诉诸行为还是情绪?平台隐私管理的双重机制

孟筱筱

国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 113-133.

PDF(2146 KB)
PDF(2146 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 113-133.
研究论文

诉诸行为还是情绪?平台隐私管理的双重机制

作者信息 +

Behavioral or emotional coping? A Dual-process Model of Platform Privacy Management

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

数字平台已经深深嵌入人类生活的方方面面,个体的隐私管理成为亟待解决的问题。本文基于传播隐私管理理论,探究用户使用如购物、打车、外卖等服务性技术系统时的隐私管理策略及其机制。本研究通过深度访谈法发现用户平台隐私管理的双重路径,再通过问卷调查法(N=1419)进一步验证了用户选择特定路径背后的心理机制。结果发现,用户是基于在继续使用平台服务的前提下来决定隐私管理方式的,而这种决策背后又受到了自我效能与隐私计算两种内外部因素的干预。本文将隐私管理策略研究放置在了新兴技术系统服务的语境下,为后续研究非人际情境中的隐私管理问题提供理论参考。

Abstract

The prevalence of digital platforms has provided great convenience but also increased privacy risks. Using the Communication Privacy Management theory, this paper explored how Chinese users manage privacy boundaries in non-social contexts. This paper found that there are dual paths of users' platform privacy boundary management through in-depth interviews and validated the psychological mechanisms through a questionnaire (N=1419). It concluded that Chinese users make privacy management decisions based on the premise that they are dependent on such non-social platforms for daily life activities. However, two internal and external factors, namely self-efficacy and privacy calculations, intervene in such decisions. This paper developed privacy management strategies in the context of life service platforms and provided a theoretical reference for subsequent research on privacy management in non-personal contexts.

关键词

隐私边界震荡 / 数字平台 / 隐私管理策略 / 隐私观念

Key words

privacy boundary turbulence / digital platform / privacy management strategy / privacy concept

引用本文

导出引用
孟筱筱. 诉诸行为还是情绪?平台隐私管理的双重机制[J]. 国际新闻界. 2024, 46(4): 113-133
MENG XiaoXiao. Behavioral or emotional coping? A Dual-process Model of Platform Privacy Management[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(4): 113-133

