“Stream” as Topoi: The Discontinuity of Streaming Video and Hypermodern Society

LIU Chunyi, HU Yong

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 95-114.

PDF(1514 KB)
PDF(1514 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 95-114.
Research Articles

“Stream” as Topoi: The Discontinuity of Streaming Video and Hypermodern Society

Author information +
History +

Abstract

“Stream”, as media topoi, has always maintained its conceptual persistence and fluidity in the transformations of communication technologies, media forms, and social structures. While the topological discourse of stream becomes increasingly pronounced in the era of streaming video, its mediality and societal reconstructive power paradoxically manifest as a form of disruption of flow. Through interfaces, data, and the practice of “binge-watching”, streaming video restructures the logic of media programming, circulation, and reception, thereby revealing the essentially discontinuous nature of the flow. The medial factors driving this disruption-namely, immediacy, privatization, and interactivity—dismantle the spatiotemporal and organizational frameworks once shaped by traditional media. In their place, they foster a presentist temporality and unstable subjectivities, ultimately intensifying the fragmentation and imbalance characteristic of hypermodernism.

Key words

Streaming video / media topology / streaming media platform / hypermodernism

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Chunyi , HU Yong. “Stream” as Topoi: The Discontinuity of Streaming Video and Hypermodern Society[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2025, 47(8): 95-114

References

[1]
大卫·赫斯蒙德夫(2013/2016). 《文化产业》(张菲娜译). 中国人民大学出版社.
[2]
吉尔·利波维茨基,塞巴斯蒂安·夏尔(2004/2005). 《超级现代时间》(谢强译). 中国人民大学出版社.
[3]
列夫·马诺维奇(2001/2021). 《新媒体的语言》(车琳译). 贵州人民出版社.
[4]
罗杰·西尔弗斯通(1994/2004). 《电视与日常生活》(陶庆梅译). 江苏人民出版社.
[5]
威廉·弗卢塞尔(1998/2022). 《传播学: 历史、 理论与哲学》(周海宁译). 复旦大学出版社.
[6]
乌尔里希·贝克(1986/2018). 《风险社会:新的现代性之路》(何博闻,张文杰译). 译林出版社.
[7]
Arditi D. (2021). Streaming culture: Subscription platforms and the unending consumption of culture. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[8]
Asendorf C. (1993). Batteries of life: On the history of things and their perception in modernity. University of California Press.
[9]
Benjamin W. (1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In Arendt H. (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and reflections (pp.217-253). Schocken.
[10]
Blum A. (2012). Tubes: A journey to the center of the Internet. Harper Collins Publishers.
[11]
Dean J. (2005). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics, Cultural Politics, 1(1), 51-74.
What is the political impact of networked communications technologies? I argue that as communicative capitalism they are profoundly depoliticizing. The argument, first, conceptualizes the current political-economic formation as one of communicative capitalism. It then moves to emphasize specific features of communicative capitalism in light of the fantasies animating them. The fantasy of abundance leads to a shift in the basic unit of communication from the message to the contribution. The fantasy of activity or participation is materialized through technology fetishism. The fantasy of wholeness relies on and produces a global both imaginary and Real. This fantasy prevents the emergence of a clear division between friend and enemy, resulting instead in the more dangerous and profound figuring of the other as a threat to be destroyed. My goal in providing this account of communicative capitalism is to explain why in an age celebrated for its communications there is no response.
[12]
Ernst W. (2011). Media Archaeography. Method and machine versus history and narrative of media. In Errki Huhtamo, E. & Parikka, J. (Eds.), Media archaeology: approaches, applications, and implications (pp. 239-255), University of California Press.
[13]
Gerbner G., Gross L., Morgan M. & Signorielli N. (1980). The “Mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile No. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10-29.
[14]
Hesmondhalgh D. & Lotz A. (2020). Video screen interfaces as new sites of media circulation power. International Journal of Communication, 14(24), 386-409.
[15]
Huhtamo E. (2013). Illusions in motion: media archaeology of the moving panorama and related spectacles. MIT Press.
[16]
Johnson C. (2019). Online TV. Routledge.
[17]
Lull J. (2007). The Push and pull of global culture. In Lull, J. (2007), Culture-on-demand: Communication in a crisis world (pp. 80-103). Blackwell Publishing.
[18]
McKelvey F. & Hunt M. (2019). Discoverability: Toward a definition of content discovery through platforms. Social Media and Society, 5(1), 1-15.
[19]
Meyrowitz J. (1993). Images of media: hidden ferment - and harmony - in the field. Journal of Communication, 43(3), 55-56.
[20]
Schivelbusch W. (1986). The railway journey: The industrialization of time and space in the nineteenth century. University of California Press.
[21]
Schybergson O. (2014, June 25). The generation raised on touchscreens will forever alter tech design. Wired magazine. http://www.wired.com/2014/06/generation-moth
[22]
Public Knowledge. (2006, June 28). Senator Stevens speaks on net neutrality. https://publicknowledge.org/senator-stevens-speaks-on-net-neutrality
[23]
Srnicek N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254-257.
[24]
Williams R. (2004). Television: Technology and cultural form. Routledge.
PDF(1514 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/