在线健康社区用户满意度研究:社会临场感理论视角

金恒江, 聂静虹

国际新闻界 ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 120-138.

PDF(1623 KB)
PDF(1623 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 120-138.
传播学研究

在线健康社区用户满意度研究:社会临场感理论视角

作者信息 +

Research on user satisfaction in online health communities: perspective of social presence theory

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在线健康社区给公众健康信息获取与健康行为带来较大的便利。本文通过问卷调研,一共采集到841个在线健康社区用户的数据,以检验社会临场感和在线健康社区用户满意度的关系以及健康隐私关注的中介作用。研究结果显示,社会临场感(共在意识、心理参与、亲密度和健康知识分享契合度)越强的用户,他们对在线健康社区用户满意度(健康信息满意度、医患关系满意度和病患沟通满意度)就越高,且社会临场感可以通过影响健康隐私关注进而负向影响在线健康社区用户的满意度。本研究立于社会心理学视角,对于在线健康社区用户的媒介心理表征和使用心理状态的关系进行讨论,研究结论不仅有利于在线健康社区的健康发展,对于未来中国健康传播的探索和研究的深入讨论,以及线上医患关系的良性发展都有积极的推动作用。

Abstract

Online health community has brought greater convenience for public health information acquisition and health behavior. This article has totally collected data of 841 on-line health community users through questionnaire inquiry to check for relationship between social presence and on-line health community users’ satisfaction, inter-mediation of health privacy concerns. The research results have shown that, the users with stronger social presence (coexistence consciousness, psychological participation, intimacy and sharing integration degree of health knowledge) have higher satisfaction (satisfaction on health information, doctor-patient relationship and communication with patients) on on-line health community users, meanwhile social presence could negatively influence satisfaction of on-line health community users through influencing health privacy attention. This research has focused on perspective of social psychology to discuss relationship between medium psychology representation and usage psychology state of on-line health community users. The research conclusion is not only advantageous to healthy development of on-line health community, but also has positive driving effects on exploration of China future health communication, deep discussion of research and benign development of on-line doctor-patient relationship.

关键词

社会临场感 / 医疗健康 / 社会心理学 / 媒介心理 / 健康隐私关注

Key words

social presence / medical health / social psychology / media psychology / health privacy concern

引用本文

导出引用
金恒江, 聂静虹. 在线健康社区用户满意度研究:社会临场感理论视角[J]. 国际新闻界. 2021, 43(10): 120-138
JIN Hengjiang, NIE Jinghong. Research on user satisfaction in online health communities: perspective of social presence theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2021, 43(10): 120-138

