PDF(1527 KB)
The Ideal and Reality of Weibo as the “Public Sphere” of Gender Issues: Computer-Assisted Content Analysis Based on the Topic “Masculinity”
XU Jinghong, HUANG Hui, YOU Xinyang
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 106-124.
PDF(1527 KB)
PDF(1527 KB)
The Ideal and Reality of Weibo as the “Public Sphere” of Gender Issues: Computer-Assisted Content Analysis Based on the Topic “Masculinity”
In recent years, the crisis of masculinity has become a controversial gender issue between the mainstream and the youth subculture. This article takes Computer-assisted Content Analysis as the research method and uses three tools to analyze the topic #what is today’s masculinity# on Weibo, including the social network analysis, the context analysis based on term, and the sentiment analysis. We found that the public participation in the topic takes the key opinion leaders as the communication hub, which is characterized by free thinking and exchange and strong cohesion. In terms of theme orientation, the topic presents an open discussion between male supremacy and gender equality. In the sentiment analysis, the topic presents a rational discussion atmosphere in each stage of its development, but the netizens’ significant recognition of negative emotional comments can be seen from the whole. Therefore, although Weibo provides a relatively equal, extensive and open communication space for the gender issues, it is still far from forming an ideal“public sphere”of it.
masculinity / Weibo / public sphere / gender consciousness / computer-assisted content analysis
| [1] |
陈吉德(2017). 消费时代的浮躁表演——近年来影视界“小鲜肉”现象批判. 《中国电视》,(11),93-97.
|
| [2] |
戴蓓芬(2016). 试论性别话题公民新闻的出现及意义. 《新闻知识》,(11),9-13.
|
| [3] |
党明辉(2017). 公共舆论中负面情绪化表达的框架效应——基于在线新闻跟帖评论的计算机辅助内容分析. 《新闻与传播研究》,(4),42-64+128.
|
| [4] |
第一财经(2020). 《移动互联网月活3月突破11.56亿,在线办公时长暴增20倍》.检索于 https://www.yicai.com/news/100602737.html.
|
| [5] |
丁慧(2012). 批判与再筑:公私二元性别规范的省思——以兰西•弗雷泽公共领域观为视角. 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》,(5),597-602.
|
| [6] |
方刚(2006). 当代西方男性气质理论概述. 《国外社会科学》,(4),67-72.
|
| [7] |
冯培华(2018). 网络环境下自我呈现的性别特征差异分析——基于新浪微博文本的考察. 《文化创新比较研究》,(19),73-74.
|
| [8] |
高庆(2012). 被集体围观的小众:“伪娘”的个性表达与社会纠结. 《中国青年研究》,(9),79-84+30.
|
| [9] |
郭讲用(2013). 微博约架:传媒公共领域的实践困境. 《当代传播》,(3),65-68.
|
| [10] |
郭彦森(2012). 网络公共领域研究中的“哈贝马斯依赖”现象评析. 《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(4),16-20.
|
| [11] |
何苑(2019). 《“阴柔”亚文化流行的影响因素研究》.北京师范大学新闻与传播学院博士论文.北京.
|
| [12] |
黄月琴(2008). 公共领域的观念嬗变与大众传媒的公共性——评阿伦特、哈贝马斯与泰勒的公共领域思想. 《新闻与传播评论》,(1),111-119+252+260.
|
| [13] |
蒋旭玲, 吕厚超(2012). 男性气质:理论基础、研究取向和相关研究领域. 《心理科学进展》, (7),1040-1051.
|
| [14] |
林小闻(2017). 微博是否为公共领域之探究. 《中国报业》,(20),17-18.
|
| [15] |
刘军(2014). 《整体网分析:UCINET软件实用指南》(第二版). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
|
| [16] |
刘子潇(2018). 微博建构公共领域的实践困境. 《传媒》,(2),94-96.
|
| [17] |
瑞文·康奈尔(1995/2003). 《男性气质》(柳莉等译). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
|
| [18] |
沈亚平, 刘志辉(2014). 现代信息技术发展与公共生活变迁. 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(4),71-78.
|
| [19] |
舒奇志(2011). 当代西方男性气质研究理论发展概述. 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(4),119-126.
|
| [20] |
宋辰婷(2013). 微博——公共领域建构的新契机. 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》, (4),86-89.
|
| [21] |
宋桂花(2015). 网络空间中女性“反话语”的建构与悖论. 《中华女子学院学报》,(3),37-43.
|
| [22] |
孙玮, 李梦颖(2014). “可见性”:社会化媒体与公共领域——以占海特“异地高考”事件为例. 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》,(2),37-44.
|
| [23] |
王淑华(2014). 传媒下的社会想象与多元的共同体——泰勒的多元公共领域概念评析. 《浙江传媒学院学报》,(3),19-23.
|
| [24] |
魏冰(2018). 微博舆论场与公共领域建构的可行性和困境. 《西部广播电视》,(6),7-8+15.
|
| [25] |
吴曼迪(2013). 从网络论坛透析新媒体在公共领域建构中的作用. 《赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版)》,(2),196-197.
|
| [26] |
吴瑛, 宋韵雅, 刘勇(2016). 社会化媒体的“中国式反腐”——对落马官员案微博讨论的社会网络分析. 《新闻大学》,(4),104-113+128+153.
|
| [27] |
熊光清(2014). 网络公共领域的兴起与话语民主的新发展. 《中国人民大学学报》,(5),88-96.
|
| [28] |
杨胜男(2018). 微博问政与网络公共关系. 《科技传播》,(1),86-87.
|
| [29] |
尹连根(2013). 结构·再现·互动:微博的公共领域表征. 《新闻大学》,(2),60-68.
|
| [30] |
尹连根(2014). 框架之争:作为公共领域的微博空间——以深圳5·26飙车案为例. 《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》,(2),119-125.
|
| [31] |
尤根·哈贝马斯(1962/1999). 《公共领域的结构转型》(曹卫东等译). 上海: 学林出版社.
|
| [32] |
张殿元(2017). 技术·权力·结构:网络新媒体时代公共领域的嬗变. 《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》,(6),138-144.
|
| [33] |
张恒军(2016). 微博在公共领域建构中的言论特征与管理. 《传播与版权》,(1),99-100.
|
| [34] |
张伦, 钟智锦(2017). 社会化媒体公共事件话语框架比较分析. 《新闻记者》,(2),69-77.
|
| [35] |
张晓静(2012). 微博:媒介公共领域构建的新维度. 《青年记者》,(11),65-66.
|
| [36] |
The concept of hegemonic masculinity has influenced gender studies across many academic fields but has also attracted serious criticism. The authors trace the origin of the concept in a convergence of ideas in the early 1980s and map the ways it was applied when research on men and masculinities expanded. Evaluating the principal criticisms, the authors defend the underlying concept of masculinity, which in most research use is neither reified nor essentialist. However, the criticism of trait models of gender and rigid typologies is sound. The treatment of the subject in research on hegemonic masculinity can be improved with the aid of recent psychological models, although limits to discursive flexibility must be recognized. The concept of hegemonic masculinity does not equate to a model of social reproduction; we need to recognize social struggles in which subordinated masculinities influence dominant forms. Finally, the authors review what has been confirmed from early formulations (the idea of multiple masculinities, the concept of hegemony, and the emphasis on change) and what needs to be discarded (onedimensional treatment of hierarchy and trait conceptions of gender). The authors suggest reformulation of the concept in four areas: a more complex model of gender hierarchy, emphasizing the agency of women; explicit recognition of the geography of masculinities, emphasizing the interplay among local, regional, and global levels; a more specific treatment of embodiment in contexts of privilege and power; and a stronger emphasis on the dynamics of hegemonic masculinity, recognizing internal contradictions and the possibilities of movement toward gender democracy.
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
This study investigated whether and how journalistic news frames affect readers' thoughts about and recall of two issues. A sample of 187 participants was randomly assigned to one of four experimental framing conditions, which included (a) conflict, (b) human interest, (c) attribution of responsibility, and (d) economic consequences, as well as a control condition. Each participant was presented with two newspaper stories that dealt with two socially and politically pertinent issues in Europe: crime and the introduction of the euro, the common European currency. Each story had an identical core component, whereas the title, opening paragraph, and closing paragraph were varied to reflect the frame. The study found that frames played a significant role in the readers' thought-listing responses, and they defined the ways that readers presented information about both issues. The results showed that the human interest news frame can have negative consequences for recall.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
1. LIWC(Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count)是一款基于心理学的文本情感分析软件,由Pennebaker等人研究开发,情感词库是其程序的核心。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |