How does Use of Network Media Influences on Online Political Participation?: An Empirical Analysis Based on an Framework of “Psychological Tendency-Situational Cognition”

XUE Tianshan

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 6-30.

PDF(1498 KB)
PDF(1498 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 6-30.
Specific Topic/Political Communication Studies

How does Use of Network Media Influences on Online Political Participation?: An Empirical Analysis Based on an Framework of “Psychological Tendency-Situational Cognition”

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Network media has not only profoundly changed people's living ethics and ways of activities, but also reshaped the mode of citizens' political participation. Online political participation has gradually become an important way of political participation. This paper aims to construct an analytical framework of “Psychological Tendency-Situational Cognition”, introduce concepts of government trust and political efficacy, and explore the mechanism of the influence of network media use on online political participation. Through the analysis of 2629 questionnaire survey data, we find that the level of government trust mediates the relationship between the use of network media and online political participation. The use of network media has a negative impact on the public's government trust, which in turn has a negative impact on online political participation. That is, the more frequently network media is used, the lower level of the government trust is, and the lower level of trust significantly improves the public's online political participation. Meanwhile, political efficacy regulates the relationship between government trust and online political participation. The stronger the public’s political efficacy, the smaller the negative effect of government trust on online political participation.

Key words

network media use / government trust / online political participation / political efficacy

Cite this article

Download Citations
XUE Tianshan. How does Use of Network Media Influences on Online Political Participation?: An Empirical Analysis Based on an Framework of “Psychological Tendency-Situational Cognition”[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2023, 45(2): 6-30

References

[1]
韩晓宁, 吴梦娜(2013). 微博使用对网络政治参与的影响研究:基于心理和工具性视角. 《国际新闻界》,(11),88-102.
[2]
胡荣(2007). 农民上访与政治信任的流失. 《社会学研究》,(3),39-55+243.
[3]
胡荣, 庄思薇(2017). 媒介使用对中国城乡居民政府信任的影响. 《东南学术》,(1),94-111.
[4]
加布里埃尔·阿尔蒙德, 西德尼·维巴(1963/2008). 《公民文化——五个国家的政治态度和民主制》(徐湘林等译)(第2版). 北京: 东方出版社.
[5]
刘小燕, 李慧娟, 王敏, 赵雨思(2014). 乡村传播基础结构、政治信任与政治参与的实证研究. 《国际新闻界》,(7),130-145.
[6]
李亚妤(2011). 互联网使用、网络社会交往与网络政治参与——以沿海发达城市网民为例. 《新闻大学》,(1),67-81.
[7]
李之美(2012). 新媒介与公众话语权. 《浙江学刊》,(5),198-202.
[8]
罗伯特·A·达尔(1963/1987). 《现代政治分析》(王沪宁,陈峰译)(第4版). 上海: 上海译文出版社.
[9]
罗伯特·帕特南(2000/2011). 《独自打保龄:美国社区的衰落与复兴》(刘波等译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[10]
卢春天, 权小娟(2015). 媒介使用对政府信任的影响——基于CGSS2010数据的实证研究. 《国际新闻界》,(5),66-80.
[11]
漆国生, 王琳(2010). 网络参与对公共政策公信力提升的影响分析. 《中国行政管理》,(7),21-23.
[12]
孙昕, 徐志刚, 陶然, 苏福兵(2007). 政治信任、社会资本和村民选举参与——基于全国代表性样本调查的实证分析. 《社会学研究》,(4),165-187.
[13]
王菁(2017). 媒介使用如何影响我国大学生微博政治参与——一个以政治心理为中介变量的实证测度. 《新闻与传播研究》,(7),50-74.
[14]
王思琦(2013). 政治信任、人际信任与非传统政治参与. 《公共行政评论》,(2),22-51.
[15]
王正祥(2009). 传媒对大学生政治信任和社会信任的影响研究. 《青年研究》,(2),64-74.
[16]
文宏(2013). 从自发到工具——当前网络围观现象的行为逻辑分析. 《公共管理学报》,(3),51-62+139-140.
[17]
薛可, 余来辉, 余明阳(2017). 媒介接触对政府信任的影响:基于中国网民群体的检验. 《现代传播》,(4),131-136.
[18]
应星(2009). “气场”与群体性事件的发生机制——两个个案的比较. 《社会学研究》,(6),105-121.
[19]
伊丽莎白·诺尔-诺依曼(1980/2013). 《沉默的螺旋:舆论——我们的社会皮肤》(董璐译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[20]
臧雷振(2016). 新媒体信息传播对中国政治参与的影响——政治机会结构的分析视角. 《新闻与传播研究》,(2),51-65.
[21]
张蓓(2014). 媒介使用与城市居民的政治参与——基于中国综合社会调查的研究. 《学海》,(5),56-62.
[22]
张建荣, 李宏伟, 张维, 李楷(2008). 当代大学生非制度性政治参与的行为特征及原因分析. 《兰州文理学院学报(社会科学版)》,(2),103-105.
[23]
张宁, 唐嘉仪(2018). 社交媒体、网民心态与网络非制度化政治参与——以微博为例的实证研究. 《新闻与传播评论》,(2),99-111.
[24]
郑建君(2013). 政治信任、社会公正与政治参与的关系——一项基于625名中国被试的实证分析. 《政治学研究》,(6),61-74.
[25]
郑建君(2016). 个体与区域变量对公民选举参与的影响——基于8506份中国公民有效数据的分析. 《政治学研究》,(5),112-125.
[26]
Acock, A. C., & Clarke, H. D. (1990). Alternative measures of political efficacy: Models and means. Quality & Quantity, 24(1), 87-105.
[27]
Balch, G. (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept “sense of political efficacy”. Political Methodology, 37(2), 1-43.
[28]
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299.
[29]
Bardoel, J., & Deuze, M. (2001). “Network journalism”: Converging competences of old and new media professionals. Australian Journalism Review, 23(2), 91-103.
[30]
Becker, L. B., & Whitney, D. C. (1980). Effects of media dependencies: Audience assessment of government. Communication Research, 7(1), 95-120.
A review of existing research shows some evidence that persons dependent on television news for public affairs information are more likely to have negative attitudes toward government and to be less well informed about that government than persons dependent on newspapers Such a relationship between dependency and evaluations and knowledge of government was replicated here, though only where local government was concerned The meaning of the dependency concept is explored and empirical evidence is offered that dependency is distinct from simple exposure to the media
[31]
Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183-216.
[32]
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67.
Some aspects of democracy appear more sensitive than others to the availability throughout society of political information. Individual-level political engagement poses a puzzle in this regard. An instrumentalquantitative conception of information that is central to rational theories and is also found in some behavioral theories of participation appears contradicted by historical trends. I treat the contemporary expansion in political information made possible by new information technology as a form of natural experiment. I test for a relationship between information availability and political engagement using survey data about Internet use in the period 1996-99. This test is relevant to the applied debate over whether the information revolution will prove salutary for participation, and at the same time sheds light on contending theories of information. I find little relationship exists; the only form of participation which is demonstrably connected to Internet use is donating money This finding fails to support instrumental conceptions of information and instead endorses cognitive conceptions employed in psychological and certain behavioral theories of political engagement.
[33]
Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211.
[34]
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538.
[35]
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271-294.
This paper develops a resource model of political participation. The resources considered are time, money, and civic skills—those communications and organizational capacities that are essential to political activity. These skills are not only acquired early in life but developed in the nonpolitical institutional settings of adult life: the workplace, organizations, and churches and synagogues. These resources are distributed differentially among groups defined by socioeconomic status. A two-stage least squares analysis shows these resources have powerful effects on overall political activity, thus explaining why socioeconomic status has traditionally been so powerful in predicting participation. We disaggregate overall activity into three kinds of acts: those that involve giving time, those that entail donating money, and voting. Each requires a different configuration of resources resulting in different patterns of stratification across various political acts.
