“无家可归,无处可依?”:虾米难民的记忆想象与情动怀旧

曲舒文, 徐敏

国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 134-155.

PDF(1993 KB)
PDF(1993 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 134-155.
研究论文

“无家可归,无处可依?”:虾米难民的记忆想象与情动怀旧

作者信息 +

“No Home to Go to; No World to Be in?”: Mnemonic Imagination and Affective Nostalgia of Xiami Refugees

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

已有记忆实践研究针对表征的、档案的记忆实践做出了丰富的讨论,但是尚未就想象的、非表征的、情感(动)的记忆实践展开充分研究。本文分析了虾米难民之“难”的三种情感性的记忆想象及其情动怀旧意涵。每日推荐的记忆想象展演了心动音乐发现的情动体验及中介化的在世存有感觉;小众风格标签的记忆想象是在后摇和氛围音乐中整合出一种非人类中心的世界想象;而歌单和音乐库的记忆想象则展演了个体、社群与平台协力共建集体音乐档案的情感联结,及其背后的文化遗产价值。这三种情感性记忆想象是虾米难民的情动怀旧的动力基础。在难民们“无家可归、无处可依”的情动怀旧背后潜藏着一种希望伦理:它淘澄出人们对线上公共音乐生活的渴望,使人们反思脆弱的中介化在世存有并找到了三种应对策略,让人们通过(残留的)身体和情动记忆重探与复数身体的关系性联结。

Abstract

Research on memory practices has richly discussed representational and archival memory practices, but has not yet fully analyzed imaginative, non-representational and affective memory practices. This paper analyzes three types of affective mnemonic imagination of Xiami Refugees’ “difficulties” and the related affective nostalgic connotations. The mnemonic imagination of daily recommendations demonstrates the affective experience of flipped music discovery and a mediated sense of being-in-the-world. The mnemonic imagination of genre labeling integrates a nonhuman-centered world imagery in the recollection of post-rock and ambient music. The mnemonic imagination of playlist and music library demonstrates the affective connection of individual, community, and the platform in the construction of collective vernacular music archiving as well as the public value behind cultural heritage. These three kinds of emotional mnemonic imagination are the momentum of Xiami Refugee’s affective nostalgia. What underneath the affective nostalgia of “No home to go to, and no world to be in” is the ethics of hope: clarifying people’s longing for online public music life, reflecting on the precarity of mediated being-in-the-world with three strategies to cope with it, relying on residuals of body memory and affective memory to re-explore relational connection with multiple bodies.

关键词

记忆想象 / 非表征 / 情动怀旧 / 音乐流媒体 / 虾米难民 / 希望伦理

Key words

mnemonic imagination / non-representation / affective nostalgia / music steaming / Xiami refugees / hope ethics

引用本文

导出引用
曲舒文, 徐敏. “无家可归,无处可依?”:虾米难民的记忆想象与情动怀旧[J]. 国际新闻界. 2024, 46(4): 134-155
QU Shuwen, XU Min. “No Home to Go to; No World to Be in?”: Mnemonic Imagination and Affective Nostalgia of Xiami Refugees[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(4): 134-155

