PDF(1601 KB)
Paradigm Shift of “Gatekeeper” and Communication Turn: From the Perspective of Technological Evolution and Platform Governance Institutional Innovation
FANG Xingdong, ZHONG Xiangming
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 97-117.
PDF(1601 KB)
PDF(1601 KB)
Paradigm Shift of “Gatekeeper” and Communication Turn: From the Perspective of Technological Evolution and Platform Governance Institutional Innovation
From “gatekeeping” the content gate of journalism and communication to “gatekeeping” the social gate of platform governance, the paradigm shift of the concept of “gatekeeper” reflects the inevitable trend of technological progress and the development of the times, continues the internal consistent spirit of human civilization, and also represents the paradigm shift of human social communication and governance in the whole digital age. This study traces the origin of the concept of “gatekeeper” and combs its connotation and paradigm transformation process through literature research and interdisciplinary comparative research. From the “gatekeeper” in the field of journalism and communication to the “gatekeeper” on the Internet platform, this paper analyzes the changes and invariance, and discriminates the essence of the change in the digital age and the difficulties faced by today’s human social governance. From the “gatekeeper” of journalism and communication to the “gatekeeper” of the platform is essentially a paradigm shift in the role and role of information communication in human society. Under the guidance of the new human communication behavior with data as the core, the theoretical basis and knowledge system of communication need to be reconstructed in order to realize the real paradigm transformation of communication. The change of the concept of “gatekeeper” provides important enlightenment for the transformation and reconstruction of communication.
“gatekeeper” / Internet platform / the Digital Markets Act / platform governance / communication reform
| [1] |
白红义(2020). 媒介社会学中的“把关”:一个经典理论的形成、演化与再造. 《南京社会科学》,(1),106-115.
|
| [2] |
陈力丹(2017). 把关人理论与传播的五种自然控制. 《东南传播》,(4),20-23.
|
| [3] |
方兴东, 严峰, 钟祥铭(2020). 大众传播的终结与数字传播的崛起——从大教堂到大集市的传播范式转变历程考察. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》.(7),132-146.
|
| [4] |
方兴东, 钟祥铭(2021). 互联网平台反垄断的本质与对策. 《现代出版》,(2),37-45.
|
| [5] |
胡泳, 周凌宇(2021). 把关理论与现代社会的重构. 《新闻与写作》,(8),41-51.
|
| [6] |
黄旦(1996). “把关人”研究及其演变. 《国际新闻界》,(8),27-31.
|
| [7] |
黄旦(2005). 《传者图像:新闻专业主义的建构和消解》. 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
|
| [8] |
李钢(2016). “把关”再认知与回到勒温. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(5),164-165.
|
| [9] |
罗昕(2011). 结构性缺失:网络时代把关理论的重新考察. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),68-76+112-113.
|
| [10] |
马丁·摩尔, 达米安·坦比尼 (2018/2020). 《巨头:失控的互联网企业》(魏瑞莉,倪金丹译). 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
|
| [11] |
尼克·斯尔尼塞克(2017/2018). 《平台资本主义》(程水英译). 广州: 广东人民出版社.
|
| [12] |
乔治·莱考夫, 马克·约翰逊(2003/2015). 《我们赖以生存的隐喻》(何文忠译). 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
|
| [13] |
吴飞(2016). 新媒体时代更需要“把关人”. 《中国记者》,(11),7.
|
| [14] |
吴沈括, 胡然(2021). 数字平台监管的欧盟新方案与中国镜鉴——围绕《数字服务法案》《数字市场法案》提案的探析. 《电子政务》,(2),111-120.
|
| [15] |
余子纯(2020). 新媒体环境下“把关人”理论探究. 《新闻传播》,(17),47-48.
|
| [16] |
钟祥铭, 方兴东(2021). “围墙花园”破拆:互联网平台治理的一个关键问题. 《现代出版》,(5),62-67.
|
| [17] |
\n • In the professional news media, invitations to submit photos and video material are the most common means of allowing citizens to participate in the content production, as opposed to merely commenting on professional material. Based on interviews with leading journalists in different media in the Netherlands, this study examines how professional journalists respond to the phenomenon of amateur photography, how it is assessed in terms of journalism’s values and how amateur images are used in the established news media, both in the online context and in the broadcast or print context.\n 1\n Our primary question is what amateur photography means for ‘participatory journalism’, understood in terms of conversation, collaboration and the democratization of news media. •\n
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Eight college and university Webmasters in three midwestern states were interviewed to explore their communications practices and activities by applying a traditional mass media gatekeeping perspective. The results suggest that gatekeeping theory is a valuable approach for studying individuals responsible for the mediation of messages in the emerging online media. Webmasters’ personal characteristics and attitudes were found to influence their media content decisions, they share common values used to determine content and design, and they face a variety of organizational and related constraints, some exclusive to Web gatekeepers in an academic setting. Examples of gatekeeping activity and observations by the informants are presented, and suggestions for future research are included.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Several fundamental questions concerning internet law come to a head over search engines. There are trademark cases, issues about the protection of minors and questions of liability. However, as far as we know, the fundamental role that search engines play in public communication based on the World Wide Web has not yet been subjected to any legal analysis. This seems to leave a significant gap in our knowledge, given the fact that the market for search engines tends to be monopolistic.
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Lewin's concept of “force” is explored in this study, which shows support for the proposition that newspaper gatekeeping is influenced more by forces on the routine level of analysis than by individual staff writers' characteristics. Newspaper stories about fifty Congressional bills were content analyzed, and two surveys were conducted of the stories' writers and of editors at their newspapers. No individual-level force was related to the quantity of coverage the bills received, whereas editors' aggregated assessment of bills' newsworthiness was positively related to quantity of bills' newspaper coverage.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
1. 参见Ending Platform Monopolies Act. Retrieved from
2. 参见The Digital Markets Act: ensuring fair and open digital markets. Retrieved from
3. 参见Foroohar, R. (2018). Year in a Word: Techlash. Finance Time Retrieved from
4. 参见David Ciciline的Twitter账户
5. 参见Ending Platform Monopolies Act. Retrieved from
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
