PDF(1564 KB)
Role Integration and Job Satisfaction of Journalists under Media Convergence: Based on the Perspectives of Multiple Institutional Logic
ZHU Jiangli, SHI Lingli
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 139-156.
PDF(1564 KB)
PDF(1564 KB)
Role Integration and Job Satisfaction of Journalists under Media Convergence: Based on the Perspectives of Multiple Institutional Logic
By influencing the role identity of journalists, multiple institutional logic results in the interaction between different roles, and the degree of role interaction and integration is then reflected in the job satisfaction of journalists. Empirical analysis shows that “staff role” identification, “employee role” identification and “professional role” identification can increase job satisfaction, and “employee role” identification and “professional role” identification respectively play an important intermediary variable from role identification to job satisfaction. From the perspective of multiple institutional logic, “staff role”, “employee role” and “professional role” are not contrary and separate, but can complement each other. Especially “professional role” is the catalyst to promote the integration of the three roles. In order to improve the recognition of “professional role” of journalists, it is fundamentally necessary to strengthen the cooperation between the national logic and the group’s hierarchical logic and professional logic, and allocate some attention of journalists to “professional role”.
Role integration / Job satisfaction / Multiple institutional logic / Journalists
| [1] |
白红义(2013). 塑造新闻权威:互联网时代中国新闻职业再审视. 《新闻与传播研究》,(1),26-36.
|
| [2] |
丁方舟(2016). 创新、仪式、退却与反抗——中国新闻从业者的职业流动类型研究. 《新闻记者》,(4),27-33.
|
| [3] |
丁方舟, 韦路(2015). 社会化媒体时代中国新闻从业者的认知转变与职业转型. 《国际新闻界》,(10),92-106.
|
| [4] |
丁汉青, 苗勃(2018). 网络时代新闻从业者职业认同危机研究. 《当代传播》,(4),19-23.
|
| [5] |
丁汉青, 王军(2019). 冲突与协调:传媒从业者后备军职业认同状况研究——以北京某高校新闻学院在校生为例. 《国际新闻界》,(2),113-131.
|
| [6] |
韩晓宁(2016). 体制内媒体从业者生存状态研究——以编制因素与职业忠诚度为视角. 《当代传播》,(4),101-103.
|
| [7] |
黄旦(2002). 新闻专业主义的建构与消解——对西方大众传播者研究历史的解读. 《新闻与传播研究》,(2),2-9.
|
| [8] |
黄丽媛, 沈阳(2016). 媒介融合与新闻从业者焦虑情绪的相关性及调节变量. 《新闻界》,(5),35-41.
|
| [9] |
蒋东旭, 胡正荣(2019). 互动依赖:多元逻辑中的媒介制度变迁. 《新闻大学》,(6),81-89.
|
| [10] |
李超平, 李晓轩, 时勘, 陈雪峰(2006). 授权的测量及其与员工工作态度的关系. 《心理学报》,(1),99-106.
|
| [11] |
刘思达(2016). 职业自主性与国家干预——西方职业社会学研究述评. 《社会学研究》,(1),197-221.
|
| [12] |
陆晔(2004). 社会控制与自主性——新闻从业者工作满意度与角色冲突分析. 《现代传播》,(6),7-11
|
| [13] |
陆晔, 潘忠党(2002). 成名的想象:中国社会转型过程中新闻从业者的专业主义话语建构. 《新闻学研究》(中国台湾),(4),17-59.
|
| [14] |
陆晔, 俞卫东(2003a). 社会转型过程中传媒人职业状况——2002上海新闻从业者调查报告之一. 《新闻记者》,(1),42-44.
|
| [15] |
陆晔, 俞卫东(2003b). 传媒人的职业理想——2002上海新闻从业者调查报告之二. 《新闻记者》,(2)8-11.
|
| [16] |
陶建杰, 张志安(2018). 过渡性职业:新媒体环境下本科新闻学子的择业意愿及影响因素. 《现代传播》,(9),166-174.
|
| [17] |
王军, 韩晓宁(2020). 坚定与动摇:新闻从业者的职业承诺及其影响因素研究. 《国际新闻界》,(8),66-87.
|
| [18] |
王晓红, 俞逆思(2019). 我国城市广电媒体从业者职业认同现状及影响因素分析. 《新闻记者》,(9),51-60.
|
| [19] |
吴飞(2005). 新闻从业人员的职业满意度. 《新闻与传播研究》,(3),49-56.
|
| [20] |
夏倩芳(2013). “挣工分”的政治:绩效制度下的产品、劳动与新闻人. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(9),28-36.
|
| [21] |
喻国明(1998). 中国新闻工作者的职业意识与职业道德. 《新闻记者》,(3),10-17.
|
| [22] |
曾丽红(2014). 新闻从业者的工作自主性及影响因素研究——基于新媒体环境下的考察. 《新闻与传播研究》,(1),26-47.
|
| [23] |
赵云泽, 滕沐颖, 杨启鹏, 解雯迦(2014). 记者职业地位的殒落:“自我认同”的贬斥与“社会认同”的错位. 《国际新闻界》,(12),84-97.
|
| [24] |
周葆华, 谢欣阳, 寇志红(2014). 网络新闻从业者的基本构成与工作状况——“中国网络新闻从业者生存状况调查报告”之一. 《新闻记者》,(1),43-48.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
We integrate the upper-echelons perspective with the attention-based view of the firm by examining the role of attentional orientation of top management teams (TMTs). In the context of airline deregulation, we find that deregulation caused a shift in managerial attention, but that this shift in attention was the greatest for firms that changed the composition and compensation of their TMTs in ways that favored the deregulated regime. We also find that attention partially mediated the relationship between TMT changes and strategy changes. The results of this study shed light on the transformation of industry attention patterns following an environmental shift, and the role of TMT composition and incentive systems in that process.
|
| [30] |
Dexter, & Anthony, L. (1964). People, society and mass communications. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Haveman,
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Organizational theory and research has increased attention to the determinants and consequences of attention in organizations. Attention is not, however, a unitary concept but is used differently in various metatheories: the behavioral theory of the firm, managerial cognition, issue selling, attention-based view, and ecology. At the level of the brain, neuroscientists have identified three varieties of attention: selective attention, executive attention, and vigilance. Attention is shaped by both top-down (i.e., schema-driven) and bottom-up (i.e., stimulus-driven) processes. Inspired by neuroscience research, I classify and compare three varieties of attention studied in organization science: attentional perspective (top-down), attentional engagement (combining top-down and bottom-up executive attention and vigilance), and attentional selection (the outcome of attentional processes). Based on research findings, I develop five propositions on how the varieties of attention in organization provide a theoretical alternative to theories of structural determinism or strategic choice, with a particular focus on the role of attention in explaining organizational adaptation and change.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