参考文献

[1]
董庆兴, 周欣, 毛凤华, 张斌(2019). 在线健康社区用户持续使用意愿研究——基于感知价值理论. 《现代情报》,(3),3-14.
[2]
董开栋, 谢金文(2014). 手机新闻媒体用户满意度模型构建及实证研究——基于对上海某高校学生的调查分析. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),79-87.
[3]
杜焱强, 刘平养, 包存宽 等. 社会资本视阈下的农村环境治理研究——以欠发达地区J村养殖污染为个案. 《公共管理学报》,(4),101-112.
[4]
费坚, 胡涛(2015). 新媒体使用习惯及其影响的实证研究——基于社会心理学的视角. 《浙江学刊》,(6),212-217.
[5]
季丹(2016). 网络临场感对传播效果的影响研究——基于信任关系的中介效应分析. 《现代传播》,(4), 142-148.
[6]
吕洪兵(2013). B2C网店社会临场感与粘性倾向的关系研究. 北京: 光明日报出版社.
[7]
刘鲁川, 孙凯(2015). 社会化媒体用户的情感体验与满意度关系——以微博为例. 《中国图书馆学报》,(215),76-91.
[8]
李武, 赵星(2016). 大学生社会化阅读APP持续使用意愿及发生机理研究. 《中国图书馆学报》, (221),52-65.
[9]
毛春蕾, 袁勤俭 (2018). 社会临场感理论及其在信息系统领域的应用与展望. 《情报杂志》,(8),187-195.
[10]
童清艳, 迟金宝(2016). 微信实时传播的社会临场感影响因子研究——以上海交通大学学生微信使用为例. 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(2),68-78.
[11]
唐晓波, 陈馥怡(2015). 微信用户满意度影响因素模型及实证研究. 《情报杂志》,(6),114-120.
[12]
苑宁(2016). 社会临场感视角下网络游戏直播平台探究. 《青年记者》,(24),88-89.
[13]
喻昕, 许正良, 郭雯君(2017). 在线商户商品信息呈现对消费者行为意愿影响的研究——基于社会临场感理论的模型构建. 《情报理论与实践》,(10),80-84.
[14]
张婧鑫, 姜强, 赵蔚(2019). 在线学习社会临场感影响因素及学业预警研究——基于coi理论视角. 《现代远距离教育》,(4),38-47.
[15]
周涛, 王盈颖, 邓胜利(2019). 在线健康社区用户知识分享行为研究. 《情报科学》,(4),72-78.
[16]
周涛, 鲁耀斌, 张金隆(2009). 基于感知价值与信任的移动商务用户接受行为研究. 《管理学报》,(10),1407-1412.
[17]
周菲, 李小鹿 (2015). 社会临场感对网络团购消费者再购意向影响研究. 《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(4),113-121.
[18]
仲伟伫, 席菱聆, 武瑞娟(2014). 基于ACSI模型的网络购物满意度影响因素实证研究. 《软科学》,(2),100-105.
[19]
张馨遥, 曹锦丹, 王佩鑫(2010). 健康网站信息服务满意度评价指标体系研究. 《情报杂志》,(10),99-103.
[20]
朱佳(2016). 社会存在感对社交商务消费者满意度的影响研究. 《消费经济》,(1),46-51.
[21]
Alzabi T., & Shah A. (2016). An empirical investigation of factors influencing user satisfaction with online services of mobile communication providers: study of Kuwait. Science & Technology Management Research, 130(5),
[22]
Biocca F., Harms C., & Burgoon J. K.. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2003, 12(5), 456-480.
[23]
Cheikh-Ammar M., & Barki H. (2016). The influence of social presence, social exchange and feedback features on sns continuous use. Journal of Organizational & End User Computing, 28(2), 33-52.
[24]
Chan TKH., Cheung CMK., Shi N., Lee MKO., & Lee ZWY. (2015, January). Why Do I Keep Checking My Facebook? The Role of Urge in the Excessive Use of Social Networking Sites. Paper presented at Conference on HICSS ' 15 Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,Washington.
[25]
Demiris G. (2006). The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Education & Counseling, 62(2), 178-188.
[26]
Dhir A., Kaur P., & Rajala R. (2018). Why do young people tag photos on social networking sites? explaining user intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 117-127.
[27]
Gao W., Liu Z., & Li, J (2017). How does social presence influence SNS addiction? A belongingness theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 347-355.
[28]
Hassanein K., & Head M. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8):689-708.
[29]
Hayashi A., Chen C., Ryan T., & Wu J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139-154.
[30]
Liu W. (2014). Explaining and Predicting Older Adult’ Continuance Intention toward SNSs: An Extension of the Expectation-Confirmation Model. Lecture Notes on Information Theory, 2(3), 154-158.
[31]
Lu B., Fan W., & Zhou M. (2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225-237.
[32]
Ozdemir Z. D., Smith H. J., & Benamati J. H. (2017). Antecedents and outcomes of information privacy concerns in a peer context: an exploratory study. European journal of information systems, 26(6), 642-660.
[33]
Palmer, M. T. (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality:mediating interpersonal relationships. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp.277-299). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=207922.207932.
[34]
Parmar N., Dong L., & Eisingerich A. B. (2018). Connecting with your dentist on facebook: patients' and dentists' attitudes towards social media usage in dentistry. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6).
[35]
Pongpaew W., Speece M., & Tiangsoongnern L. (2017). Social presence and customer brand engagement on facebook brand pages. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(3),262-281.
[36]
Robinson L., Behi O., Corcoran A., Cowley V., Cullinane J., Martin I., & Tomkinson D.(2015). Evaluation of Whatsapp for promoting social presence in a first year undergraduate radiography problem-based learning group. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 46(3), 280-286.
The article reports the findings of an analysis into student postings on a mobile instant messaging service (WhatsApp) established to develop social presence in a small group of first-year undergraduate radiography students. The analysis was carried out using a validated and reported tool specifically designed to identify categories of social presence, developed using the Community of Enquiry theoretical model. The students themselves undertook the analysis, which enhanced validity due to participant verification of findings. Six hundred posts (approximately 10% of the total year's messages) were analysed at key points in the first-year student journey. In conclusion, WhatsApp was able to provide students with a platform to demonstrate all the characteristics relevant for the development of social presence. In addition, its immediacy appeared to offer benefits over embedded social media platforms such as discussion boards.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[37]
Short J., Williams E., & Christie B. (1976). the social psychology of telecommunications. Contemporary Sociology, 7(1), 32.
[38]
Salinäs E. (2000). Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(4), 461-476.
An experimental study of interaction in a collaborative desktop virtual environment is described. The aim of the experiment was to investigate if added haptic force feedback in such an environment affects \nperceived virtual presence, perceived social presence, perceived task performance, and task performance. A between-group design was employed, where seven pairs of subjects used an interface with graphic representation of the environment, audio connection, and haptic force feedback. Seven other pairs of subjects used an interface without haptic force feedback, but with identical features otherwise. The PHANToM, a one-point haptic device, was used for the haptic force feedback, and a program especially developed for the purpose provided the virtual environment. The program enables for two individuals placed in different locations to simultaneously feel and manipulate dynamic objects in a shared desktop virtual environment. Results show that haptic force feedback significantly improves task performance, perceived task performance, and pereceived virtual presence in the collaborative distributed environment. The results suggest that haptic force feedback increases perceived social presence, but the difference is not significant.
[39]
Tu C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34-45.
[40]
Wang D., Oppewal H., & Thomas D. (2017). Anticipated embarrassment due to social presence withholds consumers from purchasing products that feature a lucky charm. European Journal of Marketing, 51(7), 1612-1630.
Several studies have shown that superstitious beliefs, such as beliefs in “lucky” product attributes, influence consumer purchase behaviour. Still, little is known about how social influence, in particular mere social presence, impacts consumer superstition-related purchase decisions. Drawing on impression management theory, this paper aims to investigate the effect of social presence on consumer purchase decisions of products featuring lucky charms including the role of anticipated embarrassment as a mediator of the social presence effect.
[41]
Wei G., Yamei L., Zhaopeng L., & Jingyuan L. (2018). How does presence influence purchase intention in online shopping markets? an explanation based on self-determination theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-14.
[42]
Xu H., Gupta S., Rosson M. B., & Carroll J. M. (2012). Measuring Mobile Users’ Concerns for Information Privacy. Paper presented at Conference on the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems,Orlando.
[43]
Xu H., Teo H. H., Tan B. C. Y., & Agarwal R. (2009). The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 135-174.
[44]
Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L., & Parasuraman A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.

基金

国家社科基金一般项目“网络健康社区的运行机制及治理模式研究”(19BXW082)
中央高校基金“中国特色新闻学学术话语建设的探索与实践”(2021CDSKXYXW008)

PDF(1623 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/