Representing Animals: A Study on the Evolution of Animal Images in Disney’s Films and the Dissemination of Views on Animals Globally

JI Li, ZHANG Jing

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12) : 99-115.

PDF(1608 KB)
PDF(1608 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12) : 99-115.
Research Articles

Representing Animals: A Study on the Evolution of Animal Images in Disney’s Films and the Dissemination of Views on Animals Globally

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The process of connecting the things we perceive with concepts and their meanings is representation. Throughout its century-long history, the Walt Disney Company has established a dominant presence in the global cultural market, not only through audiovisual productions centered on iconic character series such as “princesses” and “superheroes”, but also through its widely acclaimed animal-themed films, which have resonated with audiences across generations. However, the research on Disney’s animal-themed movies and their global dissemination has rarely drawn the attention of Chinese communication scholars. This paper sorts out the diachronic evolution process of animal images and the representation of views on animals in Disney’s animated films over the past century, and explores the value tools through which Disney’s cultural products achieve global dissemination. The study finds that Disney has produced animal-themed movies with global influence in different historical periods. The representation of its views on animals has echoed the historical development of the global ecological trend of thought, which has become main reason for its cultural products to possess global cultural influence. Nevertheless, since entering the 21st century, as a representative of the capitalist cultural industry, Disney no longer closely follows the more internationalist ecological trends of thought like environmental justice, and relies excessively on digital technological means. Its animal-themed movies have fallen into a double trap of representation. The malfunction of the ecological ideological value tool has caused Disney’s animal-themed movies to lose their leading impetus in global dissemination in the 21st century.

Key words

Disney animated films / animal images / animal values / representation

Cite this article

Download Citations
JI Li , ZHANG Jing. Representing Animals: A Study on the Evolution of Animal Images in Disney’s Films and the Dissemination of Views on Animals Globally[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(12): 99-115

References

[1]
戴维·佩珀(2011). 《现代环境主义导论》(宋玉波,朱丹琼译). 上海人民出版社.
[2]
冯雷(2005). 对近代自然观和人类中心主义的再思考. 《理论与现代化》,(4),31-35+46.
[3]
纪莉, 曾益民(2015). 美国环境传播中的生态女性主义运动与发展:思考与启示. 《新闻与传播研究》,(9),22-35+126.
[4]
纪莉, 张毓强(2021). 构建地球生命共同体:生态文明的中国话语及其国际传播意义. 《对外传播》,(11), 61-65.
[5]
江晓原(2007). 好莱坞科幻电影主题分析. 《自然辩证法通讯》,(5),1-7+110.
[6]
李彬(2021). 核恐慌、克苏鲁神话与新黑暗时代——海洋科幻电影中的怪兽/异形叙事与人性异化危机. 《汉语言文学研究》,(3),45-53.
[7]
刘彬(2018). 动物批评:后人文时代文学批评新方法. 《文学理论前沿》,(1),19-42.
[8]
刘昌奇(2024). 电影动物形象的视觉表征类型及其生态意涵. 《美学研究》,(1),121-135.
[9]
史凤阁(2021). 自然中心主义生态观的批判与新生态哲学的建构. 《国外社会科学》,(2),57-64.
[10]
孙建业(2020). 从 “拟人” 到 “拟真”:浅论美国电影中兽设形象的三种形态. 《当代电影》,(9), 59-64.
[11]
孙凯(2020). “人类世”时代的全球环境问题及其治理. 《人民论坛·学术前沿》,(11),43-49.
[12]
王东, 张芮祎(2014). 美国经典动画影片主角形象分析与启示. 《当代电影》,(5),171-173.
[13]
王晖, 贺琳雅(2022). 表征与隐喻:海洋科幻电影中的多重意象. 《当代电影》,(12),31-38.
[14]
王圣华(2021). VR虚拟拍摄技术下“真兽版”《狮子王》的写实化困境. 《电影评介》,(3),34-38.
[15]
袁家丽(2017). 论《动物园的故事》中的男性气质问题. 《国外文学》,(1),89-96.
[16]
袁祖社(2024). 中国式现代化的生态文明意蕴. 《中国社会科学》,(8),23-39.
[17]
约翰·彼得斯(2020). 《奇云: 媒介即存有》(邓建国译). 复旦大学出版社.
[18]
周玥, 唐正东(2021). 鲍德里亚拟真理论中资本逻辑的抽象建构. 《南京社会科学》,(3),47-53.
[19]
Acampora R. R. (2001). Representation cubed: Reviewing reflections on animal imagery. Society and Animals, 9 (3), 299-307.
[20]
Annett S. (2013). New media beyond neo-imperialism: Betty Boop and Sita Sings the Blues. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 49(5), 565-581.
[21]
Artz L. (2002). Animating hierarchy: Disney and the globalization of capitalism. Global media journal, 1(1), 16-33.
[22]
Bachelard G. (1983). Water and dreams: An essay on the imagination of matter. Pegasus Foundation, Dallas Institute of Humanities and Culture.
[23]
Baker S. (2001). Picturing the beast: Animals, identity, and representation. University of Illinois Press.
[24]
Best J. & Lowney K. S. (2009). The disadvantage of a good reputation: Disney as a target for social problems claims. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(3), 431-449.
[25]
Black L. T. (1998). Bear in human imagination and in ritual. Ursus, 10, 343-347.
[26]
Bryman A. (1999). The disneyization of society. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 25-47.
[27]
Buell L. (1995). The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing, and the formation of American culture. Harvard University Press.
[28]
Byrne E., & McQuillan M. (1999). Deconstructing Disney. Pluto Press.
[29]
Chris C. (2006). Watching wildlife. University of Minnesota Press.
[30]
Dorfman A., & Mattelart A. (1975). How to read Donald Duck. International General.
[31]
Dorfman A. (2018, October 5). How we roasted Donald Duck, Disney’s agent of imperialism.The Guardian. https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/05/ariel-dorfman-how-we-roasted-donald-duck-disney-agent-of-imperialism-chile-coup
[32]
Garner C. (1996, December 1). Film may cause 1001 unwanted Dalmatians. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/film-may-cause-1001-unwanted-dalmatians-1312437.html
[33]
Geerdts M. (2016). (Un) Real animals: Anthropomorphism and early learning about animals. Child Development Perspectives, 10(1), 10-14.
[34]
Lutts R. H. (1992). The trouble with Bambi: Walt Disney’s Bambi and the American vision of nature. Forest and Conservation History, 36(4), 160-171.
[35]
Molloy C. (2012). Nature writes the screenplays:Commercial wildlife films and ecological entertainment. In S. Rust, S. Monani, & S. Cubitt (Eds.), Ecocinema theory and practice (pp.169-188). Routledge.
[36]
Murphy P. D. (1995). The whole wide world was scrubbed clean:The androcentric animation of denatured Disney. In E. Bell, L. Haas, & L. Sells (Eds.). From mouse to mermaid: The politics of film, gender, and culture (pp.125-136). Indiana University Press.
[37]
Paul E. S., & Serpell J. A. (1993). Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood. Animal Welfare, 2(4), 321-337.
A questionnaire survey of 385 UK-based university students was used to investigate whether there was an association between pet keeping in childhood and humane attitudes in young adulthood. Subjects gave detailed, retrospective reports of the pets they had kept during their childhoods, and a variety of attitude scales and open-ended questions were used to measure their current attitudes concerning the welfare of both animals and humans. Higher levels of childhood pet keeping were related to more positive attitudes towards pet animals and greater concerns about the welfare of non-pet animals and humans. Ethical food avoidance practices (eg vegetarianism); membership of animal welfare and environmental organizations were also found to be associated with pet keeping during childhood. Knowledge of the experiences that underlie existing variation in humane attitudes will greatly assist the development of more effective humane education programmes in the future.
[38]
Robinson K., & Jorgensen B. (2013, July 15-17). From blindness to sight environmental epistemology in 1990s Disney films. [Paper presentation]. IEEE International Professonal Communication. Vancouver, Canada.
[39]
Schwartz K., Lutfiyya Z. M., & Hansen N. (2013). Dopey’s legacy:Stereotypical portrayals of intellectual disability in the classic animated films. In J. Chen (Eds.), Diversity in disney films: Critical essays on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and disability (pp. 179-194). McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
[40]
Stanton R. R. (2019). Representations of animal harm and objectification in the works of Walt Disney Animation Studios’ films: 1937-2016 [PhD dissertation]. University of Northumbria.
[41]
Thomas K. (1991). Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England 1500-1800. Penguin UK.
[42]
Tuan Y. F. (1984). Dominance and affection: The making of pets. Yale University Press.
[43]
Whitley D. (2016). The idea of nature in Disney animation: From Snow White to WALL-E. Routledge.
[44]
Wills K. (2007). The close-knit circle: American knitters today. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Footnotes

1. “幸运兔奥斯华”(Oswald the Lucky Rabbit)是华特·迪士尼在1927年创作出来的首个卡通明星,是米老鼠形象的前身,因缺乏版权意识该形象被环球影视收入囊中,成为华特一生的遗憾,自此迪士尼公司非常重视动画人物资产的运营与保护工作。2022年,为庆祝100周年,迪士尼的动画艺术家们新制作了一部长达一分钟的黑白动画短片,其便是以幸运兔为主角,庆祝它的版权回归。

2. 华特迪士尼动画工作室(WDAS)官网详见 https://disneyanimation.com/,其第一部正式发行的电影为《白雪公主和七个小矮人》(1937),第一部动物电影是以米老鼠为主角的《幻想曲》(1940)。因此本文选择以1940年为研究起点。

3. 据考证,华特·迪士尼本人是一位动物爱好者,尤其反对虐杀动物。

4. 1982年“第三届联合国海洋法会议”所审议通过的《联合国海洋法公约》,首次提出“海洋世纪”的概念。

5. “海洋命运共同体”是中国人类命运共同体治理理念在海洋问题上的具体体现,也是21世纪一项全球社会工程,需要把气候变化、生物技术、数字技术运用整合在一起去理解海洋问题。

Funding

Key Project of Key Recearch Bases of the Ministry of Education(22JJD860006)
PDF(1608 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/