[1]	阿尔弗雷德·拉德克里夫-布朗(1952/2009). 《原始社会的结构与功能》(丁国勇译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[2]	埃弗雷特·M·罗杰斯(1994/2005). 《传播学史:一种传记式的方法》(殷晓蓉译). 上海: 上海译文出版社. Cited in this article [2]

[3]	埃米尔·涂尔干(1893/2000). 《社会分工论》(渠东译). 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.

[4]	安东尼·吉登斯(1984/1998). 《社会的构成——结构化理论大纲》(李康,李猛译). 上海: 三联书店. Cited in this article [1]

[5]	彼得·西蒙森, 加布里埃尔·韦曼, (2003/2011). 哥伦比亚的批判研究:拉扎斯菲尔德与默顿的《大众传播、流行品位与组织化社会行为》.载伊莱休·卡茨,约翰·杜伦·彼得斯,泰玛·利比斯,艾薇儿·奥尔洛夫(主编),《媒介研究经典文本解读》(常江译)(第13-39页). 北京: 北京大学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[6]	波考克(1975/2013). 《马基雅维里时刻:佛罗伦萨政治思想和大西洋共和主义传统》(冯克利,傅乾译). 南京: 译林出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[7]	查尔斯·赖特·米尔斯(1959/2005). 《社会学的想象力》(陈强,张永强译). 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店. Cited in this article [1]

[8]	大卫·E·莫里森(1998/2004). 《寻找方法:焦点小组和大众传播研究的发展》(柯惠新,王宁译). 北京: 新华出版社.

[9]	丹尼斯·麦奎尔, 斯文·温德尔(1982/1987). 《大众传播模式论》(祝建华,武伟译). 上海: 上海译文出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[10]	高海波(2010). 《拉斯韦尔战时传播理论研究》. 华中科技大学博士论文.武汉.

[11]	汉诺·哈特(1992/2008). 《传播学批判研究:美国的传播、历史和理论》(何道宽译). 北京: 北京大学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[12]	胡翼青(2012a). 范式的重塑:社会化媒体时代对功能主义路径的反思. 《新闻大学》,(2),5-9. Cited in this article [1]

[13]	胡翼青(2012b). 超越功能主义意识形态:再论传播社会功能研究. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(7),8-12. Cited in this article [1]

[14]	胡翼青(2016). 重塑传播研究范式:何以可能与何以可为. 《现代传播(中国传媒大学学报)》,(6),51-56. Cited in this article [1]

[15]	黄旦(2005). 美国早期的传播思想及其流变——从芝加哥学派到大众传播研究的确立. 《新闻与传播研究》,(12),15-27. Cited in this article [1]

[16]	黄旦(2008). 由功能主义向建构主义转化. 《新闻大学》,(2),46-48+39. Cited in this article [1]

[17]	雷蒙·威廉斯(1985/2005). 《关键词:文化与社会的词汇》(刘建基译). 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店. Cited in this article [1]

[18]	刘易斯·科塞(1956/1989). 《社会冲突的功能》(孙立平译). 北京: 华夏出版社. Cited in this article [3]

[19]	刘易斯·科塞(1971/2007). 《社会思想名家》(石人译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.

[20]	刘海龙(2009). 一篇存在争议的传播学奠基文献. 《国际新闻界》,(2),9-14. Cited in this article [1]

[21]	刘海龙(2012). 中国传播研究中的两种功能主义. 《新闻大学》,(2),10-14+4. Cited in this article [1]

[22]	卡尔·曼海姆(1955/2009). 《意识形态与乌托邦》(姚仁权译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[23]	克洛德·列维-斯特劳斯(1973/2006). 《结构人类学》(张组建译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[24]	帕特里克·贝尔特(1998/2005). 《二十世纪的社会理论》(瞿铁鹏译). 上海: 上海译文出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[25]	渠敬东(1999). 《涂尔干的遗产:现代社会及其可能性》. 《社会学研究》,(1),29-48.

