Making Transparency: The Crisis of Trust and the Self-certification in Fanquan

XIONG Yuelei, HUANG Weizi

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 133-152.

PDF(1580 KB)
PDF(1580 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 133-152.
Research Articles

Making Transparency: The Crisis of Trust and the Self-certification in Fanquan

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The practice of “self-certification” has become widespread in contemporary Chinese fandoms. From selling fan-made merchandise and joining online communities to publicly expressing emotions, self-certification has become a crucial prerequisite for establishing trust among fans. The normalization and routinisation of “self-certification” reflect the trust crisis faced by individuals in the digital age, providing an entry point for studying digital communication among young people. This study conducted semi-structured interviews and participatory observations with fan groups from different areas to sort out the genesis and operational mechanisms of the digital “self-certification” phenomenon from the theoretical perspective of “the transparency society”. The findings reveal that the rise of self-certification reflects a shift from private interactions to the public sphere, in which fans retroactively construct transparent identities on social media and engage in self-governance according to fanquan rules. In building a trust system, fan groups generate “reputation capital” through diverse practices and evaluate emotional intensity using a complex “multi-currency” system. As interpersonal trust among fans becomes more abstract and technologically-mediated, digital tools like lists, screenshots, and watermarks play an increasingly central role. However, the logic of digital transparency, characterized by an overload of data and the erasure of emotional nuance, also brings about existential anxieties and deepens the difficulties surrounding trust. The potential for underlying violence within these dynamics deserves further exploration.

Key words

self-certification / fans / fanquan culture / trust / the transparency society

Cite this article

Download Citations
XIONG Yuelei , HUANG Weizi. Making Transparency: The Crisis of Trust and the Self-certification in Fanquan[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2025, 47(2): 133-152

