PDF(1573 KB)
PDF(1573 KB)
PDF(1573 KB)
赛博格视角下人工智能广告的时空性
The Spatiotemporal Nature of Artificial Intelligence Advertising from a Cyborg Perspective
本文基于人机互动的赛博格视角对人工智能广告的时空性进行了探讨。结合对当前广告业实践案例的分析与讨论,认为相较于传统广告所建构的时空,智能广告趋近于将时空无限地延伸和拓展。而赛博格化可以说是智能广告最直观的变化,它通过媒介的智能化、信息的数字化、体验的感官化、用户的参与化、沟通的网络化、效果的直接化六方面颠覆了传统广告的时空性,促生了智能广告时空性的形成。由此,本文总结提出智能广告的四个时空特性,即时空叠加性、时空流动性、时空压缩性、时空再造性,并从赛博格的视角将人工智能广告定义为:消费者以自身个体为界面,通过智能技术连接多维时间和空间,在人机融合的交互感官体验中获取任何所需的营销沟通活动。
Based on the cyborg perspective of human-computer interaction, this paper investigates the spatiotemporal nature of artificial intelligence advertising. Combined with the analysis and discussion of the current advertising industry practice cases, it is believed that compared with the time and space constructed by traditional advertising, smart advertising tends to extend and expand the time and space infinitely. Cyborgization can be said to be the most intuitive change of intelligent advertising. It subverts the traditional through six aspects: intelligent media, digitization of information, sensory experience, user participation, communication network, and direct effect. The spatiotemporal nature of advertising has contributed to the formation of the spatiotemporal nature of intelligent advertising. Therefore, this paper summarizes and proposes four temporal and spatial characteristics of intelligent advertising, namely, spatial and temporal superposition, temporal and spatial fluidity, temporal and spatial compression, and temporal and spatial reconstruction. From the perspective of cyborg, artificial intelligence advertising can be defined as: consumers use themselves as the interface, connecting multi-dimensional time and space through intelligent technology, and obtaining any required marketing communication activities in the interactive sensory experience.
human-computer interaction / advertising communication / Virtual Reality
| [1] |
安东尼·吉登斯(1990/2011). 《现代性的后果》(田禾译). 南京: 译林出版社.
|
| [2] |
蔡立媛, 龚智伟(2020). 人工智能时代广告的“时空侵犯”. 《新闻与传播评论》,(2),70-76.
|
| [3] |
陈静, 王杰(2009). 我们都是赛博格——信息时代的文化新景观. 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(5),106-109.
|
| [4] |
戴世富, 彭峰(2021). 时空重构与具身沉浸:5G时代智能广告传播的新趋向. 《南方传媒研究》,(5),58-63.
|
| [5] |
段淳林, 宋成(2020). 用户需求、算法推荐与场景匹配:智能广告的理论逻辑与实践思考. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(8),119-128.
|
| [6] |
哈罗德·英尼斯(1951/2003). 《传播的偏向》(何道宽译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
|
| [7] |
何镇飚, 王润(2014). 新媒体时空观与社会变化:时空思想史的视角. 《国际新闻界》,(5),33-47.
|
| [8] |
凯瑟琳·海勒(1999/2018) 《我们何以成为后人类》(刘宇清译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
|
| [9] |
柯泽, 谭诗妤(2020). 人工智能媒介拟态环境的变化及其受众影响. 《学术界》,(7),51-60.
|
| [10] |
李建会, 苏湛(2005). 哈拉维及其“赛博格”神话. 《自然辩证法研究》,(3),18-22+36.
|
| [11] |
刘海龙, 束开荣(2019). 具身性与传播研究的身体观念——知觉现象学与认知科学的视角. 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》,(2),80-89.
|
| [12] |
吕宇翔, 方格格(2021). 时空、流动与身体:传播仪式观下的故宫云展. 《艺术设计研究》,(6),91-96.
|
| [13] |
梅琼林(2005). 技术的质疑——从保罗·维利里奥的时空观谈起. 《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》,(6),133-135.
|
| [14] |
莫里斯·梅洛庞蒂(1964/ 2001) 《知觉现象学》(姜志辉译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
|
| [15] |
彭兰(2016). 智媒化:未来媒体浪潮——新媒体发展趋势报告(2016). 《国际新闻界》, (11),6-24.
|
| [16] |
彭兰(2019). 智能时代人的数字化生存——可分离的“虚拟实体”“数字化元件”与不会消失的“具身性”. 《新闻记者》,(12),4-12.
|
| [17] |
彭兰(2020). 《新媒体用户研究:节点化、媒介化、赛博格化的人》. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
|
| [18] |
秦雪冰(2022). 技术嵌入与价值取向:智能广告的演进逻辑. 《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(1),171-179.
|
| [19] |
芮必峰, 孙爽(2020). 从离身到具身——媒介技术的生存论转向. 《国际新闻界》,(5),7-17.
|
| [20] |
邵培仁, 黄庆(2009). 媒介时间论——针对媒介时间观念的研究. 《当代传播》,(3),21-24.