[26]	渠敬东(2017). 《缺席与断裂:有关失范的社会学研究》. 北京: 商务印书馆. Cited in this article [1]

[27]	沙垚, 李雪丽(2020). 重返实践功能:功能主义传播研究的再思考. 《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,(5),116-119. Cited in this article [1]

[28]	苏国勋(1990). 新功能主义:当代社会学理论中的一种新的综合视角. 《国外社会科学》,(8),1-7. Cited in this article [2]

[29]	孙玮, 黄旦(2012). 超越结构功能主义:中国传播学的前世、今生与未来. 《新闻大学》,(2),1-4. Cited in this article [1]

[30]	孙云龙(2012). 考泽莱克与德语世界的概念史. 《史学理论研究》,(1),11-14. Cited in this article [1]

[31]	塔尔科特·帕森斯(1937/2003). 《社会行动的结构》(张明德等译). 南京: 译林出版社. Cited in this article [4]

[32]	吴予敏(2012). 功能主义及其对传播研究的影响之审思. 《新闻大学》,(2),22-26. Cited in this article [1]

[33]	伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦(2001/2008). 《否思社会科学——19世纪范式的局限》(刘琦岩,叶萌芽译). 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店. Cited in this article [1]

[34]	詹姆斯·W·凯瑞(1989/2005). 《作为文化的传播:“媒介与社会”论文集》(丁未译). 北京: 华夏出版社. Cited in this article [1]

[35]	展宁(2020). 伊莱休·卡茨与大众传播研究:半个多世纪的学术演变. 《新闻与传播研究》,(10),5-22.

[36]	张勇锋(2014). 经验功能主义:还原、反思与重构——对中国语境中传播学经验功能主义的再认识. 《新闻与传播研究》,(9),24-38+129. Cited in this article [1]

[37]	Alexander, J. (1978). Formal and substantive voluntarism in the work of Talcott Parsons: A theoretical and ideological reinterpretation. American Sociological Review, 43(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094698 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094698?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[38]	Alexander, J. C. (Ed.).(1985). Neofunctionalism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [2]

[39]	Alexander, J. (1990). Beyond the epistemological dilemma: General theory in a postpositivist mode. Sociological Forum, 5, 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115390 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01115390 Cited in this article [1]

[40]	Anderson, J. A., & Meyer, T. P. (1975). Functionalism and the mass media. Journal of Broadcasting, 19(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157509363766 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08838157509363766 Cited in this article [2]

[41]	Barber, B. (1956). Structural-functional analysis: Some problems and misunderstandings. American Sociological Review, 21(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088512 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2088512?origin=crossref Cited in this article [3]

[42]	Berelson, B. (1959). The state of Communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1086/266840 https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/266840 Cited in this article [1]

[43]	Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F.,& McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in A Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Cited in this article [3]

[44]	Berger, P. L.,& Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction Of Reality: A Treatise In The Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Books. Cited in this article [1]

[45]	Blau, P. (1964). Exchange And Power in Social Life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Cited in this article [1]

[46]	Blumer, H.(1969/1986) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective And Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cited in this article [1]

[47]

Blumler, J. G. (1979). The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research, 6(1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027900600102 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365027900600102 Cited in this article [2] Abstract Although the uses and gratifications approach lacks a single general theory, it is not inherently atheoretical, and the author suggests how progress can be made in dealing with four conceptual issues facing this tradition: the nature of the \"active\" audience; the role of gratification orientations in mediating effects; the social origins of media needs and uses; and the interest shared with students of popular culture in perceptions of and cognitions about mass media content formed by audience members.

[48]	Blumler, J. G.,& Katz, E. (Eds.)(1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [1]

[49]	Brown, S. R. (2002). Structural and functional information. Policy Sciences, 35(3), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021358313052 Cited in this article [1]

[50]	Buckley, W. (1957). Structural-functional analysis in modern society. In Becker, H.,& Boskoff, A. (Eds.). Modern Sociology Theory In Continuity And Change (pp. 236-259). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Cited in this article [1]

[51]	Burrowes, C. P. (1993, August). The functionalist tradition and communication theory. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Kansas City. Cited in this article [3]

[52]	Burrowes, C. P. (1996). From functionalism to cultural studies: Manifest ruptures and latent continuities. Communication Theory, 6(1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.1996.6.issue-1 http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/comt/6/1 Cited in this article [1]