References

[1]
安东尼·吉登斯(1990/2022). 《现代性的后果》(田禾译)(修订版). 译林出版社.
[2]
蔡竺言, 刘楚君(2022). 从“追星族”到“饭圈”:中国粉丝研究的核心概念与框架变迁. 《新闻记者》,(4),60-72.
[3]
陈若茵(2021). 内容众筹与情感共振:微博人工bot兴起原因探析. 《科技传播》,(15),123-125+136.
[4]
邓建国(2023). 沟通即文明:《三体》内外的媒介和传播. 《文化艺术研究》,(1),39-44+113.
[5]
丁珂玥, 胡菡菡(2019). 粉丝“集资”:信任的形成与集体行动——以TFBOYS粉丝投票群为例. 《传媒观察》,(9),57-62.
[6]
翟学伟, 薛天山(2014). 《社会信任: 理论及其应用》. 中国人民大学出版社.
[7]
董晨宇, 丁依然(2018). 当戈夫曼遇到互联网——社交媒体中的自我呈现与表演. 《新闻与写作》,(1),56-62.
[8]
高寒凝(2018). 虚拟化的亲密关系——网络时代的偶像工业与偶像粉丝文化. 《文化研究》,(3),108-122.
[9]
高艺等(2022). “可见性”何以成为生意?——交友类App会员制的监视可供性研究. 《国际新闻界》,(1),137-155.
[10]
韩炳哲(2013/2019a). 《透明社会》(吴琼译). 中信出版社.
[11]
韩炳哲(2013/2019b). 《暴力拓扑学》(安尼,马琰译). 中信出版社.
[12]
亨利·詹金斯(2012/2016). 《文本盗猎者: 电视粉丝与参与式文化》(郑熙青译). 北京大学出版社.
[13]
黄华, 吴越(2023). 作为中介的平台:K-Pop“周边”的移动和粉丝圈层秩序的再造. 《新闻与写作》,(9),23-35.
[14]
黄月琴, 黄宪成(2023). 粉丝公益传播中的时空套利与“数据人”异化:数据主义批判的视角. 《新闻与传播研究》,(7),55-74+127.
[15]
胡岑岑(2020). 从“追星族”到“饭圈”——我国粉丝组织的“变”与“不变”. 《中国青年研究》,(2),112-118+57.
[16]
胡翼青, 王沐之(2022). 作为媒介性的可见性:对可见性问题的本体论探讨. 《新闻记者》,(4),8-19.
[17]
胡泳, 刘纯懿(2021). 现实之镜:饭圈文化背后的社会症候. 《新闻大学》,(8),65-79+119.
[18]
吉尔·利波维茨基, 让·塞鲁瓦(2011/2020). 《总体屏幕: 从电影到智能手机》(李宁玥译). 南京大学出版社.
[19]
金方廷(2024). “饭圈化”:移动互联时代的群体组织与行为逻辑. 《文化纵横》,(2),142-151+159.
[20]
江怡(2021). 大数据时代粉丝身份的割裂与弥合——从“灯牌大战”说起. 《文化研究》,(4),243-255.
[21]
李晓云, 王锋(2024). 于流动与行动之间:作为情动的“小作文”书写——一个理解粉丝主体性的另类视角. 《传媒观察》,(1),96-106.
[22]
毛丹, 王敬雅, 陈佳俊(2021). “饭圈”观察:组织特征与圈内外关系. 《社会学研究》,(6),90-112+228.
[23]
漆亚林, 李秋霖(2024). 媒介考古学视阈下信任媒介的认知建构与传播理路. 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》,(1),89-100.
[24]
让·鲍德里亚(1990/2019). 《恶的透明性》(王晴译). 西北大学出版社.
[25]
尼克拉斯·卢曼(1973/2005). 《信任: 一个社会复杂性的简化机制》(瞿铁鹏译). 上海人民出版社.
[26]
宋美杰, 陈元朔(2021). 为何截屏:从屏幕摄影到媒介化生活. 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(1),123-132+171.
[27]
孙玮, 李梦颖(2014). “可见性”:社会化媒体与公共领域——以占海特“异地高考”事件为例. 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》,(2),37-44.
[28]
孙卫华, 刘亚楠(2024). 感知、生产与行动:饭圈粉丝的算法想象. 《当代传播》,(1),92-96.
[29]
唐宏峰(2022). 《透明:中国视觉现代性(1872—1911)》. 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[30]
马中红, 唐乐水(2022). 绕过年龄重思“代”:从文本实践到数据实践的饭圈迭代研究. 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》, 21(1),64-76.
[31]
彭兰(2019). 网络的圈子化:关系、文化、技术维度下的类聚与群分. 《编辑之友》,(11),5-12.
[32]
彭兰(2022). “数据化生存”:被量化、外化的人与人生. 《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(2),154-163.
[33]
王仕勇, 陈超(2023). 量化的爱与可见的权力:粉丝圈群与平台算法的互动. 《重庆社会科学》,(3),131-144.
[34]
王诗萁, 刘海龙(2024). 粉丝“脱粉”背后的偶像魅力悖论. 《新闻大学》,(9),87-102+120-121.
[35]
维维安娜·泽利泽(1997/2021). 《金钱的社会意义》(姚泽麟译). 华东师范大学出版社.
[36]
吴畅畅, 顾明敏(2023). 偶像“塌房”与大众文化的精神政治学分析. 《文艺理论与批评》,(3),158-168.
[37]
吴琼(2006). 视觉性与视觉文化——视觉文化研究的谱系. 《文艺研究》,(1),84-96+159.
[38]
徐婧, 王婧涵(2022). 数字牧领与饭圈“治理术”:平台视角下饭圈组织内部的权力生产. 《新闻记者》, 2022(12),67-80.
[39]
杨玲(2020). 撕:网络圈层冲突中的语言操演、认同建构与性别鸿沟. 《文化研究》,(1),37-53.
[40]
尹一伊(2021). 从“跨粉都”到“饭圈”:论中国网络粉丝实践的形成. 《电影艺术》,(6),84-89.
[41]
袁光锋(2024). “感受的共同体”:数字媒介中的情感流通与认同建构. 《新闻与写作》,(1),5-13.
[42]
张洪忠, 任吴炯(2024). 超越“第二自我”的人机对话——基于AI大模型应用的信任关系探讨. 《新闻大学》,(3),47-60+118-119.
[43]
郑熙青(2023). 网络粉丝社群和网络社交平台的同构性与亲密性. 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》,(5),70-80.
[44]
朱丽丽(2016). 网络迷群的社会动员与情感政治. 《南京社会科学》,(8),103-109.
[45]
朱丽丽(2022). 数字时代的破圈:粉丝文化研究为何热度不减. 《中国社会科学评价》,(1),119-127+160.
[46]
周葆华(2022). 算法、可见性与注意力分配:智能时代舆论基础逻辑的历史转换. 《西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》,(1),143-152.
[47]
周懿瑾(2021). 偶像忠诚与“部落流动”:生产规范与嵌入性的作用——关于粉丝爬墙和脱粉的网络民族志. 《中国社会心理学评论》,(1),144-178+272.
[48]
Alloa, E. (2018). Transparency:A magic concept of modernity. In E. Alloa & D. Thomä (Eds.), Transparency, society and subjectivity: Critical perspectives (pp.21-55). Routlege.
[49]
Brin D. (1998). The transparent society: Will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom? Perseus Books.
[50]
Hills, M. (2016). From para-social to multisocial interaction. In D. P. Marshall, & S. Redmond (Eds.), A companion to celebrity (pp.463-482). John Wiley and Sons.
[51]
Illouz E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity.
