媒介化灾难治理中的持续参与者——基于郑州暴雨“救援文档”的研究

戴佳, 季诚浩

国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 111-134.

PDF(1766 KB)
PDF(1766 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 111-134.
研究论文

媒介化灾难治理中的持续参与者——基于郑州暴雨“救援文档”的研究

作者信息 +

The Serial Participants in Mediatized Disaster Governance: A Case Study of Rescue Document in Zhengzhou Rainstorm

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

近年来频繁发生的极端天气灾害给灾难治理带来了新的挑战。本文基于2021年郑州暴雨救援中广为传播的《待救援人员信息》在线协作文档,探索了自组织社群通过媒介化的方式实现灾难救援中的协同治理的过程。研究结果表明,自组织社群中的持续参与者是促成救援成功的核心要素。首先,持续参与者通过扮演网络中介和缩短成员间的互动距离,成功提高了待救援人员转化为成功救援人员的概率;其次,正是由于持续参与者针对救援文档中出现的问题促成的供需匹配、资源部署、加速信息流动、联结多元行动者等解决方案,包括国家、市场和公众在内的多方利益相关者之间持续互动的利益调和与联合行动过程才得以实现。最后,本文讨论了灾害中的媒介化治理的特征,回应了在深入推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的战略目标之下,基于数字媒介技术的治理革新如何实现治理效能优化的问题。

Abstract

The frequent occurrence of extreme weather disasters in recent years poses new challenges for disaster governance. Through the examination of public participation in an online collaborative editing document in the 2021 rainstorm rescue in Zhengzhou, this article explores the process of self-organizing communities achieving collaborative governance in disaster relief through media. The research results indicate that serial participant in self-organizing communities is a core element contributing to the success of rescue efforts. Firstly, serial participants successfully increased the probability of converting victims in need to victims rescued by acting as network intermediaries and shortening the interaction distances between participants. Secondly, it is precisely because of the solutions of supply and demand matching, resource deployment, accelerating the flow of information, connecting multiple actors proposed by serial participants, that the interest reconciliation and joint action between multiple stakeholders, including the state, the market and the public, can be realized. Finally, as a response to China’s strategic goal of deepening the modernization of governance systems and governance capabilities, this article discusses the characteristics of mediatized governance in disasters, and how governance innovation based on digital media technology can optimize efficiency.

关键词

媒介化治理 / 灾难救援 / 持续参与者 / 自组织 / 网络田野观察

Key words

mediatized governance / disaster rescue / serial participants / self-organizing community / online field observation

引用本文

导出引用
戴佳, 季诚浩. 媒介化灾难治理中的持续参与者——基于郑州暴雨“救援文档”的研究[J]. 国际新闻界. 2024, 46(9): 111-134
DAI Jia, JI Chenghao. The Serial Participants in Mediatized Disaster Governance: A Case Study of Rescue Document in Zhengzhou Rainstorm[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(9): 111-134

参考文献

[1]
埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆(1990/2000). 《公共事物的治理之道》(余逊达,陈旭东译). 上海: 上海译文出版社.
[2]
甘莅豪(2022). 规约与博弈:维基百科自组织知识编纂中的命名政治. 《新闻与传播研究》,(12),18.
[3]
光明日报(2021). “救命文档”,公众参与的新方式. 检索于 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/MPN2qidqG6yr3NDJkpxi5g.
[4]
雷跃捷, 白欣蔓(2022). “凝视,消费与建构”——“流调”引发网络舆论之“无组织的组织力量”考察. 《国际新闻界》,(11),18.
[5]
唐京华(2023). 数字技术驱动科层组织领域化运作的逻辑——基于浙江"基层治理四平台"的案例分析. 《治理研究》,(1),40-52.
[6]
腾讯(2021). 一份“救命文档”的24小时.检索于 https://xw.qq.com/partner/vivoscreen/20210721A0F3MP/20210721A0F3MP00?showComments=0&isNews=1.
[7]
熊凌云, 方远, 杨李娟(2023). 多个大股东的监督治理效应——来自企业违规的经验证据. 《财经论丛》,(11),69-80.
[8]
闫岩, 时元皓, 舒畅, 张婧玮, 张皖疆(2023). 聚沙成塔:新冠疫情早期的居民自组织——武汉某小区业主微信群的组织传播分析. 《新闻与传播研究》,(6),68-86.
[9]
闫文捷, 潘忠党, 吴红雨(2021). 媒介化治理——电视问政个案的比较分析. 《新闻与传播研究》,(11),37-56.
[10]
俞可平(2020). 《善治与治理》. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
[11]
翟云(2022). 数字政府替代电子政务了吗?——基于政务信息化与治理现代化的分野. 《中国行政管理》,(2),114-122.
[12]
Abeele M. V., Schouten A. P., & Antheunis M. L. (2017). Personal, editable, and always accessible: An affordance approach to the relationship between adolescents’ mobile messaging behavior and their friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(6), 875-893.
This study takes a perceived affordance approach to explain how differences in teenagers’ mobile messaging behavior associate with indicators of friendship maintenance behavior. Based on a survey among 1943 teenagers, a structural equation model was tested in which their appreciation of three main affordances of mobile messaging predicted the companionship and support that they derive from their friends through their instrumental and expressive mobile messaging behavior. The model fitted the data well: teenagers’ appreciation for anytime–anyplace connectivity, private communication, and control over message content explained to what extent they use mobile messaging to micro-coordinate, to chitchat with friends, and to intimately self-disclose, thereby indirectly explaining the companionship and support that teens derive from friends. This finding supports the notion that inherent characteristics of technology play a role in contemporary relationship management by driving social uses of the technology.
[13]
Beck U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
[14]
Bennett W. L., & Segerberg A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
[15]
Bodin Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114.
[16]
Boersma F. K., Ferguson J., Groenewegen P., & Wolbers J. (2014). Beyond the myth of control:Toward network switching in disaster management. In Hiltz, S. R., Pfaff, M. S., Plotnick, L., & Robinson A. C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 11th International ISCRAM Conference (pp. 125-129). University Park, PA: Penn State University.
[17]
Boersma K., Ferguson J., Groenewegen P., & Wolbers J. (2014). Beyond the myth of control: Toward network switching in disaster management. ISCRAM, 11, 123-127.
[18]
Bovaird T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.
[19]
Brudney J. L., & England R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 59-65.
[20]
Couldry N., & Hepp A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191-202.
[21]
Della Porta D., & Mattoni A. (2014). Social networking sites in pro-democracy and anti-austerity protests: Some thoughts from a social movement perspective. In Trottier, D., & Fuchs, C (Eds.). Social media, politics and the state (pp. 51-76). London, UK: Routledge.
[22]
Freelon D., McIlwain C., & Clark M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990-1011.
The exercise of power has been an implicit theme in research on the use of social media for political protest, but few studies have attempted to measure social media power and its consequences directly. This study develops and measures three theoretically grounded metrics of social media power—unity, numbers, and commitment—as wielded on Twitter by a social movement (Black Lives Matter [BLM]), a counter-movement (political conservatives), and an unaligned party (mainstream news outlets) over nearly 10 months. We find evidence of a model of social media efficacy in which BLM predicts mainstream news coverage of police brutality, which in turn is the strongest driver of attention to the issue from political elites. Critically, the metric that best predicts elite response across all parties is commitment.
[23]
Gladwell M. (2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/10/04/small-change-malcolm-gladwell.
[24]
Hsiao Y., & Yang Y. (2018). Commitment in the cloud? Social media participation in the sunflower movement. Information Communication & Society, 21(7), 996-1013.
[25]
Hufty M. (2011). Investigating policy processes: The governance analytical framework (GAF). Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives, 403-424.
[26]
Jiang H., Zhang Y., Guo W., Cheng W., & Peng J. (2022). Online collaborative documents as media logic: The mediatization of risk response in the post-pandemic era. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 892569.
Online collaborative documents (OCDs) have previously been the focus of office efficiency, but today they can be a special approach to risk response in public health and natural disaster situations. Studying the mediatization of the risk response by OCDs can help us understand the interaction between digital technologies, online users, and emotions in a post-pandemic world. A mixed-method design involving online ethnography and focus groups was employed to discuss OCD performance during the 2021 Henan flood. The empirical results indicate that four dimensions of technological affordances (i.e., editability, accessibility, activability, and normability) connected the functional features of the digital platform with users’ potential actions. Risk communication as a contextual element of media exposure and discursive practice provided a participatory and constructive framework for users’ gathering. Therefore, affective ties including anxiety, fear, and encouragement supported the affective publics’ mass deliberation and social mobilization. These findings provide an institutional lens for mediatization research to view OCD as media logic and reveal some methods that can be referred to for risk management and humanistic concerns globally.
[27]
Kaur A., & Sood S. K. (2019). Analytical mapping of research on disaster management, types and role of ICT during 2011-2018. Environmental Hazards, 18(3), 266-285.
[28]
Kostka G., Zhang X., & Shin K. (2020). Information, technology, and digitalization in China’s environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(1), 1-13.
Research on the relationship between information, technology, and environmental governance in the current Information Age has gained momentum in recent years. Nevertheless, much theoretical, empirical, and normative issues remain seriously under-explored. Existing studies also tend to be predominantly based on contexts, experiences, and lessons in advanced democratic societies. What the rapid developments in new information technologies, data, and information networks might mean for environmental politics and governance in non-democratic contexts remains even more elusive. This special issue brings together some of the latest research in the context of contemporary China to shed light on some of these fundamental issues. We argue that the role of information has evolved over time as dominant approaches to environmental regulation have shifted. Yet, findings in this special issue show that how it has manifested in China thus far has been anything but straightforward. While a few parallels can be drawn between advanced democratic countries and China, many of the predictions made about the effects of data and information technologies have not been borne out in China. We raise several questions as a fruitful avenue for further research.
[29]
Kozinets R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
[30]
Kreiss D., Finn M., & Turner F. (2011). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243-259.
[31]
Lev-On A. (2012). Communication, community, crisis: Mapping uses and gratifications in the contemporary media environment. New Media and Society, 14(1), 98-116.
The article analyzes how community members who were evacuated from their homes use various media, and especially the internet, to keep in touch, receive and disseminate information and express their opinions. Of particular interest are the differences between members of various groups, who differ in their decision whether to relocate in Israel with the rest of the original community or not, in media usage patterns and sense of community. The findings demonstrate that evacuees use diversity and multiplicity of media, where various media are used for different purposes according to need. Small media, with a rather limited and local reach (such as pamphlets, SMS, niche websites and small-scale meetings) are predominantly used for most of the needs, overshadowing mass media usage. Correlations were found amongst various media usages, and between the usage of various media and users’ sense of community. The study demonstrates how contemporary media users use a variety of media depending on their circumstances and needs, and how media usage assists in establishing and maintaining a sense of community after the forced transition from the communities of origin.
[32]
Livingstone S., & Lunt P. (2014). Mediatization:an emerging paradigm for media and communication studies. In: Lundby K.,(Ed.). Mediatization of Communication. Handbooks of Communication Science (pp.703-724). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
[33]
McKnight W. (2014). Chapter twelve-graph databases:When relationships are the data. Information Management, Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 120-131.
[34]
Meijer A. J. (2011). Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598-607.
[35]
Mercea D., & Bastos M. T. (2016). Being a serial transnational activist. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 140-155.
[36]
Morozov E. (2012). The net delusion:The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
[37]
Nepstad S. E. (2004). Persistent resistance: Commitment and community in the plowshares movement. Social Problems, 51(1), 43-60.
[38]
Ojala M., Pantti M., & Laaksonen S. M. (2019). Networked publics as agents of accountability: Online interactions between citizens, the media and immigration officials during the European refugee crisis. New Media and Society, 21(2), 279-297.
This study examines how citizens made use of online platforms to direct diverging critiques and demands at the Finnish Immigration Service during what has come to be known as the refugee crisis in Europe. Focusing on peak periods of debate, identified using big data, we closely observe how public scrutiny of the immigration service occurred in the interactions between online users, the news media and the agency itself. Our analysis indicates that networked publics can be regarded as influential drivers of accountability for government agencies, which often feel obligated to justify their actions to these publics. However, the operation of networked publics as accountability agents remains heavily dependent on the broader public debate, which is still largely shaped by news media organisations, political elites and the officials themselves.
