PDF(1962 KB)
PDF(1962 KB)
PDF(1962 KB)
私人情感表达、多重自我管理与情境创造性：青年群体基于微博小号的情感工作与自我实践
Private Emotional Expression, Multiple Self-Management and Creativity within Situation: Research on Alternative Weibo Account Users’ Emotion Management and Self-Practice
面对当下数字交往带来的普遍联结，社交媒体用户在不断扩张的公共空间中寻求对自我/私人空间的界限感。本研究关注青年群体的微博小号使用现象，考察其基于小号所构建的新关系情境与自我实践。研究发现，青年个体通过小号进行的情感工作有效调节了现实生活中的自我张力与情感冲突，在此过程中其自我、身份与认同在中国传统关系取向的交往法则与不断凸显的个体化进程的张力之间实现了流动与重构，其情境也从情境再分离走向新的现实情境创造；这种新型自我重组方式是以往网络中的分离自我和现实中的隐忍自我未能涵盖的，其现实的情境创造也赋予了现实角色与社会自我新的个体意义的活力，折射出当下青年群体主观个体化的创造性行动。
Considering the universal connection in the digital association today, social media users seek a sense of self/private boundaries in an ever-expanding public space. This study focuses on the alternative account (xiaohao) in Weibo using by the young groups and the new relationship situation and new self-practice based on it. The study found that the user's personal emotional work based on xiaohao can effectively regulate and alleviate the self-tension and emotional dilemma in real life. In this process, the self, identification and identity realize the flow and reconstruction between the communication law of traditional Chinese relationship orientation and the increasingly prominent individual will, the situation also moves from the situation re-separation to the creation of new reality situation; This new self-reorganization method is unexplicable to the separated self in the network and the suppressed self in the reality, and the creation of its realistic situation also endows the realistic role and the social-self with the vitality of new individual meaning, reflecting the subjective individual will and creative actions of young people today.
微博小号 / 情感工作 / 自我实践 / 情境创造性 / 个体化
xiaohao / emotion management / self-practice / creativity within situation / individualization
| [1] |
阿莉·拉塞尔·霍克希尔德(1983/2020). 《心灵的整饰:人类情感的商业化》(成伯清,淡卫军,王佳鹏译). 上海: 上海三联书店.
|
| [2] |
卞冬磊(2019). 线上社会世界的兴起——以“自我”概念探究“社交”媒体. 《新闻记者》,(10),31-39.
|
| [3] |
程诗语, 余来辉(2022). 社交媒体用户“小号”使用行为定性研究. 《传媒论坛》,(11),36-38.
|
| [4] |
董书华, 张雪宁(2023). 断联与再联:社交媒体可见性调整与自我形象管理——基于Z世代微博小号的使用行为研究. 《青年记者》,(22),55-59.
|
| [5] |
汉斯·约阿斯, 沃尔夫冈·克伯诺(2004/2021). 《社会理论二十讲》(郑作彧译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
|
| [6] |
黄厚铭, 曹家荣(2015). “流动”的手机:液态现代性的时空架构与群己关系. 《新闻学研究》(台北),(124),39-81.
|
| [7] |
林升栋, 余洁(2017). 社交网络用户非常态使用行为分析. 《青年记者》,(21),49-50.
|
| [8] |
李亚伟, 林升栋, 普非拉(2019). 微博马甲号博文内容分析及其使用动机研究. 《青年记者》,(25),54-56.
|
| [9] |
盛芳, 左其福(2017). 社交媒体时代青年个体化进程中的认同悖论. 《牡丹江大学学报》,(11),6-8.
|
| [10] |
乌尔里希·贝克, 伊丽莎白·贝克(2002/2011). 《个体化》(李荣山,范譞,张惠强译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
|
| [11] |
王丹娜(2022). 微博小号用户使用行为的影响因素研究——基于扎根理论.华东政法大学硕士论文.上海.
|
| [12] |
王阳, 张攀(2018). 个体化存在与圈群化生活:青年群体的网络社交与圈群现象研究. 《中国青年研究》,(2),83-88.
