Viewing from Afar or Involving Intimately: An Empirical Investigation the Effects of VR Agency Affordance on Cultural Heritage Identification and Engagement

ZHOU Baohua, TANG Qingyang

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12) : 30-54.

PDF(1743 KB)
PDF(1743 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12) : 30-54.
Research Articles

Viewing from Afar or Involving Intimately: An Empirical Investigation the Effects of VR Agency Affordance on Cultural Heritage Identification and Engagement

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study employs the theoretical framework of agency affordance to explore the potential of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in facilitating immersive communication of cultural heritage, as well as its impact on the subjective experiences and attitudes of different individuals. Through controlled VR experiments manipulating the affordance of agency in three levels (none vs. low vs. high), the study finds that agency affordance can enhance the identification and attention to cultural heritage, but this effect is only significant at low level. Higher level of agency affordance is more effective in promoting the willingness to replace physical visits with virtual tours. Flow experience has a suppression effect on the relationship between agency affordance and cultural identification, and a mediation effect between agency affordance and the virtual replacement of physical tours. Media experience moderates the effect of agency affordance on offline engagment intention: for individuals with extensive VR experience, high level of agency affordance may reduce their willingness to engage in offline cultural heritage activities, leading them to prefer virtual tours instead. This research provides a new theoretical perspective and empirical support for understanding the impact of VR as a new medium for cultural communication, and offers evidence-based insights for designing more targeted communication strategies for cultural heritage.

Key words

Virtual reality / immersive communication / agency affordance / cultural heritage / flow experience

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHOU Baohua , TANG Qingyang. Viewing from Afar or Involving Intimately: An Empirical Investigation the Effects of VR Agency Affordance on Cultural Heritage Identification and Engagement[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(12): 30-54