[52]
Linden H., & Linden S. (2017). Fans and fan cultures: Tourism, consumerism and social media. Springer.
[53]
Mao D., Wang J., & Chen J. (2023). Observations of Chinese fandom: Organizational characteristics and the relationships inside and outside the “fan circle”. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(1), 18.
[54]
Reade J. (2021). Keeping it raw on the ‘gram: Authenticity, relatability and digital intimacy in fitness cultures on Instagram. New media & society, 23(3), 535-553.
[55]
Redmond, S. (2016). Emotional celebrity:introduction. In D. P. Marshall, & S. Redmond (Eds.), A companion to celebrity (pp. 351-354). John Wiley and Sons.
[56]
Stanfill M. (2019). Exploiting fandom: How the media industry seeks to manipulate fans. University of Iowa Press.
[57]
Švelch J. (2021). Redefining screenshots: Toward critical literacy of screen capture practices. Convergence, 27(2), 554-569.
With the help of screenshots, human and nonhuman actors alike document their professional and leisure encounters with screen-based technologies. In this article, I investigate how and why screenshots have come to be understood as faithful visual records of digital culture. By tracing screenshot’s origins to photographic techniques used for capturing medical imaging, oscillograms, and first applications of computer-aided design, I show a lineage of a straightforward mode of representation built on the assumptions of indexicality and iconic resemblance. However, this initially mechanical act of image reproduction has given rise to transformative practices of promotional and artistic screenshots (represented in this article by in-game photography), which subvert the conventions of accurate representation. By contrasting these visual phenomena, I argue for the redefinition of screenshot and show the need for critical literacy of screenshot-based images.
[58]
Tolson A. (2010). A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube. Critical discourse studies, 7(4), 277-289.
[59]
Thornton S. (1995). Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Wesleyan University Press.
[60]
Yin Y. (2020). An emergent algorithmic culture: The data-ization of online fandom in China. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 475-492.
The digitalization of fandom and fan culture has become significant topic in recent studies, yet there is a lack of examination of the nuance between specific fan performance and the affordance, infrastructure and architecture that constitute it as it is today. In this article, I examine how digital fandom involves the platform algorithm and the logic of data contribution, affectively engaging fans to participate in increased data labour. Depicting online fandom on Weibo, a massive Chinese social media platform, I portray the data-ization of online fandom in China, arguing that the traffic data has been dematerialized as new affective object in fan–object relations, while digital fan culture has been constructed into a type of algorithmic culture.
[61]
Yin Y., & Xie Z. (2018). The bounded embodiment of fandom in China: Recovering shifting media experiences and fan participation through an oral history of Animation-Comics-Games lovers. International Journal of Communication, 12, 18.
[62]
Zhang W. (2016). The Internet and new social formation in China: Fandom publics in the making. Routledge.
[63]
Zucker L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.

Footnotes

1. #乃万自证#标签的微博热搜数据源于: https://m.s.weibo.com/vtopic/detail_new?click_from=searchpc&q=%23%E4%B9%83%E4%B8%87%E8%87%AA%E8%AF%81%23

2. “娃妈”通常指的是负责棉花娃娃(一种周边形式)开团的粉丝。

Funding

“The Uses of Media Literacy and Parenting Practice in Contemporary China”, funded by Macau University of Science and Technology Research Foundation(FRG-24-051-FA)
PDF(1580 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/