空间，它是物质性形塑社会建构活动的产物。对于这一概念的具体讨论参见戴宇辰（
3. 一个类似讨论参见孔舒越（
4. 关于“媒介化”这一概念以及其与物质性关联更为详细的讨论，参见戴宇辰（
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
