PDF(1488 KB)
PDF(1488 KB)
PDF(1488 KB)
技术的应许与脆弱不安的生命：残障者的互联网工作实践
The Promise of Technology and the Precarious Lives: Disabled People’s Practices of Internet Work
互联网等信息通讯技术与残障者脆弱不安生命境况之间的关系问题，是互联网研究与残障研究交叉领域兼具现实关怀与理论观照的重要研究问题。因此，本研究聚焦中国特定语境下残障者互联网工作的在地实践，探索如何从残障者视角剖析技术应许与脆弱生命之间的内在张力。基于三年多的田野观察和近百名残障工作者的深度访谈，本研究既呈现了互联网给予残障者的技术应许，也展现了技术赋能之下残障者脆弱不安的境况。具体研究发现：需要从工作与赚钱的物质层面以及价值与关系的意义层面，理解技术应许对中国残障者特殊的深层意义，也需要在脆弱不安的普遍共性问题之上，从情感压力和忍耐主体的精神层面，理解残障者特殊的生命体验和主体生成，进而理解我们自己，理解这个时代。
The relationship between information and communication technologies (ICTs) like the Internet and the precarious conditions of disabled people is an important research issue with practical concerns and theoretical implications in the intersection of Internet research and disability studies. Situated in China’s specific context, therefore, this study focuses on disabled people’s local practices of Internet work, to explore the research question that how to examine the relationship between the promise of technology and the precarious conditions of disabled people. Based on field observations for more than three years and in-depth interviews with nearly one hundred disabled workers, this study demonstrates not only the promise of technology of the Internet to disabled people, but also the precarious conditions of disabled people despite the technological empowerment. Specifically, the research findings suggest that we need to understand the special meaning of technological promises to Chinese disabled people from both the material perspective of having a job and making money and the meaning perspective of value and relationship. We also need to go beyond the common problems of precarity to understand disabled people’s special life experience and subjectivity formation from the spiritual perspective of emotional pressure and suffering subject, thus finally understanding ourselves and our time.
信息通讯技术 / 脆弱不安 / 国家治理 / 残障 / 互联网
information and communication technology / precarity / state governing / disability / Internet
| [1] |
郭亚军, 卢星宇, 张瀚文(2020). 人工智能赋能信息无障碍:模式、问题与展望. 《情报理论与实践》,(8),57-63+69.
|
| [2] |
李东晓(2013). 我国电视媒体的无障碍发展现状、问题兼及建议. 《现代传播: 中国传媒大学学报》, 35(5),7-13.
|
| [3] |
李东晓, 熊梦琪(2019). 新中国信息无障碍70年:理念、实践与变迁. 《浙江学刊》,(5),14-23.
|
| [4] |
杨波(2020). 论网络对个体自我效能的影响——以社会残障人士为例. 《国际新闻界》,(6),64-68.
|
| [5] |
林仲轩, 杨柳(2020). 互联网背景下残障群体的社会心态研究. 《残疾人研究》,(3),72-76.
|
| [6] |
赵英(2018). 针对残障人士的信息无障碍影响因素研究. 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(5),84-93.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Children with disabilities, especially those from the Global North, often figure into public discourse as beneficiaries of the “digital revolution.” However, if children’s voices and experiences are generally under-considered in digital policy and rights debates, this is even more likely when it comes to disability. Against this background, this article looks at the global rights of children with disabilities in the digital age. We consider the state of digital inclusion and exclusion, as well as the intersection between children’s rights and disability rights. Moving forward, we suggest ways to reconceptualize digital and related rights inclusive of all children.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
This article examines academic and popular examples of a “cyborg hoax”—an articulation of gender, dis/ability, and technology that is deceptive, reinforces an ideology of ability, and prevents users and scholars alike from seeing the value of disability for digital media cultures. The article uses cyborg theory, cyberculture studies, literature on online deception, and critical disability studies to argue that cyborg hoaxes are a dominant but stereotypical representation. This is contrasted with ethnographic data about disabled peoples’ online experiences, which suggest that alternative linkages of disability, gender, and technology can provide valuable insights into the critical study of online cultures.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
The growth of precarious work since the 1970s has emerged as a core contemporary concern within politics, in the media, and among researchers. Uncertain and unpredictable work contrasts with the relative security that characterized the three decades following World War II. Precarious work constitutes a global challenge that has a wide range of consequences cutting across many areas of concern to sociologists. Hence, it is increasingly important to understand the new workplace arrangements that generate precarious work and worker insecurity. A focus on employment relations forms the foundation of theories of the institutions and structures that generate precarious work and the cultural and individual factors that influence people's responses to uncertainty. Sociologists are well-positioned to explain, offer insight, and provide input into public policy about such changes and the state of contemporary employment relations.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are increasingly important for people with disabilities (PWDs), suggesting digital inclusion as a possible social mechanism against the social exclusion of disability. This study suggests a more complicated relationship between ICTs and disability. Situated in a Chinese context and based on research methods of ethnographic participant observation and in-depth interviews, this study explains why and how social exclusion of disability in China leads to PWDs’ exodus to the Internet, where they find a possible habitat of digital and social inclusion notwithstanding the risk of more profound social exclusion. The study finally argues that the Internet habitat of PWDs is both a material enclave and a discourse heterotopia for understanding Chinese society, disability, and ICTs. In addition, future studies should further include PWDs in this field.
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Although the field of disability studies has examined disability across many contexts, the experience of library workers remains largely unexamined. Library literature tends to focus on the experiences of library users, rather than address the structural inequities in the profession itself. In the United States, current conversations within higher education and academic librarianship around resilience and professionalism create additional barriers to inclusion and exclude the lived experiences of those with disabilities. Additionally, existing processes designed to address disability treat its existence as a problem in need of a solution, and in doing so, further contribute to the workplace precarity experienced by library workers. Instead of maintaining existing systemic barriers and perpetuating an ableist professional ideal that places responsibility on the individual to be resilient, libraries and library workers need to redefine professionalism, minimize the stigma associated with any type of disability, and reduce precarity for disabled library employees. Only then can libraries and library workers focus on equity and inclusion for all.
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
This article investigates how differences in social ties lead to differences in the social use of information and communication technology (ICT) and vice versa. The article draws on a qualitative study in the field of disability studies. Through this study of a marginalized subgroup of youth, the article advances insight into the permeability of the real and the virtual and extends the notion of established concepts of social ties and digital differentiation. The youth in the current study are 23 disabled Norwegians aged 15—20 years. The analysis is based on the principles of grounded theory and is characterized by a constant content comparative process. The outcome of this analysis shows how social ties of a marginalized subgroup of young people hold different characteristics than established notions anticipate, how these characteristics are vital in youths' interaction in offline and online life and how this interaction implies a mixed reality.
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
