Juxtaposition of Public and Private, Pursuit of win-win: The Publicity of China’s Public Relations Practice

CHEN Xianhong, LI Yingyi

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7) : 50-73.

PDF(1648 KB)
PDF(1648 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7) : 50-73.
Specific Topic/Innovation of Independent Knowledge System of Chinese Journalism and Communication

Juxtaposition of Public and Private, Pursuit of win-win: The Publicity of China’s Public Relations Practice

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The tension between the pursuit of publicity by “public” and the praise of “private” by “relationship” in public relations has always been the fundamental cause of the legalization and stigmatization crisis of China’s public relations. Based on the public characteristics of Western political philosophy and public relations, this paper creatively puts forward the “contingency model of publicity” of China’s public relations practice by means of questionnaire survey and grounded theory, so as to explain the internal logic of China’s local public relations practice. The research shows that: the publicity of China’s public relations practice is rooted in the cultural tradition of family, country and the world. In the contingency game between “public” and “private”, it presents a dynamic picture of “public-private mixture”, in which the public practice form of “public-private Juxtaposition” is the most rational. The degree of “publicity” of Chinese public relations practice will be affected by the four dominant factors of organizational characteristics, media characteristics, environmental characteristics, public characteristics and the implicit factor of practitioner relationship characteristics, which will change continuously in the degree of “extremely public” and “extremely private” publicity. The publicity of China’s local public relations practice does not exclude the relationship, which will promote or restrict the external performance of the publicity of public relations practice in varying degrees.

Key words

China public relations / public relations practice / publicity characterization

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Xianhong , LI Yingyi. Juxtaposition of Public and Private, Pursuit of win-win: The Publicity of China’s Public Relations Practice[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2022, 44(7): 50-73

References

[1]
陈先红(2017). 《现代公共关系学》(第二版). 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[2]
陈先红(2016). 公共关系学的想象:视域、理论与方法. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(5):27-35.
[3]
陈先红、 侯全平(2019). 积极公共关系:中国公共关系研究的本土化探索. 《新闻大学》,(4),87-99+119-120.
[4]
陈先红(主编)(2018): 《中国公共关系学》. 北京: 中国传媒大学出版社,.
[5]
陈飞(2019). 公共性观念的历史嬗变与马克思公共性观念的变革. 《江汉论坛》,(4),28-33.
[6]
陈弱水(2006). 《公共意识与中国文化》. 北京: 新星出版社.
[7]
陈向明(1999). 扎根理论的思路和方法. 《教育研究与实验》,(5),58-63+73.
[8]
陈赟(2005). 通达与敞开:中西政治哲学中的公共性. 《学海》,(5),75-84.
[9]
费孝通(1998). 《乡土中国》. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[10]
龚莉萍(2008). 三鹿事件:拷问危机公关职业底线. 《国际新闻界》,(10),28-32.
[11]
汉娜·阿伦特(2009). 《人的境况》(王寅丽译). 上海: 上海世纪出版社.
[12]
洪治刚(2004). 《胡适经典文存》. 上海: 上海大学出版社.
[13]
胡百精(2007). 公共关系的“元理由”与对话范式. 《国际新闻界》,(12),11-16.
[14]
胡百精(2013). 合法性、市场化与20世纪90年代中国公共关系史纲——中国现代公共关系三十年(中). 《当代传播》,(5),4-9+14.
[15]
黄懿慧、 林颖萱(2004). 公共关系之关系策略模式初:在地与文化的观点. 《新闻学研究》,(19),76-84.
[16]
金耀基(1992). 关系和网络的建构——一个社会学的诠释. 《二十一世》,(8),22-36.
[17]
黎靖德(主编)(2011). 《朱子语类(一)》. 北京: 中华书局.
[18]
梁劲泰(2007). 文化传统下的“公共性”——读薛冰教授的专著《历史与逻辑: 公共性视域中的公共管理》. 《科教文汇》,(10),180-182.
[19]
刘建成(2004). 哈贝马斯的公共性概念探析—从批判到整合. 《教学与研究》(8),20-24.
[20]
刘泽华(2003). 春秋战国的“立公灭私”观念与社会整合(上). 《南开学报》,(4),63-72+95.
[21]
卢梭(1762/1982). 《社会契约论》(李平沤译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[22]
洛克(1690/1964). 《政府论》(叶启芳,瞿菊农译). 上海: 商务印书馆.
[23]
秦亚青(2009). 关系本位与过程建构:将中国理念植入国际关系理论. 《中国社会科学》,(3),69-86+205-206.
[24]
任剑涛(2011). 公共与公共性:一个概念辨析. 《马克思主义与现实》,(6),58-65.
[25]
唐卫东, 程勇, 陈祖新, 韩培立(1990). 论权变理论及其发展. 《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》.(2),90-95.
[26]
王乐夫, 陈干全(2003). 公共性:公共管理研究的基础与核心. 《社会科学》,(4),67-74.
[27]
王庆(2015). 论公共性的回归与重塑. 《浙江工商大学学报》,(1),115-123.
[28]
许纪霖(主编)(2007).《知识分子论丛》第6辑. 南京: 江苏人民出版社,2007年.
[29]
许纪霖(2015). 现代中国的家国天下与自我认同. 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》,(5),46-53.
[30]
薛冰(2006). 《历史与逻辑:公共性视域中的公共管理》. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[31]
以赛亚·伯林(1958/2011). 《自由论》(胡传胜译). 南京: 译林出版社.
[32]
尤尔根·哈贝马斯(1962/1999). 《公共领域的结构转型》(曹卫东,王晓珏,刘北城等译). 上海: 学林出版社.
[33]
翟学伟(1999). 个人地位:一个概念及其分析框架——中国日常社会的真实建构. 《中国社会科学》,(4),144-157+207.
[34]
詹世友(2005). 公共领域·公共利益·公共性. 《社会科学》,(7),64-73.
[35]
朱慧玲(2011). 共同体主义还是共和主义?——桑德尔政治哲学立场评定与剖析. 《世界哲学》,(3),150-159.
[36]
Benhabib S. (1992). Model of Public Space:Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition and Jǜrgen Habermas. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press.
[37]
Cancel A.E., Cameron G.T., Sallot L.M., & Mitrook M.A. (1997). It depends: A contingency theory of accommodation in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 31-63.
[38]
Cancel A.E., Mitrook M.A., & Cameron G.T. (1999). Testing the contingency theory of accommodation in pubic relations. Public Relations Review, 25(2), 171-197.
[39]
Cutlip S.M., Center A.H., & Broom G.M. (1994). Effective public relations. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[40]
Edwards L.(2009). Symbolic power and public relations practice: Locating individual practitioners in their social context. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(3), 251-272.
[41]
Motion J. & Weaver C.K.(2005). A discourse perspective for critical public relations research : Life sciences network and the battle for Truth. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(1), 49-67.
[42]
Stauber J., & Rampton S. (1995). Toxic Sludge is Good for You! Lies, Damn Lie and the Public Relations Industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage.
[43]
Strömbäck J., & Kiousis S.(2011). Political Public Relations: Defining and Mapping an Emergent Field. London, UK: Routledge.
[44]
Wang C.L. (2007). Guanxi vs. relationship marketing: exploring underlying difference. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 81-86.

Funding

Major Research Project of the Ministry of Education “Research on telling China Stories and Promoting China’s National Discourse Power and Cultural Soft Power”(17JZD038)
PDF(1648 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/