|
| [21] |
孙玮(2018). 交流者的身体:传播与在场——意识主体、身体—主体、智能主体的演变. 《国际新闻界》, (12),91.
|
| [22] |
孙玮(2018). 赛博人:后人类时代的媒介融合. 《新闻记者》,(6),4-11.
|
| [23] |
谭辉煌(2016). 论广告形态的演进趋势——超时空自由与多感官平衡. 《湖北科技学院学报》,(8),1-4.
|
| [24] |
谭凌宇(2012). 从实物广告到旗帜广告:论原始广告形态的演变. 《新闻世界》,(12),117-118.
|
| [25] |
谭雪芳(2019). 图形化身、数字孪生与具身性在场:身体—技术关系模式下的传播新视野. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(8),64-70+79.
|
| [26] |
唐·伊德(2008/ 2012). 《技术与生活世界:从伊甸园到尘世》(韩连庆译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
|
| [27] |
王菲, 姚京宏(2021). 构建全新的信任范式:论区块链对广告业的变革. 《当代传播》,(5),85.
|
| [28] |
王林, 乔建梅(2021). 国外数字孪生技术发展及对我国的启示. 《上海信息化》,(11),52-55.
|
| [29] |
王雅鹃(2021). 技术规约、身体复归与智能觉醒:智能广告伦理的三个研究取向. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(9),130-134.
|
| [30] |
吴世文(2011). 融合文化本质与受众自我赋权. 《重庆社会科学》,(3),85-88.
|
| [31] |
杨勇(2021). 新兴技术共塑下的广告产业发展范式变革及伦理挑战. 《现代视听》,(12),5-8.
|
| [32] |
姚曦, 任文姣(2020). 从意识沉浸到知觉沉浸:智能时代广告的具身性转向. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(1),128-132.
|
| [33] |
袁艳(2006). 传播学研究的空间想象力. 《新闻与传播研究》,(1),45-50+95.
|
| [34] |
杨硕, 周显信(2021). 品牌价值共创:理论视角、研究议题及未来展望. 《江海学刊》,(5),241-247+255.
|
| [35] |
曾琼(2020). “泛在”与“沉浸”:5G时代广告传播的时空创造与体验重构. 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》,(4),120-126.
|
| [36] |
詹姆斯·凯瑞(1989/2005) 《作为文化的传播》(丁未译). 北京: 华夏出版社.
|
| [37] |
张方敏, 刘芳(2010). 电视广告中的时空艺术. 《传媒观察》,(9),47-48.
|
| [38] |
张洪忠, 斗维红, 任吴炯(2022). 元宇宙:具身传播的场景想象. 《新闻界》,(1),76-84.
|
| [39] |
张进, 王垚(2017). 技术的嵌入性、杂合性、药性与物质文化研究. 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(1),20-26.
|
| [40] |
张一兵(2008). 拟像、拟真与内爆的布尔乔亚世界——鲍德里亚《象征交换与死亡》研究. 《江苏社会科学》,(6),32-38.
|
| [41] |
张昱辰(2018). 跨学科视野中的媒介融合研究:多重维度与范式. 《新闻记者》,(6),19-27.
|
| [42] |
赵超(2020). 意义的建构:心理学研究综述与案例分析. 《装饰》,(4),42-53.
|
| [43] |
赵豆(2021). 从人类增强到机器向人化——对脑机接口技术两种进路的哲学审思. 《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(6),27-35.
|
| [44] |
郑新刚(2019). 超越与重塑. 《编辑之友》,(5),74-80.
|
| [45] |
This article develops the concept of cyborg activism as novel configuration of democratic subjectivity in the Information Age by exploring the online collectivity Anonymous as a prototype. By fusing elements of human/machine and organic/digital, the cyborg disrupts modern logics of binary thinking. Cyborg activism emerges as the reconfiguration of equality/hierarchy, reason/emotion and nihilism/idealism. Anonymous demonstrates how through the use of contingent and ephemeral digital personae hierarchies in cyborg activism prove more volatile than in face-to-face settings. Emotions appear as an essential part of a politics of passion, which enables pursuing laughter and joy, expressing anger and experiencing empowerment as part of a reasoned, strategic politics. Anonymous’ political content reconfigures nihilist sentiments, frustration and political disenchantment, on one hand, with idealist world views, on the other. This enables the cohabitation and partial integration of a great diversity of political claims rooted in various ideologies.
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Finding our way between places, through spaces, has been documented using various techniques of mapping. Maps are often thought of as products that allow us to find our way between places. However, they have various other uses and meanings, existing as both scientific and cultural artefacts. Mobile phone technologies have evolved, allowing for the integration of global positioning systems (GPS). The inclusion of GPS in ‘smart phones’ such as the iPhone now allows users to view the spaces they are moving through in new ways. This article examines how we are now remapping places through mobile technologies, which poses the question of how our relationship with local spaces may be changing. It focuses on Foursquare, the Layar AR browser and the iPhone game Argh as examples of how our sense of place and mapping are evolving through user-generated input.
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |