本文试图从观念研究的角度，以“同人办报”为参照，探讨“同人报”何以既声名显赫，
却面目模糊。实际上，在现已公开的史料中，“同人报”的提法始见于1957年，原本只是“集体
所有制报刊”的同义词。由于初始意义并不具体，而看似相仿的“同人办报”又早就被认定为错
误路线。在当时的历史情境下，“同人报”被重新解读、赋予意义，和“资产阶级报刊”等同起
来；并藉此暴得大名，沉淀为集体的记忆，乃至成为基本的表述语汇。正因为从一开始，在不同
理解之间，存在太大的差异，所以始终难以在理念上形成具体的共识。随着历史流转，当时语境
逐渐消散，“同人报”的含义也就越发飘忽难定。

We attempt to explore why the newspaper of colleagues is so prestigious but ambiguous in the
history. In this paper, we start from the concept studying and take the newspaper by colleagues for
reference. Actually, from the history we’ve already known, the concept of newspaper of colleagues
origins from 1957, and it was only the synonymy of group ownership newspaper. Since there was no
clear definition on the newspaper of colleagues, and another similar one, the newspaper by colleagues
was regarded as conducted in the wrong way. The newspaper of colleagues had to be reinterpreted
and it was thought to be the same as “Bourgeois Press” . Therefore, it became prestigious and finally
settled down as a basic expression and a group memory. Because of the various interpretations towards
the newspaper of colleagues, we still couldn’t achieve a common sense on it. Time changes, context is
different, too. It is harder to figure out clear meaning about it.