The World “Being Inscribed”: Reinterpreting Friedrich Kittler’s Concept of “Aufschreibesystem” and His Media Theory

TANG Haijiang; XU Haoliang

PDF(1544 KB)

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 71-91.

Research Articles

The World “Being Inscribed”: Reinterpreting Friedrich Kittler’s Concept of “Aufschreibesystem” and His Media Theory

Author information +

History +

Abstract

On the occasion of the upcoming 40th anniversary of the publication of Aufschreibesysteme 1800/1900 by Friedrich Kittler, the article returns to this work and examines its core term, “Aufschreibesystem”, which is also the basic concept underpinning his media theory. It examines the reasons why “Aufschreibesystem” is translated as “discourse network” in British and American academic circles, and verifies its true meaning from an etymological perspective: inscription system. Additionally, the article explores the origin and relationship between the concept and Shannon-Weaver's information theory, Foucault’s “extériorit”, Lacan’s psychoanalysis and Derrida’s grammatology, and reveals the specific connotations of “inscription”, “transformation”, “surface”. In addition, it outlines the world picture of its “inscription” by comparing the relevant thoughts of Foucault, Lacan and Derrida. This views not only opens up many aspects of Kittler’s media theory that have long been neglected and obscured, but also reveals the methodological basis of his media theory, and leaves a unique and valuable ideological legacy for analysing both history and the present.

Key words

Aufschreibesystem / Friedrich Kittler / Media theory / Media materiality

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

TANG Haijiang , XU Haoliang. The World “Being Inscribed”: Reinterpreting Friedrich Kittler’s Concept of “Aufschreibesystem” and His Media Theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(9): 71-91

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	陈永国(2007). 《德里达与解构策略》. 《文艺研究》, 2007,(8),31-37. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	弗里德里希·基特勒(1986/2017). 《留声机、电影、打字机》(邢春丽译). 上海: 复旦大学出版社. Cited in this article [12]

[3]	杰弗里·温斯洛普—扬(2011/2019). 《基特勒论媒介》(张昱辰译). 北京: 北京广播学院出版社. Cited in this article [2]

[4]	米歇尔·福柯(1971/2001). 《话语的秩序》.载许宝强,袁伟(选编),《语言与翻译的政治》(第1-31页). 北京: 中央编译出版社. Cited in this article [2]

[5]	米歇尔·福柯(1963/2011). 《临床医学的诞生》(刘北成译). 南京: 译林出版社. Cited in this article [2]

[6]	米歇尔·福柯(1966/2016). 《词与物:人文知识的考古学》(莫伟民译). 上海: 上海三联书店. Cited in this article [2]

[7]	米歇尔·福柯(1969/2021). 《知识考古学》(董树宝译). 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店. Cited in this article [4]

[8]	牛津大学出版社, 杜登出版社(2000/2009). 《德英汉·英德汉词典》(王京平,李惟嘉译). 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社. Cited in this article [2]

[9]	汪堂家(2008). 《汪堂家讲德里达》. 北京: 北京大学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	吴琼(2011). 《雅克·拉康:阅读你的症状(上/下)》. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[11]	雅克·德里达(1967/2010). 《声音与现象》(杜小真译). 北京: 商务印书馆. Cited in this article [2]

[12]	雅克·德里达(1967/2015). 《论文字学》(汪堂家译). 上海: 上海译文出版社. Cited in this article [4]

[13]	约翰·彼得斯(2015/2021). 《奇云:媒介即存有》(邓建国译). 杭州: 中国美术学院出版社. Cited in this article [4]

[14]	Armitage J. (2006). From discourse networks to cultural mathematics: An interview with friedrich a. Kittler. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8), 17-38. Cited in this article [3]

[15]	Chattopadhyay A. (2017). Lacan and beckett: Acts of writing between psychoanalysis and literature. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui. 29 (1): 79-91. Cited in this article [2]

[16]	Enns A. (2016). Media history versus media archeology:German media theory and wolfgang ernst’s chronopoetics. In Ernst, W. Chronopoetics:The temporal being and operativity of technological media. (Enns, A. Trans.). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield. Cited in this article [1]

