以布迪厄的场域理论为出发点，基于对南方Z市政务微信编辑的深度访谈，本文研 究认为，政务微信生产实践宜理解为新闻场域与政治场域两种文化逻辑之间的融合与 冲突，理解为其间各行动主体之间的博弈。具体地，政务微信的融合形态有四，即， “忠”且“传”，“忠”而不“传”，“不忠”而“传”，“不忠”且“不传”。融合 中的冲突性元素源于各自相异的场域逻辑，显现为融合中的行动主体——行政领导与微 信编辑——在投入与效果、有为与无为、代际差异三方面的博弈。不过，两大场域在目 标上可能的一致性，即，政治安全前提下的市场致效，使得政务新媒体仍存在有机融合 的空间。基于此，本文尝试性地将我国政务新媒体实践概括为“博弈性融合”。

Departing from Bourdieu’s field theory and based on in-depth interviews with practitioners of governmental WeChat media in City Z, this article argues that the practice of governmental WeChat media is the result of convergence or con?ict between journalistic feld and political feld, in which different actors play the game according to the logic of their respective field. To put it concretely, there are four forms of practices, i.e. political loyalty combined with communication success, political loyalty but communication failure, political dissonance and communication failure, and political dissonance but communication success. The contradictory practice derives from the cultural con?ict between the two distinctive felds. It re?ects the ‘gaming’ attitude between different actors in the government and WeChat media, who are constantly considering kinds of three factors: expenses and gain, level of activity, and generational judgement. Nevertheless, achieving market success while maintaining political safety is the trade-off commonly shared by both sides, and this makes possible the accommodating practice between two fields. The article thus concludes that Chinese governmental new media practice can be understood as a game-like convergence.