PDF(1569 KB)
PDF(1569 KB)
PDF(1569 KB)
国际跨文化传播研究新特征和新趋势
New Characteristics and Trends in International Intercultural Communication Research
在中国的跨文化传播研究不断深入的背景下,本领域全球发展现状需被全面了解。本文根据专家意见法确定了8本国外重要的跨文化传播期刊,对2018年至2020年的495篇文献进行梳理和解读,从问题意识、研究方法、发现与创新性等层面进行分析。国外跨文化传播研究大体呈现出以下几个特征:文化身份省思与群际传播内在张力的学术视角;跨文化接触中殖民主义和集体记忆关注;语言在传递文化价值观与增强文化归属感中的作用重点提及;传播学、跨文化传播学的学科边界意识;对既有理论的检验和延伸推动新知识生产的趋势;媒介使用比较研究的跨文化视角; 社交媒体在跨文化融入中的功能研究;跨文化能力和跨文化培训在众多领域的重要性凸显;多元文化背景下的文化安全感与跨文化关系研究;基于身份政治、文化自觉的传播学跨文化审视危机意识。
With China’s intercultural communication research constantly going deeper, it is necessary to gain a global perspective with regard to the development of this field. Based on Delphi method, this paper identifies eight prestigious intercultural communication journals overseas, reviews 495 articles published in 2018-2020, and analyzes them from the aspects of their question awareness, research methods, findings and innovative points. Several major trends have been highlighted as follows: the inherent interplay between cultural identity and inter-group communication from the academic perspective; the attention to colonialist and collective memories during intercultural contacts; the role of language in communicating cultural values and enhancing cultural belonging; discussions of the disciplinary boundaries; testing and extending existing theories to facilitate the production of new knowledge; the intercultural perspective of media uses; research on the function of social media in intercultural integration; the importance of intercultural competence and cross-cultural training in relevant areas; research on cultural security and its effects on intercultural relations in a multicultural context; intercultural reflections based on identity politics and cultural awareness.
International intercultural communication / cultural identity / collective memory / intergroup contact
| [1] |
阿恩雷·鲍尔德温等 (1998/2004). 《文化研究导论》(陶冬风等译)(修订版). 北京: 高等教育出版社.
|
| [2] |
常江, 何仁亿(2018). 迈克尔·舒德森:新闻学不是一个学科——历史、常识祛魅与非中心化. 《新闻界》,(1),12-17.
|
| [3] |
恩斯特·卡西尔(1944/1985). 《人论》(甘阳译). 上海: 上海译文出版社.
|
| [4] |
姜飞(2005). 《跨文化传播的后殖民语境》. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
|
| [5] |
姜飞(2018). 2017年全球传播生态年度发展报告. 载高伟,姜飞(主编),《全球传播生态发展报告》(第1-45页). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
|
| [6] |
威廉·洪堡特(1836/1999). 《论人类语言结构的差异及其对人类精神发展的影响》(姚小平译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
This paper presents a meta-analysis of 79 cases (N = 21,857) testing the effectiveness of mediated intergroup contact on prejudice. Positive mediated contact decreased (r = −.23; 95% CI, −.29 to −.17), whereas negative mediated contact increased prejudicial attitudes (r = .31; 95% CI,.24 to.38) and intergroup anxiety and empathy were both significant mediators of these relationships. Furthermore, the data revealed no significant differences between parasocial and vicarious effects, positive and negative mediated-contact effects, or the effects of the duration of mediated-contact stimulus exposure on prejudice. However, the data did reveal experiments to have stronger effects than survey research. These and other results are discussed along with implications, limitations, and future research directions.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Generation Z has been said to have more in common with their global generational cohort than they do with their parents. The 24/7 access to information, through increasingly ubiquitous Internet access, has been credited as the facilitator of the spread of generational values and characteristics. While this may apply to Generation Z in many developed countries, does it apply in developing nations such as Thailand? For example, by the year 2015, only 40 percent of the Thai population had access to the Internet. Thus, this study attempts to understand to what extent proclaimed Generation Z characteristics and values ring true for a segment of Thai youth with the necessary access to and corresponding usage of connected technology. A literature review was conducted of both English and Thai language literature. Thai Generation Z university students were surveyed, and the results were analyzed using structural equation modeling. On the one hand, the results did support an affinity toward technology, on the other hand, it suggested that Thai youth valued and used the technology differently than their generational cohort in the west, especially concerning content creation. Furthermore, they differed from their global cohort in their preference for collectivism. They also differed from national cultural expectations as they showed tendencies toward low power distance. Finally, work values were largely consistent with international generational expectations in that they showed the strongest preference toward intrinsic and altruistic rewards. It will be essential for Human Resources (HR) to communicate these rewards to attract and retain this next generation of employees. This article contributes to the greater cross-cultural management scholarship by filling a gap in understanding the cultural and work values of a generational cohort in Thailand. It does this by highlighting the institutional and cultural setting this cohort came of age in and surveys cohort members to understand their values and preferences.