参考文献

[1]
顾洁(2018). 媒介研究的实践范式:框架、路径与启示. 《新闻与传播研究》,(6),13-32+126.
[2]
黄佩映(2022). 多重界面与情动的联结:媒介化旅行的后现象学解读. 《国际新闻界》,(9),65-86.
[3]
李红涛, 黄顺铭(2017). 一个线上公祭空间的生成——南京大屠杀纪念与数字记忆的个案考察. 《新闻与传播研究》,(1),5-26+126.
[4]
刘于思(2016). 签到即记忆:移动媒介的空间实践与意义生产. 《浙江传媒学院学报》,(5),41-49+160.
[5]
潘晓婷, 陈莹(2021). 记忆实践:传播学视域下集体记忆研究的路径转向. 《新闻界》,(7),55-63.
[6]
斯维特兰娜·博伊姆(2001/2010). 《怀旧的未来》(杨德友译). 南京: 译林出版社.
[7]
宋美杰(2020). 非表征理论与媒介研究:新视域与新想象. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),86-97+127-128.
[8]
孙玮(2015). 微信:中国人的“在世存有”. 《学术月刊》,(12),5-18.
[9]
周葆华, 钟媛(2021). “春天的花开秋天的风”:社交媒体、集体悼念与延展性情感空间——以李文亮微博评论(2020-2021)为例的计算传播分析. 《国际新闻界》,(3),79-106.
[10]
周裕琼, 张梦园(2022). 数字公墓作为一种情动媒介. 《新闻与传播研究》,(12):32-52+127.
[11]
周裕琼, 张梦园(2023). 未知死,焉知生:过程性视角下的死亡与传播. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(2),1-10.
[12]
Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In Anderson, B. & Harrison, P. (Eds.). Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 1-37). London, UK: Ashgate.
[13]
Bollas, C. (2013). Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self experience. London, UK: Routledge.
[14]
Bonini, T., & Magaudda, P. (2023). Listeners:How they shape music consumption practices. In Bonini, T., & Magaudda, P. (Eds.). Platformed! How streaming, algorithms and artificial intelligence are ahaping music cultures (pp. 93-120). Cham, CH: Springer Nature.
[15]
Boukala, S., & Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2017). The politics of fear vs. the politics of hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek election and referendum campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 39-55.
[16]
Bull, M. (2005). No dead air! The iPod and the culture of mobile listening. Leisure studies, 24(4), 343-355.
[17]
Chion, M. (1994). Audio-vision:Sound on screen. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
[18]
Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132.
[19]
Crouch, D. (2010). Flirting with space: Thinking landscape relationally. Cultural Geographies, 17(1), 5-18.
[20]
Drozdzewski, D., & Birdsall, C. (2018). Doing memory research. Singapore, SG: Springer Verlag.
[21]
Friedner, M., & Helmreich, S. (2012). Sound studies meets deaf studies. The Senses and Society, 7(1), 72-86.
[22]
Foster, J. K. (2008). Memory:A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[23]
Graber, K. J., & Sumera, M. (2020, January). Interpretation, resonance, embodiment: Affect theory and ethnomusicology. Ethnomusicology Forum, 29(1), 3-20.
[24]
Gupta, H., & Medappa, K. (2020). Nostalgia as affective landscape: Negotiating displacement in the “World City”. Antipode, 52(6), 1688-1709.
[25]
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.
[26]
Harris, O. J., & Sørensen, T. F. (2010). Rethinking emotion and material culture. Archaeological Dialogues, 17(2), 145-163.
[27]
Hennion, A. (2007). Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 97-114.
[28]
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). Why music matters. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
[29]
Ingold, T. (2011). Four objections to the concept of soundscape. In Ingold, T. (Ed.). Being alive:Essays on movement, knowledge and description (pp.136-139). London, UK: Routledge.
[30]
Jones, O. (2011). Geography, memory and non-representational geographies. Geography Compass, 5(12), 875-885.
[31]
Kassabian, A. (2013). Ubiquitous listening:Affect, attention, and distributed subjectivity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[32]
Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2012). The mnemonic imagination. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
[33]
Long, P., Baker, S., Istvandity, L., & Collins, J. (2017). A labour of love: The affective archives of popular music culture. Archives and Records, 38(1), 61-79.
[34]
Massantini, L. (2020). Affective scaffolds of nostalgia. Philosophical Inquiries, 8(2), 47-70.
[35]
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
[36]
Nguyen-Thu, G. (2023). From hope to haunt: Digital activism and the cultural politics of hope (lessness) in late-socialism. Cultural Studies, 37(6), 846-871.
[37]
Nowak, R. (2016). When is a discovery? The affective dimensions of discovery in music consumption. Popular Communication, 14(3), 137-145.
[38]
Pickering, M., & Keightley, E. (2015). Photography, music and memory:Pieces of the past in everyday life. London, UK: Springer.
[39]
Pogačar, M. (2023). A microphone in a chandelier: How a secret recording sparks mnemonic imagination and affect. Memory Studies, 16(2), 169-184.
[40]
Qu, S., Hesmondhalgh, D., & Xiao, J. (2023). Music streaming platforms and self-releasing musicians: the case of China. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 699-715.
[41]
Rajagopalan, S. (2019). Remix videos and the mnemonic imagination: Emotional memories of late Soviet childhood. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), 9-36.
[42]
Reynolds, S. (2004). Post-rock. In Cox, C., & Warner, D. (Eds.). Audio culture: Readings in modern music (pp. 358-361). New York, NY: Continuum.
[43]
Rodman, G. B., & Vanderdonckt, C. (2006). Music for nothing or, I want my mp3: The regulation and recirculation of affect. Cultural Studies, 20(2-3), 245-261.
[44]
Spinetti, F., Schoop, M. E., & Hofman, A. (2021). Introduction to music and the politics of memory: Resounding antifascism across borders. Popular Music and Society, 44(2), 119-138.
[45]
Sumera, M. (2020, January). Half life: Reflections on music, grief, and affectivity. Ethnomusicology Forum, 29(1), 62-80.
[46]
Sutton, J. (2009). The feel of the world:Exograms, habits, and the confusion of types of memory. In Kania, A. (Ed.). Memento (pp.65-86). London, UK: Routledge.
[47]
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space/ politics/ affect. London, UK: Routledge.
[48]
Tumarkin, M. (2013). Crumbs of memory: Tracing the ‘more-than-representational’ in family memory. Memory Studies, 6(3), 310-320.
[49]
Van Dijck, J. (2007). Mediated memories in the digital age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
[50]
Veale, K. (2017). Gone home, and the power of affective nostalgia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(7), 654-666.
[51]
Walkerdine, V. (2016). Affective history, working-class communities and self-determination. The Sociological Review, 64(4), 699-714.
[52]
Waterton, E. (2018). More-than-representational landscapes, In Howard, P., Thompson, I., Waterton, E., & Atha, M. (Eds.). The routledge companion to landscape studies (2nd Ed) (pp. 91-101). London, UK: Routledge.

致谢

感谢浙江大学传媒与国际学院在2022年9月23日-9月25日于杭州举办的“数字记忆:共同体想象与再造”工作坊,两位作者在会议中获益良多。感谢点评人陈彦宁博士,以及参会老师(按拼音排序)方惠、黄旦、黄顺铭、李红涛、刘蒙之、刘于思、宋美杰、吴尚蔚、袁梦倩等师友提出的宝贵意见。特别感谢两位匿名评审专家及方惠提出的建设性修改建议。

基金

暨南大学“宁静致远”项目阶段性研究成果(332202312623657)

PDF(1993 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/