参考文献

[1]
陈素白, 项倩(2022). 自我表露动机与角色压力视角下的朋友圈隐私管理机制研究. 《新闻大学》,(12),32-45+122.
[2]
陈昌凤(2022). 人机何以共生:传播的结构性变革与滞后的伦理观. 《新闻与写作》,(10),5-16.
[3]
顾理平(2022). 数字化时代隐私内涵的演进嬗变与研究的前沿问题. 《新闻与写作》,(1),5-13.
[4]
洪杰文, 陈嵘伟(2022). 意识激发与规则想象:用户抵抗算法的战术依归和实践路径. 《新闻与传播研究》,(8),38-56+126-127.
[5]
匡文波(2021). 智能算法推荐技术的逻辑理路、伦理问题及规制方略. 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》,(1),144-151.
[6]
贾瑞雪(2022). 打开“黑箱”:平台社会视野下个人数据收集的结构性特征. 《新闻与传播研究》,(7),38-54+127.
[7]
卢家银(2022). 无奈的选择:数字时代隐私让渡的表现、原因与权衡. 《新闻与写作》,(1),14-21.
[8]
牛静, 孟筱筱(2019). 社交媒体信任对隐私风险感知和自我表露的影响:网络人际信任的中介效应. 《国际新闻界》,(7),91-109.
[9]
强月新, 肖迪(2019). 社交网络中的隐私悖论:隐私关注、自我表露意愿对社交推文发送的影响研究. 《国际新闻界》,(12),6-26.
[10]
孟筱筱(2023). 隐私边界协调对震荡感的影响研究——基于传播隐私管理理论的视角. 《新闻大学》,(5),44-58+119-120.
[11]
宣长春, 陈素白(2023). 隐私侵犯经历对个人信息保护意愿的影响:基于“风险-收益”和调节定向的理论视角. 《国际新闻界》,(4),138-156.
[12]
邵成圆(2019). 重新想象隐私:信息社会隐私的主体及目的. 《国际新闻界》,(12),44-57.
[13]
徐敬宏, 侯伟鹏, 程雪梅, 王雪(2018). 微信使用中的隐私关注、认知、担忧与保护: 基于全国六所高校大学生的实证研究. 《国际新闻界》,(5),160-176.
[14]
张萌(2022). 从规训到控制:算法社会的技术幽灵与底层战术. 国际新闻界,(1),156-173.
[15]
曾秀芹, 吴海谧, 蒋莉 (2018). 成人初显期人群的数字媒介家庭沟通与隐私管理:一个扎根理论研究. 《国际新闻界》, (9),64-84.
[16]
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In G. Danezis & P. Golle (Eds.), Privacy enhancing technologies(pp.36-58). Berlin, DE: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[17]
Aloia, L. S. (2018). The Emotional, Behavioral, and Cognitive Experience of Boundary Turbulence. Communication Studies, 69(2), 180-195.
[18]
Bartsch, M., & Dienlin, T. (2016). Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 147-154.
[19]
Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967-984.
[20]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
[21]
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneaul, A. (2005). Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 493-524.
[22]
Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2021). Exploring Motivations for Online Privacy Protection Behavior: Insights From Panel Data. Communication Research, 48(7), 953-977.
[23]
Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information Communication and Society, 20(1), 30-44.
[24]
Cho, H. (2021). Privacy helplessness on social media: its constituents, antecedents and consequences. Internet Research, 32(1), 150-171.
[25]
Cho, H., Li, P., & Goh, Z. H. (2020). Privacy risks, emotions, and social media: A coping model of online privacy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(6), 1-28.
[26]
Choi, H., Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 42-51.
[27]
Chen, H.-T., & Chen, W. (2015). Couldn’t or wouldn’t? The influence of privacy concerns and self-efficacy in privacy management on privacy protection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 13-19.
[28]
Chou, H. L., & Chou, C. (2023). How teens negotiate privacy on social media proactively and reactively. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1290-1312.
[29]
Chen, H.-T. (2018). Revisiting the privacy paradox on social media with an extended privacy calculus model: The effect of privacy concerns, privacy self-efficacy, and social capital on privacy management. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(10), 1392-1412.
[30]
DeGroot, J. M., & Vik, T. A. (2017). “We were not prepared to tell people yet”: Confidentiality breaches and boundary turbulence on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 351-359.
[31]
Dienlin, T., & Metzger, M. J. (2016). An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for SNSs: Analyzing Self-Disclosure and Self-Withdrawal in a Representative U.S. Sample. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 368-383.
[32]
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Personality and Social Psycology, 48(1), 150-170.
[33]
Frick, N. R. J., Wilms, K. L., Brachten, F., Hetjens, T., Stieglitz, S., & Ross, B. (2021). The perceived surveillance of conversations through smart devices. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 47(February), 101046.
[34]
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., & Ranzini, G. (2016). Privacy cynicism: A new approach to the privacy paradox. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10(4), article 7.
[35]
Hargittai, E., & Marwick, A. (2016). “What can I really do?” Explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3737-3757.
[36]
John, N. A., & Peters, B.. (2016). Why privacy keeps dying: the trouble with talk about the end of privacy. Information Communication and Society, 20(1-2), 284-298.
[37]
Kang, H., & Oh, J. (2023). Communication privacy management for smart speaker use: Integrating the role of privacy self-efficacy and the multidimensional view. New Media & Society, 25(5), 1153-1175.
[38]
Krause, A., & Horvitz, E. (2010). A utility-theoretic approach to privacy in online services. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 39, 633-662.
[39]
Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109-125.
[40]
Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2014). A bumpy ride on the information superhighway: Exploring turbulence online. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 520-529.
[41]
Litt, E. (2013). Understanding social network site users’ privacy tool use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1649-1656.
[42]
Lee, J. M., & Rha, J. Y. (2016). Personalization-privacy paradox and consumer conflict with the use of location-based mobile commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 453-462.
[43]
Li, L., Wang, Z., Zhang, Q., & Wen, H. (2020). Effect of anger, anxiety, and sadness on the propagation scale of social media posts after natural disasters. Information Processing and Management, 57(6), 102313.
[44]
Lau, W. W., & Yuen, A. H. (2014). Developing and validating of a perceived ICT literacy scale for junior secondary school students: Pedagogical and educational contributions. Computers & Education, 78, 1-9.
[45]
Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., & Ranzini, G. (2020). Data capitalism and the user: An exploration of privacy cynicism in Germany. New Media and Society, 22(7), 1168-1187.
[46]
Meng, X. (2024). Conceptualizing and Measuring Privacy Boundary Turbulence in Technological Contexts: Constructing a Measurement Scale. Information Processing and Management, 61, 103658.
[47]
McNealy, J., & Mullis, M. D. (2019). Tea and turbulence: Communication privacy management theory and online celebrity gossip forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 92(July 2018), 110-118.
[48]
McLaren, R. M., & Steuber, K. R. (2012). Emotions, communicative responses, and relational consequences of boundary turbulence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(5), 606-626.
[49]
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy:dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
[50]
Park, Y. J. (2013). Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online. Communication Research, 40(2), 215-236.
[51]
Rogers, R.W. (1983) Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change:a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R. (Eds.). Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. NY: Guilford Press, pp. 153-176.
[52]
Sun, P. (2019). Your order, their labor: An exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 308-323.
[53]
Trepte, S. (2015). Social Media, Privacy, and Self-Disclosure: The Turbulence Caused by Social Media’s Affordances. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1-2.
[54]
Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011). Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 798-824.
[55]
Youn, S., & Shin, W. (2019). Teens’ responses to Facebook newsfeed advertising: The effects of cognitive appraisal and social influence on privacy concerns and coping strategies. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 30-45.
[56]
Zhu, H., Ou, C. X. J., van den, Heuvel, W., J. A. M., & Liu, H. (2017). Privacy calculus and its utility for personalization services in e-commerce: An analysis of consumer decision-making. Information and Management, 54(4), 427-437.
[57]
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London, UK: Profifile Books Ltd.

注释 [Notes]

1. 参见:中共中央 国务院印发的《中长期青年发展规划(2016-2025年), https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-04/13/content_5185555.htm#1

基金

上海市哲学社会科学青年项目“深度智能时代的个人信息风险边界识别与政策保障研究”(2023EXW004)

PDF(2146 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/