PDF(1615 KB)
PDF(1615 KB)
PDF(1615 KB)
人格失焦：数字原住民人格特质与微信个人资料图像的自我呈现
The Indeterminate Personality: The relationship between Digital Natives’ Personality Traits and WeChat Profile Image
微信用户的个人资料图像是解析用户互联网生存心理和行为的关键切入点之一。社交网络中的自我呈现行为是否是现实生活的延伸与映射，一直存在争议。本文基于自我呈现理论、大五人格模型理论、人格心理学视角进行量化分析，以数字原住民微信用户个人资料图像为研究对象，考察该群体人格特质对自我呈现的影响。研究发现，人格特质得分越高的数字原住民微信用户越倾向于使用含有自己的图像；具体个人资料图像的选择更多是一种随机性的表达；人格特质差异并不明显影响个人资料图像的选择。但是，数字原住民微信用户人格特质五因素间大多存在相关关系，同时在是否使用含有自己图像的两类用户中相关关系的表现存在明显差异。研究还发现，数字原住民微信用户更倾向于使用不含有自己的图像，这与境外以Facebook用户为对象的同类研究差异明显。
WeChat users' profile image is one of the key points to analyze the survival psychology and behavior on the internet. Whether the self-presentation behavior in social network is a reflection and extension of real life has always been controversial. Based on the self-presentation theory, the Big-five structure theory and the perspective of personality psychology, this paper conducts a quantitative analysis and takes the profile image of digital native WeChat users as the research object to investigate the influence of the personality traits on self-presentation. The research finds that the higher the score of the digital natives WeChat users' personality traits, the more inclined to use their own image. The choice of specific profile image is more of a random expression. And, differences in personality traits do not significantly affect the choice of personal profile image. However, most of the five factors of digital native WeChat users' personality traits have correlations, and there are significantly differences in the performance of correlation between the two types of users who use their own image or not. The research also finds that digital natives WeChat users prefer to use image that do not contain their own, which is quite different from similar researches on Facebook users abroad.
自我呈现 / 大五人格模型 / 数字原住民 / 微信个人资料图像
Self-presentation / big five structure model / digital natives / WeChat profile image
| [1] |
陈成鑫, 初景利(2010). 国外新一代用户网络信息行为研究进展. 《图书馆论坛》,(6),71-75.
|
| [2] |
陈少华(2013). 《人格判断--多维的视角》. 广州: 暨南大学出版社.
|
| [3] |
曹菲, 王琴瑶, 周梁, 等(2015). 微信用户使用行为的现况调查与分析. 《中国健康心理学杂志》,(1),81-85.
|
| [4] |
曹培杰, 余胜泉(2012). 数字原住民的提出、研究现状及未来发展. 《电化教育研究》,(4),21-27.
|
| [5] |
范哲(2017). 基于用户画像的数字原住民社会化媒体采纳意愿的阶段性分析. 《现代情报》,(6),99-106.
|
| [6] |
方可人, 喻国明(2020). 媒介用户:从物理划分到心理划分的范式升级——关于媒介人格与媒介使用偏向的实证研究. 《新闻与写作》,(5),61-66.
|
| [7] |
倪宁, 徐智, 杨莉明(2016). 复杂的用户:社交媒体用户参与广告行为研究. 《国际新闻界》,(10),111-127.
|
| [8] |
申琦(2015). 自我表露与社交网络隐私保护行为研究——以上海市大学生的微信移动社交应用(APP)为例. 《新闻与传播研究》,(4),5-17+126.
|
| [9] |
宋振超(2017). 网络原住民在社交平台上知识共享的驱动因素分析. 《图书馆》,(12),78-82.
|
| [10] |
孙行(2016). 大学生群体在微信和微博上自我呈现的差异研究. 《新闻研究导刊》,(22),84+92.
|
| [11] |
田卉(2015). 基于受众心理的网络舆情分析. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》, (9),164-165.
|
| [12] |
田娜娜, 汪梦君(2015). 微信的自我呈现与身份焦虑. 《新闻世界》,(6), 117-118.
|
| [13] |
童慧(2014). 微信的自我呈现与人际传播. 《重庆社会科学》,(1),102-110.
|
| [14] |
王欢, 黄海, 吴和鸣(2014). 大学生人格特征与手机依赖的关系:社交焦虑的中介作用. 《中国临床心理学杂志》,(3),447-450.
|
| [15] |
熊茵, 赵振宇(2016). 微信舆情的传播特征及风险探析. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(2),79-82.
|
| [16] |
徐剑, 商晓娟(2015). 社交媒体国际学术研究综述——基于SSCI高被引论文的观察. 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(1),102-108.
|
| [17] |
徐智, 杨莉明(2016). 微信朋友圈信息流广告用户参与效果研究. 《国际新闻界》,(5),119-139.
|
| [18] |
杨嫚, 曹聪颖, 程媛媛(2019). 社交媒体头像呈现与使用动机研究——以大学生微信应用为例. 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》,(2),182-188.
|
| [19] |
杨善林, 王佳佳, 代宝, 李旭军, 姜元春, 刘业政(2015). 在线社交网络用户行为研究现状与展望. 《中国科学院院刊》,(2),200-215.
|
| [20] |
姚琦, 马华维, 阎欢, 陈琦(2014). 心理学视角下社交网络用户个体行为分析. 《心理科学进展》,(10),1647-1659.
|
| [21] |
喻国明, 方可人(2020). 人格特质如何影响人们的社会认知与媒介使用——基于“全民媒介使用与媒介观调查”的描述与分析. 《东南传播》,(4),1-4.
|
| [22] |
张磊, 陈贞翔, 杨波(2014). 社交网络用户的人格分析与预测. 《计算机学报 》,(8),1877-1894.
|
| [23] |
赵静波, 赵久波, 侯艳飞(2009). 《人格与健康》. 北京: 人民卫生出版社.
|
| [24] |
赵曙光(2014). 社交媒体的使用效果:社会资本的视角. 《国际新闻界》,(7),146-159.
|
| [25] |
周爽(2017). 大学生在微信圈的自我呈现. 《人力资源管理》,(2),182.
|
| [26] |
周彤(2015). 微信朋友圈中的“拟态环境”解读. 《新闻世界》,(10),82-83.
|
| [27] |
周懿瑾, 魏佳纯(2016). “点赞”还是“评论”?社交媒体使用行为对个人社会资本的影响——基于微信朋友圈使用行为的探索性研究. 《新闻大学》,(1),68-75+149.
|
| [28] |
周裕琼(2018). 数字弱势群体的崛起:老年人微信采纳与使用影响因素研究. 《新闻与传播研究》, 25(7),66-86 +128-129.
|
| [29] |
宗乾进, 袁勤俭, 沈洪洲(2012). 国外社交网络研究热点与前沿. 《图书情报知识》,(6),68-75.
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Face perception, perhaps the most highly developed visual skill in humans, is mediated by a distributed neural system in humans that is comprised of multiple, bilateral regions. We propose a model for the organization of this system that emphasizes a distinction between the representation of invariant and changeable aspects of faces. The representation of invariant aspects of faces underlies the recognition of individuals, whereas the representation of changeable aspects of faces, such as eye gaze, expression, and lip movement, underlies the perception of information that facilitates social communication. The model is also hierarchical insofar as it is divided into a core system and an extended system. The core system is comprised of occipitotemporal regions in extrastriate visual cortex that mediate the visual analysis of faces. In the core system, the representation of invariant aspects is mediated more by the face-responsive region in the fusiform gyrus, whereas the representation of changeable aspects is mediated more by the face-responsive region in the superior temporal sulcus. The extended system is comprised of regions from neural systems for other cognitive functions that can be recruited to act in concert with the regions in the core system to extract meaning from faces.
|
| [40] |
Generational differences are seen as the cause of wide shifts in our ability to engage with technologies and the concept of the digital native has gained popularity in certain areas of policy and practice. This paper provides evidence, through the analysis of a nationally representative survey in the UK, that generation is only one of the predictors of advanced interaction with the Internet. Breadth of use, experience, gender and educational levels are also important, indeed in some cases more important than generational differences, in explaining the extent to which people can be defined as a digital native. The evidence provided suggests that it is possible for adults to become digital natives, especially in the area of learning, by acquiring skills and experience in interacting with information and communication technologies. This paper argues that we often erroneously presume a gap between educators and students and that if such a gap does exist, it is definitely possible to close it.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
