Contract Metaphor: A Study of Virtual Digital Contracts for Intimate Relationships—Investigation on the “Spark Continuation” Behavior of Users Based on Douyin

JING Yixin, SUN Jiaxue

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 47-67.

PDF(1681 KB)
PDF(1681 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 47-67.
Research Articles

Contract Metaphor: A Study of Virtual Digital Contracts for Intimate Relationships—Investigation on the “Spark Continuation” Behavior of Users Based on Douyin

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Douyin's sparks have created virtual digital contracts for intimate relationships and shaped new social behavior and culture. This study adopts observation and in-depth interviews to analyse the symbolic significance of sparks in intimate relationships, the process of relationship development based on sparks, and the impact of sparks on intimate relationships. Research shows that, sparks, as virtual mediators, influence and regulate user behavior. The process of maintaining sparks reveals dynamic developmental features. Based on social penetration theory and the ladder model, this study proposes the “contract metaphor”, which divides the process of sustaining sparks into six stages: “contract signing”, “contract compliance”, “contract strengthening”, “contract negotiation”, “contract internalization” and “contract breaking”. Sparks impact intimate relationships, either intensifying, downgrading, or reconciling them. This study triggers reflections on the role of sparks as virtual mediators and deepens existing understanding of how virtual mediators affect intimate relationships, which is conducive to exploring the path to the creation and positive development of intimate relationships.

Key words

Intimacy / contract metaphor / virtual digital contract / virtual mediators / Douyin's sparks

Cite this article

Download Citations
JING Yixin , SUN Jiaxue. Contract Metaphor: A Study of Virtual Digital Contracts for Intimate Relationships—Investigation on the “Spark Continuation” Behavior of Users Based on Douyin[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2025, 47(5): 47-67

References

[1]
白昊石, 黄顺铭, 刘祖瑞(2023). “养火”:虚拟中介物与电子亲密关系. 《新闻与写作》,(7),86-96.
[2]
陈拓, 吴向然(2023). 个体化与技术共谋:青年异地夫妻数字化亲密研究. 《东南学术》,(4),186-196.
[3]
查尔斯·都希格(2012/2013). 《习惯的力量》(吴奕俊,陈丽丽,曹烨译). 中信出版社.
[4]
董晨宇, 段采薏(2018). 传播技术如何改变亲密关系——社交媒体时代的爱情. 《新闻与写作》,(11),48-52.
[5]
杜丹(2020). 共生、转译与交互:探索媒介物的中介化. 《国际新闻界》,(5),18-34.
[6]
姜宇辉(2022). 数字亲密:爱还是痛?——哲学与政治之间的批判性反思. 《文化艺术研究》,(2),34-48+112-113.
[7]
蒋俏蕾, 凌绮(2023). 数智时代的“亲密”:媒介化亲密、亲密资本与亲密公众. 《山东社会科学》,(3),87-96.
[8]
李华伟, 徐开彬(2022). 信息渗透与权力博弈:社交媒介在青年亲密关系中的作用研究——基于关系发展的阶段理论. 《中国青年研究》,(6),48-58+47.
[9]
兰德尔·柯林斯(2004/2009). 《互动仪式链》(林聚任,王鹏,宋丽君译).商务印书馆.
[10]
南希·K·拜厄姆(2015/2020).《交往在云端: 数字时代的人际关系》(第2版)(董晨宇,唐悦哲译). 中国人民大学出版社.
[11]
让-雅克·卢梭(1762/2014). 《社会契约论》(黄小彦译). 译林出版社.
[12]
孙萍, 李宜桐, 于小童(2023). “中介化爱情”之困:理解线上交友平台的媒介化与性别化. 《妇女研究论丛》,(1),117-128.
[13]
陶振超(2015). 网际网路与友谊网络:取代、扩大、或强化. 《传播与社会学刊》,(34),57-88.
[14]
托马斯·霍布斯(1651/2009). 《利维坦》(黎思复,黎廷弼译).商务印书馆.
[15]
张钧涵(2019). 弱联系的建构与强联系的削弱——抖音对青年群体社会交往的影响研究. 《中国青年研究》,(3),5-11.
[16]
Baym N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press.
[17]
Bouffard S., Giglio D., & Zheng Z, (2022). Social media and romantic relationship: Excessive social media use leads to relationship conflicts, negative outcomes, and addiction via mediated pathways. Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1523-1541.
Social media provides a useful platform for people to share information, develop networks, and connect with each other online. While social media allows one to foster relationships with ease, it may pose challenges for individuals in a romantic relationship. Mounting evidence suggests that social media use may have an adverse impact on relationship dynamics, largely due to reduced time and attention for relationship partners. However, it remains unclear (1) how the increased use of social media may lead to negative consequences of relationship quality; (2) how the increased use of social media and negative relationship consequences together may trigger social media addiction; and (3) whether there are psychological factors that may contribute to the mitigation of the negative consequences. Here, we explored these issues by selecting Instagram (IG) as the target platform because the unique feature of tracking objective time of usage within the IG app allowed us to more accurately determine the length of IG usage. Using a structural equation modeling approach, we found that increased IG usage reduced relationship satisfaction, which led to an increase in both conflicts and negative outcomes. The sequential effects of reduced relationship satisfaction and increased conflicts then triggered addictive use of IG. In contrast, tendency to make sacrifice for the relationship partner in everyday life produced a positive effect on relationship satisfaction, which in turn reduced the likelihood of conflicts, negative outcomes, and addiction. Taken together, we have delineated pathways through which excessive social media use may detrimentally affect both relationship and personal well-being and identified sacrifice as a possible psychological factor to mitigate the detrimental effects. We believe that these findings add to our understanding of the processes by which social media influences romantic relationship and highlight the interactive effects of social media and relationship on causing unexpected, adverse consequences.
[18]
Braithwaite D. O., & Schrodt P. (2022). Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. Routledge.
[19]
Bachman G. F., & Guerrero L. K. (2006). Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 943-963.
[20]
Bem D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62.
[21]
Bhandari A., & Bimo S. (2022). Why's everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media. Social media+ society, 8(1), 20563051221086241.
[22]
Clark M. S., & Reis H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 609-672.
[23]
Carr C. T., & Rosaen S. F. (2024). We're Going Streaking!: Associations Between the Gamification of Mediated Communication and Relational Closeness. Communication Reports, 37(3), 185-199.
[24]
Dainton M., & Aylor B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 52-66.
[25]
Dai Y., & Shin S. Y. (2022). How reading information on SNSs influences interpersonal and personal certainties about a target: The effects of information valence, information source, and positivism bias. Communication Studies, 73(5-6), 561-576.
[26]
Fox J., Warber K. M., & Makstaller D. C. (2013). The role of Facebook in romantic relationship development: An exploration of Knapp's relational stage model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(6), 771-794.
This study examines the implications of social networking web sites (SNSs) within romantic relationships. Specifically, Knapp’s (1978) stage model of relationships is examined through a new lens wherein the role of SNSs, specifically Facebook, is explored in the escalation stages of romantic relationships (i.e., initiating, experimenting, intensifying, integrating, and bonding). Furthermore, this study sought to discern the interpersonal and social implications of publicly declaring oneself as “In a Relationship” with another person on Facebook (i.e., going “Facebook official” or “FBO”). Ten mixed-sex focus groups were conducted. Analysis revealed that Facebook is one of the primary means of uncertainty reduction in the initial stages of relationship formation. College students consider FBO to be indicative of an increased level of commitment in relationships. Typically, relationship exclusivity precedes a discussion on becoming FBO, which occurs when the relationship is considered stable. Going FBO has implications for the public proclamation of one’s relationship status as described in Knapp’s model, and these results differ for men and women. Theoretical implications for the role of SNSs in romantic relationships are discussed.
[27]
Gershon I. (2010). Media ideologies: An introduction. Journal of linguistic anthropology, 20(2), 283-293.
[28]
Kwok I., & Wescott A. B. (2020). Cyberintimacy: A scoping review of technology-mediated romance in the digital age. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(10), 657-666.
[29]
Ledbetter A. M., Mazer J. P., DeGroot J. M., Meyer K. R., Mao Y., & Swafford B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1), 27-53.
This investigation tested a theoretical model of communication behavior with specific Facebook friends, such that attitudes toward (a) online self-disclosure, and (b) online social connection, predict Facebook communication frequency and, in turn, relational closeness. Participants included both undergraduates and older adults. Results generally supported the model, with the interaction effect between self-disclosure and social connection directly predicting Facebook communication and indirectly predicting relational closeness. For both dependent variables, online social connection was a positive predictor at low and moderate levels of online self-disclosure, but high levels reduced the association to nonsignificance. One implication of these results was that high-warrant information may discourage those with social anxiety from social network site communication.
[30]
Latour B. (1994). On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
[31]
Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.
[32]
Levordashka A., & Utz S. (2016). Ambient awareness: From random noise to digital closeness in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 147-154.
Ambient awareness refers to the awareness social media users develop of their online network in result of being constantly exposed to social information, such as microblogging updates. Although each individual bit of information can seem like random noise, their incessant reception can amass to a coherent representation of social others. Despite its growing popularity and important implications for social media research, ambient awareness on public social media has not been studied empirically. We provide evidence for the occurrence of ambient awareness and examine key questions related to its content and functions. A diverse sample of participants reported experiencing awareness, both as a general feeling towards their network as a whole, and as knowledge of individual members of the network, whom they had not met in real life. Our results indicate that ambient awareness can develop peripherally, from fragmented information and in the relative absence of extensive one-to-one communication. We report the effects of demographics, media use, and network variables and discuss the implications of ambient awareness for relational and informational processes online.
[33]
Luthar B., & Pušnik M. (2021). Intimate media and technological nature of sociality. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1257-1277.
The article argues for the audience studies, which draws on the analysis of artifactual, spatial, temporal, and sensorial aspects of media consumption and builds on, that is, the so-called medium theory and theory of practice in sociology. In the second part of the article, we interpret the results of a qualitative empirical study regarding the daily use of media technology among young people, aged between 19 and 29 years. The study finds that circumstances, under which digital media have colonized all spheres of public life and under which online social life has become completely naturalized, have led to constant online connectivity as well as highly fragmented and dispersed communication practices of users moving between different media. The analysis of media consumption diaries points to radical mediatization, which plays an important role in the changing generational structure of feeling.
[34]
Madianou M., & Miller D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187.
This article develops a new theory of polymedia in order to understand the consequences of digital media in the context of interpersonal communication. Drawing on illustrative examples from a comparative ethnography of Filipino and Caribbean transnational families, the article develops the contours of a theory of polymedia. We demonstrate how users avail themselves of new media as a communicative environment of affordances rather than as a catalogue of ever proliferating but discrete technologies. As a consequence, with polymedia the primary concern shifts from the constraints imposed by each individual medium to an emphasis upon the social, emotional and moral consequences of choosing between those different media. As the choice of medium acquires communicative intent, navigating the environment of polymedia becomes inextricably linked to the ways in which interpersonal relationships are experienced and managed. Polymedia is ultimately about a new relationship between the social and the technological, rather than merely a shift in the technology itself.
[35]
Papp L. M., Danielewicz J., & Cayemberg C. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners' Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 85-90.
[36]
Pickens J. C., & Whiting J. B. (2020). Tech talk: Analyzing the negotiations and rules around technology use in intimate relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 42, 175-189.
[37]
Quinn K. (2016). Contextual social capital: Linking the contexts of social media use to its outcomes. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 582-600.
[38]
Reis H. (2018). Relationships, well-being and behaviour: Selected works of Harry Reis. Routledge.
[39]
Rousseau D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage.
[40]
Schalk R., & Roe R. E. (2007). Towards a dynamic model of the psychological contract. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 167-182.
[41]
Scissors L., Burke M., & Wengrovitz S. (2016, February 27-March 2). What's in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook [Paper Presentation]. CSCW'16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, San Francisco, CA, United States.
[42]
Tandoc Jr. E. C., Lou C., & Min V. L. H. (2019). Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(1), 21-35.
Guided by the frameworks of niche and polymedia theories, this study sought to understand the phenomenon of platform-swinging on social media, which refers to the routine use of multiple social media platforms that has become commonplace across different ages. Based on focus group discussions (FGDs) with 62 social media users in Singapore, this study found that social media users engage in platform-swinging for relationship management and self-presentation gratifications. While these gratifications are also served by individual social media platforms, platform-swinging allows social media users to navigate structural, social, and norm barriers to obtain greater gratification opportunities. This has implications on how social media users subsequently regard and segment their personal relationships.
[43]
Thorburn D., & Jenkins H. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking media change: The aesthetics of transition. Mit Press.
[44]
Van Ouytsel J., Van Gool E., Walrave M., Ponnet K., & Peeters E. (2016). Exploring the role of social networking sites within adolescent romantic relationships and dating experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 76-86.

Funding

The Key Cultivation Special Project for Basic Research of Hebei Provincial Department of Education “Innovative Research on the Transformation of Communication Structure and the Construction Path of New Mainstream Media in the Mobile Intelligent Media Era”(JCZX2024018)
PDF(1681 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/