本研究以128篇中英文献为分析单元，运用文献荟萃分析法，以比较视角考察2005- 2015年国内外关于“中国网络抗争性话语”研究的学术图景。在对文献的数量分布、类型与级别、研究焦点、研究话题、理论框架、研究方法进行整体性描述的基础上，本研究认为，本话题的研究版图跨越了从人文科学到社会科学的若干领域，其中，语言学与文艺学路径关注文本结构，大众文化路径关注权力关系，以政治学、社会学为主导的社会科学路径则关注政治效应。在学界“权力理论转向”的影响下，近年来，以福柯为代表的微观权力理论受到不同研究取向的认可，沟通了大众文化、社会运动、公共参与等路径的研究，由此形成“话语即行动”、“戏谑即抵抗”等研究共识。但学术探索与国内特有的对策研究之间在对抗争性话语的性质界定、影响评价、对待方式上存在根本分歧，不利于形成理论合力。最后，文章对目前研究中存在的问题进行了讨论。

This paper comparatively outlines the international literatures on the research of “China’s online contentious discourse”, based on 128 academic articles both in Chinese and English. The basic indexes of literature, such as the quantity and distribution, type of research, research focus, research topic, theory framework, and research method are described as a whole. Basically, it can be concluded that this topic of research layout across the feld from humanities to social sciences, among them the linguistics and literature concern on text structure, the mass culture concerns more on power relationship, and the politics and sociology pay more attention on political effect. Under the in?uence of “theory turn of power” in humanities and social sciences, micropower theory which is represented by Michel Foucault is accepted by many different research approaches in recent years, which takes different feld like mass cultural study, social movements, and public participation together. As a result, “discourse is action”, “playful is resistance” are accepted as a consensus by more and more researchers. However, there are fundamental diversities between academic study and administration study which is a special type in domestic research, in terms of how to identify, evaluate and treat the online contentious discourse. Finally, the problems existing in current study were also discussed.