[36]
Campbell, S.W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536-555.
[37]
Catterberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31-48.
[38]
Carpini, M. X. D. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17(4), 341-349.
[39]
Ceron, A. (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487-503.
[40]
Dashti, A. A., Al-Abdullah, H. H., & Johar, H. A. (2015). Social media and the spiral of silence: The case of kuwaiti female students’ political discourse on Twitter. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 16(3), 42-53.
[41]
De Zuniga, H. G., Puig-I-Abril, E., & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11(4), 553-574.
[42]
Finkel, S. E. (2009). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891-913.
[43]
Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2002). Online action in campaign 2000: An exploratory analysis of the U.S.political Web sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(2), 222-244.
[44]
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575-586.
[45]
Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918-1927.
Abstract
A content analysis of 2 years of Psychological Science articles reveals inconsistencies in how researchers make inferences about indirect effects when conducting a statistical mediation analysis. In this study, we examined the frequency with which popularly used tests disagree, whether the method an investigator uses makes a difference in the conclusion he or she will reach, and whether there is a most trustworthy test that can be recommended to balance practical and performance considerations. We found that tests agree much more frequently than they disagree, but disagreements are more common when an indirect effect exists than when it does not. We recommend the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval as the most trustworthy test if power is of utmost concern, although it can be slightly liberal in some circumstances. Investigators concerned about Type I errors should choose the Monte Carlo confidence interval or the distribution-of-the-product approach, which rarely disagree. The percentile bootstrap confidence interval is a good compromise test.
[46]
Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131-152.
[47]
Hoffmann, C. P., & Lutz, C. (2019). Digital divides in political participation: The mediating role of social media self-efficacy and privacy concerns. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 6-29.
[48]
Hu, R., Sun, Y., & Wu, Y. (2015). Chinese trust in the police: The impact of political efficacy and participation. Social Science Quarterly, 96(4), 1012-1026.
[49]
Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles in Advanced Industrial Society. New York, NY: Princeton University Press.
[50]
Kazee, T. A. (1981). Television exposure and attitude change: The impact of political interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(4), 507-518.
[51]
Khan, H. A. (2016). The linkage between political trust and the quality of government: An analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(9), 665-675.
[52]
Kim, Y., & Chen, H. T. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 320-330.
[53]
Lu. J. (2013). Acquiring political information in contemporary China: Various media channels and their respective correlates. Journal of Contemporary China, 22(83), 828-849.
[54]
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
[55]
Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political in the 1988 national election study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407-1413.
Political efficacy has been studied extensively since the 1950s, hut analysts have never been fully satisfied with its measurement. After considerable testing, four new questions tapping internal political efficacy were added to the 1988 National Election Study. Our investigation shows that inter-item correlations among these questions indicate high internal consistency, that by both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis the items measure a single concept distinct from external efficacy and political trust, that the measurement model is robust across major subgroups, and that the overall scale is externally valid and provides a good distribution of efficacy scores across the population. Further, the results of an order experiment in the survey suggest that responses are unaffected by mode of presentation. In short, the four new questions constitute the most satisfactory measure of internal political efficacy to date.
[56]
Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to putnam. Political Science and Politics, 29(3), 474-480.
During the past thirty-five years many commentators have expressed concern about declining support for the American political system, noting familiar evidence of the steady erosion in electoral turnout (Stanley and Niemi 1995, 78; Teixeira 1992), falling participation in political parties (Rosenstone and Hansen 1993), plummeting levels of political trust (Lipset and Schneider 1987), and weakening civic engagement (Putnam 1995a). Evidence for declining confidence in American government is well-established. The standard National Election Study measures show that in 1954 three-quarters of the American public trusted government in Washington to do what was right ‘just about always or most of the time’. By 1994, a quarter of the public proved as trusting. Moreover how far Americans trust each other—or social trust—has also fallen by more than a third since the early sixties (Uslaner 1995; Putnam 1995a).