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Over the past 30 years, scholars have criticized the propensity of the international media to reproduce damaging and racist stereotypes about Africa. How do foreign correspondents, who are key actors in the production of Africa's media image, position themselves in relation to this criticism? Based on 35 interviews conducted with correspondents in Kenya and South Africa between 2013 and 2017, I find that many correspondents recognize the negative contributions of the news industry to representational Othering, thereby agreeing with the general tenets of the criticism. This paper is an in-depth exploration of this phenomenon, which I call postcolonial reflexivity. I outline the features of this postcolonial reflexivity, discuss its impact on journalistic practices, and explore the reasons for its prevalence among correspondents. Overall, the research contributes to bridging the gap between the textual orientation of postcolonial studies and the inclination for analyzing production practices in journalism studies.
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
With the explosive growth in research topics, communication science is said to be more fragmented and hyper-specialized than ever before, producing an increasing number of small, niche research topics that lack intellectual coherence as a whole. While such issues have been a central concern for the field, there has been a relative lack of systematic effort to map the topical interconnections among different communication science subfields, answering the question of how they remain empirically fragmented. Using full-texts of scholarly articles published in the top 20 communication science journals from 2010 to 2019, we provide systematic evidence to such claims in terms of their actual contents and their connectivity patterns. Drawing on extant works concerning the sociology of science and structures of scientific knowledge, as well as on topic modeling and simulation-based inferences on network topological features, we find that subdisciplinary linkage in communication is more frequent than we often think.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
This study sought to test the underlying assumption of the face-negotiation theory that face is an explanatory mechanism for culture’s influence on conflict behavior. A questionnaire was administered to 768 participants in 4 national cultures (China, Germany, Japan, and the United States) asking them to describe interpersonal conflict. The major findings of this study are as follows: (a) cultural individualism-collectivism had direct and indirect effects on conflict styles, (b) independent self-construal related positively with self-face and interdependent self-construal related positively with other-face, (c) self-face related positively with dominating conflict styles and other-face related positively with avoiding and integrating styles, and (d) face accounted for all of the total variance explained (100% of 19% total explained) in dominating, most of the total variance explained in integrating (70% of 20% total explained), and some of the total variance explained in avoiding (38% of 21% total explained) when considering face concerns, cultural individualismcollectivism, and self-construals.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
In 4 studies, the authors investigated mediators of the effect of cross-group friendship. In Study 1, cross-group friendship among White elementary school children predicted more positive explicit outgroup attitude toward South Asians, mediated by self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. In Study 2, cross-group friendship and extended contact among White and South Asian high school students positively predicted explicit outgroup attitude, mediated by self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Study 3 replicated these findings in a larger independent sample. In all 3 studies, exposure to the outgroup positively predicted implicit outgroup attitude. Study 4 further showed that self-disclosure improved explicit outgroup attitude via empathy, importance of contact, and intergroup trust. The authors discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings, which argue for the inclusion of self-disclosure as a key component of social interventions to reduce prejudice.(c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |