自《元代“邸报”新证》一文发表后，有学者提出商榷和讨论。首先，笔者对于辨者的诸多“商榷讨论”，提出了自己的看法。其次，文章又根据新近发现的历史文献史料，梳理出与元代“邸报”关系十分密切的媒体：“朝报”、“京报”、“除目”、“除书”等信息传播载体。考证出在元代现有文献中存有关于“朝报”、甚至“京报”的史料记载，而像“除目”、“除书”之类的信息传播载体史料，更是比比皆是。最后，笔者从古代社会人的新闻意识觉醒的视角，进一步考察我国元代“邸报”存在的可能性。

Since my paper   Dibao in the Yuan dynasty: A Discovery   was published,some scholars expressed different views about it. Firstly, the author replies to these criticisms. Secondly, according to the newly discovered historical literature, the author ?nd that some categories  of  media have close relationships with       the Dibao  of  Yuan dynasty, such as Chaobao, Jingbao, Chumu, Chushu. The author argues that existing historical materials show that in the Yuan dynasty there were literatures about Chaobao, Jingbao, and Chumu, Chushu. Finally, by examining the awareness of the news in ancient China, the author further discussed the possibility of the existence of Dibao in Yuan dynasty.