[53]	Buxton, W. (2003). From radio research to communications intelligence: Rockefeller philanthropy, communications specialists, and the American intelligence community. In Braman, S. (Eds.). Communication Researchers And Policy-Making (pp.295-346). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

[54]	Cade, R. B. (1975). Lasswell’s three functions: Toward a theory of mass communication. Southern Quarterly, 14(1), 41-52. Cited in this article [1]

[55]	Camic, C. (1992). Reputation and predecessor selection: Parsons and the institutionalists. American Sociological Review, 57(4), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096093 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096093?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[56]	Cancian, F. (1960). Functional analysis of change. American Sociological Review, 25(6), 818-827. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089979 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2089979?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[57]	Capecchi, V. (1978). Paul F. Lazarsfeld: A link between American and European methodology. Quality and Quantity, 12(3), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144138 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00144138 Cited in this article [1]

[58]	Carey, J. W. (1978). Social theory and communication theory. Communication Research, 5(3), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500309 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365027800500309 Cited in this article [1]

[59]	Carey, J. W. (2009). Communication As Culture: Essays on Media And Society (Revised edition). New York, NY: Routledge. Cited in this article [1]

[60]	Carey, J. W.,& Kreiling, A. L. (1974). Popular culture and uses and gratifications: Notes towards an accommodation. In Blumler, J. G.,& Katz, E. (Eds.). The Uses Of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp.225-248). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [3]

[61]	Cole, J. R. (2004, June). Paul F. Lazarsfeld: His scholarly journey. Keynote address at an international symposium in honor of Paul Lazarsfeld. Brussels. Cited in this article [1]

[62]	Coleman, J. S. (1980). The structure of society and the nature of social research. Science Communication, 1(3), 333-350. Cited in this article [1]

[63]	Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1309-1335. https://doi.org/10.1086/228423 https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/228423 Cited in this article [3]

[64]	Coleman, J. S. (1990). Columbia in the 1950s. In Berger, B. M. (Ed.). Authors of Their Own Lives: Intellectual Autobiographies (pp.75-103). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

[65]	Coleman, J. S., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1980). The substance and style of his work. In Merton, R. K., & Riley, M. W. (Eds.). Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation: Glimpses of The American Experience (pp.153-174). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Cited in this article [1]

[66]	Collins, R. (1985). Review: Jeffrey Alexander and the search for multi-dimensional theory. Theory and Society, 14(6), 877-892. Cited in this article [1]

[67]	Cooper, E., & Jahoda, M. (1947). The evasion of propaganda: how prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda. Journal of Psychology, 23(1), 15-25. Cited in this article [1]

[68]	Coser, L. A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Cited in this article [1]

[69]	Coser, L. A. (1957). Social conflict and the theory of social change. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(3), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/586859 https://www.jstor.org/stable/586859?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[70]	Coser, L. A., & Rosenberg, B. (Eds.)(1969). Sociological Theory: A Book of Readings (3rd. ed.). New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.

[71]	Curran, J.,& Liebes, T. (2002). The intellectual legacy of Elihu Katz. In Liebes, T., & Curran, J. (Eds.). Media, Ritual and Identity (pp.3-22). London, UK: Routledge. Cited in this article [1]

[72]

Daley, P. (1979). The limitations of functional analysis in mass communications research. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 5(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/019685997900500104 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/019685997900500104 Cited in this article [2] Abstract Despite Wright's optimistic claim in 1974 that func tionalism was alive and well, it seems that both con ceptually and empirically, functionalism has been o f little value... Mass communication theory needs a comprehensive research approach which takes into consideration producers (including vested interests) and consumers, as well as other definable groups and intervening social processes and relations.... What is needed is a theory of society that embraces not only the control mechanisms serving to maintain the social order but which also deals with the conflict ual processes that resist or attempt to subvert the \"equilibrium\"....

[73]	Davis, K. (1959). The myth of functional analysis as a special method in Sociology and Anthropology. American Sociological Review, 24(6). 757-772. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088563 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2088563?origin=crossref Cited in this article [3]

[74]	Dayan, D. & Katz, E. (1992). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited in this article [1]

[75]	Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication research: A history. In Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (Eds.). Handbook Of Communication Science (pp.20-98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [1]

[76]	Durkheim, E.(1895/1982). The rules of sociological method. (W. D. Halls Trans). New York, NY: The Free Press.

