确定性的迷思:舆论、媒介与贝雷尔森等的《投票》

王金礼

国际新闻界 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 42-54.

国际新闻界 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 42-54.
本期话题

确定性的迷思:舆论、媒介与贝雷尔森等的《投票》

  • 王金礼,四川外国语大学新闻传播学院副教授。电邮:53550900@qq.com。本文是四川外国语大学社会科学研究重大项目“芝加哥学派新闻传播思想研究”(项目编号:siuzd201201)的阶段性成果。
作者信息 +

The Myth of Certainty: Public Opinion, Media, and Voting

  • Wang Jinli, associate professor at the School of Journalism & Communication, Sichuan International Studies University (SISU). E-mail: 53550900@qq.com. This paper is supported by the major project of social science of SISU(No. siuzd201201)
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

凭借精致的问题设计和测量,应用社会研究所的舆论研究形成了一系列关于传播与舆论形成的相关性知识。但这种知识却仅仅具有细节的精确,却无法实现研究者的普遍性、确定性承诺。本文以应用社会研究所舆论研究中测量工具最为成熟的《投票》为细读对象,检讨研究者个人主义的方法论、“刺激-反应论”舆论、传播观与其知识生产的相互关系。作者认为,《投票》等的知识困境,正是其方法论的预言自我实现。

Abstract

Depending on elegant question-design and measurement, the study of public opinion in the Bureau of Applied Social Research (BASR) had produced substantial knowledge about the relation between communications and formation of public opinion, but such study only gained the precision of detail, failing to achieve the generality and certainty of knowledge as the researchers committed to. This paper scrutinizes Voting which had the most skillful measurement in BASR, to identify the relation between methodological individualism, ideas of public opinion and communication under the S-R theory, and the model of knowledge-producing. The author takes the predicament of knowledge-producing as a self-fulfilling prophecy through methodology used.

关键词

舆论 / 测量 / 方法论个人主义 / 刺激反应论 / 确定性

Key words

public opinion / measurement / methodological individualism / S-R theory / certainty

引用本文

导出引用
王金礼. 确定性的迷思:舆论、媒介与贝雷尔森等的《投票》[J]. 国际新闻界. 2014, 36(4): 42-54
WANG Jinli. The Myth of Certainty: Public Opinion, Media, and Voting[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2014, 36(4): 42-54

基金

本文是四川外国语大学社会科学研究重大项目“芝加哥学派新闻传播思想研究”(项目编号:siuzd201201)的阶段性成果。


Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/