本文透过“次级资料法”和“深度访谈法”探索新闻记者的新闻劳动环境变化，与 媒体如何对新闻记者工作进行考核。针对《中国时报》《自由时报》《联合报》与《苹 果日报》的研究发现，记者新闻劳动工时增加，劳动环境相对恶化，四大报的绩效考核 方式各有利弊，研究建议绩效考核需考虑“差异化”，透过与新闻记者的互动讨论，找 出“最关键”指标，另需要避免“人治”的影响，维持考核制度的公平性，激发出记者 的最佳表现。

This paper employed the methods of "secondary data analysis" and "in-depth interview" to explore the changes in news labor of journalists and how the newspapers evaluate the journalists. Through the study of the "China Times", "Liberty Times", "United Daily News" and "Apple Daily", this study found that the increasing working hours of the journalists and the deterioration of the labor environment. The performance management of the four newspapers have their own advantages and disadvantages. This study suggests the performance management should consider the "differentiation", through the interactions with journalists to fnd out the "key" performance indicators. Secondly, the performance management needs to avoid the "rule by people" and maintain the fairness in order to inspire the best performance of the journalists.