基于演化博弈的互联网广告流量欺诈现象的仿真实验与治理启示

雷蕾

国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4) : 96-115.

PDF(1635 KB)
PDF(1635 KB)
国际新闻界 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4) : 96-115.
研究论文

基于演化博弈的互联网广告流量欺诈现象的仿真实验与治理启示

作者信息 +

The Simulation Experiment of Internet Advertising Traffic Fraud based on Evolutionary Game Theory and the Enlightenment of Governance

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于前期的文献研究与深度访谈,本研究从互联网广告流量交易现状中抽离关键变量,借助计算机仿真软件Netlogo构建了互联网广告流量欺诈的行动者模型,设计并运行六项仿真实验重点考察互联网广告流量交易的收入、成本、净收益、增长阈值、欺诈者占比、需求方起始数量六项变量对市场均衡状态的影响作用,从而展现互联网广告流量欺诈现象的产生机制。研究发现,相较于流量需求方相关的内生变量(起始数量与增长阈值),市场环境相关的外生变量(收入-成本-净收益与欺诈者占比)对市场均衡状态的影响更显著;“高利诱惑”与“欺诈容忍度”在对市场均衡状态的影响上势均力敌。此外,模型也提供了探索市场临界状态(介于全部退出与市场饱和)的方法,对互联网广告流量欺诈现象的治理也有一定的启示。

Abstract

Based on the previous literature research and interviews, this study extracts fourteen key variables from the current Internet advertising traffic transactions to construct agents-based model of Internet advertising traffic with the help of computer simulation software Netlogo and focuses on the effects of six factors which include income, cost, net income, growth threshold, the proportion of fraudsters and the initial number of demanders of traffic transactions on the market equilibrium through six simulation experiments. It is found that the market environment factors, such as income, cost, net income and the proportion of fraudsters, have impact on the market equilibrium more significantly than the factors about demanders. High profit temptation and fraud tolerance are equal in the impact on market equilibrium. In addition, the model also provides a way to explore the critical state of the market (between full withdrawal and market saturation), which also provide some enlightenment on the governance of Internet advertising traffic fraud.

关键词

虚假流量 / 计算机仿真 / 行动者模型

Key words

bogus traffic / computer simulation / Agent-based Model

引用本文

导出引用
雷蕾. 基于演化博弈的互联网广告流量欺诈现象的仿真实验与治理启示[J]. 国际新闻界. 2022, 44(4): 96-115
LEI Lei. The Simulation Experiment of Internet Advertising Traffic Fraud based on Evolutionary Game Theory and the Enlightenment of Governance[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2022, 44(4): 96-115

