The Inclination of “Embodied Media Space” and the Reconstruction of “Hierarchical Order” : An Empirical Study of One Hollow Village

QIAO Lijuan

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 91-109.

PDF(1747 KB)
PDF(1747 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 91-109.
Research Articles

The Inclination of “Embodied Media Space” and the Reconstruction of “Hierarchical Order” : An Empirical Study of One Hollow Village

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper takes the hollow village named M in Zhang Jiakou as the research object, and aims to explore the characteristic of the media space in this hollow village and its influence on social structure. The paper has developed a conception named “embodied media space”. First, the paper finds that M has the characteristic of the inclination of “embodied media space”. The elderly are embedded in the media space constructed by technologies for instrumental purposes. They reproduce the family space and connect the “family” and “nation” space. The elderly particularly rely on the “embodied media space” constructed by body guided activities such as “chatting on the street”, reflecting the space subjectivity and the body creativity. Second, based on the reciprocity of benefits and emotions, the “embodied media space” has promoted blood-like relationship among neighbors. The traditional “hierarchical order” has been reconstructed. The conception of “embodied media space” has returned to the principal position of the body, valued the meaning of the neighbouring space and reemphasized the integration among “body, mind and space”. It has some enlightening significance on rural governance.

Key words

“Embodied media space” / hollow village / “hierarchical order” / rural governance

Cite this article

Download Citations
QIAO Lijuan. The Inclination of “Embodied Media Space” and the Reconstruction of “Hierarchical Order” : An Empirical Study of One Hollow Village[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(6): 91-109