References

[1]
黄葳威(1999). 《文化传播》. 正中书局.
[2]
刘茜, 刘子维, 汤清扬(2023). 系统沉浸vs心理沉浸——基于三项虚拟现实传播效果实验的综合探讨. 《传媒经济与管理研究》,(1),28-63.
[3]
潘小毅, 官翠玲, 陈建华, 孙晶(2019). 中医药文化认同量表的设计与开发. 《时珍国医国药》,(4), 1015-1019.
[4]
徐孝娟, 邓金雨, 吴曼丽, 曹芬芳(2022). 文化遗产数字化展示类APP的用户使用研究——基于传播生态学理论的视角. 《现代情报》,(9),80-90.
[5]
Andreouli E., & Chryssochoou X. (2015). Social representations of national identity in culturally diverse societies. In E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, G. Sammut, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp.309-322). Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Argyriou L., Economou D., & Bouki V. (2020). Design methodology for 360° immersive video applications: The case study of a cultural heritage virtual tour. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 24(6), 843-859.
[7]
Ateca-Amestoy V., Gorostiaga A., & Rossi M. (2020). Motivations and barriers to heritage engagement in Latin America: Tangible and intangible dimensions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 44(3), 397-423.
[8]
Ateca-Amestoy V., Villarroya A., & Wiesand A. J. (2021). Heritage engagement and subjective well-being in the european union. Sustainability, 13(17), 9623.
[9]
Bian Y., Zhou C., Gai W., Liu J., & Yang C. (2023). The effect of embodied interaction designs on flow experience: Examination in VR games. Virtual Reality, 27(2), 1549-1565.
[10]
Bolter J. D., & Grusin R. A. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
[11]
Carlson J. R., & Zmud R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153-170.
[12]
Chong H. T., Lim C. K., Ahmed M. F., Tan K. L., & Mokhtar M. B. (2021). Virtual reality usability and accessibility for cultural heritage practices: Challenges mapping and recommendations. Electronics, 10(12), Article 12.
[13]
Cokley K. (2007). Critical issues in the measurement of ethnic and racial identity: A referendum on the state of the field. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 224-234.
[14]
Coolican H. (2018). Research methods and statistics in psychology (7th ed.). Psychology Press.
[15]
Cover R. (2006). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media & Society, 8(1), 139-158.
This article examines the ways in which recent theorizations of interactivity work to reconceive the author-text-audience relationship. Suggesting that all media forms - historical and contemporary - can be reconceptualized in light of recent understandings of interactivity, it is argued that control over the text and its narrative as mythically ‘finished’ products is struggled over between an authorial desire for finality and an audience desire for control over the arrangement, (re)configuration and (re)distribution of the text. This struggle takes place across the sites of technological developments of textual control versus full interactivity, and in the realms of both media theory and media law.
[16]
Csikszentmihalyi M., & Csikszentmihalyi I. S. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
[17]
Cummings J. J., Tsay-Vogel M., Cahill T. J., & Zhang L. (2022). Effects of immersive storytelling on affective, cognitive, and associative empathy: The mediating role of presence. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2003-2026.
Popular claims of virtual reality systems serving as ‘empathy machines’ often fail to consider (a) the cognitive mechanisms driving the effects of technological immersion on empathy and (b) the conceptualization of empathy as a multidimensional construct. More, recent research has yielded mixed empirical support. This study investigates how dimensions of psychological presence—perceived self-location, sense of copresence, and judgments of social realism—mediate the effect of immersion on cognitive, affective, and associative empathy. Findings indicate that experiencing a news story via 360° video on a head-mounted display led to stronger self-location and copresence than engaging with the same video via desktop or reading a text version. While only copresence increased cognitive empathy, both self-location and copresence facilitated affective empathy. Whereas self-location and copresence enhanced associative empathy, social realism decreased it. These results highlight the value of a multidimensional conceptualization of empathy in investigating the prosocial potential of immersive media.
[18]
DeSanctis G., & Poole M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
The past decade has brought advanced information technologies, which include electronic messaging systems, executive information systems, collaborative systems, group decision support systems, and other technologies that use sophisticated information management to enable multiparty participation in organization activities. Developers and users of these systems hold high hopes for their potential to change organizations for the better, but actual changes often do not occur, or occur inconsistently. We propose adaptive structuration theory (AST) as a viable approach for studying the role of advanced information technologies in organization change. AST examines the change process from two vantage points: (1) the types of structures that are provided by advanced technologies, and (2) the structures that actually emerge in human action as people interact with these technologies. To illustrate the principles of AST, we consider the small group meeting and the use of a group decision support system (GDSS). A GDSS is an interesting technology for study because it can be structured in a myriad of ways, and social interaction unfolds as the GDSS is used. Both the structure of the technology and the emergent structure of social action can be studied.