[17]	Ernst W. (2013). From media history to zeitkritik. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 132-146. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	Futterknecht F.& Wellbery D. (1987). Mother’s mouth and typewriter. Poetics today, 8(3/4), 675-687. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772576 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1772576?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[19]	Gane N. (2005). Radical post-humanism: Friedrich kittler and the primacy of technology. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(3), 25-41. Cited in this article [1]

[20]	Geoghegan B. (2013). After kittler: On the cultural techniques of recent german media theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 66-82. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	Kittler F. (1985). Die Aufschreibesysteme 1800/1900. München, MUC: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. Cited in this article [22]

[22]	Kittler F. (1993). Real time analysis: Time axis manipulation. In Draculas Vermächtnis: Technische Schriften, Leipzig, LEJ: Reclam-Verlag. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	Kittler F. (2009). Towards an ontology of media. Theory, Culture & Society, 26 (2-3), 23-31. Cited in this article [4]

[24]	Kittler F. (2010). Optical media:Berlin lectures 1999. ( Enns A. Trans.). Cambridge,CB: Polity Press. Cited in this article [2]

[25]	Krämer S. (2006). The cultural techniques of time axis manipulation: On friedrich kittler’s conception of media. Theory, Culture & Society, 23 (7-8), 93-109. Cited in this article [1]

[26]	Krämer S., & Bredekamp H. (2013). Culture, technology, cultural techniques - moving beyond text1. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 20-29. Cited in this article [1]

[27]	Lacan J. (1999). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX:On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge, 1972-1973. (Flink, B.Trans.). Miller, J. A. (Eds.), New York, NY: W.W.Norton&Company. Cited in this article [2]

[28]	Lacan J. (2006). Écrits:The first complete edition in english. (Fink, B. Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. Cited in this article [1]

[29]	Maddalena K. & Packer J. (2015). The digital body:Telegraphy as discourse network. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 93-117. Cited in this article [1]

[30]	Partington G. (2006). Friedrich Kittler’s “Aufschreibsystem”. Science Fiction Studies, 33(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1525/sfs.33.1.53 https://online.ucpress.edu/sfs/article/33/Part%201%20(98)/53/208369/Friedrich-Kittler-s-Aufschreibsystem Cited in this article [5]

[31]	Pfeifer W. (2000). Etymologisches wörterbuch des deutschen, münchen. Retrieved from https://www.dwds.de/wb/Schreiben. https://www.dwds.de/wb/Schreiben Cited in this article [1]

[32]	Schmidgen H. (2019). Successful paranoia:Friedrich kittler, lacanian psychoanalysis, and the history of science. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(1), 107-131. Cited in this article [3]

[33]	Sebastian T. & Geerke J. (1990). Technology romanticized:Friedrich Kittler’s discourse networks 1800/1900. MLN, 105(3), 583-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2905075 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2905075?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[34]	Siegert B. (2013). Cultural techniques: Or the end of the intellectual postwar era in german media theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 48-65. Cited in this article [1]

[35]	Wellbery D. (1990). “Foreword.” In Kittler, F. Discourse networks 1800/1900. California, CA: Stanford University Press. Cited in this article [1]

[36]	Winthrop-Young G. & Wutz M. (1999). Translators’ introduction:Friedrich kittler and german media discourse analysis. In Kittler, F., Gramophone, film, typewriter, California, CA: Stanford University Press. Cited in this article [1]

[37]	Winthrop-Young G. (2000). Silicon sociology, or, two kings on hegel’s throne? kittler, luhmann, and the posthuman merger of german media theory. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 13(2), 391-420. https://doi.org/10.1353/yale.2000.0027 https://muse.jhu.edu/article/36865 Cited in this article [1]

[38]	Winthrop-Young G. & Gane N. (2006). Friedrich Kittler: An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8), 5-16. Cited in this article [1]

Funding

National Social Science Fund “Media Archaeology of China from the Perspective of Civilization Diversity (Multiple Volumes)”(20&ZD329)

PDF(1544 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections

Recommended

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export