哲学的媒介与技术诠释:多样性、行星思维与智能的未来——对许煜教授的学术访谈

曾国华, 高山, 吴璟薇

国际新闻界 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 157-176.

PDF(1651 KB)
PDF(1651 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 157-176.
学术访谈

哲学的媒介与技术诠释:多样性、行星思维与智能的未来——对许煜教授的学术访谈

作者信息 +

Philosophy Interpreted from the Perspective of Media and Technology: Diversity, Planetary Thinking, and the Future of Intelligence—An Interview with Yuk Hui

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

面对海德格尔所言的西方形而上哲学传统的终结,中国的技术思想可以做些什么?许煜教授以“宇宙技术”作为核心概念处理中西语境的差异,呼吁维持和生产多样性、促进对话以及思想的个体化。面对行星媒介或技术,不应将其视为批判理论的科幻概念,而应从行星技术中反思人和环境以及非人类之间的关系。面对人工智能,要警惕数据中心带来的消费资本主义陷阱,警惕人工智能将所有东西变成计算之后的不理性行为。面对媒介研究与技术哲学的关联,应搁置本质化的媒介概念,将媒介理解为历史性的技术显现,放置在更开阔的框架下思考。如同将技术放置在宇宙之中一样,在康德第二批判的星空和道德之间也存在着“媒介”的位置。

Abstract

Facing what Heidegger termed the end of metaphysics, what can Chinese technological thoughts contribute? Professor Yuk Hui employs “cosmotechnics” as a core concept to address the differences between Chinese and Western traditions, advocating for the preservation and production of diversity, the facilitation of dialogue, and the individualization of thinking. Confronting planetary media or technology, Hui emphasizes that these should not be reduced to science-fictional concepts for critical theory, but rather should prompt reflection on human-environment relations and non-human interactions through planetary-scale technologies. Regarding artificial intelligence, Hui warns against the traps of consumer capitalism inherent in data centers and cautions against AI's tendency to reduce all phenomena to computational irrationality. On the relationship between media studies and the philosophy of technology, Hui proposes suspending essentialized notions of media. Instead, media should be understood as a historical technophany examined within a broader framework—much like situating technology within the cosmos, just as there exists a position for “media” between the starry heavens and moral law in Kant's second critique.

关键词

宇宙技术 / 行星思维 / 多样性 / 媒介 / 技术

Key words

Cosmotechnics / planetary thinking / diversity / media / technology

引用本文

导出引用
曾国华, 高山, 吴璟薇. 哲学的媒介与技术诠释:多样性、行星思维与智能的未来——对许煜教授的学术访谈[J]. 国际新闻界. 2025, 47(5): 157-176
ZENG Guohua, GAO Shan, WU Jingwei. Philosophy Interpreted from the Perspective of Media and Technology: Diversity, Planetary Thinking, and the Future of Intelligence—An Interview with Yuk Hui[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2025, 47(5): 157-176

参考文献

[1]
汉娜·阿伦特(1958/2009). 《人的境况》(王寅丽译). 上海人民出版社.
[2]
伊曼努尔·康德(1788/2016). 《康德三大批判合集》(李秋零译). 中国人民大学出版社.
[3]
许煜(2019/2020). 《递归与偶然》(苏子滢译). 华东师范大学出版社.
[4]
许煜(2021/2022). 《艺术与宇宙技术》(苏子滢译). 华东师范大学出版社.
[5]
许煜(2016/2018). 《论数码物的存在》(李婉楠译). 上海人民出版社.
[6]
许煜(2016/2020). 《论中国的技术问题——宇宙技术初论》(苏子滢、 卢睿洋译). 中国美术学院出版社.
[7]
贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒(1996/2019).《技术与时间1.爱比米修斯的过失》(裴程译). 译林出版社.
[8]
Heidegger M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In Martin Heidgger. (Eds.). The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3-35). Harper & Row.
[9]
Heidegger M. (2023). Was heißt Denken? (Reclams Universal-Bibliothek Nr. 14491). Philipp Reclam jun. Verlag.
[10]
Hui Yuk. (2024). Post-Europe. Urbanomic/Sequence Press.
[11]
Hui Yuk. (2024). Machine and sovereignty: For a planetary thinking. University of Minnesota Press.

注释 [Notes]

1. 在古希腊语境中,技艺既指艺术、工艺、技术、手工艺和技能,还包括方法、知识、职业,并且与道德相关。

2. 又译作“技术逻辑”。

3. 又译作“智神”。

基金

国家社会科学基金青年项目“文明交流互鉴下中西媒介思想及其数智时代范式创新研究”(24CXW010)

编辑: 刘洁
PDF(1651 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/