[57]
Park, H. M., & Perry, J. L. (2008). Do campaign Web sites really matter in electoral civic engagement? Empirical evidence from the 2004 and 2006 post-election internet tracking survey. Social Science Computer Review, 26(2), 190-212.
This study explores the impact of campaign web sites on electoral civic engagement by examining 2004 Internet Tracking Survey data. Propensity score matching and the recursive bivariate probit model are employed to deal with endogeneity and the missing data problem, which are often ignored in existing literature. Findings show that effects of campaign web sites vary across individual engagements and generally support reinforcement theory rather than mobilization theory.
[58]
Pei, Z., Pan, Y., & Skitmore, M. (2018). Political efficacy, social network and involvement in public deliberation in rural China. Social Indicators Research, 139(2), 453-471.
[59]
Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411-427.
Conflicting claims have been put forward regarding the effects of Internet use on real-life political participation. Some argue that Internet use, and the accompanying political resources, stimulates political participation; others fear that intensive Internet use is associated with a withdrawal from public life. This article's authors test both claims on a representative sample of 6,330 16-year-olds in Belgium. They investigate young people's behavior, assuming that young people are the most avid information and communication technologies users and the most susceptible to the influence of various socialization experiences. The authors introduce a distinction between time spent on the Internet (time-replacement hypothesis) and various activities performed online. Results show time on the Internet does not have an effect on the propensity to participate in public life. Although some online activities are clearly and significantly associated with offline political participation, it remains to be investigated whether this relation is a form of causality.
[60]
Robinson, M. J. (1976). Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: The case of the selling of the pentagon. American Political Science Review, 70(2), 409-432.
Television journalism can produce significant changes in opinions about basic American institutions and may also foster political malaise. Laboratory investigation revealed that the CBS documentary, “The Selling of the Pentagon,” convinced viewers that the military participated more in national politics and misled the public more about Vietnam than these viewers had previously believed. The program also caused a significant decrease in political efficacy among all our groups. This finding led to correlational research to determine if exposure to television news is also associated with lower levels of efficacy.
[61]
Savigny, H. (2002). Public opinions: Political communication and the internet, Politics, 22(1), 1-8.
[62]
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[63]
Wang, H. Y., Cai, T. J., Xin, Y. Y., Chen, B. C. (2019). The effects of previous and current instrumental involvement and expressive involvement on online political participation among Chinese college students. Sociological Inquiry, 89(2), 214-238.
[64]
Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M., & Williams, C. (2010). Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 US presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 669-688.
The Internet was a major factor in the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign and has become an important tool for political communication and persuasion. Yet, information systems research is generally silent on the role of the Internet in politics. In this paper, we argue that IS is positioned to enhance understanding of the influence of the Internet on politics, and, more specifically, the process of election campaigning using Internet-based technologies such as Web 2.0. In this paper, we discuss how these technologies can change the nature of competition in politics and replace or complement traditional media. Our empirical study on how Web 2.0 technologies were used by the candidates leading up to the 2008 U.S. presidential primaries sheds light on how these technologies influenced candidate performance. Finally, we outline a research agenda highlighting where IS can contribute to the academic discourse on e-politics.
[65]
William, M., & Richard, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust. Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30-62.
[66]
Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704-718.
[67]
Yu, R. P., & Oh, Y. W. (2018). Social media and expressive citizenship: Understanding the relationships between social and entertainment expression on Facebook and political participation. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2299-2311.
[68]
Zuckerman, E. (2014). New media, new civics?. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 151-168.

Footnotes

1. 在哑变量的设置方面,性别以女性、婚姻状况以未婚、政治面貌以群众、户籍以农村户籍、宗教信仰以无宗教信仰为参照项。

Funding

National Social Science Foundation’s Project “Research on Government Trust and Civil Expression in the Internet Era”(17BSH148)
PDF(1498 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/