|
| [13] |
王昀, 刘思佳(2022). 重塑网络“舒适圈”:多重账号实践中的用户自我呈现——基于微博小号现象之考察. 《传播与社会学刊》(香港),(62),147-175.
|
| [14] |
邢海燕(2021). “国潮”与“真我”:互联网时代青年的自我呈现. 《西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》,(1),126-133.
|
| [15] |
邢雅静(2021). 从“上班族”到“打工人”:网络青年亚文化的消极抵抗话语实践分析. 《视听》,(2),122-123.
|
| [16] |
阎云翔(2012). 《中国社会的个体化》(陆洋等译). 上海: 上海译文出版社.
|
| [17] |
阎云翔(2016). 《私人生活的变革:一个村庄里的爱情、 家庭与亲密关系》(龚小夏译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
|
| [18] |
张杰(2016). 通过陌生性去沟通:陌生人与移动网时代的网络身份/认同——基于“个体化社会”的视角. 《国际新闻界》,(1),102-119.
|
| [19] |
张放, 尹雯婷(2012). 从独白式微博书写看媒介中介化自我传播. 《当代传播》,(4),79-81.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Social media users are routinely counseled to cultivate their online personae with acumen and diligence. But universal prescriptions for impression management may prove for vexing for college students, who confront oft-conflicting codes of normative self-presentation in digital contexts. Against this backdrop, our research sought to examine the online self-presentation activities of emerging adults (18–24) across an expansive social media ecology that included Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Snapchat, and Twitter. Drawing upon in-depth interviews with 28 Fcollege-aged youth, we highlight how the imagined surveillance of various social actors steered their self-presentation practices in patterned ways. After exploring three distinct responses to imagined surveillance—including the use of privacy settings, self-monitoring, and pseudonymous accounts (including “Finstas,” or fake + Instagram)—we consider the wider implications of a cultural moment wherein users are socialized to anticipate the incessant monitoring of social institutions: family, educators, and above all, (future) employers.
|
| [25] |
Drawing on data gathered during ethnographic fieldwork in Mardin, a medium-sized town in southeast Turkey, this article shows that social media users actively appropriate online platforms and change privacy settings in order to keep different social spheres and social groups apart. Keeping different online social contexts distinct from each other is taken for granted as a way of using social media in Mardin. By contrast, social media scholars have extensively discussed the effects of social media in terms of context collapse. The article highlights how context collapse is the result of patterns of usage within Anglo-American contexts and not the consequence of a platform’s architecture or social media logic. It then suggests a theoretical refinement of affordances, and proposes the concept of affordances-in-practice.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Social media technologies collapse multiple audiences into single contexts, making it difficult for people to use the same techniques online that they do to handle multiplicity in face-to-face conversation. This article investigates how content producers navigate ‘imagined audiences’ on Twitter. We talked with participants who have different types of followings to understand their techniques, including targeting different audiences, concealing subjects, and maintaining authenticity. Some techniques of audience management resemble the practices of ‘micro-celebrity’ and personal branding, both strategic self-commodification. Our model of the networked audience assumes a many-to-many communication through which individuals conceptualize an imagined audience evoked through their tweets.
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Guided by the frameworks of niche and polymedia theories, this study sought to understand the phenomenon of platform-swinging on social media, which refers to the routine use of multiple social media platforms that has become commonplace across different ages. Based on focus group discussions (FGDs) with 62 social media users in Singapore, this study found that social media users engage in platform-swinging for relationship management and self-presentation gratifications. While these gratifications are also served by individual social media platforms, platform-swinging allows social media users to navigate structural, social, and norm barriers to obtain greater gratification opportunities. This has implications on how social media users subsequently regard and segment their personal relationships.
|
1. 极目新闻（2023）。抖音、微信、微博等各大平台官宣，“实名制”时代来了。检索于
2. “参考群体”概念指涉的是个体在行动时，行动倾向往往取决于其认可的参考群体。参考群体主要是身处其中的群体，但也可以是想要加入的群体。详见罗伯特·K·默顿（Merton,R.K.）著；唐少杰等译《社会理论与社会结构》，南京：译林出版社，2008。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