[19]
Dimoulas C. A. (2022). Cultural heritage storytelling, engagement and management in the era of big data and the semantic web. Sustainability, 14(2), Article 2.
[20]
Donghui C., Guanfa L., Wensheng Z., Qiyuan L., Shuping B., & Xiaokang L. (2019). Virtual reality technology applied in digitalization of cultural heritage. Cluster Computing, 22(4), 10063-10074.
[21]
Evans S. K., Pearce K. E., Vitak J., & Treem J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35-52.
[22]
Flavián C., Ibáñez-Sánchez S., & Orús C. (2019). Integrating virtual reality devices into the body: Effects of technological embodiment on customer engagement and behavioral intentions toward the destination. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 847-863.
[23]
Guttentag D. (2022). Virtual reality and the end of tourism? A substitution acceptance model. In Z. Xiang, M. Fuchs, U. Gretzel, & W. Höpken (Eds.), Handbook of e-Tourism (pp.1901-1919). Springer International Publishing.
[24]
Gao L., Wan B., Liu G., Xie G., Huang J., & Meng G. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of virtual reality for culture learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(18), 1771-1781.
[25]
Ghani I., Rafi A., & Woods P. (2020). The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 24(6), 861-872.
[26]
Gibson J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. (pp. xiv, 332). Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
[27]
Goh S. H., & Paradice D. B. (2008). Collaborative worlds and avatar-based communication: A comparison of virtual worlds with traditional computer-mediated communications media. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings. 23.
[28]
Hartmann T., & Fox J. (2021). Entertainment in virtual reality and beyond: The influence of embodiment, co-location, and cognitive distancing on users’ entertainment experience. In The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 717-732). Oxford University Press.
[29]
Hayes A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford press.
[30]
Huang Y., Backman S. J., & Backman K. F. (2012). Exploring the impacts of involvement and flow experiences in Second Life on people’s travel intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 3(1), 4-23.
The virtual world environment presents new business opportunities for building destination images that allow customers to make an informed decision and initiate travel arrangements. The purpose of this study is to investigate the applicability of flow theory and the concept of involvement in understanding the impacts of virtual experiences of Second Life on people's travel intentions.
[31]
Huang Y., & Sundar S. S. (2022). Do we trust the crowd? Effects of crowdsourcing on perceived credibility of online health information. Health Communication, 37(1), 93-102.
[32]
Hwang K., tom Dieck M. C., Jung T., & Kwon O. (2023). The influence of virtual reality on the experience of religious cultural heritage content. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2022-0669
[33]
Israel K., Zerres C., & Tscheulin D. K. (2023). Virtual reality — Substitute for a real experience? The role of user motivation, expectations and experience type. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 20(3), 2350018.
[34]
Iyengar S. S., & Lepper M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366.
Conventional wisdom and decades of psychological research have linked the provision of choice to increased levels of intrinsic motivation, greater persistence, better performance, and higher satisfaction. This investigation examined the relevance and limitations of these findings for cultures in which individuals possess more interdependent models of the self. In 2 studies, personal choice generally enhanced motivation more for American independent selves than for Asian interdependent selves. In addition, Anglo American children showed less intrinsic motivation when choices were made for them by others than when they made their own choices, whether the others were authority figures or peers. In contrast, Asian American children proved most intrinsically motivated when choices were made for them by trusted authority figures or peers. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
[35]
Jackson S., Martin A., & Eklund R. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 561-587.
[36]
Jicol C., Wan C. H., Doling B., Illingworth C. H., Yoon J., Headey C., Lutteroth C., Proulx M., Petrini K. & O’Neill E. (2021). Effects of emotion and agency on presence in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445588
[37]
Jin P., & Liu Y. (2022). Fluid space: Digitisation of cultural heritage and its media dissemination. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8, 100022.
[38]
Johnson-Glenberg M. C., & Megowan-Romanowicz C. (2017). Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 24.
[39]
Jung E. H., & Sundar S. S. (2018). Status update: Gratifications derived from Facebook affordances by older adults. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4135-4154.
\n Guided by the Uses and Gratifications 2.0 approach, this study examines the role played by three classes of affordances (i.e. modality, agency, and interactivity) in explicating the gratifications derived by older adults on Facebook. Data from a content analysis of Facebook profiles and an online survey with older adults (aged 60 years and older) who have used Facebook for at least 1 year (\n N\n  = 202) show that while status updating and posting personal stories are associated with activity and community-building gratifications respectively, profile customization is key for obtaining agency-enhancement gratification, and participating in conversations on comment threads plays an important role in providing interaction gratification. These findings advance our understanding of social networking site (SNS) use among older adults and suggest interface designs that maximize gratifications for older adults.\n
