Some Introductory Thoughts on the Future of Media and Communications

Written by DAVID Morley, Translated by WANG Xin

Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10) : 164-176.

PDF(1424 KB)
PDF(1424 KB)
Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10) : 164-176.
Book Reviews

Some Introductory Thoughts on the Future of Media and Communications

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In recent years, media studies have often focused on how contemporary digital technologies are reshaping both societies and individual consciousness. These issues inevitably raise difficult questions about the relationship of communications, media and transport and the gains and losses consequent upon media-centric perspectives. In this context, we have to ask how our field of study should be defined in relation to the disciplines of media studies, communications, cultural studies, transport geography and mobility studies-and what kind of disciplinary boundaries we want to establish or transcend. All this also raises issues about historical periodisation, and how best to conceptualise both breaks and continuities between eras. Here, I argue that we need to reverse the usual perspective on the effects of technologies and ask to what questions new technologies are the answers? In doing so, it is useful to highlight the specific characteristics of the de-regulated Post-Fordist societies which set the conditions of operation of the media of the rich northern temperate zone-which then tend to provide a universalised template for many analyses. Thus, we evidently also need to consider questions of the `De-Westernising` of the field and about how the specificities of the post-Covid pandemic period in which we live, serve to determine the context of contemporary forms of communication.

Key words

history / context / new media / communication / criticize

Cite this article

Download Citations
Written by DAVID Morley , Translated by WANG Xin. Some Introductory Thoughts on the Future of Media and Communications[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication. 2024, 46(10): 164-176

References

[1]
Creswell T. (2006). On the Move. London, UK: Routledge.
[2]
Davis M. (2006). Planet of Slums. London, UK: Verso Books.
[3]
Diamond J. (2012). The World Until Yesterday. London, UK: Viking Press.
[4]
Dupuy J. P.. (2022). How to Think about Catastrophes. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
[5]
Durkheim E. (1893). The Division of Labour in Society, Paris, FR: Alcan.
[6]
Edgerton D. (2006). The Shock of the Old. London, UK: Profile Books.
[7]
Gauntlett D. (2015). Making Media Studies. Cambridge, MA: Peter Lang.
[8]
Hagerstrand T. (1967). Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[9]
Hartog F. (2017). Regimes of Historicity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
[10]
Innis H. (1951). The Bias of Communication. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.
[11]
Johnson C. (2020). Routes to Content: VOD and TV Viewing in the UK. Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield Publications.
[12]
Larkin B. (2008). Signal and Noise. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
[13]
Latour B. (1993). We have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[14]
Latour B. (2022), After Lockdown-a Metamorphosis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[15]
Lerner D. (1958). The Passing of traditional Society. New York, NY: Free Press.
[16]
McLuhan M. (1967). The Medium is the Message. London, UK: Penguin Press.
[17]
Marvin C. (1990). When Old Technologies Were New. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[18]
Marx K. (1939). Grundrisse. Moscow, RUS: Foreign Language Publishers.
[19]
Morley D. (2009). For a materialist, non-media-centric media studies. Television & New Media, 10(1), 114-116.
[20]
Nemer D. (2022). Technology of the Oppressed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[21]
Rose N. (1998). Inventing Ourselves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[22]
Shove E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience-The Social Organisation of Normalcy. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.
[23]
Spigel L. (1992). Make Room for Television. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[24]
Star S. L. (2009). Standards and Their Stories. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
[25]
Zielinski S. (1999). Audiovisions. Amsterdam, NL: University of Amsterdam Press.

Footnotes

1. 该文是戴维·莫利教授为其专著《传播与流动:移民、手机与集装箱》(Communication and Mobility: the Migrant, the Mobile Phone and the Container Box)中译本撰写的序言,中国人民大学出版社2024年版。

2. 该大学为伦敦政治经济学院(The London School of Economics and Political Science)。

3. 克里奥尔(creole)化通常是指两种或多种语言在特定地区混合后形成的一种新的语言现象,最初表现为欧洲殖民语言与非洲土语混杂形成的一种新的混合语言,即克里奥尔语。作为一种以混杂性为特征的语言形态,克里奥尔语是理解当代政治文化状况的一个重要视角,也用来解释全球化和地方文化的互动过程。最早出现在社会语言学和人类学等领域,被用来描述在殖民地或多元文化交汇的地方各种形式的文化接触。克里奥尔化也被认为是特定殖民地的历史进程,尤其是在加勒比海与印度洋地区,被视为当地文化的重要组成部分,反映了该地区的多元文化和历史背景。

同济大学设计创意学院博士生高源对此文校译亦有帮助。

PDF(1424 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/