References

[1]
爱德华·W·苏贾(1989/2004). 《后现代地理学》(王文斌译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[2]
安东尼·吉登斯(1986/1998). 《社会的构成》(李康,李猛译). 北京: 三联书店.
[3]
陈俊杰, 陈震(1998). “差序格局”再思考. 《社会科学战线》,(1),197-204.
[4]
陈新民, 王旭升(2009). 电视的普及与村落“饭市”的衰落——对古坡大坪村的田野调查. 《国际新闻界》,(4),63-67.
[5]
崔丽华(2019). 大卫·哈维空间理论的三个视角. 《南京社会科学》,(11),67-71.
[6]
费孝通(1985). 《乡土中国》. 北京: 三联书店.
[7]
费孝通(1998). 《乡土中国·生育制度》. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[8]
高瑞琴, 朱启臻(2019). 何以为根:乡村文化的价值意蕴与振兴路径——基于《把根留住》一书的思考. 《中国农业大学学报》,(3),103-110.
[9]
关琮严(2021). 属性转移、边界消弭与关系重构:当代乡村媒介空间的转型. 《新闻与传播研究》,(4),57-72.
[10]
哈罗德·伊尼斯(1951/2003). 《传播的偏向》(何道宽译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[11]
黄宗智(1986). 《华北的小农经济与社会变迁》. 北京: 中华书局.
[12]
克里斯·希林(2003/2010). 《身体与社会理论》(李康译), 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[13]
李斌, 艾冬丽(2023). 跨越城乡的媒介空间:城乡融合的媒介社会学研究. 《湖南大学学报》,(2),76-83.
[14]
李彬, 关琮严(2012). 空间媒介化与媒介空间化——论媒介进化及其研究的空间转向. 《国际新闻界》,(5),38-42.
[15]
李春雷, 柯高雅(2023). 数字抵抗:现代性背景下留守老年人媒介实践中的剥夺感知——基于广东省三市的实证研究. 《现代传播》,(4),143-151.
[16]
李红艳, 冉学平(2022). 以“乡土”为媒: 熟人社会内外的信息传播. 《现代传播》,(1),19-28.
[17]
李耘耕(2019). 从列斐伏尔到位置媒介的兴起:一种空间媒介观的理论谱系. 《国际新闻界》,(11),6-23.
[18]
刘海龙, 束开荣(2019). 具身性与传播研究的身体观念知觉现象学与认知科学的视角. 《兰州大学学报》,(2),80-89.
[19]
刘国强, 颜廷旺(2022). 底层群体为何拒用智能手机?——基于重庆棒棒的扎根研究. 《国际新闻界》,(7),74-96.
[20]
莫里斯·梅洛·庞蒂(1945/2021). 《知觉现象学》(杨大春,张尧均,关群德译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[21]
潘忠党, 於红梅(2015). 阈限性与城市空间的潜能——一个重新想象传播的维度. 《开放时代》,(3),140-157.
[22]
沙垚(2016). 乡村文化传播的内生性视角:“文化下乡”的困境与出路. 《现代传播》,(6),20-24.
[23]
沙垚(2017). 传播学底层研究的范式更迭与当代探索. 《江淮论坛》,(1),146-150.
[24]
孙信茹, 苏和平(2012). 媒介与乡村社会空间的互动及意义生产——云南兰坪大羊普米族村寨的个案考察. 《云南社会科学》,(6),10-14.
[25]
文军(2008). 身体意识的觉醒:西方身体社会学理论的发展及其反思. 《华东师范大学学报》,(6),73-81.
[26]
文军, 黄锐(2012). “空间”的思想谱系与理想图景:一种开放性实践空间的建构. 《社会学研究》,(2),35-39.
[27]
文军, 吴越菲(2017). 流失“村民”的村落:传统村落的转型及其乡村性反思——基于15个典型村落的经验研究. 《社会学研究》,(4),22-45.
[28]
吴理财, 张良(2012). 乡村治理转型视域下的文化体制改革. 《社会主义研究》,(5),72-76.
[29]
项飙, 张子约(2022). 作为视域的“附近”. 《清华社会学评论》,(1),78-98.
[30]
徐琴(2020). “微交往”与“微自治”:现代乡村社会治理的空间延展及其效应. 《华中农业大学学报》,(3),129-137.
[31]
杨宜音(1999). 自己人:信任建构过程的个案研究. 《社会学研究》,(2),38-52.
[32]
张北县政协文史资料委员会(2012). 《张北文史资料第十辑》. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[33]
Beck U., & Gernsheim E. (2014). Distant love. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
[34]
Couldry N., & Carthy A. (2003). Introduction orientations: Mapping media space. In Couldry, N., & Mc Carthy, A. (Eds.). Mediaspace place, scale and culture in a media age (p.2). London, UK: Routledge.
[35]
Cresswell T., & Merriman P. (2013). Geographies of mobilities:Practices, spaces, subjects. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
[36]
Davidson J., & Milligan C. (2004). Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523-532.
[37]
Duranti A. (1997). Indexical speech across Samoan communities. American Anthropologist, 99(2), 342-354.
[38]
Gordon R. (2007). Beyond the failures of western communication theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 89-107.
[39]
Green N. (2002). On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society, 18(4), 281-292.
[40]
Hartley J. (1999). Uses of television. London, UK: Routledge.
[41]
Harvey D. (1990). Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3), 418-434.
[42]
Harvey D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
[43]
Hetherington K., & Degen M. (2011). Spatial hauntings, Space and Culture, 11(12), 1-5.
[44]
Jansson A., & Falkheimer J. (2006). Towards a geography of communication. In Jansson, A., & Falkheimer, J. (Eds.). Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies. (p.7) Gothenburg, SE: Nordicom.
[45]
Jason F. (2011). Mobile interface theory embodied space and locative media. New York,NY: Routledge.
[46]
Lefebvre H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
[47]
Lefebvre H. (1979). Space, social product and use value. In Freiberg, J. W. (Ed.). Critical sociology. European Perspectives(p.286). New York, NY: Irvington/Wiley.
[48]
Licoppe C. (2004). Connected presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135-156.
[49]
Low S. (1996). Spatializing culture: the social production and social construction of public space. American Ethnologist, 23(4), 861-879.
[50]
Low S. (2003). Embodied space(s): Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6(1), 9-18.
[51]
Paul D. (2001). Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 229-241.
[52]
Richardson M. (1982). Being-in-the-plaza versus being-in-the-market: Material culture and the construction of social reality. American Ethnologist, 9(2), 421-436.
[53]
Waldherr A., Klinger U., & Pfetsch B. (2021). Spaces, places, and geographies of public spheres: Exploring dimensions of the spatial turn. Media and Communication, 9(3), 1-4.
[54]
Wehrle M. (2021). Normality as embodied space the body as transcendental condition for experience. In Jacobs, H. (Ed.). The husserlian mind (p.195). London, UK: Routledge.
[55]
Wilkinsn D. (2013). The body, the shelter, and the shebeen: an affective geography of homelessness in South Africa. Cultural Geographies, 20(3), 357-378.
[56]
World Health Organization.(2019). Aging. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing#tab=tab_1.

Funding

2023 Major Project of Philosophy and Social Science of the Ministry of Education “Research on the International Communication Path of Chinese Modernization”(23JZD033)
PDF(1747 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/