[40]
Kalyanaraman S., & Bailenson J. (2019). Virtual reality in media effects. In Media effects (pp.404-418). Routledge.
[41]
Kang H., & Sundar S. S. (2016). When self is the source: Effects of media customization on message processing. Media Psychology, 19(4), 561-588.
[42]
Kennedy P., Miele D. B., & Metcalfe J. (2014). The cognitive antecedents and motivational consequences of the feeling of being in the zone. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 48-61.
[43]
Kim M. J., & Hall C. M. (2019). A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 236-249.
[44]
Kock N. (2005). Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward e-communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(2), 117-130.
[45]
Kowert R., & Oldmeadow J. A. (2015). Playing for social comfort: Online video game play as a social accommodator for the insecurely attached. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 556-566.
[46]
Laurent G., & Kapferer J.N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1), 41-53.
There is more than one kind of consumer involvement. Depending on the antecedents of involvement (e.g., the product's pleasure value, the product's sign or symbolic value, risk importance, and probability of purchase error), consequences on consumer behavior differ. The authors therefore recommend measuring an involvement profile, rather than a single involvement level. These conclusions are based on an empirical analysis of 14 product categories.
[47]
Lavoie R., Main K., King C., & King D. (2021). Virtual experience, real consequences: The potential negative emotional consequences of virtual reality gameplay. Virtual Reality, 25(1), 69-81.
As virtual reality (VR) technology enters mainstream markets, it is imperative that we understand its potential impacts on users, both positive and negative. In the present paper, we build on the extant literature’s focus on the physical side effects of VR gameplay (e.g., cybersickness) by focusing on VR’s potential to intensify users’ experiences of negative emotions. We first conducted a preliminary survey to assess users’ emotional responses during VR gameplay, with the results suggesting that certain VR situations can in fact produce intense negative emotional experiences. We then designed an interactive scenario intended to elicit low to moderate amounts of negative emotion, wherein participants played out the scenario in either VR (using the HTC Vive) or on a laptop computer. Compared to the participants who enacted the scenario on the laptop, those in the VR condition reported higher levels of absorption, which in turn increased the intensity of their negative emotional response to the scenario. A follow-up questionnaire administered several hours later revealed that the intensified negative emotions resulting from VR had a significant positive correlation with negative rumination (i.e., harmful self-related thoughts related to distress). These results show that VR gameplay has the potential to elicit strong negative emotional responses that could be harmful for users if not managed properly. We discuss the practical and policy implications of our findings.
[48]
Li X., Deng X., & Xu H. (2022). Interactive cultural communication effect in VR space of intelligent mobile communication network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9689272
[49]
Lin J.H., Wu D.Y., & Bowman N. (2022). Beat saber as virtual reality exercising in 360 degrees: A moderated mediation model of VR playable angles on physiological and psychological outcomes. Media Psychology, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2154806
[50]
Liu Q., Tang Q., & Wang Y. (2021). The effects of pretraining intervention in immersive embodied virtual reality cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(12), 1265-1277.
[51]
Liu Q., Wang Y., Yao M. Z., Tang Q., & Yang Y. (2020). The effects of viewing an uplifting 360-degree video on emotional well-being among elderly adults and college students under immersive virtual reality and smartphone conditions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(3), 157-164.
[52]
Makransky G., Andreasen N. K., Baceviciute S., & Mayer R. E. (2021). Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 719-735.
[53]
Mills N., Courtney M., Dede C., Dressen A., & Gant R. (2020). Culture and vision in virtual reality narratives. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 733-760.
[54]
Mura P., Tavakoli R., & Pahlevan S. S. (2017). ‘Authentic but not too much’: Exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism. Information Technology & Tourism, 17(2), 145-159.
[55]
Nikolaou A., Schwabe A., & Boomgaarden H. (2022). Changing social attitudes with virtual reality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(1), 30-61.
[56]
Novak T. P., Hoffman D. L., & Yung Y.F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42.
Intuition and previous research suggest that creating a compelling online environment for Web consumers will have numerous positive consequences for commercial Web providers. Online executives note that creating a compelling online experience for cyber customers is critical to creating competitive advantage on the Internet. Yet, very little is known about the factors that make using the Web a compelling experience for its users, and of the key consumer behavior outcomes of this compelling experience.
[57]
Oh J., Khoo G.S., Lee J. A., & Sudarshan S. (2021). Source interactivity enhances sense of community and reduces psychological reactance: Effects of the like button on smoking message evaluations and attitudes. Journal of Health Communication, 26(7), 501-513.
[58]
Piccione J., Collett J., & De Foe A. (2019). Virtual skills training: The role of presence and agency. Heliyon, 5(11), e02583.
[59]
Pollard K. A., Oiknine A. H., Files B. T., Sinatra A. M., Patton D., Ericson M., Thomas J., & Khooshabeh P. (2020). Level of immersion affects spatial learning in virtual environments: Results of a three-condition within-subjects study with long intersession intervals. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 783-796.
[60]
Pujol-Tost L. (2019). Did we just travel to the past? Building and evaluating with cultural presence different modes of VR-mediated experiences in virtual archaeology. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 12(1), 1-20.
[61]
Quiring O., & Schweiger W. (2008). Interactivity: A review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Communications, 33(2), 147-167.
The terms ‘interactivity’ and ‘interactive media’ became significant buzzwords during the late 1980s and early 1990s when the multi-media euphoria fascinated politicians, economists, and researchers alike. However, right from the beginning of the scientific debate, the inconsistent usage of the term ‘interactivity’ massively complicated the comparability of numerous empirical studies. This is where this article joins the discussion. First, the article sheds light on the terminological origins of ‘interactivity’ and distinguishes the term from cognate expressions. Further, it restructures and extends existing findings on the basis of a new analysis framework which considers three levels of interactive communication (action level, level of subjective situation evaluation, and level of meaning exchange). Finally, it delivers a systematic overview of specific criteria of interactive communication.
[62]
Richards G., King B., & Yeung E. (2020). Experiencing culture in attractions, events and tour settings. Tourism Management, 79, 104104.
[63]
Richards R. (2006). Users, interactivity and generation. New Media & Society, 8(4), 531-550.
This article is, in part, a response to articles for this Journal by Sally McMillan and Spiro Kiousis. The article examines the analytical problems caused by the fact that interactivity is both a property and an activity. It asserts that interactivity is a contextualizing facility that mediates between environments and content and users. The article analyses the modes of operation both for the production of the properties of interactivity and usage/production in the activity of interactivity. The concept of ‘positioning’ is offered as a means of moving the debate on from the application of communication models or the practical development of ‘features’. The article proposes ‘succession mapping’ as a methodology that acknowledges the building up of the interactive offer and also the generative capabilities of packages. The concept of the active user engaged in ‘user production’ i.e. generation is introduced as being of value to academics, practitioners and those who practice, teach and research.
[64]
Rodríguez-Ardura I., & Meseguer-Artola A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53(4), 504-516.
[65]
Ruppel E. K. (2015). The affordance utilization model: Communication technology use as relationships develop. Marriage & Family Review, 51(8), 669-686.
[66]
Shen J., Wang Y., Chen C., Nelson M. R., & Yao M. Z. (2020). Using virtual reality to promote the university brand: When do telepresence and system immersion matter? Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(4), 362-393.
[67]
Sherry J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 328-347.
[68]
Skarbez R., Bowman D. A., Ogle J. T., Tucker T., & Gabbard J. L. (2022). Virtual replicas of real places: Experimental investigations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(12), 4594-4608.
[69]
Steuer J. S. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.
[70]
Sundar S. S. (2008). Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In Mediated Interpersonal Communication. Routledge.
[71]
Sundar S. S. (2012). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Sundar S. S., Jia H., Waddell T. F., & Huang Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. In The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47-86). Wiley Blackwell.
[73]
Sundar S. S., Kang J., & Oprean D. (2017). Being there in the midst of the story: How immersive journalism affects our perceptions and cognitions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(11), 672-682.
[74]
Sundar S. S., & Marathe S. S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298-322.
[75]
Sundar S. S., & Nass C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52-72.
[76]
Sundar S. S., Oh J., Bellur S., Jia H., & Kim H.S. (2012). Interactivity as self-expression: A field experiment with customization and blogging. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 395-404.
[77]
Tang Q., Wang Y., Liu H., Liu Q., & Jiang S. (2022). Experiencing an art education program through immersive virtual reality or iPad: Examining the mediating effects of sense of presence and extraneous cognitive load on enjoyment, attention, and retention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957037
[78]