[39]
Reese S. D., & Chen B. (2022). Emerging hybrid networks of verification, accountability, and institutional resilience: The U.S. Capitol Riot and the work of open-source investigation. Journal of Communication, 72(6), 633-646.
The violent spectacle of the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot provides a case study of how online open-source investigation helped identify members of the mob and provide deeper understanding of the day’s events. Considering this form of investigation as an emerging network for the hybrid institution of journalism, an assemblage extending beyond the newsroom, this study takes a mixed-method, networked ethnography approach to map out this open-source space. Using a network analysis of open-source investigators based on Twitter data shows that the recently emerged Bellingcat organization and similar open-source groups serve a liaison function, bridging professional journalists and largely anonymous citizen “sleuthers.” Using this network as a guide, depth interviews were conducted with key participants, showing that the community was organized around an accountability ethos and a methodology of verification. We argue that this interlocking network has potential to strengthen the resilience of the journalistic institution, build citizen trust and resist politicized historical revisionism.
[40]
Rhodes R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.
The term ‘governance’ is popular but imprecise. It has at least six uses, referring to: the minimal state; corporate governance: the new public management; ‘good governance’; socio-cybernetic systems: and self-organizing networks. I stipulate that governance refers to ‘self-organizing, interorganizational networks' and argue these networks complement markets and hierarchies as governing structures for authoritatively allocating resources and exercising control and co-ordination. I defend this definition, arguing that it throws new light on recent changes in British government, most notably: hollowing out the state, the new public management, and intergovernmental management. 1 conclude that networks are now a pervasive feature of service delivery in Britain; that such networks are characterized by trust and mutual adjustment and undermine management reforms rooted in competition; and that they are a challenge to governability because they become autonomous and resist central guidance.
[41]
Rijshouwer E., Uitermark J., & de Koster W. (2021). Wikipedia: A self-organizing bureaucracy. Information, Communication & Society, 1-18.
[42]
Schobert M., Orru K., Gabel F., Nero K., Windsheimer P., Klaos M., & Nævestad T. O. (2023). The three A’s of social capital in crises: challenges with the availability, accessibility and activatability of social support. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 92, 103-704.
[43]
Schulz W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87-101.
Mediatization relates to changes associated with communication media and their development. A basic assumption of mediatization is that the technological, semiotic and economic characteristics of mass media result in problematic dependencies, constraints and exaggerations. These are closely associated with three basic functions of the media in communication processes: (1) the relay function, grounded in the media’s technological capacities, serving to bridge spatial and temporal distances; (2) the semiotic function, making messages suitable for human information processing through encoding and formatting; and (3) the economic function, highlighting the standardization of media products as an outcome of mass production processes. The article looks at the analytical functions of mediatization and, finally, discusses three possible answers to the question whether the advent of new media might bring an end to mediatization.
[44]
Shaw A., & Hill B. M. (2014). Laboratories of oligarchy? How the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 215-238.
[45]
Sommerfeldt E. J., & Yang A. (2017). Relationship networks as strategic issues management: An issue-stage framework of social movement organization network strategies. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 829-839.
[46]
Stoker G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28.
[47]
Treem J. W., & Leonardi P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189.
[48]
Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our Global Neighborhood:The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[49]
Peters B. G. (2018). Governance: Ten thoughts about five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 68(227/228), 5-14.
[50]
Wang L., Yang A., & Thorson K. (2021). Serial participants of social media climate discussion as a community of practice: A longitudinal network analysis. Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 941-959.
[51]
Whitaker G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40(3), 240-246.
[52]
Xu Y., Sun Y., Hagen L., Patel M., & Falling M. (2021). Evolution of the plandemic communication network among serial participants on Twitter. New Media & Society, 146144482110509.
[53]
Yang L., & Emerson K. (2023). Collaborative governance in strong state settings: Perceived voluntariness and the role of the state in Rural China. Public Management Review, 1-35.

注释 [Notes]

1. 中华人民共和国应急管理部《对十三届全国人大五次会议第8971号建议的答复》。检索于 https://www.mem.gov.cn/gk/jytabljggk/rddbjydfzy/2022/202301/t20230116_440623.shtml

2. 上述参与者ID已进行匿名化处理。

基金

清华大学自主科研计划项目 “提升面对重大突发风险事件的媒介化治理能力研究”(2021THZWJC03)
清新计算传播学与智能媒体实验室研究支持计划(2024TSLCLAB001)

PDF(1766 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/