PDF(1993 KB)
PDF(1993 KB)
PDF(1993 KB)
“无家可归,无处可依?”:虾米难民的记忆想象与情动怀旧
“No Home to Go to; No World to Be in?”: Mnemonic Imagination and Affective Nostalgia of Xiami Refugees
已有记忆实践研究针对表征的、档案的记忆实践做出了丰富的讨论,但是尚未就想象的、非表征的、情感(动)的记忆实践展开充分研究。本文分析了虾米难民之“难”的三种情感性的记忆想象及其情动怀旧意涵。每日推荐的记忆想象展演了心动音乐发现的情动体验及中介化的在世存有感觉;小众风格标签的记忆想象是在后摇和氛围音乐中整合出一种非人类中心的世界想象;而歌单和音乐库的记忆想象则展演了个体、社群与平台协力共建集体音乐档案的情感联结,及其背后的文化遗产价值。这三种情感性记忆想象是虾米难民的情动怀旧的动力基础。在难民们“无家可归、无处可依”的情动怀旧背后潜藏着一种希望伦理:它淘澄出人们对线上公共音乐生活的渴望,使人们反思脆弱的中介化在世存有并找到了三种应对策略,让人们通过(残留的)身体和情动记忆重探与复数身体的关系性联结。
Research on memory practices has richly discussed representational and archival memory practices, but has not yet fully analyzed imaginative, non-representational and affective memory practices. This paper analyzes three types of affective mnemonic imagination of Xiami Refugees’ “difficulties” and the related affective nostalgic connotations. The mnemonic imagination of daily recommendations demonstrates the affective experience of flipped music discovery and a mediated sense of being-in-the-world. The mnemonic imagination of genre labeling integrates a nonhuman-centered world imagery in the recollection of post-rock and ambient music. The mnemonic imagination of playlist and music library demonstrates the affective connection of individual, community, and the platform in the construction of collective vernacular music archiving as well as the public value behind cultural heritage. These three kinds of emotional mnemonic imagination are the momentum of Xiami Refugee’s affective nostalgia. What underneath the affective nostalgia of “No home to go to, and no world to be in” is the ethics of hope: clarifying people’s longing for online public music life, reflecting on the precarity of mediated being-in-the-world with three strategies to cope with it, relying on residuals of body memory and affective memory to re-explore relational connection with multiple bodies.
记忆想象 / 非表征 / 情动怀旧 / 音乐流媒体 / 虾米难民 / 希望伦理
mnemonic imagination / non-representation / affective nostalgia / music steaming / Xiami refugees / hope ethics
| [1] |
顾洁(2018). 媒介研究的实践范式:框架、路径与启示. 《新闻与传播研究》,(6),13-32+126.
|
| [2] |
黄佩映(2022). 多重界面与情动的联结:媒介化旅行的后现象学解读. 《国际新闻界》,(9),65-86.
|
| [3] |
李红涛, 黄顺铭(2017). 一个线上公祭空间的生成——南京大屠杀纪念与数字记忆的个案考察. 《新闻与传播研究》,(1),5-26+126.
|
| [4] |
刘于思(2016). 签到即记忆:移动媒介的空间实践与意义生产. 《浙江传媒学院学报》,(5),41-49+160.
|
| [5] |
潘晓婷, 陈莹(2021). 记忆实践:传播学视域下集体记忆研究的路径转向. 《新闻界》,(7),55-63.
|
| [6] |
斯维特兰娜·博伊姆(2001/2010). 《怀旧的未来》(杨德友译). 南京: 译林出版社.
|
| [7] |
宋美杰(2020). 非表征理论与媒介研究:新视域与新想象. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),86-97+127-128.
|
| [8] |
孙玮(2015). 微信:中国人的“在世存有”. 《学术月刊》,(12),5-18.
|
| [9] |
周葆华, 钟媛(2021). “春天的花开秋天的风”:社交媒体、集体悼念与延展性情感空间——以李文亮微博评论(2020-2021)为例的计算传播分析. 《国际新闻界》,(3),79-106.
|
| [10] |
周裕琼, 张梦园(2022). 数字公墓作为一种情动媒介. 《新闻与传播研究》,(12):32-52+127.
|
| [11] |
周裕琼, 张梦园(2023). 未知死,焉知生:过程性视角下的死亡与传播. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(2),1-10.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
感谢浙江大学传媒与国际学院在2022年9月23日-9月25日于杭州举办的“数字记忆:共同体想象与再造”工作坊,两位作者在会议中获益良多。感谢点评人陈彦宁博士,以及参会老师(按拼音排序)方惠、黄旦、黄顺铭、李红涛、刘蒙之、刘于思、宋美杰、吴尚蔚、袁梦倩等师友提出的宝贵意见。特别感谢两位匿名评审专家及方惠提出的建设性修改建议。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |