PDF(1699 KB)
PDF(1699 KB)
PDF(1699 KB)
记者还在现场吗?社交开源情报对机构媒体的信源与角色影响
Are Reporters Still On-Site? The Influence of Social Media Intelligence on the Sources and Roles of Institutional Media
传统新闻实践中记者需要“身体在场”进行新闻报道，但随着新传播技术的发展，“记者在现场”作为首要信息来源的新闻传统正在发生变化。本文以21世纪三次重大国际冲突为例，考察了互联网技术发展背景下新闻来源的结构变化和新闻生产的模式转变。研究指出社交开源情报（SOCMINT）正加速成为机构媒体的重要信源，并进一步分析了社交开源情报在信息生产、事实核查、信息扩散三个层面的特征和机制。最后，探讨了机构媒体在SOCMINT时代的角色转变，同时也提出了机构媒体在利用社交开源情报发挥功能、承担责任方面的一些新思考。
In traditional journalism, reporters need to be “physically present” to cover news stories. However, with the development of new communication technologies, the tradition of “reporters on the scene” as the primary source of information is changing. This paper examines the structural changes in news sources and the transformation of news production models in the context of internet technology development, using three major international conflicts in the 21st century as examples. The study identifies Social Media Intelligence (SOCMINT) as an increasingly significant source for institutional media. It further analyzes the characteristics and mechanisms of SOCMINT in three aspects: information production, fact-checking, and information dissemination. Finally, the paper explores the evolving role of institutional media in the SOCMINT era and offers new perspectives on how institutional media can function and fulfill their responsibilities through SOCMINT.
社交开源情报（SOCMINT） / 新闻信源 / 机构媒体 / 事实核查
social media intelligence (SOCMINT) / news source / institutional media / fact-checking
| [1] |
蔡林杉(2021). 数字时代新闻生产者的“后在场”及现场新闻重构. 《传媒》,(10),91-93.
|
| [2] |
陈昌凤(2021). 数据主义之于新闻传播:影响、解构与利用. 《新闻界》,(11),4-13.
|
| [3] |
胡洪江(2022). 从“身体在场”到“多元在场”:移动互联时代记者与新闻现场的关系重构. 《青年记者》,(15),53-55.
|
| [4] |
胡雅萍, 洪方(2018). 社交媒体开源情报研究. 《情报杂志》,(3),15-21.
|
| [5] |
姜华, 张涛甫(2021). 传播结构变动中的新闻业及其未来走向. 《中国社会科学》,(8),185-203.
|
| [6] |
毛炜豪, 聂晓丽(2022). 透视战争认知三个维度.检索于http://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2022-02/17/content_309571.htm.
|
| [7] |
孟笛, 柳静, 王雅婧(2021). 颠覆与重塑:人工智能时代的新闻生产 《中国编辑》,(4),21-25.
|
| [8] |
潘忠党, 陆晔(2017). 走向公共:新闻专业主义再出发. 《国际新闻界》,(10),91-124.
|
| [9] |
彭兰(2021). 数字时代新闻生态的“破壁”与重构. 《青年记者》,(14),4-5.
|
| [10] |
王佳航(2022). 记者缺席的“在场”:“新闻现场”报道的变革及反思. 《当代传播》,(6),71-74.
|
| [11] |
王梦媛(2023). 智媒时代新闻专业主义的消解与重构. 《声屏世界》,(10),88-90.
|
| [12] |
魏超(2003). 战事报道领域的拓展——伊拉克战争中的网络新闻报道. 《新闻界》,(3),33-34.
|
| [13] |
杨保军, 孙新(2021). 论新世纪以来新闻生产主体的结构变迁. 《未来传播》,(4),2-13.
|
| [14] |
杨建英, 余至诚(2019). 开源情报在中国国家安全情报中的地位和作用分析. 《情报杂志》,(10).21-26.
|
| [15] |
杨柠聪(2022). 俄乌冲突中的信息战及其启示. 《世界社会主义研究》,(10),80-88.
|
| [16] |
喻国明, 马慧(2016). 互联网时代的新权力范式:“关系赋权”——“连接一切”场景下的社会关系的重组与权力格局的变迁. 《国际新闻界》,(10),6-27.
|
| [17] |
张伦(2023). 作为实践的开源新闻生产:概念、特征与反思. 《新闻界》,(12),1-9.
|
| [18] |
赵宁, 黄铁娜, 唐振宇, 等(2021). 大数据时代开源情报的知识危机与应对策略. 《情报杂志》,(5),92-99.
|
| [19] |
郑保卫(2003). 伊拉克战争中的媒体新闻战. 《国际新闻界》,(3),7-11.
|
| [20] |
Ad Fontes Media. (2024). News media across the political spectrum. Retrieved from https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/.
|
| [21] |
The way political reporters understand their own role in election campaigns is changing, signalling a deeper shift in journalistic self-conception. In traditional discourses of journalistic identity, campaign reporters are positioned as playing a unique democratic role enabling citizens to make informed voting decisions. This article asks, ‘How do campaign reporters understand and construct their own value and that of their work in an increasingly fragmented and crowded news environment?’ It offers new empirical insight through a two-country study that both considers journalist perspectives and situates these within relevant theoretical debates. It analyses interviews with political reporters in the United States and Australia in 2017, guided by two conceptual frameworks that consider the ways journalists actively construct their own identity and authority: interpretive communities and metajournalistic discourse. This allows insight into the way political reporters reconsider the need to cover campaigns from ‘on the bus’ and defend the enduring value of being there.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
In the first of these articles, those aspects of group life which can be represented as an equilibrium in a phase space were considered. In the discussion of social equilibrium it was emphasized that for understanding social events, and for planning social action, a reference from the phase space to the total social field is usually necessary. As an example of such an analysis of a social field, certain problems of social channels will be discussed briefly in this second article. We shall then consider some general problems of social planning, with particular reference to the role of “action research ” in bringing about social change.
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
This research aims to design and prototype a tool to perform intelligence on open sources (OSINT), specifically on official medical bulletins for the detection of false news. MedOSINT is a modular tool that can be adapted to process information from different medical official bulletins. From the processed information, intelligence is generated for decision making, validating the veracity of the COVID-19 news. The tool is compared with other options and it is verified that MedOSINT outperforms the current options when analyzing official bulletins. Moreover, it is complemented with an expert explanation provided by a Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) system. This is proved to be an ideal complement because it can find explanatory cases for an explanation-by-example justification.© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
| [37] |
NATO. (2001). NATO Open Source Intelligence Handbook. Retrieved from https://ia601403.us.archive.org/32/items/NATOOSINTHandbookV1.2/NATO%20OSINT%20Handbook%20v1.2%20-%20Jan%202002.pdf.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
The violent spectacle of the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot provides a case study of how online open-source investigation helped identify members of the mob and provide deeper understanding of the day’s events. Considering this form of investigation as an emerging network for the hybrid institution of journalism, an assemblage extending beyond the newsroom, this study takes a mixed-method, networked ethnography approach to map out this open-source space. Using a network analysis of open-source investigators based on Twitter data shows that the recently emerged Bellingcat organization and similar open-source groups serve a liaison function, bridging professional journalists and largely anonymous citizen “sleuthers.” Using this network as a guide, depth interviews were conducted with key participants, showing that the community was organized around an accountability ethos and a methodology of verification. We argue that this interlocking network has potential to strengthen the resilience of the journalistic institution, build citizen trust and resist politicized historical revisionism.
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
