在网络服务提供者专门提供服务以方便网络用户交流时，即使其与网络用户之间不存在意思联络，也可能会因网络用户的侵权行为而承担连带责任。对网络服务提供者苛加连带责任，既与法理相悖，不符合立法者宣称的立法目的，也不符合需承担连带责任的帮助侵权的责任构成要件。同时，它有悖于网络传播的特性，阻碍网络传播的发展。网络服务提供者与网络用户之间形成的是《侵权责任法》第12条规定的无意思联络的数人侵权，应承担按份责任。

When ISP provides special services to facilitate internet user’s communication, it may bear Joint and Several Liability due to the user s’ violation, even the connection of intent between IPS and users doesn’t exist. Joint and several liability of ISP is contradictory to jurisprudence, and is not in conformity with the purpose of legislation , the mechanism of China Tort Liability Act, and the elements of liability of helping tort. At the same time, it is contrary to network communication characteristic, and hinders the development of network communication. The tort by ISP and internet users is Multiple Tort Without Conspiracy, also known as Several Concurrent Tortfeasors provided by §12 of China Tort Liability Act. ISP should bear the Several Liability.