[77]	Elliott, P. (1974). Uses and gratification research: A critique and a sociological alternatives. In Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research (pp.249-268). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [3]

[78]	Fletcher, R. (1956). Functionalism as a social theory. The Sociological Review, 4(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1956.tb00976.x https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1956.tb00976.x Cited in this article [1]

[79]	Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Cited in this article [1]

[80]	Gary, B. (1996). Communication research, the Rockefeller foundation and mobilization for the war on words. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 124-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01493.x https://academic.oup.com/joc/article/46/3/124-148/4160052 Cited in this article [1]

[81]	Gary, B. (1999). The Nervous Liberals: Propaganda Anxieties from World War I to The Cold War. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

[82]	Giddens, A. (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: Vol. 1: Power Property And The State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cited in this article [1]

[83]	Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6(2), 205-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681751 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01681751 Cited in this article [1]

[84]	Glander, T. R. (2000). Origins of Mass Communications Research During The American Cold War: Educational Effects And Contemporary Implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[85]	Glock, C. Y. The comparative study of Communications and opinion formation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(4), 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/266414 https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/266414 Cited in this article [1]

[86]	Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books. Cited in this article [1]

[87]	Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (1978). Theories of communication and theories of society. Communication Research, 5(3), 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500308 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365027800500308 Cited in this article [2]

[88]	Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociology Review, 25(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2092623?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[89]	Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of western Sociology. New York, NY: Basic. Cited in this article [1]

[90]	Habermas, J.(1981/1984). The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. I: Reason And The Rationalization of Society. T. McCarthy (trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon. Cited in this article [1]

[91]	Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran & J. Woollacott (Eds.). Culture, Society And The Media (pp.56-90). London, UK: Methuen. Cited in this article [2]

[92]	Hardt, H. (1979). Social theories of the press: Early German and American perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [2]

[93]	Hempel, C. G. (1959). The logic of functional analysis. In L. Gross (Ed.). A Symposium On Sociological Theory (pp. 271-307). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co. Cited in this article [1]

[94]	Herzog, H. (1941/2004). On borrowed experience: An analysis of listening to daytime sketches. In Peters, J. D., & Simonson, P. (Eds.). Mass Communication And American Social Thought: Key Texts, 1919-1968 (pp. 139-157). Maryland, DC: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Cited in this article [1]

[95]	Herzog, H. (1944). What do we really know about daytime serial listeners?. In Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Stanton, F. N. (Eds.). Radio Research 1942-1943 (pp. 3-33): New York, NY: Duell, Sloan and Pearce. Cited in this article [1]

[96]	Isajiw, W. W. (1968). Causation And Functionalism In Sociology, New York, NY: Routledge. Cited in this article [1]

[97]	Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6. Cited in this article [1]

[98]	Katz, E. (1960). Communication research and the image of society convergence of two traditions. American Journal of Sociology, LXV(5), 435-440. Cited in this article [1]

[99]	Katz, E. (1981). Publicity and pluralistic ignorance: notes on “The Spiral of Silence”. In Baier, H., Kepplinger, H. M., & Reumann, K. (Eds.). Public Opinion And Social Change: For Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann. (pp.28-38). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag. Cited in this article [1]

[100]

Katz, E. (1996). Diffusion research at Columbia. In Dennis, E. E., & Wartella, E. A. (Eds.). American Communication Research: The Remembered History (pp.61-69). New York, NY: Routledge. Cited in this article [1]

[101]

Katz, E. (2001). Lazarsfeld’s map of media effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13(3), 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.3.270 https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ijpor/13.3.270 Cited in this article [2]

[102]

Katz, E. (2006). Rediscovering Gabriel Tarde. Political Communication, 23(3), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600808711 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10584600600808711 Cited in this article [1]

[103]

Katz, E. (2009a). Why Sociology abandoned Communication. The American Sociologist, 40(3), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-009-9077-y http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12108-009-9077-y Cited in this article [1]

[104]

Katz, E. (2009b). Introduction: the end of television?, In Katz, E., & Scannell, P. (Eds.), The End Of Television? Its Impact On The World (So Far) (pp. 6-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Cited in this article [1]

[105]

Katz, E. (2014). Kanonizing Katz | Commuting and co-Authoring: How to be in more than one place at the same time. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2165-2174. Cited in this article [1]

[106]

Katz, E.,& Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111 https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/267111 Cited in this article [4]

[107]

Katz, E., & Gurevitch, M. (1976). The Secularization of Leisure. London, UK: Faber & Faber. Cited in this article [1]

[108]

Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the uses of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38(2), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094393 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094393?origin=crossref Cited in this article [2]

[109]

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955/2006). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in The Flow of Mass Communications. New Brunswich and London: Transaction Publishers. Cited in this article [4]

[110]

Katz, E., & Wedell, E. (1977). Broadcasting in The Third World: Promise And Performance, London: Macmillan. Cited in this article [1]

[111]

Klapper, J. T. (1954). The comparative effects of the various media. In Schramm, W. (Ed.). The Process And Effects Of Mass Communication (pp.91-105). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Cited in this article [1]

[112]

Klapper, J. T. (1960). The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Cited in this article [1]

[113]

Klapper, J. T. (1963). Mass communication research: An old road resurveyed. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(4), 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1086/267201 https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/267201 Cited in this article [3]

[114]

Kreiling, A. (1978). Toward a cultural studies approach for the sociology of popular culture. Communication Research, 5(3), 240-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500302 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365027800500302 Cited in this article [1] Abstract This article urges sociologists interested in popular culture to adopt a phenomenological perspective focused upon the problem of the meaning of popular culture as world of symbolic forms. It is argued that this problem requires a conceptual apparatus that focuses directly upon culture, now seen as not wholly derivative of social structure, and a view of society as a socially constructed meaningful world rather than an external container that determines action. The proposed approach, which looks at popular culture as a documentary record of the meaningful realities built by social groups, is illustrated by application to recent American developments.

[115]

Kuper, A. (1985). The historians’ revenge. American Ethnologist, 12(3), 523-528. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1985.12.3.02a00080 https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/ae.1985.12.3.02a00080 Cited in this article [2]

[116]

Lasswell, H. D.(1948/1971) The structure and function of communication in society. In Schramm, W., & Robert, D. F. (Eds.). The Process And Effects of Mass Communication (pp.84-99). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Cited in this article [4]

[117]

Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence For A Free Society: Studies in Law, Science And Policy (2 vols.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. Cited in this article [2]

[118]

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2012). Working with Merton. In Coser, L. A. (Ed.). The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton (pp.34-66). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. Cited in this article [2]

[119]

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People’s Choice: How The Voter Makes Up His Mind In A Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan and Pearce. Cited in this article [1]

[120]

Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1950/1972). Professional school for training in social research. in Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Ed.). Qualitative Analysis: Historical And Critical Essays (pp.361-391). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc

[121]

Lazarsfeld, P. F.,& Merton, R. K.(1948/2004). Mass communications, popular taste, and organized social action. In Peters, J. D.,& Simonson, P. (Eds.). Mass Communication And American Social Thought: Key Texts, 1919-1968 (pp. 230-241). Maryland, DC: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher. Cited in this article [5]

[122]

Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954/1982). Friendship as social process:A substantive and methodological analysis. In Kendall, P. L. (Eds.). The Varied Sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld (pp.298-348). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

[123]

Lerner, D. (1973). Notes on communication and the nation state. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1086/268111 https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/268111 Cited in this article [1]

[124]

Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of “Dallas.”. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Cited in this article [1]

[125]

Lipset, S. M., & Smelser, N. (1961). Change and controversy in recent American sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 12(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/588015 https://www.jstor.org/stable/588015?origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[126]

Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown: A Study in American Culture. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and Company. Cited in this article [3]

[127]

Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown In Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflict. New York, NY: Harco urt, Brace & World. Cited in this article [2]

[128]

Malinowski, B. (1960). A Scientific Theory of Culture And Other Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Cited in this article [1]

[129]