Theodoropoulos A., & Antoniou A. (2022). VR games in cultural heritage: A systematic review of the emerging fields of virtual reality and culture games. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8476.
[79]
Tremayne M. (2005). Lessons learned from experiments with interactivity on the web. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2005.10722100
[80]
van Noort G., Voorveld H. A. M., & van Reijmersdal E. A. (2012). Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 223-234.
Web site interactivity creates numerous opportunities for marketers to persuade online consumers and receives extensive attention in the marketing literature. However, research on cognitive and behavioral responses to web site interactivity is scarce, and more importantly, it does not provide empirical evidence for how interactivity effects can be explained. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the underlying principle that explains the influence of web site interactivity on consumers’ cognitive, affective and behavioral responses: online flow, the web site users’ complete immersion in an online activity (Hoffman and Novak 2009). In two studies, the hypothesis was tested that a visitor's flow experience in a specific brand web site mediates the effects of interactivity on the number and type (web site vs. product related) of thoughts, on attitudes toward the brand and web site, and on several behavioral intentions. The results provide evidence for the importance of flow in a marketing context, and the notion that the flow experienced on a specific web site is the underlying mechanism by which cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioral responses to an interactive brand web site can be explained.
[81]
Wang R., & Sundar S. S. (2018). How does parallax scrolling influence user experience? A test of TIME (Theory of Interactive Media Effects). International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(6), 533-543.
[82]
Wang Y., & Yao M. Z. (2020). Did you notice the Ads? Examining the influence of telepresence and user control on the effectiveness of embedded billboard Ads in a VR racing game. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(3), 258-272.
[83]
Weller R., Cepok J., Arzaroli R., Marnholz K., Große C. S., Reuter H., & Zachmann G. (2022). Effects of immersion and navigation agency in virtual environments on emotions and behavioral intentions. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2022.893052
[84]
Withagen R., de Poel H. J., Araújo D., & Pepping G.J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250-258.
[85]
Wu S.H., Wei N.C., Hsu H.C., & Pu T.C. (2021). Exploring the intention of visiting the museum using immersive virtual reality technique and flow experience. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 14(1), 25-40.
[86]
Wu X., & Santana S. (2022). Impact of intrinsic and extrinsic gaming elements on online purchase intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885619
[87]
Xu Y., Chen Z., Peng M. Y.P., & Anser M. K. (2020). Enhancing consumer online purchase intention through gamification in China: Perspective of cognitive evaluation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581200
[88]
Yang S., & Zhang W. (2022). Presence and flow in the context of virtual reality storytelling: What influences enjoyment in virtual environments? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(2), 101-109.
Virtual reality (VR) has widely been implemented in a variety of industries, with immersive storytelling now gaining popularity in the field of journalism. In this regard, there are many important questions about which direction modern journalism should take as a whole. To test the feasibility of immersive storytelling, this study developed a cognitive experience model containing paths for presence, flow, credibility, empathy, understanding, and enjoyment. A total of 131 participants were divided into three groups and exposed to either VR, 360-degree videos, or two-dimensional (2D) videos, then asked to rate their experiences. With the exception of understanding, results showed that the VR and 360-degree videos were more highly evaluated in each path when compared with 2D videos. In this case, technical attributes did not greatly affect the study variables. However, presence played a vital role in news promotion, while flow was positively affected by presence; flow also affected other variables when combined with presence. Finally, a structural equation model was tested and the weights of the different influences on the enjoyment impact were presented. In sum, this study found that immersive storytelling improved both presence, flow, and credibility, which jointly and positively affected enjoyment. Understanding negatively affected enjoyment. Empathy had little effect on enjoyment in the model.
[89]
Yoo K. W., Hwang K., & Kwon O. (2022). The effects of VR-based cultural heritage experience on visit intention. Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 26(2), Article 2.
[90]
Yung R., & Khoo-Lattimore C. (2019). New realities: A systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(17), 2056-2081.

Footnotes

1. 心境VR/Mind VR Exploration(2020)。可在此网站下载: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1383450/_VR__Mind_VR_Exploration/

1. 感谢张思琪、杨天铸、罗沛、何婧文等对本研究的帮助。

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China(22VRC186)
Major Project of the Key Research Base of the Ministry of Education(22JJD860004)
Fudan University Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project(IDH3353070)
Fudan University School of Journalism Research Innovation Project
SIMIS Project(SIMIS-ID-2024-LZ)
PDF(1743 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/