参考文献

[1]
陈友芳(2011). 重复博弈、信息不对称与诚信建设的博弈机制. 《福建论坛(人文社会科学版)》,(1),17-21.
[2]
Juniper Research(2018). 转引自秒针系统(2019).互联网广告异常流量2018年度报告. 检索于 http://www.miaozhen.com/index.php/Index/newsxq/id/2718.html.
[3]
李苏文, 吴清烈(2007). 电子商务交易过程中信用的演化博弈分析. 《科技情报开发与经济》,(17),114-116.
[4]
李秀岩(2017). 基于演化博弈视角的保险欺诈问题分析. 《纳税》,(6),58.
[5]
廖秉宜(2015). 中国程序化购买广告产业现状、问题与对策. 《新闻界》,(24),43-46.
[6]
秒针系统(2019). 互联网广告异常流量2018年度报告. 检索于 http://www.miaozhen.com/index.php/Index/newsxq/id/2718.html.
[7]
奈杰尔·吉尔伯特(2012). 《基于行动者的模型》(盛智明译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[8]
托马斯·谢林(2008). 中文版序言.2008年10月.载彼得·赫斯特罗姆(2010),《解析社会:分析社会学原理》(第2页)(陈云松等译). 南京: 南京大学出版社.
[9]
王淼(2017). 数据驱动的互联网广告效果监测研究. 《广告大观·理论版》,(8),31-46.
[10]
夏茂森, 朱宪辰, 江波(2009). 农产品交易行为的动态演化博弈分析. 《技术经济》,(8),123-127.
[11]
徐妍(2014). 基于演化博弈的证券交易者策略选择研究. 《南京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》,(6),13-21.
[12]
杨德勇, 董左卉子(2007). 证券市场羊群效应的演化博弈分析. 《北京工商大学学报:社会科学版》,(4),21-24.
[13]
杨肃昌, 董甜甜(2018). 市场监管机制对网购市场诚信经营的作用——基于动态演化博弈分析. 《兰州财经大学学报》, 34(04),56-63.
[14]
于斌斌(2013). 演化经济学理论体系的建构与发展:一个文献综述. 《经济评论》,(5),139-146.
[15]
张付标, 邢精平, 季峰(2012). 合谋操纵与散户跟风的演化博弈分析. 《证券市场导报》,(2),33-37.
[16]
张国华(2017). 净化广告数据监测环境,促进广告产业繁荣发展. 《中国广告》,(5),30-32.
[17]
张维迎(2013). 《博弈与社会》. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[18]
中国广告协会(2019). 一般无效流量数据服务. 检索于 http://www.china-caa.org/digital.
[19]
Fetters, A., Garbayo, A. & Suarez-Davis, J. (2016). Combat (Digital) Fraud to Drive ROI. Retrieved from https://thearf.org/category/news-you-can-use/editors-note-from-the-am-conference-in-june-combat-digital-fraud-to-drive-roi-presented-by-aaron-fetters-comscore-inc-amaya-garbayo-kellogg-and-jon-suarez-davis-krux/.
[20]
ARF (2015). TAG Rolls Out “Approved” List and Payment IDs to Fight Ad Fraud: Group Takes Aim at Fraudsters with Two-Step Verification Process. Retrieved from. https://thearf.org/category/news-you-can-use/tag-rolls-out-approved-list-and-payment-ids-to-fight-ad-fraud-group-takes-aim-at-fraudsters-with-two-step-verification-process/.
[21]
Association of National Advertisers & White Ops. (2019). The Bot Baseline: Fraud in Digital Advertising 2018-2019 Report. Retrieved from https://www.ana.net.
[22]
Sass, E. (2015). MRC Issues Ad Fraud Rules. Retrieved from https://thearf.org/category/news-you-can-use/mrc-issues-ad-fraud-rules/.
[23]
Slefo, G. (2016). Senators take aim at Ad fraud. Advertising Age, 87(14), 0004.
[24]
Nelson, J. L. & Webster, J. G. (2016). Audience Currencies in the Age of Big Data, International Journal On Media Management, 18(1), 9-24.
[25]
Kantrowitz, A. (2014). Fraud is Rampant in the Digital Ad World. Here’s Why So Little Has Been Done about It. Advertising Age, 85(6), 28.
[26]
Kahn, R. (2015). Four Reasons Why You're Losing Large Chunks of Your Budget to Click Fraud. Retrieved from http://www.marketingprofs.com/opinions/2015/28244/four-reasons-why-youre-losing-large-chunks-of-your-budget-to-click-fraud.
[27]
Scott, M. (2017). Is Block chain a solution to digital Ad fraud. Retrieved from https://www.pubexec.com/post/blockchain-solution-digital-ad-fraud/.
[28]
Napoli, P. (2011). Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audience. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
[29]
Meehan, E. (1984). Rating and the institutional approach: a third answer to the commodity question. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2(1), 216-225.
[30]
World Federation of Advertisers (2016). WFA issues first advice for combatting ad fraud. Retrieved from https://www.wfanet.org/news-centre/wfa-issues-first-advice-for-combatting-ad-fraud/.

注释 [Notes]

1. 深度访谈。访谈对象:刘沛(第三方营销数据技术服务商秒针系统技术副总裁,MMA中国移动营销协会技术专家),访谈时间:2019年4月18日下午,访谈形式:面访,访谈地点:秒针公司。

2. 同1。

3. 深度访谈。访谈对象:陈传洽(营销数据技术服务商秒针系统运营合伙人,MMA中国广告标准委员会副主席),访谈时间:2019年4月19日下午,访谈形式:电话访谈。

4. 同3。

5. 深度访谈。访谈对象:谭北平(第三方营销数据技术服务商秒针系统产品合伙人),访谈时间:2019年5月15日上午,访谈形式:面访,访谈地点:秒针公司。

基金

2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于演化博弈的互联网广告流量欺诈的治理研究”(19YJCZH075)

PDF(1635 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/