Martindale, D. (1965). Limits of and alternatives to functionalism in Sociology. In Martindale, D. (Ed.). Functionalism In The Social Sciences (pp.144-162). Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science. Cited in this article [2]

[130]

McQuail, D. (1969). Towards a Sociology of mass Communications. London, UK: Macmillan. Cited in this article [2]

[131]

Merton, R. K..(1946/2004). Mass Persuasion: The Social Psychology Of A War Bond Drive. New York, NY: Howard Fertig. Cited in this article [2]

[132]

Merton, R. K. (1949). Pattern of influence:A study of interpersonal influence and communications behavior in a local community. In Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Stanton, F. N. (Eds.). Communications Research (pp.180-219). New York, NY: Harper. Cited in this article [1]

[133]

Merton, R. K. (1955). A paradigm for the study of the Sociology of knowledge. In Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Rosenberg, M. (Eds.). The Language of Social Research: A Reader In The Methodology Of Social Research (pp.498-510). New York, NY: The Free Press.

[134]

Merton, R. K. (1964). Anomie, anomia, and social interaction:Contexts of deviant behavior. In Clinard, M. B. (Eds.). Anomie And Deviant Behavior: A Discussion And Critique (pp.213-242). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

[135]

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory And Social Structure. New York, NY: The Free Press. Cited in this article [13]

[136]

Merton, R. K. (1979). Remembering Paul Lazarsfeld. In Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S., & Rossi, P. H. (Eds.).

[137]

Merton, R. K., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.).(1950). Continuities In Social Research: Studies In The Scope And Method Of “The American Soldier”. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

[138]

Miliband, R. (1985). The new revisionism in Britain. New Left Review, 150, 5-26. Cited in this article [1]

[139]

Morley, D. (1980). The “Nationwide” Audience: Structure And Decoding. London, UK: British Film Institute. Cited in this article [1]

[140]

Morrison, D. (1978). The beginning of modern mass Communication research. European Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600005269 https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003975600005269/type/journal_article Cited in this article [1]

[141]

Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories And Theory Groups In Contemporary American Sociology. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Cited in this article [1]

[142]

Munch, P. A. (1976). The concept of “function” and functional analysis in Sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 6(3), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317600600301 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004839317600600301 Cited in this article [1]

[143]

Nepstad, S. E. (2005). The continuing relevance of Coser’s theory of conflict. Sociological Forum, 20(2), 335-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-005-4103-5 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11206-005-4103-5 Cited in this article [1]

[144]

Parsons, T. (1945). The present position and prospects of systematic theory in Sociology. In Gurvitch, G., & Moore, W. E. (Eds.). Twentieth Century Sociology (pp.42-69), New York, NY: Philosophical Library. Cited in this article [1]

[145]

Parsons, T. (1948). The position of sociological theory. American Sociological Review, 13(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087030 http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1224%28194804%2913%3A2%3C156%3ATPOST%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V&origin=crossref Cited in this article [1]

[146]

Parsons, T. (1954). Essays In Sociological Theory. New York, NY: The Free Press. Cited in this article [1]

[147]

Parsons, T. (1977). Social Systems And The Evolution of Action Theory. New York, NY: The Free Press. Cited in this article [1]

[148]

Parsons, T. (2017). The present status of structural-functional theory in sociology. In Coser, L. W. (Eds.). The Idea of Social Structure: papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton (pp.67-84). New York, NY: Routledge. Cited in this article [1]

[149]

Parsons, T., Bales, R. F., & Shils, E. A. (1953). Working Papers in The Theory of Action. New York, NY: The Free Press. Cited in this article [1]

[150]

Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.).(1951). Toward A General Theory of Action. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Cited in this article [1]

[151]

Peterson, T. (1996). The press as a social institution. In Dennis, E. E., & Wartella, E. (Eds.). American Communication Research: The Remembered History (pp.85-93). New York, NY: Routledge. Cited in this article [1]

[152]

Platt, J. (1986). Functionalism and the survey: The relation of theory and method. The Sociological Review, 34(3), 501-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1986.tb00687.x https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1986.tb00687.x Cited in this article [1] Abstract Many writers hold that research method is necessarily determined by theory, and it is common to suggest the relationship between functionalism and survey method in post-war US sociology as an example of this. This paper questions the extent to which that method and that theory were in reality meaningfully associated, and argues against the position that theory and method are in general invariably connected in the way suggested.

[153]

Pooley, J. D. (2006). An Accident of Memory: Edward Shils, Paul Lazarsfeld and the History of American Mass Communication Research. PhD dissertation, Columbia University, New York. Cited in this article [1]

[154]

Pope, W. (1975). Durkheim as a functionalist. The Sociological Quarterly, 16(3), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1975.tb00954.x https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1975.tb00954.x Cited in this article [2]

[155]

Pryluck, C. (1975). Functions of functional analysis: comments on Anderson-Meyer. Journal of Broadcasting, 19(4), 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838157509363803 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08838157509363803 Cited in this article [1]

[156]

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1935). On the concept of function in social science. American Anthropologist, 37(3), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1935.37.3.02a00030 https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/aa.1935.37.3.02a00030 Cited in this article [1]

[157]

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1968). Structure And Function In Primitive Society. New York, NY: Free Press.

[158]

Rogers, E. M. (1982). The empirical and the critical schools of communication research. In Burgoon, M. (Eds.). Communication Yearbook 5 (pp. 125-144). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Cited in this article [1]

[159]

Rothenbuhler, E. W. (1987). Neofunctionalism for mass communication theory. In Gurevitch, M., & Levy, M. (Eds.). Mass Communication Review Yearbook (pp.67-85). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.

[160]

Rothenbuhler, E. W. (1993). Argument for a Durkheimian theory of the communicative. Journal of Communication, 43(3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01288.x https://academic.oup.com/joc/article/43/3/158-163/4160178 Cited in this article [1]

[161]

Sapienza, Z. S., Iyer, N., & Veenstra, A. S. (2015). Reading Lasswell’s model of communication backward: Three scholarly misconceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 599-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666 Cited in this article [1]

[162]

Sills, D. (1987). Paul F. Lazarsfeld: 1901-1976. Biographical Memoir. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

[163]

Simonson, P. (2005). The serendipity of Merton’s communications research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh068 https://academic.oup.com/ijpor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ijpor/edh068

[164]

Swanson, D. L. (1977). The uses and misuses of Uses and Gratifications. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.1977.3.issue-3 http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/hcre/3/3 Cited in this article [1]

[165]

Swanson, D. L. (1979). Political communication research and the Uses and Gratification model: a critique. Communication Research, 6(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027900600103 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365027900600103 Cited in this article [1] Abstract Serious conceptual problems undermine the usefulness of the uses and gratifications approach. These problems, in turn, grow out of the approach's commitment to the variable analytic method. So long as that commitment is retained, the value of research based on the uses and gratifications approach will continue to be limited.

[166]

Thomas, S. (1989). Functionalism revised and applied to mass communication study. In Dervin, B., Grossberg, L., O’Keefe, B. J., & Wartella, E. (Eds.). Rethinking Communication, Volume 2: Paradigm Exemplars (pp.376-396). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [2]

[167]

Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1928/1958). The Polish Peasant In Europe And America. New York, NY: Dover Publications. Cited in this article [1]

[168]

Todd, E. W. (1993). The “New Woman” Revised: Painting And Gender Politics On Fourteenth Street. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cited in this article [1]

[169]

Whitaker, I. (1965). The nature and value of functionalism in sociology. The nature and value of functionalism in sociology. In Martindale, D. (Eds.). Functionalism in the social sciences (pp.127-143). Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science. Cited in this article [1]

[170]

Wright, C. R..(1959/2004). What is mass communication?. In Peters, J. D., & Simonson, P. (Eds.). Mass Communication And American Social Thought: Key Texts, 1919-1968 (pp. 454-456). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

[171]

Wright, C. R. (1960). Functional analysis and mass communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(4), 605-620. https://doi.org/10.1086/266976 https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/266976 Cited in this article [6]

[172]

Wright, C. R. (1974). Functional analysis and mass communication revisited. In Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.). The Uses Of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives Of Gratifications Research (pp.197-212). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage. Cited in this article [5]